Check-Cap claims BMO's Chris Taves Illegally Attacks Israeli NASDAQ-Listed Company During Wartime
Taves Times his Attack to Commence 23 Minutes before the Start of Shabbat to Delay the Company from Responding
ISFIYA, ISRAEL, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Check-Cap Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHEK) ('Check-Cap' or the 'Company'), a clinical-stage medical diagnostics company incorporated in Israel, today publicly condemned MediPharm Labs Corp. (LABS) ('MediPharm Labs') and its Chairman, Chris Taves, Head of Asia for BMO Capital Markets, for disseminating derogatory, false, and misleading statements about Check-Cap during a profoundly sensitive and challenging time for Israeli Companies.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Check-Cap is deeply disturbed that Mr. Taves would leverage the implied authority of his position as a senior BMO Executive to exploit the wartime circumstances currently affecting Israel, in order to knowingly spread false information aimed at harming Check-Cap's reputation, stock price, and business relationships. This conduct is not only unethical and unlawful - it is shameful.
Specifically, MediPharm Labs's May 23, 2025 press release quoted Mr. Taves making what Check Cap believes to be demonstrably false statements about Check-Cap. Even more egregious, Mr. Taves, a financial executive who surely knows better, publicly disseminated his accusation of there being deficiencies in our public disclosures, without any actual factual basis whatsoever.
Check-Cap believes that Mr. Taves is misusing his position of trust as a BMO Capital Markets Executive to intentionally issue these misleading statements during trading hours in order to manipulate and drive down Check-Cap's stock price, violating Section 9(a)(2) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Check-Cap demands that MediPharm Labs and Mr. Taves immediately retract the defamatory press release, cease all related misleading communications, and publicly apologize for Mr. Taves disgraceful actions.
The fact that Mr. Taves and MediPharm Labs have chosen to launch such deplorable and unfounded attacks on an Israeli company minutes before the start of Shabbat at a time of war is reprehensible. Check-Cap will vigorously defend its reputation and its rights against these highly unethical attempts at aspersion, market manipulation and interference in a public transaction.
About Check-Cap
Check-Cap (NASDAQ: CHEK) is a clinical stage medical diagnostics company aiming to redefine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening through the introduction of C-Scan®, the first and only patient-friendly preparation-free screening test to detect polyps before they may transform into colorectal cancer and enable early intervention and cancer prevention. C-Scan is an investigational device and is not available for sale in the United States.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Legal Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This press release contains 'forward-looking statements' about the Company's expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding, among other things, its product development efforts, business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies or prospects. Words such as 'may,' 'should,' 'could,' 'would,' 'predicts,' 'potential,' 'continue,' 'expects,' 'anticipates,' 'future,' 'intends,' 'plans,' 'believes,' 'estimates,' and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, often signify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and may not be accurate indications of when such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information that the Company has when those statements are made or management's good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. For a discussion of these and other risks that could cause such differences and that may affect the realization of forward-looking statements, please refer to the 'Forward-looking Statements' and 'Risk Factors' in the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year endedDecember 31, 2023and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Investors and security holders are urged to read these documents free of charge on the SEC's web site at http://www.sec.gov. The Company assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise its forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
info@checkcap.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
18 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
20 years after its landmark withdrawal from Gaza, Israel is mired there
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Twenty years ago, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip, dismantling 21 Jewish settlements and pulling out its forces. The Friday anniversary of the start of the landmark disengagement comes as Israel is mired in a nearly 2-year war with Hamas that has devastated the Palestinian territory and means it is likely to keep troops there long into the future. Israel's disengagement, which also included removing four settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's controversial attempt to jump-start negotiations with the Palestinians. But it bitterly divided Israeli society and led to the empowerment of Hamas, with implications that continue to reverberate today.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
20 years after its landmark withdrawal from Gaza, Israel is mired there
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Twenty years ago, Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip, dismantling 21 Jewish settlements and pulling out its forces. The Friday anniversary of the start of the landmark disengagement comes as Israel is mired in a nearly 2-year war with Hamas that has devastated the Palestinian territory and means it is likely to keep troops there long into the future. Israel's disengagement, which also included removing four settlements in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's controversial attempt to jump-start negotiations with the Palestinians. But it bitterly divided Israeli society and led to the empowerment of Hamas, with implications that continue to reverberate today. The emotional images of Jews being ripped from their homes by Israeli soldiers galvanized Israel's far-right and settler movements. The anger helped them organize and increase their political influence, accounting in part for the rise of hard-line politicians like National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. On Thursday, Smotrich boasted of a settlement expansion plan east of Jerusalem that will 'bury' the idea of a future Palestinian state. For Palestinians, even if they welcomed the disengagement, it didn't end Israel's control over their lives. Soon after, Hamas won elections in 2006, then drove out the Palestinian Authority in a violent takeover. Israel and Egypt imposed a closure on the territory, controlling entry and exit of goods and people. Though its intensity varied over the years, the closure helped impoverish the population and entrenched a painful separation from Palestinians in the West Bank. Israel captured the West Bank, east Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip in the 1967 Mideast war. The Palestinians claim all three territories for a future independent state. A unilateral withdrawal enhanced Hamas' stature Israel couldn't justify the military or economic cost of maintaining the heavily fortified settlements in Gaza, explained Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the Misgav Institute and the Institute for National Security Studies think tanks. There were around 8,000 Israeli settlers and 1.5 million Palestinians in Gaza in 2005. 'There was no chance for these settlements to exist or flourish or become meaningful enough to be a strategic anchor,' he said. By contrast, there are more than 500,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank, most living in developed settlement blocs that have generally received more support from Israeli society, Michael said. Most of the world considers the settlements illegal under international law. Because Israel withdrew unilaterally, without any coordination with the Palestinian Authority, it enhanced Hamas' stature among Palestinians in Gaza. 'This contributed to Hamas' win in the elections in 2006, because they leveraged it and introduced it as a very significant achievement,' Michael said. 'They saw it as an achievement of the resistance and a justification for the continuation of the armed resistance.' Footage of the violence between Israeli settlers and Israeli soldiers also created an 'open wound' in Israeli society, Michael said. 'I don't think any government will be able to do something like that in the future,' he said. That limits any flexibility over settlements in the West Bank if negotiations over a two-state solution with the Palestinians ever resume. 'Disengagement will never happen again, this is a price we're paying as a society, and a price we're paying politically,' he said. One of the first settlers longs to return Anita Tucker, now 79, was part of the first nine Jewish families that moved to the Gaza Strip in 1976. She and her husband and their three kids lived in an Israeli army outpost near what is today Deir al-Balah, while the settlement of Netzer Hazoni was constructed. Originally from Brooklyn, she started a farm growing vegetables in the harsh, tall sand dunes. At first relations were good with their Palestinian neighbors, she said, and they worked hard to build their home and a 'beautiful community.' She had two more children, and three chose to stay and raise their families in Netzer Hazoni. She can still recall the moment, 20 years ago, when 1,000 Israeli soldiers arrived at the gate to the settlement to remove the approximately 400 residents. Some of her neighbors lit their houses on fire in protest. 'Obviously it was a mistake to leave. The lives of the Arabs became much worse, and the lives of the Jews became much, much worse, with rockets and Oct. 7,' she said, referring to the decades of rockets fired from Gaza into Israel and the date in 2023 of the Hamas attack that launched the ongoing war. Despite the passage of time, her family still is 'yearning and longing for their home,' she said. Several of her 10 grandchildren, including some who spent their early childhood in the Gaza settlements, have served in the current war and were near her old house. 'It's hard to believe, because of all the terrible things that happened that we predicted, but we're willing to build there again,' said Tucker. Palestinians doubt Israel will ever fully withdraw from Gaza again After Israel's withdrawal 20 years ago, many Palestinians described Gaza as an 'open-air prison.' They had control on the inside – under a Hamas government that some supported but some saw as heavy-handed and brutal. But ultimately, Israel had a grip around the territory. Many Palestinians believe Sharon carried out the withdrawal so Israel could focus on cementing its control in the West Bank through settlement building. Now some believe more direct Israeli occupation is returning to Gaza. After 22 months of war, Israeli troops control more than 75% of Gaza, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks of maintaining security control long term after the war. Amjad Shawa, the director of the Palestinian NGO Network, said he doesn't believe Netanyahu will repeat Sharon's full withdrawal. Instead, he expects the military to continue controlling large swaths of Gaza through 'buffer zones.' The aim, he said, is to keep Gaza 'unlivable in order to change the demographics,' referring to Netanyahu's plans to encourage Palestinians to leave the territory. Israel is 'is reoccupying the Gaza Strip' to prevent a Palestinian state, said Mostafa Ibrahim, an author based in Gaza City whose home was destroyed in the current war. Missed opportunities Israeli former Maj. Gen. Dan Harel, who was head of the country's Southern Command during the disengagement, remembers the toll of protecting a few thousand settlers. There were an average of 10 attacks per day against Israeli settlers and soldiers, including rockets, roadside bombs big enough to destroy a tank, tunnels to attack Israeli soldiers and military positions, and frequent gunfire. 'Bringing a school bus of kids from one place to another required a military escort,' said Harel. 'There wasn't a future. People paint it as how wonderful it was there, but it wasn't wonderful.' Harel says the decision to evacuate Israeli settlements from the Gaza Strip was the right one, but that Israel missed crucial opportunities. Most egregious, he said, was a unilateral withdrawal without obtaining any concessions from the Palestinians in Gaza or the Palestinian Authority. He also sharply criticized Israel's policy of containment toward Hamas after disengagement. There were short but destructive conflicts over the years between the two sides, but otherwise the policy gave Hamas 'an opportunity to do whatever they wanted.' 'We had such a blind spot with Hamas, we didn't see them morph from a terror organization into an organized military, with battalions and commanders and infrastructure,' he said. The Oct. 7 attack, Israel's largest military intelligence failure to date, was not a result of the disengagement, said Harel. 'The main issue is what we did in the 18 years in between.' __ Associated Press writer Fatma Khaled contributed from Cairo.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
authID Revenue Jumps 367% in Q2
Key Points Record quarterly revenue grew approximately 415.3% year over year in Q2 2025, reaching $1.4 million for the quarter on significant customer momentum. Operating expenses increased approximately 63.9% year over year and a net loss of $4.4 million. Annual recurring revenue metrics and pipeline advanced. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › authID (NASDAQ:AUID), the identity technology firm specializing in privacy-focused biometric authentication, reported its second quarter 2025 results on Aug. 14, 2025. The most significant news in the release was a sharp jump in GAAP revenue to $1.4 million, reflecting substantial customer and booking momentum, even as Operating expenses and net losses continued to climb. There were no analyst estimates with which to compare results. Management highlighted record growth across several metrics, but persistent losses and new credit provisions underlined continued financial challenges. authID's business model and strategic focus authID provides identity authentication solutions, including its biometric platform called PrivacyKey. The platform transforms biometric data -- like facial images -- into cryptographic keys, which allows for quick and highly secure identity verification. Crucially, no actual biometric data is stored, aiding regulatory compliance and privacy. The company's business targets regulated sectors and high-risk transactions that require a high level of authentication assurance. Recent company focus areas include driving technological innovation, broadening its partnership network, and expanding recurring revenue. Key success factors are product leadership, strategic alliances, and effectiveness in converting pilots or trials into long-term contracts. Quarterly review: Revenue growth, metrics, and execution The period saw authID post record GAAP revenue, marking a notable year-over-year increase in GAAP revenue. AuthID also secured a live production trial with a Fortune Global 500 company in the UK, an agreement anticipated to transition into a full contract if successful. The company's annual recurring revenue (ARR, non-GAAP) reached $5.8 million, up from $1.1 million of ARR (non-GAAP) as of Q2 2024 and $1.2 million of ARR (non-GAAP) as of Q1 2025. Gross booked annual recurring revenue (bARR, non-GAAP) jumped to $2.2 million from $0.63 million in Q2 2024. Net bARR (non-GAAP), which subtracts the value from contracts delayed or lost, grew to $1.9 million. The company's remaining performance obligation (RPO), which shows the contracted but not yet recognized revenue, was $13.8 million.—more than triple the figure from Q2 2024. On the technology side, authID launched IDX, a new biometric authentication product developed in partnership with NEC, a provider of biometric hardware. Management claims this product enables ultra-fast and accurate authentication for regulated industries, while maintaining customer privacy. The period also featured enhancements to the PrivacyKey product, now capable of one-to-many search -- meaning it can identify a person out of a large group quickly -- without the need to store any biometric data. Strategic partnerships played a role in the quarter's results. Alongside NEC, management highlighted a new agreement with Prove, which operates a large-scale identity fraud platform. These partnerships are intended to enable faster market entry and broaden the user base, particularly by embedding authID's solutions into third-party ecosystems. In addition, the company expanded its board with new members and advisors, aiming to support ongoing growth and value creation for stakeholders. Operating expenses increased approximately 63.9% year-over-year, totaling $5.9 million, primarily reflecting investments in hiring, sales, and research and development. The company cited a $0.8 million provision for estimated credit losses, which reflects new assessments around credit risk for certain customer contracts. These expense increases, along with persistent net losses, highlight the pressure of scaling operations ahead of realized revenue. Notably, net loss (GAAP) widened to $4.4 million, compared to $3.3 million for Q2 2024. Net cash flows from operations (GAAP) showed an outflow of $8.4 million for the first half of 2025, with $8.3 million in cash on hand at the end of the quarter. Share count increased, reaching 13.2 million on a diluted basis versus 9.5 million a year ago. There were also challenges during the period. AuthID had to book new credit loss provisions, signaling some delays or potential issues with collecting revenue on certain customer contracts. Some signed deals faced slowdowns moving from contract to full go-live, impacting recognized bARR (non-GAAP) and creating challenges on the path toward more predictable recurring revenue. Throughout the quarter, the company continued to emphasize its privacy-by-design approach. Compliance with privacy and biometric regulations is a key selling point, especially for large enterprises and public sector clients. There were no new regulatory hurdles cited for the period, but the continued assertion that the platform stores no biometric data is a core strategic differentiator. Looking ahead: Outlook and potential risks Management did not provide specific forward-looking financial guidance for revenue, margin, or profit for upcoming quarters or the full year. In public commentary earlier in the year, management referenced a bookings target of $18 million in gross bARR (a non-GAAP measure) for fiscal 2025. With half-year bARR (non-GAAP) totaling $2.2 million for the first six months of 2025, achieving this full-year goal would require a significant acceleration in booking large contracts and ramping deployments in the next two quarters. For investors and stakeholders, areas to observe in coming quarters include the pace of contract conversions, expense management, success of partnership-driven sales, and resolution of credit risk exposures. Given the persistent high operating costs and net losses, the company's ability to demonstrate path to sustained profitability and positive cash flow remains a critical watchpoint. AUID does not currently pay a dividend. Revenue and net income presented using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) unless otherwise noted. Where to invest $1,000 right now When our analyst team has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062%* — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. They just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy right now, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025
