logo
LPR funding not included in Nashville Mayor's budget. Metro Council says debate isn't over

LPR funding not included in Nashville Mayor's budget. Metro Council says debate isn't over

Yahoo04-06-2025
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — On Tuesday night, Metro Council will consider whether to change Mayor Freddie's O'Connell's budget.
The changes include a property tax increase, however, it does not have funding for license plate readers.
Metro Council approved the permanent use of LPR cameras last year, but after a six-month pilot, the program shut down. The cameras will not return unless a new contract is approved and funded.
PREVIOUS | LPRs not listed in Nashville Mayor's proposed budget
Some council members have encouraged private businesses and property owners to install their own cameras, as the city has not yet approved its own camera system.
A new apartment complex coming to Hamilton Church Road in 2026 plans to include this technology.
'We want to make sure that you feel safe and secure; we want to build strong communities, and as I said, you can't build strong communities without being safe and secure,' said Alex Trent with Trent Development Group.
District 32 Metro Councilwoman Joy Styles has encouraged private businesses and properties to install their own LPR technology while the program remains stalled citywide.
'They are working with us on great things like license plate readers being included and a gate being included,' Styles said. 'That is the accountability that we are missing in this whole city.'
'I think the private companies and apartments putting LPRs in place just shows how much Nashville wants and needs this type of technology,' added District 11 Council Member Jeff Eslick.
Tennessee police departments share intel, use LPR cameras to track down theft suspect
LPR cameras scan license plates and compare them to state and federal databases to help locate stolen vehicles and missing and wanted people.
'For the most part, it is going to help the everyday citizen, the taxpayer out there, live a safer life and feel better when they go to bed,' Eslick said. 'I think if we are going to add all this money to the budget and spend all this money to make people feel better, we should feel safer as well.'
Eslick said funding for LPRs may come later.
'I think we are going to have to work out the budget, try to figure out where we are on that, and we can add LPRs,' Eslick told News 2. 'The amount that it costs to put the LPRs in place isn't something outside of what we could pull from something like the 4% fund.'
| READ MORE |
District 26 Council Member Courtney Johnston told News 2 that LPRs would not be included in her substitute budget proposal, saying in a statement: 'Putting that line item in any substitute would cause that substitute to fail with this council. That said, funding is not the issue. The issue is that we don't have support for LPRs from either the Mayor's office or the majority of the council to approve the contracts.'
Eslick added that the conversation is not over.
'I think the budget is going to go through similar to what it is,' he explained. 'In a way, to kind of makeup for it, we will have LPRs on the agenda in the near future. Now, that doesn't mean it's going to pass. It's still going to be a struggle, but if we can just get it before us and start talking about it, I think we can find a way to get the common ground that we need.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What is Team Trump thinking when it comes to future of Fannie, Freddie?
What is Team Trump thinking when it comes to future of Fannie, Freddie?

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

What is Team Trump thinking when it comes to future of Fannie, Freddie?

-- Team Trump is exploring ways to monetize the U.S. government's stakes in mortgage giants Fannie Mae (OTC:FNMA) and Freddie Mac (OTC:FMCC), with an initial sale of up to $30 billion possible 'as soon as this winter,' according to TD Cowen. The White House's focus is on 'the government realizing a return rather than on the GSEs raising new capital,' the analysts said, adding that under the plan, 'GSEs stay in conservatorship' with 'an implicit government backstop.' TD Cowen cautioned that 'having the government monetize its investments in Fannie and Freddie is more complex than it may appear.' Key hurdles include 'shareholder rights,' 'control of the boards of directors,' 'valuation,' 'commitment fee,' and 'limits on what the GSEs may do,' as well as the 'potential to merge the GSEs prior to any sales.' The bank said there is 'a path' for President Donald Trump to move forward, but it would require 'political risks that could impact both his popular support and GOP prospects in the midterm election.' Despite those challenges, TD Cowen sees 'reason for optimism' that the administration could begin sales, even if not by winter. One possibility is that 'Trump could just do it regardless of political and market risk,' a tactic the firm calls 'the tariff approach,' akin to his trade policy decisions. Another option could be selling a stake to 'a foreign sovereign wealth fund' or transferring control of the holdings to 'a newly created domestic sovereign wealth fund,' both of which TD Cowen said 'could involve less market and political risk.' Related articles What is Team Trump thinking when it comes to future of Fannie, Freddie? Clients buying into summer rally, bracing for later pullback, says BofA's Hartnett If Powell goes, does Fed trust go with him? Sign in to access your portfolio

Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street
Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street

Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street originally appeared on TheStreet. After months of murmurs, the Trump administration is reportedly prepping to take mortgage giants Fannie Mae () and Freddie Mac () public, per the Wall Street Journal. The report adds that officials believe the offering could raise $30 billion in such a debut, valuing the two at "roughly $500 billion." The two firms are operated by the federal government, which receives its profits and manages its day-to-day business through a conservatorship. The two firms were taken into government control after they faced significant losses on mortgage securities during the Great Financial Crisis in 2008. In particular, the firms were heavily exposed to subprime mortgages. The government's takeover of the firms at the time helped stabilize the market. However, after 17 years under government management, officials in the White House believe that the firms have replenished their reserves and should be privatized. One big incentive to doing so? A multi-billion dollar windfall for the federal IPO Freddie and Fannie? An IPO of the two firms might read as perplexing for the unacquainted, seeing as though the two firms have traded on the OTC markets for nearly two decades despite being government-supported enterprises (GSEs). However, while the firms are run by the government, it is not a majority owner (at least, not directly.) Instead, as part of the 2008 agreement, the U.S. government received warrants which entitled it to acquire the vast majority of the two businesses. Aside from that, the companies maintain their current private ownership. Among their largest shareholders is Pershing Square's Bill Ackman, a vocal proponent of their privatization. Ackman, who has owned a sizable stake in the two for over a decade, has been banking on their privatization. In January, Ackman claimed that ending that conservatorship could boost the two stocks and help the government realize billions in profits from an IPO. Since the start of the year, when Ackman began boosting his investment case, Fannie and Freddie are up 183% and 132%, respectively. What Happens After Privatization? The GSEs currently serve a public mission: expanding housing access and increasing mortgage market stability. They do this by effectively guaranteeing the mortgages and lowering the risk of borrowing. However, analysts warn that if Fannie and Freddie were privatized, doing away with this guarantee and public mission could affect housing access and affordability. Fair housing advocates say that those impacts would be most dramatic for lower income Americans and minorities. However, privatization of the two firms would almost certainly lead to higher rates, as the firms focus on shareholder value. This story is part of Stock Market Today for Aug. 8, 2025. You can read all of the day's market coverage as it happens here. Report of Trump's $500 billion Fannie, Freddie decision turns heads on Wall Street first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 8, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 8, 2025, where it first appeared. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store