logo
‘There is something wrong': Patients say they are paying out of pocket for cataract surgeries at private clinics

‘There is something wrong': Patients say they are paying out of pocket for cataract surgeries at private clinics

It all started at the optometrist.
Stephen Purdey was at a regular checkup to update his prescription last summer when his optometrist flagged something in his eye. The optometrist thought it was cataracts, but recommended Purdey visit an ophthalmologist to confirm.
So Purdey visited a private clinic in Toronto in March for a consultation after months on the wait-list to see a specialist, and that is where he said he started to feel 'vulnerable and susceptible.'
'Because of the combination of wanting to do the best thing for yourself,' said Purdey, who is in his 70s. 'Plus not necessarily understanding everything that the doctors are telling you, you really are as a patient vulnerable to suggestions.'
'And that's what happened to me.'
The ophthalmologist he was referred to, according to Purdey, acknowledged that the patient could get his procedure done for free under OHIP.
Cataract surgery is considered a 'medically necessary surgery' by the province, so even if a person opts to go to a private clinic they shouldn't be billed for the basic OHIP-covered procedure.
Patients who spoke to the Star said they went in for cataract surgery at private clinics and felt they had to pay between a couple of hundred and thousands of dollars out of pocket, whether to bypass reportedly long wait times or receive better treatment, including upgraded lenses.
Their stories come at a time when the provincial government continues to expand the number of privately run surgical and diagnostic centres performing cataract procedures, a move first announced two years ago. They also raise questions about whether there are sufficient guardrails in place to make sure patients don't feel pressured to pay out of pocket for upgrades they may not need.
In Purdey's case, he said his ophthalmologist offered him other options, such as laser-based eye measurements, instead of a free ultrasound measurement, and 'better quality' corrective lenses — treatments that would cost money but, to Purdey, sounded appealing.
'Right away you have the impression that lasers are better than ultrasound,' he said of the measurement procedure. 'And they said, 'Yeah, that's true.''
Laser-based measurements
have been found to be more accurate
than an ultrasound, although
the American Academy of Ophthalmology
notes that there does not appear to be a difference between using a laser or ultrasound during the cataract surgery itself.
Purdey was convinced, however, so he agreed to spend $650 on the laser measurements and an astigmatism test and said he'd consider paying another $200 to $1,600 for the so-called better lenses, then went home.
The four patients who spoke to the Star for this story are older adults who were worried that they might forever damage their vision if they didn't get surgery for their cataracts.
Some of these same patients also said they didn't think they were given all the information they needed to make a decision about whether to pay for so-called better measurements and lenses.
'It is really out of control,' said Natalie Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition (OHC), an advocacy group focused on protecting public health care.
'Essentially it's like there isn't public medicare when it comes to eye surgery in Ontario,' says Natalie Mehra, executive director of the Ontario Health Coalition, an advocacy group focused on protecting public health care. 'It's gone.'
Things have gotten so bad from the perspective of the OHC that the group is filing formal complaints with the provincial and federal governments next week, Mehra said.
She said some private clinics around the province bill OHIP for medically necessary cataract surgeries, as they are allowed to, but also charge patients 'mandatory' user fees for things like eye measurements or the surgery itself in a practice known as extra-billing — which is illegal under Ontario law and a breach of the Canada Health Act. Extra-billing also includes charging patients for speedier care.
Mehra noted that the onus to report extra-billing to the province is on patients, many of whom do not realize that such 'mandatory' user fees aren't allowed. After investigating, if the province finds that extra-billing took place, it is required to report this annually to the federal government. Ottawa, in turn, will then claw back a certain amount of funding for the province's medicare program under the Canada Health Act.
And, on top of the extra-billing, private clinics are charging patients add-ons under the guise that they are medically necessary for cataracts, Mehra said.
Last year, Mehra said the coalition received more than 200 complaints over alleged extra-billing for cataract surgeries, one of the top two concerns the group heard from Ontarians. The other was about patients being kicked out of hospital before they are ready to be discharged. And Mehra said she believes there are probably thousands more who just don't know that they're being charged for what should be a free procedure.
For its part, the provincial Ministry of Health said that 32,000 people had publicly funded cataract surgery at community surgical and diagnostic centres in 2024.
'We will continue to deliver more connected, convenient care in every corner of the province, always ensuring that people are accessing the care they need with their OHIP card, never their credit card,' ministry spokesperson Ema Popovic said in an emailed statement.
Still, Mehra said the complaints heard by the OHC run counter to the intentions of the province's medicare system — something patients also echoed in interviews with the Star.
'Essentially it's like there isn't public medicare when it comes to eye surgery in Ontario,' Mehra said. 'It's gone.'
Up until her death in April from complications following cardiac surgery, something about a procedure Judith Deutsch had on her cataract back in 2022
didn't sit right with her, said husband Jim Deutsch.
Judith Deutsch, pictured here in March, didn't 'feel good' about her experience seeking care for her cataracts three years ago up until her death in April, husband Jim said.
Three years earlier, the Toronto couple had decided to go to a private clinic after they were told the wait time for cataract surgery covered by OHIP 'was going to be too long' by a doctor at a separate clinic. They considered the situation to be an 'emergency' — she incurred a concussion and a gash on her face because she couldn't see well — so the couple was willing to pay out of pocket to get care faster.
'It was going to cost a lot of money,' Jim told the Star. 'But she kept falling and just wanted to get it done as quickly as possible.'
Jim said he doesn't believe that he and his wife were scammed — they were aware of the private option and had the means to afford it. But he said the couple still didn't 'feel good' about paying to 'jump the queue' for Judith's surgery.
The OHC's Mehra said that long wait times are commonly mentioned by doctors at private clinics to encourage patients to pay out of pocket for their surgeries.
'They say the wait times in the public hospital are two years, which they are not,' Mehra said. 'Most people are getting it in 90 days, so they lie to patients and convince them to pay.'
According to
the province's surgery wait-time website
at the time of publication, the average wait time between a referral and the first clinician appointment for the lowest priority patients is 100 days. Meanwhile, the average wait time between a clinical decision for a surgery and the operation itself is 103 days.
It's not just wait times; doctors also upsell patients with 'medically unnecessary stuff,' Mehra said. She said the OHC has heard from past cataract patients that they were
encouraged to buy corrective lenses that address non-cataract issues like astigmatism.
Judith was one of these patients, with Jim saying his wife ended up paying more than $5,000 for her surgery, including specialty lenses that she thought were connected to her cataracts and
would lead to better outcomes for her vision, but later learned were for other eye conditions.
Although the couple willingly paid more to get faster care, they say they weren't aware the specialty lenses weren't necessary.
Mehra said she has also heard of patients being charged for post-operative medicine — something Paula from Barrie told the Star separately.
Paula told the Star she had to pay $230 for eye drops after her 2023 surgery at a private clinic, on top of the $5,000 she paid for special lenses and to get faster care. (She said her ophthalmologist told her the wait would be over a year if she did not pay $2,500.)
'That's not right,' Paula said of the eye drop charges. 'They should be covered.'
The Star agreed to use only Paula's first name since she has glaucoma and worries that speaking publicly could interfere with her ability to receive care.
While Paula knew going into her surgery that she wanted to get upgraded lenses and extra measurements, she said the ophthalmologist didn't ask her if she wanted the upgraded measurements.
'They should have asked me,' she said. 'If there were two options, they should have given me the option of 1 or 2.'
Jim Deutsch thinks that his wife's experience seeking care for her cataracts stems from a failure of Canada's medicare program.
The office of Ontario's Patient Ombudsman received some 4,429 complaints in the 2023-24 fiscal year — the most since it opened in 2016.
The office of Ontario's Patient Ombudsman received some 4,429 complaints in the 2023-24 fiscal year — the most since it opened in 2016.
'Medicare ended up being something that was quite different from what (Tommy Douglas) originally imagined,' said Deutsch, a psychiatrist who moved to Canada from the U.S. decades ago to work in the country's public system.
'Along the way we've ended up with this situation of scarcity and profit and allowing there to be private clinics that will offer something more speedily.'
Paula, too, believes the current system isn't fair — even if she said she would pay out of pocket again to get her surgery done faster.
'There is something wrong with the whole system,' she said, describing it as 'two-tier medicine.'
The OHC pins the blame on the Ford government, specifically the passage of Bill 60: Your Health Act in 2023.
The legislation
allows more private clinics to provide certain publicly funded procedures
, including cataract surgery. The provincial government said the Act was intended to reduce long wait times, while critics, including the OHC, said it would draw resources away from public hospitals.
'No one is able to regulate and control the private market for health care,' Mehra said. 'The most sensible thing we can do is bring (cataract surgeries) back into public hospitals.'
The Ministry of Health's Popovic stood by Bill 60 in her statement to the Star.
'To be very clear, Ontario has provisions through legislation that prohibit a patient from being charged for an OHIP-covered service, legislation that was strengthened by our government through Bill 60,' she said.
Popovic added that anyone who believes they have been charged for an OHIP-covered service can contact the Commitment to the Future of Medicare Act program to ask for a review, and that those who have been found to have been billed will be reimbursed.
After coming home from the private eye clinic, Purdey changed his mind; he wasn't going to pay for the laser measurements or other add-ons.
'I was told that the laser measurement stuff was better,' he said, 'but they didn't really tell me how much better it was.'
He called up the clinic to ask for the OHIP-funded procedures and in late May he had the first round of publicly funded surgery on one of his eyes.
'I'm quite satisfied,' Purdey said the day after his surgery. 'I feel like I narrowly missed getting trapped into spending a whole lot of money.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ClavystBio and A*STAR Partner to Grow MedTech Ventures in Singapore
ClavystBio and A*STAR Partner to Grow MedTech Ventures in Singapore

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ClavystBio and A*STAR Partner to Grow MedTech Ventures in Singapore

SINGAPORE, June 10, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- ClavystBio, a life sciences investor and venture builder established by Temasek, and the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore's lead public sector R&D agency, have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to create and grow MedTech ventures in Singapore. This partnership will support venture creation, product development, and commercialisation by bringing together ClavystBio and two national initiatives hosted by A*STAR — MedTech Catapult and the Diagnostics Development Hub (DxD Hub) — along with A*STAR's broader MedTech and venture creation capabilities. The partnership comes amid growing momentum in Singapore's biomedical landscape, with MedTech output reaching S$20 billion in 2023.[1] As Asia's MedTech market is projected to grow to US$225 billion (S$304 billion) by 2030,[2] these efforts aim to better position Singapore-based innovations to scale and enter new markets. Over this two-year partnership, the parties will work towards the co-creation of new MedTech ventures, investments into A*STAR affiliated companies, and fostering collaborations between A*STAR and ClavystBio's portfolio companies. By combining complementary strengths — from research and engineering to venture building and funding — the partnership aims to identify promising technologies, shape MedTech projects for market readiness, and support new venture formation to strengthen Singapore's innovation-driven MedTech ecosystem. The partnership will focus on several key areas: Fostering new ventures from research: A*STAR and ClavystBio will jointly identify promising research and technologies to venture build new MedTech companies. A*STAR will contribute deep scientific expertise and structured venture creation support, while ClavystBio will provide access to venture and growth capital, expert guidance, and its extensive network to launch and scale these early-stage companies. Advancing MedTech product development: MedTech Catapult will support the development of medical devices through engineering design, prototyping, and manufacturing translation, while ClavystBio will draw on its investment and industry relationships to explore potential commercial pathways for promising innovations. Accelerating commercial readiness in diagnostics and digital health: DxD Hub and ClavystBio will shape ventures in this space with strong commercial potential. DxD Hub will bring technical and productisation expertise — including in AI-powered software, multi-omics, and point-of-care diagnostics — to refine innovations for commercial viability. ClavystBio will contribute its venture investing and venture building expertise to drive commercialisation. Strengthening Singapore's MedTech ecosystem: To support long-term sector growth, the partners will assess Singapore's MedTech manufacturing, design, and regulatory support landscape. MedTech Catapult will lead efforts to map ecosystem capabilities and identify gaps, while ClavystBio will explore investment opportunities in companies with specialised technologies that can strengthen Singapore's MedTech value chain. "This partnership highlights ClavystBio's commitment to nurturing globally successful medical devices, digital health, and diagnostics companies from Singapore," said Mr Anselm Tan, Digital Health & MedTech Lead at ClavystBio. "By combining ClavystBio's investment and venture-building expertise with A*STAR's deep scientific capabilities and productisation platforms, we are cultivating an ecosystem primed for innovation and commercial success. "A*STAR is committed to nurturing a dynamic MedTech ecosystem that bridges innovation with deep tech companies," said Ms Irene Cheong, Assistant Chief Executive (Innovation & Enterprise) at A*STAR. "This MoU builds on an existing collaboration with ClavystBio and marks a significant step forward in our joint efforts to co-create and grow globally investible MedTech ventures. Through national productisation platforms like MedTech Catapult and DxD Hub, combined with A*STAR's venture creation capabilities, we aim to commercialise more innovations from lab to market and grow a vibrant MedTech ecosystem in Singapore." [1] Speech by SMS Low Yen Ling at the MedTech Forum[2] Singapore's MedTech sector and locally made medical devices punching above their weight | Singapore EDB About ClavystBio ClavystBio is a life sciences investor and venture builder set up by Temasek to accelerate the commercialization of breakthrough ideas into health impact. We invest and partner with founders and entrepreneurs to launch and grow global companies from Singapore. Our focus spans therapeutics, digital health and medtech, with an emphasis on first-in-class science and technology. Our collaborative space, Node 1, provides plug-and-play spaces for ventures that have graduated from incubators to progress to their next milestones. By bringing start-ups together, we foster a vibrant and supportive community. About the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) The Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) is Singapore's lead public sector R&D agency. Through open innovation, we collaborate with our partners in both the public and private sectors to benefit the economy and society. As a Science and Technology Organisation, A*STAR bridges the gap between academia and industry. Our research creates economic growth and jobs for Singapore, and enhances lives by improving societal outcomes in healthcare, urban living, and sustainability. A*STAR plays a key role in nurturing scientific talent and leaders for the wider research community and industry. A*STAR's R&D activities span biomedical sciences to physical sciences and engineering, with research entities primarily located in Biopolis and Fusionopolis. For ongoing news, visit About Diagnostics Development Hub (DxD Hub) The Diagnostics Development Hub is a national platform hosted by the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR). DxD Hub aims to accelerate the transformation of innovations into clinically validated diagnostic devices that are ready for market adoption. Through impactful products, empowering local enterprises and anchoring global companies in Singapore, DxD Hub contributes to the development of an effective diagnostic devices' ecosystem in Singapore. For ongoing news, visit About MedTech Catapult MedTech Catapult (MC) is a national initiative designed to accelerate the product development and commercialisation of high-value life science instruments and regulated medical devices. MC partners with product owners, local contract manufacturers (CMs), and leverages external design houses, and other key stakeholders to guide innovations from concept to market. Their goal is to strengthen Singapore's medtech ecosystem by providing dedicated engineering, quality assurance, regulatory affairs, clinical affairs, project management and commercialisation support to derisk and support products towards commercialisation and market adoption whilst supporting pull-through to local manufacturing. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE ClavystBio Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

What's next for the police response alternative STAR as it turns 5
What's next for the police response alternative STAR as it turns 5

Axios

time10 hours ago

  • Axios

What's next for the police response alternative STAR as it turns 5

Five years after launching, the Support Team Assisted Response Program — otherwise known as the STAR program — sits at a crossroads. The big picture: The program dispatches a paramedic with a behavioral health clinician to low-risk calls, most often for people dealing with mental health distress or substance use issues. Program manager and supervisor Marion Rorke tells us the program serves as an alternative to sending Denver police, who now sometimes call STAR themselves when they realize it's better equipped to handle certain calls. State of play: STAR has turned into a national mode l, but in order to one day become a 24/7 service, it needs more funding — which seems unlikely given Denver's current budget woes. What they're saying: "Every single call that the STAR van responds to — in lieu of law enforcement — could potentially be a life saved," local police reform activist Alex Landau told Denver City Council last week as it recognized the program's fifth anniversary. By the numbers: The program responded to 25,144 incidents between June 1, 2020, and June 3, 2025, per data provided by the city's department of public health, which runs STAR. When it launched, STAR had a single van with two people staffing it per shift. It now boasts eight vehicles, plus a rotating staff of 16 Denver Health paramedics and 16 clinicians from WellPower, a mental health care provider, who still work in teams of two. How it works: STAR runs from 6am-10pm daily, with Denver 911 responsible for dispatching its team instead of police or ambulances. STAR can connect people with additional services, even transporting them to places like behavioral health centers or referring them to other local health care services. Nearly 60,000 calls were STAR-eligible over the past five years. The intrigue: Rorke tells us she's working to codify a community advisory committee that provides direct feedback and recommendations to STAR's operation, something local advocates say is crucial to its success. That could mean making this community board a charter requirement, giving the panel more authority. Between the lines: STAR's current budget is $7.2 million, including $5.3 million directly from the city, and the rest coming from Caring for Denver grant money.

How did Merced County food businesses, schools fare in latest health inspections?
How did Merced County food businesses, schools fare in latest health inspections?

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

How did Merced County food businesses, schools fare in latest health inspections?

Reality Check is a Merced Sun-Star series holding those in power to account and shining a light on their decisions. Have a tip? Email tips@ All 22 food businesses and schools visited by Merced County health inspectors in the past week received passing marks for cleanliness and food-safety compliance. The latest inspections across the county were conducted between May 27 through May 29. Nineteen of the food businesses and schools received a 'good' rating and three received a rating of 'satisfactory.' The county gives 'good' ratings to businesses with six or fewer violation points, 'satisfactory' ratings for seven to 13 violation points, and 'unsatisfactory' ratings for 14 or more violation points. Two Los Banos food businesses Taco El Tono and Dino Mart both received 'good' ratings after re-inspections were conducted after both locations received 'unsatisfactory' ratings earlier this year. Businesses that received perfect scores with no violation were: ▪ Dos Palos Elementary School ▪ Dos Palos High School ▪ Valley Community School, Merced ▪ Farmdale Elementary School, Merced ▪ Escuela Popular Instituto de Cesar Chavez, Merced ▪ El Nido Elementary School ▪ Ada Givens School, Merced ▪ Cruickshank Middle School, Merced ▪ Westside High School, South Dos Palos ▪ Tenaya Intermediate, Merced ▪ Plainsburg Elementary School Cafeteria, Merced ▪ El Capitan High Food and Pool, Merced ▪ Dino Mart, Los Banos The inspections represent a snapshot of conditions found at the time of a visit and may not indicate a pattern of good or bad food safety practices. In most instances, if an inspector finds a problem, it's something that can be fixed on the spot. This can include having enough bleach or sanitizer in the water used to wipe down food-preparation areas, replenishing soap, paper towels and toilet paper in the restrooms, or reminding employees to wash their hands and wear gloves and hairnets. But some violations are considered more serious and, in some instances, can result in immediate closure of restaurants or food businesses when they are observed by health inspectors. Those may include insect or vermin infestations; refrigerators that don't keep food cold enough or steam tables that don't keep food hot enough to inhibit bacterial growth, or clogged sinks or drains that cause contaminated water to back up into kitchens. A lack of hot water is one of the most common violations that health inspectors find when they make their routine visits. Hot water at a temperature of at least 120 degrees is considered important by inspectors for safely washing pots, pans, dishes and glasses, and 100 degrees for employees to wash their hands. Merced County's Environmental Health Division maintains a database of restaurant and food inspections online for public viewing at its web page, click the 'Food Inspections' tab along the left side of the page.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store