
How a camel herder from Qatar who can't speak a word of English ended up living in London's smartest street - then tried to rape a woman in a private heart clinic where HE was being treated
The appearance of this foreign national in court – a scene replicated up and down the country – has become frighteningly common, with foreign offenders now representing nearly one in eight (12 per cent) prisoners in our overcrowded jails.
But surely few have a story quite like 27-year-old Al-Gherainiq who was, until his arrest at least, a camel herder from a conservative Bedouin tribe in the deserts of Qatar.
According to his barrister, he had little contact with the outside world or any experience of modern or urban life before his arrival in the UK to receive treatment for a rare heart condition at a private health unit linked to the renowned Royal Brompton Hospital in south-west London.
Al-Gherainiq, dressed in standard prison 'greys' (grey sweatshirt, grey trousers), was effectively from a different age, in other words.
It was the reason why, when asked how he was going to plead, Al-Gherainiq, who spoke no English, answered in Arabic and an interpreter next to him then replied: 'Not guilty.'
Profound cultural differences, the defence argued, meant he did not know how to interact with women. He was 'equivalent to an immature and inexperienced adolescent' who 'completely failed to understand' his victim's 'true feelings'.
Put bluntly, they argued that he did not know the woman had not consented to sex when he pulled her into a toilet cubicle at the medical centre and assaulted her.
The jury flatly rejected that version of events. He might have come from a remote corner of the earth, but the judge told Al-Gherainiq: 'You knew perfectly well what you were doing,' before jailing him for seven years.
The case left a number of puzzling and troubling questions. How did he get here? Who paid for his treatment and the trip? Where did he stay when he came to London?
The last of these is perhaps the key to unlocking this quite extraordinary saga.
Al-Gherainiq, who spent more than a year on remand before going on trial, came to the country sometime in 2023, the first time he had ever left Qatar.
He appeared before Westminster Magistrates' Court in August of that year following his arrest. His address was given as 79 Mount Street.
Mount Street, currently perhaps the most glamorous address in London, is in the heart of Mayfair. It's home to Scott's restaurant as well as George, an ultra-exclusive private members' club, and Toteme, the chic Swedish fashion brand which has also opened a signature store there.
It is also an area which is sometimes known as 'Little Doha' or 'Qataropolis' because of the number of multi-million-pound Qatari-owned properties in the highly exclusive enclave.
Number 79 is a six-storey Victorian townhouse that was once the London residence of homeware tycoon David Meller, a former vice chairman of Watford Football Club. When he sold the mansion for more than £40million in 2015, it was among the most expensive domestic property deals in the capital at the time. The stamp duty payment alone was in excess of £4.7million.
Hard to imagine then what connection an apparently lowly camel herder – and now convicted sex attacker – had with such a place.
The connection, however, is revealed at the Land Registry where the current owners who purchased the property from the Mellers (for precisely £44.25million) are listed as the 'State of Qatar', effectively the Thani dynasty, the ruling family of the oil and gas rich Gulf state.
Qatar is one of the few countries in the world that offers near free universal healthcare to all its citizens which includes sending them overseas if certain specialised services are unavailable at home.
Among the foreign cities where Qatar has medical offices is London which is linked to the Hamad Medical Corporation back in the Middle East, Qatar's main not-for-profit health care provider.
In 2023, 53,000 Qataris applied to receive treatment abroad. Al-Gherainiq was one of them. After a series of medical checks in his homeland, he was flown to London, a Qatari official with knowledge of the case revealed, and was initially given a daily allowance to cover his accommodation costs.
His private housing arrangements fell through at the last minute, though, and the Qatari Embassy stepped in to help him.
No 79 Mount Street, once a family home with a swimming pool in the basement, and now split up into separate rooms and apartments, is managed by the embassy and used for functions and events.
On rare occasions, as in this instance, ordinary Qatari citizens can temporarily be given a room as 'emergency accommodation'.
This is how a camel herder from the desert came to be living on Millionaire's Row.
'The Embassy of the State of Qatar in London is aware of a criminal case involving one of its citizens and his subsequent conviction,' the official said.
'The Embassy has had no contact with the individual since the time of his arrest and has not provided legal representation or support beyond standard consular assistance, in accordance with international consular norms.'
Al-Gherainiq was evicted from Mount Street after the police contacted the embassy following his arrest.
Locals say residents at the palatial property which occupies 10,000 square feet and is close to the private health unit in Wimpole Street where Al-Gherainiq was a patient, are not long-term, staying a maximum of a few months before moving on.
They are often picked up by luxury cars such as Ferraris, Aston Martins and Lamborghinis.
A team of security guards monitor comings and goings from the property next door, which the Qataris also own.
Relations between the Qatari contingent and neighbours are often strained.
'They think they own the street,' said a builder carrying out work at a house on the opposite side of the road.
They probably do, given that even a few years ago, a quarter of Mayfair's 279 acres and more than 4,300 residential properties, were reportedly owned by Qatari investors.
The contrast between this world and the world Nasser Al-Gherainiq inhabited couldn't be more stark.
He belonged to the Al Murrah tribe – the 'People of the Camel' – the largest and most powerful in Qatar, which has strong relations, including marital ties, with the ruling House of Thani.
Qatar might combine Arab culture with Western luxuries epitomised by the bling, glamour and gleaming skyscrapers of the capital Doha, but it remains a deeply patriarchal society.
Polygamy is legal, meaning a Muslim man is allowed up to four wives at once provided he treats them equally.
Opaque male guardianship rules leave women without basic freedoms, such as travelling on their own with women needing permission to travel abroad from the male head of the household, according to Human Rights Watch (HRW).
And only 45 minutes from Doha and its surrounding suburbs is the desert.
Many of the Al Murrah tribe, which is made up of various clans, have joined government sponsored resettlement programmes in urban areas.
But a hardcore, like Al-Gherainiq, remain in the wilderness, claiming, among other things, historic nomadic rights.
Many elders here still expect women to organise their lives around domestic chores, such as weaving, shearing sheep and crafting goat-hair tents and carpets for which they have become famous.
Al-Gherainiq himself, the court heard, had almost no contact with women outside his family and his only really 'meaningful contact' with a female in the family was with his mother.
'Limited visits to Doha and a preference for a desert environment curtailed his exposure to urban and modern societal norms,' said Jane Bickerstaff, KC, defending.
It might explain his unhealthy attitude to women but how could it possibly justify dragging a woman into a toilet cubicle and attempting to rape her twice?
'I was so scared,' his victim said in a statement read to the court. 'I felt frozen with fear. I couldn't go anywhere. Although the incident lasted a few minutes it felt like ages to me... my life has never been the same... I am not the outgoing woman I used to be. I am withdrawn and highly anxious and overly cautious, especially when I'm on my own in an unfamiliar environment.'
The fact this incident happened in a top medical centre is particularly chilling.
The woman, who is receiving therapy, still has difficulty sleeping and has nightmares and flashbacks. She has withdrawn from work and church, 'two things she loved', Judge Adam Hiddleston said.
'Clearly what you did has had a devastating effect on her,' he told Al-Gherainiq. 'There is evidence of severe psychological harm.' He added: 'I appreciate the cultural differences between the world in which you grew up and in the United Kingdom.'
But he rejected any suggestion that his sentence should therefore be reduced.
The judge made a recommendation that he should be deported to Qatar 'as soon as possible' once he has served his sentence.
In fact, he wants to go back, his barrister said, because 'there is no reason for him to apply to remain here'.
While it's not known if Al-Gherainiq got his heart treatment, this statement suggests it is not an outstanding issue.
The Qatari Embassy, which housed Al-Gherainiq after he first arrived in London, has been at the centre of controversy itself in the past and has a history of claiming diplomatic immunity when staff bring legal actions.
One sexual harassment case made headlines in 2019.
Mother-of-two Deanne Kingson, 58, a personal assistant, recalled how she was pestered for sex, pressed to host orgies for diplomats and go on holiday to Cuba with one of them.
She told the tribunal the then deputy ambassador Fahed Al-Mushairi repeatedly tried to sleep with her and then turned his attention to her 19-year-old daughter when she refused, even offering to marry her.
The case was not contested by the Qatari Embassy.
A panel of tribunal judges concluded that Ms Kingson – sacked after rejecting such advances and awarded £388,920 for unfair dismissal – was seen by diplomats as being 'liable to be willing to engage in sexual conduct with male employees' because she was not Muslim.
Might this then have also been the reason why camel herder Nasser Al-Gherainiq tried to rape a woman at a private clinic before sexually assaulting her on his first trip outside Qatar?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is mass surveillance the way forward to police society?
Most sources suggest that Britain, in terms of CCTV cameras and coverage per head in cities, is one of the most surveilled nations in the world, albeit coming some way behind China, where it seems to be even more routine. The trend towards 'snooping' on British folk seems to be accelerating. More live facial recognition vans are to be deployed across seven police forces in England in a mass-surveillance trial. The aim is to identify and locate suspects in some of the crimes that most worry the public, such as sexual offences, violent assaults and murder. Ticket touts are also targets. Crime is a major concern among voters, but so are their civil liberties... How will it work? Quite passively, as has been the case for some years. Just like in films, the police can place vans in crowded places such as high streets and automatically scan the faces of people walking past, checking them against a databank of images of wanted people. If it relies on busy officers spooling through hours of footage, it might not always be worth the effort; they have enough trouble at present trying to find shoplifters. Does it work? Yes. There have been many successes over the years, though it obviously works best in the big cities, where it operates like a fishing boat trawling for a catch. Ministers say that in London over the past year, facial recognition technology has helped to secure 580 arrests, including the detention of 52 registered sex offenders who breached their conditions. At a time of shrivelled police budgets, a shortage of officers and concerns about 'lawless Britain' (it isn't, by the way), facial recognition harnessed to AI could transform police productivity – and cut crime. It could quite conceivably lower the risk of mass murder through terrorism, for example, which tends to take place in urban centres. Win-win? Not quite. There are practical problems. The software can make mistakes, leading to embarrassment for innocent parties. Twins don't like it, for obvious reasons. The system can't work if people change their appearance or wear a face-covering, and if villains steer clear of the big cities. People wearing face-coverings for religious or health reasons could be stigmatised as 'camera dodgers'. What about the human right to a private life? Quite. One glaring issue is that there is no legislation covering this area of police work, and no national debate has taken place about the creeping ubiquity of various types of surveillance – online as well as on the streets. Parliament does need to create some kind of framework, and one that is consistent with existing laws and international commitments on human rights. So are we becoming a 'big brother' society? With 5 million CCTV cameras, plus an unknown number in offices, plus dashcams in cars and doorbell cameras, the British can hardly cough without it being captured in high definition. Civil liberties groups claim that the UK is becoming a 'big brother society', a 'surveillance state' where privacy is at risk. There's certainly the possibility of a 'Coldplay moment', where someone having an affair is caught on camera and the evidence finds its way into the public domain. Former health secretary Matt Hancock springs to mind. Plenty more risks like that... What does the government say? Dame Diana Johnson, the minister responsible, pleads that it is 'a powerful tool for policing' and will only be used in 'a very measured, proportionate way' to find individuals suspected of serious offences. But there's dissent. Shami Chakrabarti, who served as shadow attorney general under Jeremy Corbyn, says the technology is 'incredibly intrusive', remarking: 'Some would say this is yet another move towards a total surveillance society.' Some would indeed. And the opposition? Well, the present shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, in his role as a Home Office minister a few years ago, oversaw a substantial increase in CCTV use. In October 2023, for example, he suggested that police force leaders in England and Wales should aim to exceed 200,000 searches of still images against the police national database. Predictably, Nigel Farage, despite his summer crime campaign (to clarify, a campaign against crime), simply declared that he 'doesn't want to live in China'.


BBC News
12 minutes ago
- BBC News
VAR might rule on yellow cards in future
The scope of the video assistant referee in the Premier League might be expanded in the future to include decisions on yellow cards and the awarding of corners, says Howard chief Webb says the game's law-makers, the International Football Association Board (Ifab), is reviewing how VAR operates and he is "open to discussions" about other which has operated in the Premier League since the 2019-20 season, can currently only intervene in what are perceived as match-changing decisions - goals, straight red cards, penalties and mistaken identity."There will definitely be discussions around possible extensions," Webb told BBC Sport. "Some believe we should use VAR more extensively for certain situations, but there are others who feel that shouldn't happen."We try to align VAR delivery with the expectations of those involved in the English game, based on consultation with fans, coaches and players. The message we get is 'less is more' with VAR, and we've done pretty well in aligning our delivery with that expectation."VAR has been in place for seven years and has pretty much stayed the same. If the game, or the people involved, tell us that greater use would be better for the game, then of course I'd be open - but we need to think carefully about the consequences, the ripple effects."If you are talking about yellow cards that are delivered incorrectly, which could be impactful on the game, then you also have to think about wrongly not-issued yellow cards." Referee abuse 'worse than ever' Webb believes abuse of referees at all levels of the game is worse than it has ever been and says more support is being provided to support January, police launched an investigation after Michael Oliver received death threats online. In September, Anthony Taylor was temporarily stood down from officiating after being abused on social and his family were confronted by angry Roma fans in Budapest airport after the Italian side lost to Sevilla in the 2023 Europa League final, with video of the incident posted on social media."People have a bigger platform than ever to voice opinions, but some of how that opinion is voiced is unacceptable," said Webb."We saw examples with our officials last season. It happens with players and other participants in the game as well. It's a little bit of a reflection of society today - people express strong opinions, which is normal, and the game naturally creates split opinions in the grey zone."But disagreement with an outcome doesn't give a license to abuse officials on certain platforms, including threats to the safety of officials and their families. That is wholly unacceptable."We provide good support for officials, including psychological support, mental health and well-being. Support extends to their families, too."Webb says the introduction of VAR has increased scrutiny on officials' decision-making and can create perceptions of conspiracy of bias, though he says such perceptions are "wholly unjustifiable".He said: "Previously, referees made judgments in the moment based on what they saw. Now, VAR reviews decisions with more time and different angles. But that doesn't change the fact that some decisions remain grey."If you think a penalty decision is wrong, you expect VAR to get involved. But if it's 50/50, half will think the original decision was right, and if VAR overturns it, those people will be disappointed."The skill for us is recognising when a situation is truly grey and conversely when there is a truly clear one. But don't expect to agree with the final outcome every time." Coote unlikely to return to top-level refereeing Webb says it would be "tough" for David Coote to return to top-level refereeing after he was sacked for misconduct last was dismissed by referees' body Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) in December 2024 after a video emerged online of him making derogatory remarks about Liverpool and then manager Jurgen Tuesday, the Football Association (FA) issued an eight-week suspension and ordered Coote to have mandatory face-to-face education about the incident."Under the circumstances, it's difficult [for him to return]," said Webb. "We stay in contact and care about him, but it would be tough."The 42-year-old has also been banned by Uefa for a separate video showing him sniffing a white powder when he was on duty at Euro 2024, which is organised by European football's governing body."This was one individual who made poor choices outside the game," said Webb. "Our job was to assess the impact his role as an official had on those choices, given the stress officials face."It was an opportunity to reflect on how we support officials and to address any gaps in external expertise, which we've done recently with new appointments. It doesn't reflect on the wider officiating culture or other officials' work."David was a former colleague we cared about and wish well for the future, but his choices were individual to him and don't reflect the wider group."


Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Water pistol attackers who sprayed Jews let off with ‘slap on wrist'
Police have been urged not to turn a blind eye to anti-Semitism after two men who targeted Orthodox Jews with water pistols were let off with a 'slap on the wrist'. The pair, who filmed themselves driving around Greater Manchester spraying pedestrians dressed in Orthodox clothing with an unidentified liquid, were arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated assault last week. But Greater Manchester Police have now imposed community resolution orders – the most lenient option available – after the pair apologised for their actions. Community resolutions, which carry no criminal record, can only be issued for hate crimes in exceptional circumstances should the offender admit the offence, the victim not wish to press charges and an inspector sign off on disposing the case. But the leniency shown to the men, who sprayed adults and children before posting the footage to Instagram accompanied by the Jewish folk song Hava Nagila, has provoked outrage. 'Public humiliation for profit' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, urged police to look at the case again and take 'the most robust action'. He said: 'Spraying members of the Jewish community with water pistols while jeering from the safety of a car is cowardice. It is public humiliation for profit, fuelling online hate, and encourages others to join in. 'This is happening against the backdrop of over 1,500 anti-Semitic incidents in just the first half of this year, one of the highest totals ever recorded. Jewish communities are being harassed, spat at, and attacked, and now filmed. This is not something Britain can turn a blind eye to. 'The police should look again at this case and take the most robust action where possible. We cannot allow a Britain where Jewish families feel unsafe on their own streets simply because of their faith.'