Mouni Roy's Golden Saree Look Is A Masterclass In Acing Timeless Glam With Grace
Last Updated:
Mouni Roy took to her Instagram to share pictures of her latest look. She stunned in a gold saree that was crafted from muted gold organza fabric.
Actor Mouni Roy left her fans speechless with her stunning looks at the Cannes Film Festival 2025 on the French Riviera. Now that she is in India, she is back to serving looks after looks in some traditional Indian wear. For her recent look, she served traditional elegance with a dash of vintage charm in a golden saree.
Taking to her Instagram, Mouni Roy shared a series of vintage-style pictures of herself in a gold saree. She paired the saree with some statement traditional jewellery and truly looked like a vision. Sharing the pictures, she wrote, 'A saree girl forever x #myfrontrowcliche but Happiest in @baelibyanu by my @anusoru."
Take a closer look at Mouni's OOTD here.
View this post on Instagram
A post shared by mon (@imouniroy)
For her recent look, Mouni exuded elegance and allure in a breathtaking saree from the label Baeli by Anu. A perfect mix of classic charm and modern glam, this golden number was a lesson in timeless style. Crafted from muted gold organza fabric, the saree offered an ethereal sheen without overwhelming the look. Its understated, solid gold borders added a vintage appeal while keeping things light and graceful. Draped the traditional way, it featured neatly arranged pleats at the waist and a softly cascading pallu.
What really made the look pop was the blouse, a sleeveless, deep-cut design richly embroidered in champagne-toned threads. Structured and perfectly tailored, it hugged Mouni's silhouette while the plunging neckline added a bold touch to her otherwise dreamy ensemble. For the accessories, Mouni ditched the maximalist neckpieces and rings. She opted for astriking pair of statement earrings in gold and green, adding a regal flourish to her look.
For the glam, Mouni went with a bronzed look. She accentuated her complexion with a flawless base. She paired the bronzed look with soft nude lips and dramatic, defined eyes. Think glossy lips, a sculpted base, highlighted cheekbones, fluttery lashes, shimmering lids, and sharp brows. To complete the look, she wore her hair in a romantic half-up, half-down style, parted at the centre with gentle curls framing her face, a final touch of soft sophistication.
First Published:
May 31, 2025, 10:57 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
How much money does a superstar need?
Remember Leo Tolstoy's famous short story where a greedy peasant could claim all the land he could walk in a day? Spoiler alert: his ambition wrote checks his body couldn't cash, and he collapsed at sunset—leaving him with just enough earth for his grave. If Tolstoy were alive today and writing about Indian cinema, his fable might ask: how much money does a superstar need? And it might go something like this: Once upon a time in Bollywood, a talented, struggling actor finally hits the jackpot. After years of eating instant noodles and taking the bus to auditions, he becomes box office gold. Suddenly, producers are throwing money at him, and as if to make up for all the struggles, he starts demanding more and more, sometimes accounting for even 80% of the film budget. "But I'm worth it!" he insists. "People come to see ME!" The desperate producer, seeing visions of houseful boards across theatres in the country, reluctantly agrees. What choice does he have, he thinks: in a star-obsessed industry, you need them to guarantee screen numbers and opening weekend earnings. But what happens next would make even Tolstoy rub his pearly white beard in thought. When Stars Eat The Sky: The remaining 20% of the budget now has to become elastic and stretch to cover everything else: the supporting cast (told to think of the "exposure"), the crew (promised future projects), action sequences (downgraded now), and visual effects meant to transport audiences to another world now looking worse than an audition reel. And I almost forgot: this 20% also has to budget for a star's vanity… I mean, vanity van, or vans, and the entourage that comes with the man, which can be a dozen or more people. The film releases. The audience, who apparently didn't get the WhatsApp forward that they should be amazed by star power alone regardless of film quality, collectively shrugs. "Meh," says social media. The producer loses his shirt, his pants, and possibly his beach house in Alibaug. Meanwhile, our star has already moved on to his next victim—I mean, project—leaving behind a path of cinematic destruction Godzilla could take notes from. The Steering Wheel Syndrome: Let's get real for a minute. A star claiming sole credit for a film's success is like a steering wheel, thinking it's the entire car. "Look at me, turning left and right! I am THE vehicle!" Sorry, dude, but without the engine, tyres, chassis, and thousands of nuts and bolts holding everything together, you're just a circular ornament. For proof, conduct this thought experiment: imagine your favourite megastar, leave them alone in a room with an iPhone and let them act their heart out for two hours. Release this 'masterpiece' in theatres nationwide. Would you pay 300 rupees to watch that? Would anyone? If your answer is "no," then perhaps we need to reconsider the notion that stars single-handedly "carry" films, that often by their stubborn insistence on more everything, they bury the films prospect. So what does a fair system of compensation look like? Hollywood's Money Math: Hollywood has figured out a more equitable formula. A-list Hollywood actors typically receive a base salary of 10-20% of a film's budget. For a $100 million blockbuster, that comes to $10-20 million—enough to buy a few islands, yet have change enough for a Ferrari ki sawari. But here's where Hollywood scores an ace: they've created a concept called "gross points," which is the percentage of a film's total revenue paid to participants, such as a star, director, or producer, from the very first dollar earned. In contrast, there is the concept of 'net points,' which is prevalent in Bollywood, where one waits for the film to reach profitability before doling out cash. Stars typically negotiate between 5-15% of the gross points on top of their fee, which can be substantial earnings if the film performs well. This creates what business types call "alignment of interests", which mere mortals like us call win-win. When a film succeeds, the producers pop champagne, the studio executives buy another flat, and the star buys another farmhouse in Beverly Hills. The Bigger Pie Philosophy: Think about it this way: should a star rather have 80% of a small, sad, underfunded pie or 20% of a spectacular, crowd-pleasing, critics-adoring, award-winning pie that keeps growing bigger with every box office record it smashes? Some stars have done the math and, guess what, have chosen Door Number Two. Take Aamir Khan, for instance—Bollywood's very own Professor of Economics. He says he doesn't charge upfront fees for his films. Instead, he takes a percentage of the gross revenue. When "Dangal" conquered China faster than the Brits could, Khan's bank account experienced escape velocity. He made significantly more than any fixed fee he'd have taken–by some estimates close to ₹300 crores–while ensuring the production itself had enough resources to tell its story properly. Marvel initially doubted casting Robert Downey Jr. Naturally, they were unwilling to pay him a substantial upfront fee. Instead, they spent time creating quality films in which stories became the main draw. Yet, by the time "Avengers: Endgame" finally rolled around, Downey Jr.–who dies in the film–reportedly made up to $600 million for his roles in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) movies. His 'gross points' compensation didn't prevent the movie from having spectacular effects, an ensemble cast, and enough marketing to make sure even a Rohtak grandmother knew who Thanos was. Beyond Megastars–The Forgotten Film Family: There's a cinematic family tree that gets overshadowed when just one branch takes all the sunlight. There's the screenwriter fighting monsters in her head to craft the story that'll become the blockbuster; a salt and pepper, bearded director who keeps the vision together; a sunburnt director of photography turning ordinary locations into visual poetry; a costume designer with the magic to turn dull cloth into fairy tales; music composers blessed by the muse to create tunes that'll stay stuck in peoples whistles for decades; the stuntmen and stuntwomen who literally break their back so the stars don't have to; and let's not forget the humble spot boys running around in the scorching heat to make sure everyone stays hydrated. These aren't just "film crew"—they're artists, craftspeople, who've spent years and decades honing their craft and how to keep the beating heart of cinema alive. When a star's paycheck devours a film's budget, these essential contributors get the financial equivalent of table scraps. Over my 15 years of active work in the industry, I've seen many talented professionals leave the industry altogether, frustrated, because, you know, they have this weird desire to pay rent and feed their families. The irony in all this? When stars insist on astronomical fees that handicap the production quality of their own films, they're ultimately shooting themselves right in their foot under the expensive sneaker. A string of mediocre films damages their brand. Audiences naturally wise up, eventually, and the very stardom they're cashing in on begins to fade. Finding the Sweet Spot: No one's suggesting stars should work for peanuts, even if their acting chops remind us of monkeys. If you can command audiences, create cultural moments, and make people forget their troubles even for a few hours in a dark theatre, you deserve substantial rewards. But perhaps there's a sweeter spot: a system where the star shines brightly without eclipsing everyone else. Where the grip, the gaffer, the costume designer, and the composer can all earn dignified livings. Where there is enough budget to actually realise the filmmaker's vision. In Tolstoy's tale, the greedy peasant ends up with just six feet of earth—exactly what we all ultimately need, regardless of our Instagram follower count or how many times our face has appeared on a movie poster. However, the question of "How much money does a superstar need?" is one each performer must answer personally. But perhaps the wisest stars understand that their legacy will be measured by the quality of stories they help tell, not by what they leave behind for their children. And if they want to leave something for their children, they must remember that every paisa wrongfully earned will be squandered by their children or grandchildren. There is no other way. It is the Circe of life. Yes, Circe, not circle, the sorceress from Greek mythology who turns men into swine. Six feet; that's how much land a man needs. How much money does a superstar need? Perhaps this nursery rhyme can answer. Twinkle Twinkle Greedy Star, Bleeding budgets near and far, Up above Tinsel Town, so bright, Dimming others' creative light.
Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
For the first time since divorce from Hardik Pandya, ex-wife Natasa Stankovic opens up about silent struggle with an inspiring message
A Candid Note That Resonates Reflecting on a Challenging Year Moving Beyond the Headlines The Story Behind the Split Months after her much-publicized divorce from Indian cricket star Hardik Pandya Natasa Stankovic is stepping into the spotlight with a fresh and inspiring perspective. On June 1, 2025, the actress and model shared a candid Instagram post reflecting her journey of resilience . Her message about perseverance and self-love has struck a chord with fans, showcasing a new, empowered version of posted a raw, makeup-free mirror selfie, flaunting her toned physique and natural glow. But it was her heartfelt caption that truly captured attention:'This version of me didn't come from luck. She came from showing up, again and again – even when it was hard, even when no one noticed. And if you're doing the same? I see you. Keep going.'This message, emphasizing grit and silent strength, has been widely praised, with thousands of fans applauding her honesty and quickly flooded Natasa's comment section with love and admiration, applauding her strength and glow-up. Messages like 'Slaying forever, My Sunshine,' and 'Keep shining, Queen,' reflected the deep connection fans felt with her journey. Many hailed her as a source of inspiration, with one follower writing, 'You're doing amazing, please keep going,' while another simply affirmed, 'You are inspiring.'The past year was a turbulent one for Natasa. Following her separation from Hardik Pandya in 2024, with whom she shares a five-year-old son, Agastya, she has quietly rebuilt her life. In a recent interview with ETimes, she reflected on the hardships and growth, emphasizing the wisdom gained through experience rather than age. Natasa remains optimistic about the future, openly welcoming new opportunities and even the possibility of has consciously chosen to let go of bitterness and public scrutiny. She shared a thoughtful perspective on coping with setbacks: 'Life doesn't always go as planned, but how you respond to challenges defines your growth. Don't try to prove anyone wrong because it will only cost you peace. Just forgive and move on.' This maturity is resonating with many who have faced similar Pandya and Natasa's relationship was once a media favorite. From their chance meeting in 2018 to a grand wedding in 2023, their journey seemed filled with promise. They share a son and continue to co-parent amicably. While the reasons for their divorce remain private, both have maintained respect and cordiality in Natasa turns a new page in her life, her recent social media post signals a strong comeback built on self-awareness and inner strength. Her message encourages anyone facing hardship to keep persevering, reinforcing that growth often happens in silence.
India Gazette
24 minutes ago
- India Gazette
"I miss you everyday..": Sanjay Dutt remembers mother Nargis on her birth anniversary
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], June 1 (ANI): Actor Sanjay Dutt, on Sunday, paid a heartfelt tribute to his mother and legendary actress, Nargis Dutt, on her birth anniversary. Sanjay shared a series of pictures on his Instagram handle. The first one was a monochrome photo of Nargis, while the other was a throwback image of his mother, late father, and actor Sunil Dutt. In the caption, he wrote, 'Happy birthday maa, I miss you everyday and love you more.' Born on June 1, 1929, Nargis is widely known as one of the finest performers of all time, having acted in a variety of genres ranging from comedy to drama. She began her film career as a leading lady in the early 1940s and continued to perform until 1967. She made her final appearance in the psychological thriller film 'Raat Aur Din.'She made her screen debut in a minor role at the age of five with Talash-E-Haq (1935),[6] but her acting career actually began with the film Tamanna (1942). In the early '80s, Nargis was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, and she died on May 3, 1981. Nargis and actor Sunil Dutt fell in love with each other after a fire broke out on the sets of their 1957 film 'Mother India', and he reportedly rescued were said to have come closer while recuperating from the injuries. The couple tied the knot on March 11, 1958. Her best-known role was that of Radha in the Academy Award-nominated Mother India (1957), a performance that won her the Filmfare Award for Best Actress. She appeared infrequently in films during the 1960s. Some of her films of this period include the drama Raat Aur Din (1967), for which she received the inaugural National Film Award for Best Actress. Along with her husband, Nargis formed the Ajanta Arts Culture Troupe which hired several leading actors and singers of the time and held stage shows in border award for Best Feature Film on National Integration in the Annual Film Awards ceremony is called the Nargis Dutt Award in her honour. In the early 1970s, Nargis became the first patron of The Spastic Society of India and her subsequent work with the organisation brought her recognition as a social worker and later a Rajya Sabha nomination in 1980. Nargis Dutt was the second actor, the first being Prithvi Raj Kapoor, to be nominated, and she was in the Rajya Sabha for two years, 1980 and 1981. She was also awarded the Padma Shri in 1958. In Sanjay Dutt's biopic film 'Sanju' actor Manisha Koirala portrayed the role of Nargis. (ANI)
