
Labour's new factions show how worried the party is
Some of the 2024 intake have begun to organise and collude to work out how exactly their party can cling onto power. Last Thursday saw the launch of the Living Standards Group – a caucus of 100 MPs, led by eight members of the new intake including the MP for Loughborough, Jeevun Sandher and the two co-chairs of the Labour Growth Group, Lola McEvoy and Chris Curtis. They have called on the government to refocus on more radical ideas to tackle the cost of living otherwise, they warn, Labour won't hold onto power in 2029.
This is an interesting moment for the arrival of another back-bench caucus. Keir Starmer is likely approaching his non-governmental colleagues with caution after more than 100 MPs staged a damaging rebellion against Liz Kendall's welfare bill, leading to yet another government U-turn. The Living Stanards Group insist that the timing of theor arrival was coincidental. But coming so shortly after a major defeat for the government, this is a prime moment to put pressure on the government.
Although a few welfare rebels are members, the aims of this cohort seem to be favourable to the government. Luke Murphy, one of the eight MPs involved in the leadership of the group said that its founding is a 'recognition that we need to work harder to make sure that we're generating new ideas which focus on the cost of living'. He added: 'we don't want people to turn away from mainstream parties. We want to demonstrate that Labour gets it'.
According to Sandher, the group's de facto leader, conversations around the formation of a group focused on raising living standards have been ongoing for some time. His idea was to form a coalition of MPs from across Labour's internal political spectrum to create a 'policy funnel' for ideas on how the government can fix the cost-of-living crisis – and fast. These ideas will follow three principals: they must be progressive and aimed at middle earners, they must enhance economic growth, and they must be fiscally neutral (e.g. they are not dependent on borrowing). The group will be governed by a board which the eight founding MPs will sit on, which will meet to discuss organisation, plans and ideas.
'We'll have a way for people to sign up to those ideas, publicly or privately and take it forward from there,' he said. The group will not take a collective position due to the 'ideological diversity' of the MPs involved (the letter was signed by members of the Labour Growth Group and of their friendly opponents who they have facetiously termed the 'vegetable lobby'). Although some of the 100's support is not that substantial – one MP texts: 'I just signed [the letter] cos I agreed with it'.
But what unites these MPs is a genuine anxiety that they may be out of a job come the next election. 'We've been in power for a year,' Murphy said, 'but families are still doing the maths on rent, groceries, energy bills and childcare, and for so many people, they just don't add up. We know that's not just bad luck.' The group, therefore, is aimed to keep the government's feet to the fire in fulfilling their promise to voters and chivvying it along in the process. 'Wherever people are thinking of putting their vote, living standards are at the core of most people's vote,' he said. Sandher agreed: 'If you're a young – and you go and get a degree – then you get to the major cities and you realise it's not really affordable and we're losing votes on both sides because of that,' he said, 'fixing that problem is clearly an electoral imperative.'
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
Holding together a coalition of Labour MPs (a party which is notoriously fraught by factionalism) will be challenging, especially considering this group will not explicitly request MPs involved to publicly back their demands on government. But the arrival of the Living Standards Group clearly indicates that Labour MPs have woken up to the true depth of the electoral threats their party is facing – from the left and from the rights.
Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
How the BBC got into a mess over Gaza
On Monday, the BBC released its long-awaited report into its decision to remove the documentary Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone from its platforms. The report determined that not making viewers aware of the fact that the narrator's father was a member of the Hamas-run government of Gaza constituted a breach of its editorial policies, specifically on accuracy. However, the documentary was not found to have breached guidelines on impartiality. As the Guardian's media editor Michael Savage tells Helen Pidd, the release of this report has come after a particularly intense period for the BBC, in which its handling of the war in Gaza has been heavily criticised. In response to the resignation of Gary Lineker, its coverage of Glastonbury performers, and its decision not to broadcast certain documentaries, the BBC has faced heightened criticism from many sides in the conflict. The pair discuss how the Labour government is approaching the BBC, the shrinking number of licence fee subscribers, and whether this string of controversies will change the way the corporation approaches more sensitive issues. Support the Guardian today:


Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fears mounting over free speech as Labour plans to define Islamophobia
Fears are mounting that Labour 's moves to create an official definition of Islamophobia will have a 'chilling effect' on free speech. The Tories have warned that introducing a government-backed definition will lead to a clampdown on freedom of expression. Housing and local government spokesman Kevin Hollinrake also said the committee – made up almost entirely of Muslims – set up by Labour to devise the definition would lead to a 'predetermined and biased' conclusion. And a cross-party group of peers has written to Labour's working group, whose chairman is former Tory Dominic Grieve, expressing concerns. They claim the move could lead to public sector workers, as well as university staff or students, facing disciplinary action if accused of doing or saying 'something that falls foul of the definition'. Mr Hollinrake asked Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner in the Commons yesterday: 'Does the Secretary of State not share our concerns that their report and recommendations will be seen as predetermined and biased?' He said 'freedom of speech is on the line' and expressed concerns about the definition being drawn up in secret by the Anti-Muslim Hate/Islamophobia Definition Working Group. Ms Rayner accused Mr Hollinrake of using 'incendiary language', insisting: 'We will always protect free speech, including the right to criticise religions. 'The independent working group will submit its findings... We will then consider its recommendations and set out the next steps.' Former Tory co-chairman Baroness Warsi also accused Mr Hollinrake of 'unbefitting gutter politics'. Labour commissioned the work to devise a 'non-statutory' definition of Islamophobia in a what it says is a move to combat anti-Muslim abuse. But there are fears it could lead to a blasphemy law by the back door and stifle legitimate criticism of Islam. More than 30 peers said in their letter: 'Our principal concern is that if your working group comes up with a definition and it is taken up by the Government it will have a chilling effect on free speech and exacerbate community tensions. 'It would have 'wide-ranging implications for what people in public life, and those who work for public bodies or attend schools or universities, are able to say about Muslims and Islam. This presumably would mean any member of a university that says or does something that falls foul of the definition would face potential penalties.' The Policy Exchange think-tank has said Labour's working group should be suspended, warning an official definition of Islamophobia would 'almost certainly turbocharge cancel culture'. After a review by Whitehall troubleshooter Baroness Casey found public bodies covered up evidence about Asian grooming gangs 'for fear of appearing racist', Policy Exchange said Labour's measures 'would have made exposing the grooming scandal even harder and slower'. Ms Rayner's department said 'any proposed definition must be compatible with the right to freedom of speech and expression'.

The National
5 hours ago
- The National
Ian Murray to visit Faslane to announce £250m investment in nuclear base
SCOTTISH Secretary Ian Murray is to launch a £250 million investment at the base housing Scotland's nuclear weapons. The funding for HMNB Clyde at Faslane was announced in the spending review last month and will be spent over the next three years to improve infrastructure at the site. The upgrade will ensure the base can house the next generation of nuclear submarines. UK Government ministers Murray and Maria Eagle will visit the site on Wednesday, meeting with senior military officials, the leaders of Inverclyde and Argyll and Bute councils, and local MPs. Scottish Secretary Murray described the spending as a 'defence dividend' as he continued to talk up the economic impact of investing in the sector in Scotland, including through the Clyde 2070 programme, which will see billions pumped into the industry in the coming decades. READ MORE: Explosive new poll puts Corbyn-Sultana party level with Labour 'With Faslane home to the nation's first and final line of defence – the UK's nuclear deterrent, it's only right that Clyde 2070 represents one of the most significant UK Government investments over the coming decades,' he said. 'It will ensure the Royal Navy can deliver the continuous at sea deterrent from a modern, efficient base which will result in a better environment for our hero submariners to live, work and train in. 'Crucially it will also create skilled jobs – including for small and medium-size firms – boost the economy and help tackle the critical skills gaps facing the country in sectors such as nuclear, construction, maritime and project management, by bringing together government, Scottish communities, industry, supply chains and academia to address the challenges.' Defence procurement minister Eagle said Scotland plays a 'crucial role' in the country's Trident nuclear deterrent. She added: 'We are today re-affirming that unshakeable commitment by launching this multibillion-pound investment to His Majesty's Naval Base Clyde, which is vital to our deterrence capability. 'The initial £250 million of funding over three years will support jobs, skills and growth across the west of Scotland. 'This Government will keep the UK safe for generations to come while delivering on the Plan for Change and making defence an engine for growth.' The SNP have been contacted for comment.