University of Saskatchewan's Student Union calls for repeal on Bill 137
The law prevents children under the age of 16 from changing their names or pronouns at school without a parent's consent. The bill also allows parents to prohibit their children from receiving sexual education at school.
When the bill first passed, education minister Jeremy Cockrill shared in a statement that parents have the right to know what is being taught at their child's school.
'The Parents' Bill of Rights' is an inclusionary policy that ensures that parents are at the forefront of every important decision in their child's life.' said Cockrill.
Now, almost two years later, the University of Saskatchewan Student Union (USSU) has used their platform to bring awareness to this bill once again. The USSU, alongside the University's Pride Centre and Women's Centre, wrote a letter explaining why Bill 137 is harmful for students.
Story continues below advertisement
'Bill 137 continues to directly harm and enact violence on youth whose understandings of self do not conform to perspective colonial binaries of gender identity and gender expression.' the letter states.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
The letter also shares why access to sexual education is an important resource for students to have.
'According to the Executive Director of Sexual Assault Services of Saskatchewan (SASS), Saskatchewan has the second-highest rate of sexual violence amongst all other Canadian provinces. Moreover, Saskatchewan is consistently reported to have one of the highest provincial increases in HIV and other sexually transmitted infections.'
Access to the USSU's full letter can be found on their Instagram page.
USSU Pride Centre coordinator Wren Dahl says they see the effect the bill has had on students who were in school when the bill passed. They shared that once at the University of Saskatchewan, those students will be able to live freely and have safe spaces and support on campus.
'No matter what their high school experience was or will be, this will be a safe space that champions those rights.' shares Dahl.
In a statement made to Global News, the Saskatchewan provincial government says it maintains that parents and guardians have a key role in protecting and supporting their children as they grow and develop.
Story continues below advertisement
'The Parent's Bill of Rights introduced amendments to The Education Act, 1995, including the provision that students under the age of 16 receive parental or guardian consent if they want teachers and staff to use a gender-related preferred name or gender identity at school,' the statement reads.
'If it is reasonably expected that obtaining parental consent is likely to result in harm to the student, schools must acquire the appropriate professional resources to support and assist the student in developing a plan to address the student's request with their parent(s) or guardian(s).
'Requiring parental consent for students under 16 years of age and ensuring schools provide the resources necessary to safely receive that consent will help ensure the student is adequately supported both in the school and at their home.'
The Government of Saskatchewan used the notwithstanding clause to pass the law, but the court of appeal is still considering whether it violates Charter rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
4 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Here's what we know about which U.S. goods are still subject to Canadian tariffs
Article content There are a further set of exemptions, too. The first is an exemption for some auto manufacturers that continue to produce vehicles in Canada and carry out planned corporate investments. This represents a $35.6-billion exemption, analysis suggests. Article content The second, writes Tony Stillo of Oxford Economics, is for 'manufacturing, processing, and food and beverage packaging, and on those used for public health, health care, public safety, and national security.' This, likely worth a bit more than $20 billion, includes some steel and aluminium. This exemption will run for six months, from mid-April to mid-October 2025. Article content 'A lot of those intermediate goods that go into manufacturing, food packaging and things of that nature, are eligible for relief,' said Stillo in an interview. Article content Yes. 'There's still a degree of uncertainty about what qualifies for exemption,' said Stillo. Article content Article content There are several exemption categories that are less clear. This includes the public health, health care, public safety and national security products, which Stillo estimates are worth around $3.2 billion. Article content Why are some things tariffed and others not? Article content While it's tough to say exactly why some decisions were made by the federal government, Stillo has a hunch: There are some goods that are easily replaced. For example, Canadians can buy Canadian chicken instead of American chicken. Or chicken could be sourced from other countries. This is similarly true with all sorts of food and all sorts of cosmetics and clothing. Article content However, there are some goods and materials moving through North America's heavily integrated supply chain that can't easily be swapped out. Article content 'What the government's trying to do, and I think this is really a good plan, is we realize that it's going to be tough for a lot of our manufacturers to source from non-U.S. sources, and they're giving them time to find an alternative source,' said Stillo. 'I think the Canadian government appreciates the damage that a trade war can inflict, and they strategically aim to target counter tariffs that would be more harmful to the U.S. and Canada.' Article content Article content What does this all mean? Article content It also means that, fundamentally, the United States has an effective tariff rate of 14.1 per cent on Canadian goods, while Canada's effective tariff rate is more like 2.8 per cent, if you account for all the tariff relief.
Global News
4 hours ago
- Global News
B.C. grocer avoids selling U.S. produce for 117 days in what expert calls a ‘real' boycott
A grocery store in Victoria, B.C., has avoided selling U.S. produce for 117 days. Garth Green, general manager of Urban Grocer, says when U.S. Donald Trump launched his trade war on Canada in March, they decided to pull all U.S.-grown produce from the shelves. And so far, it's been a big success. 'We're, you know, just really trying to promote the local farms,' he said. 'And the Canadian farms. And so it's been very, very good for us. The customers have been very appreciative of it.' The experiment has not been without its challenges. When Green found out they could only get cauliflower from the U.S., he realized it was currently cauliflower season in Holland. Story continues below advertisement 'So we reached out to a few suppliers and said, 'Hey, can you get Holland cauliflower for us?'' he said. 'We ended up finding some, brought it in, and you know it's a little bit more expensive to bring in because you're flying it in. But we just took, you know, a less margin, sell it at a regular price and be able to give the customer something that they can buy until B.C. cauliflower was available.' 6:19 50% tariffs to hit Canadian copper imports to the U.S. Green said local farmers are now reaching out to offer produce to their customers. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'There's people every day almost that come in here and say, 'You know, we hear what you're doing and we love it and we'd love to join on board with you and really shop here,''' he added. Green added that it is unfortunate that it took something like the trade war to make this change but he is happy it has been so successful. Story continues below advertisement 'We've got a Canada-first motto that we like to push, but, you know, we're also not blind to the fact that you can't get everything from Canada, right?' he said. 'And so, you know, even across the store, we are working towards trying to go all Canadian if possible. It's going to be a lot harder, but we've started the process and started to weed out some of the suppliers that we don't need.' 0:27 Business response to Trump's 35% tariff threat Sylvain Charlebois, with the Faculty of Management at Dalhousie University, researches food distribution, security and safety. He told Global News that what Urban Grocer is doing points to a broader movement against American products at the grocery store. 'What's really interesting is that people haven't really boycotted chains like Walmart or Costco, but they're boycotting products,' he said. Story continues below advertisement 'And the boycott naturally worked. If you look at the data, not surveys, actual sales data, according to NielsenIQ, by volume, sales for American food products are down about 8.5 per cent.' Charlebois said in the food retail business, that number is huge. 'That's a boycott. That's the boycott now,' he added. Charlebois added that while consumers are seeing fewer U.S. products, they are seeing more products from around the world so it does not necessarily mean that Canadian product companies are benefiting from the boycott. 'The boycott is absolutely real. So this boutique store is a good, strong case study for what actually is happening across the country.'
Canada Standard
5 hours ago
- Canada Standard
"Despicable act, against spirit of festival": MEA condemns Toronto's Rath Yatra disruption, urges Canada to take action
New Delhi [India], July 14 (ANI): India on Monday strongly condemned the disruption caused during the Rath Yatra procession in Toronto, calling the act despicable and urging the Canadian authorities to take action against those responsible. In response to media queries on the incident, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) Official Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, 'We have seen reports regarding disruption created by mischievous elements during the Rath Yatra procession in Toronto.' 'Such despicable acts are regrettable and are against the spirit of the festival, which seeks to promote unity, inclusivity, and social harmony,' he added. Jaiswal further noted, 'We have strongly taken up the matter with Canadian authorities to hold the perpetrators of the act accountable.' 'We hope the Canadian Government will take necessary action to protect the religious rights of people,' the spokesperson said. Echoing the concerns raised by the MEA, former Odisha Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik on Monday expressed deep concern over reports of eggs being hurled at devotees during the Ratha Jatra celebrations in Toronto, Canada, calling the incident deeply disturbing and hurtful to the sentiments of devotees of Lord Jagannatha worldwide. 'Deeply disturbed to know about the reports of eggs being hurled at devotees during Ratha Jatra celebrations in Toronto, Canada. Such incidents not only grievously hurt the sentiments of Lord Jagannatha's devotees worldwide, but also cause deep anguish to the people of Odisha, for whom this festival holds profound emotional and cultural significance,' Patnaik said in a post on X. Urging prompt action, he called on the Odisha Government and the Ministry of External Affairs to take up the matter with Canadian authorities. 'If these media reports are accurate, the Odisha Government should take the matter seriously and urge the Ministry of External Affairs to register a strong protest with the Canadian authorities,' he added. The remarks came in response to posts by Toronto-based Instagram user Sangna Bajaj, who alleged that eggs were thrown at devotees from a nearby building during the celebrations. 'People from a building throw eggs at us,' she wrote in one post. In another, she stated, 'Someone from a nearby building threw eggs at us. Have you ever experienced discrimination for your faith?' In a troubling recurrence of targeted attacks on Hindu places of worship across Canada, the BAPS Swaminarayan Mandir in Edmonton fell victim once more to vandalism. The recent attack adds to a string of similar incidents documented in recent years, underscoring a distressing trend of religious intolerance. Last year, a Hindu temple in Windsor suffered defacement with anti-India graffiti, sparking widespread condemnation and calls for action from both Canadian and Indian officials. Earlier incidents in Mississauga and Brampton saw temples similarly targeted, drawing strong reactions from the Indian community in Canada. Canadian law enforcement agencies have been urged to take proactive measures to address these threats and ensure the safety and security of all religious communities in Canada. The incidents have prompted renewed discussions on bolstering security measures around Hindu temples and enhancing efforts to combat extremist propaganda. Meanwhile, several global reports have highlighted the growing concerns over Khalistani sympathisers operating within Canada, with incidents often linked to calls for an independent Khalistan state in India's Punjab region. (ANI)
