What an Antarctic Ice Collapse Could Mean for the Rest of Us
Louise Sime, a veteran researcher with the British Antarctic Survey, told The Guardian that recent data points to a potential tipping point in the region's ice melt.
The Cool Down reported that the West Antarctic ice sheet holds enough frozen water to raise global sea levels by several feet. If that ice starts melting faster than expected, the results could be catastrophic for millions of people worldwide.
'As a human being, I have so much trouble trying to think about the magnitude of the sea-level rise that I'm not sure I have the capacity to really think it through,' Sime said.
For over two decades, Sime has studied ancient Antarctic ice cores—frozen layers of history that reveal how the planet's climate has shifted over millennia.
Now, her climate models suggest West Antarctica could hit a runaway melting phase within decades, with the potential to trigger sudden jumps in sea levels.
That doesn't mean the ice will vanish overnight. Sime believes the process could take centuries or even longer. But once it starts, the acceleration might be faster and more damaging than anything scientists have previously predicted.
The consequences go far beyond rising shorelines.
Antarctic meltwater can disrupt global ocean circulation, leading to more extreme droughts, heavier storms, shifting agriculture zones, and soaring food prices. Coastal cities face increased flooding and storm surge damage, and saltwater intrusion threatens freshwater supplies and farmland.
Despite the grim outlook, Sime says there's still time to prevent the worst outcomes. That means reducing carbon emissions, investing in clean energy, strengthening climate-resilient infrastructure, and protecting natural carbon sinks like forests and wetlands.
'If we stop emitting carbon tomorrow, then it's quite likely that we would see no further decreases in Arctic sea ice,' Sime said.
The message is clear: The window to act is still open, but it's narrowing fast.What an Antarctic Ice Collapse Could Mean for the Rest of Us first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 15, 2025
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NASA astronauts return to Earth from ISS after five months
Four astronauts from NASA's Crew-10 mission departed the International Space Station (ISS) on Friday aboard a SpaceX Dragon capsule, beginning an almost 18-hour journey back to Earth. US astronauts Anne McClain and Nichole Ayers, Japan's Takuya Onishi, and Russian cosmonaut Kirill Peskov are set to splash down off California's coast in the Pacific Ocean at 3.33 p.m. UTC/GMT on Saturday. The crew's return wraps up NASA's 10th commercial crew rotation. According to the space agency, the four astronauts conducted more than 200 "important and time-sensitive research" experiments over 146 days, including studies on plant growth and cell behavior in microgravity. Crew-10 replaced stranded astronauts The Crew-10 mission was launched on March 14, replacing Crew-9, whose members included Barry "Butch" Wilmore and Sunita "Suni" Williams. Wilmore and Williams were stranded for nine months aboard the ISS after their Boeing Starliner capsule developed propulsion issues. Eventually, a SpaceX capsule owned by billionaire Elon Musk brought the stranded astronauts home. Wilmore retired this week after 25 years with NASA, the space agency announced. Last week, US astronauts Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke, Japan's Kimiya Yui and Russian cosmonaut Oleg Platonov boarded the ISS for a six-month mission. Edited by Sean Sinico
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump executive order gives politicians control over all federal grants, alarming researchers
NEW YORK (AP) — An executive order signed by President Donald Trump late Thursday aims to give political appointees power over the billions of dollars in grants awarded by federal agencies. Scientists say it threatens to undermine the process that has helped make the U.S. the world leader in research and development. The order requires all federal agencies, including FEMA, the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health, to appoint officials responsible for reviewing federal funding opportunities and grants, so that they 'are consistent with agency priorities and the national interest.' It also requires agencies to make it so that current and future federal grants can be terminated at any time — including during the grant period itself. Agencies cannot announce new funding opportunities until the new protocols are in place, according to the order. The Trump administration said these changes are part of an effort to 'strengthen oversight' and 'streamline agency grantmaking.' Scientists say the order will cripple America's scientific engine by placing control over federal research funds in the hands of people who are influenced by politics and lack relevant expertise. 'This is taking political control of a once politically neutral mechanism for funding science in the U.S.,' said Joseph Bak-Coleman, a scientist studying group decision-making at the University of Washington. The changes will delay grant review and approval, slowing "progress for cures and treatments that patients and families across the country urgently need,' said the Association of American Medical Colleges in a statement. The administration has already terminated thousands of research grants at agencies like the NSF and NIH, including on topics like transgender health, vaccine hesitancy, misinformation and diversity, equity and inclusion. The order could affect emergency relief grants doled out by FEMA, public safety initiatives funded by the Department of Justice and public health efforts supported by the Centers for Disease Control. Experts say the order is likely to be challenged in court. —- The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
You can double your weight loss by ditching this cancer-causing food from your diet: study
Looking to double down on weight loss? A new study suggests that eliminating one food group can significantly enhance weight loss and lower cancer risk. Participants lost twice as much weight when they adhered to a diet of minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to one that included ultra-processed foods (UPFs). UPFs — billed as ready to eat or heat — typically undergo several processing steps, feature additives and preservatives and contain high levels of sodium, refined sugars and cholesterol-spiking fats. A recent study linked UPF exposure to 32 poor health outcomes, including a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, metabolic syndrome, obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Type 2 diabetes and even premature death. In this latest trial, the UPFs were relatively 'healthy.' Items included store-bought breakfast cereal, granola bars, fruit snacks, flavored yogurt cups, instant noodles and ready-made lasagna. By contrast, participants on the MPF diet were fed catered meals of overnight oats with fresh fruit, plain yogurt with toasted oats and fruit, handmade fruit and nut bars, freshly made chicken salad, homemade stir fry and spaghetti Bolognese. While processing levels differed wildly between the two diets, portions and nutritional content were similar. Researchers matched the diets for calories, sugar, fat, fiber and micronutrients. Both aligned with dietary guidance from the UK government, called the Eatwell Guide (EWG). Participants lost weight on both diets, but considerably more when they abstained from UPFs. At the end of the eight-week trial, participants on the MPF diet lost 2% of their body weight compared to a 1% loss from the UPF diet. The results were published this week in the journal Nature Medicine. While these numbers are small, the trial period was relatively short. When extrapolated over a year, participants on an MPF diet would lose between 9% and 13% of their weight, while those who adhered to the UPF diet would drop 4% to 5%. In addition to more pounds shed, the MPF diet also correlated to more fat loss, fewer cravings and lower triglycerides. 'Choosing less processed options such as whole foods and cooking from scratch, rather than ultra-processed, packaged foods or ready meals, is likely to offer additional benefits in terms of body weight, body composition and overall health,' said senior study author Rachel Batterham from the UCL Centre for Obesity Research. Researchers believe some of the weight loss can be attributed to people eating less on the MPF diet since UPFs are 'hyperpalatable.' Despite the known risks, UPFs can be a tough habit to kick since they have been engineered for convenience and cravings, with a combination of flavors and additives designed to encourage addictive eating behavior. Comparatively, participants scored the MPF diet lower in taste and flavor ratings, suggesting that they ate less because the food was less compelling and addictive. Still, researchers noted that people were able to lose weight on the UPF diet, contradicting previous claims that UPFs inhibit weight loss. Batterham maintains that this is owed in part to this particular UPF diet following nutritional guidelines. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat and prioritizing high-fiber foods such as fruits, vegetables and nuts,' she said. One situation in which UPFs may edge out their whole food competition? Plant-based meat replacement products. The new study findings come as packaged foods and frozen meals persist in US diets, with recent research revealing that a shocking 60% of Americans' daily caloric intake comes from UPFs. While UPFs may not completely sabotage weight loss, they can contribute to a slew of health problems. A recent study suggested that some UPFs may contain a disturbing amount of microplastics, which are potentially harmful to respiratory, reproductive and mental health. UPF consumption has also been linked to an increased risk of lung cancer.
