
China's manufacturing activity contracts amid trade tension
CHINA'S manufacturing activity contracted in May for a second month, an official survey showed on Saturday, fuelling expectations for more stimulus to support the economy amid a protracted trade war with the United States.
The official purchasing managers' index (PMI) improved slightly to 49.5 in May from 49.0 in April but stayed below the 50-mark separating growth from contraction, in line with a median forecast of 49.5 in a Reuters poll.
On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump accused China of violating a two-way deal to roll back tariffs and unveiled a doubling of worldwide steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%, once again rattling international trade.
'Recent developments between China and the United States suggest bilateral relations are not improving,' said Zhiwei Zhang, chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management.
'Firms in China and the United States with exposure to international trade have to run their business under persistently high uncertainty. It will weigh on the growth outlook in both countries.'
The new orders sub-index rose to 49.8 in May from 49.2 in April, while the new export orders sub-index rose to 47.5 from 44.7.
Some firms reported a noticeable rebound in trade with the United States, with improvements in both imports and exports, said senior NBS statistician Zhao Qinghe.
The non-manufacturing PMI, which includes services and construction, fell to 50.3 from 50.4, staying above the 50-mark separating growth from contraction.
Analysts expect Beijing to deliver more monetary and fiscal stimulus over the coming months to underpin growth and insulate the economy from the tariffs.
Interest rate cuts and a major liquidity injection were among easing steps unveiled by the central bank this month.
Beijing and Washington have agreed to a 90-day pause during which both would cut import tariffs, raising hopes of easing tension, but investors worry negotiations will be slow amid persistent global economic risks.
Trump's decision to single out China in his global trade war has stirred major worries about an economy that has been reliant on an export-led recovery to drive momentum in the face of weak domestic demand and deflationary pressures.
On Monday, rating agency Moody's maintained its negative outlook on China, citing unease over tensions with major trade partners could have a lasting impact on its credit profile.
But it acknowledged that government policy had tackled its previous concerns about the health of state-owned firms and local government debt that prompted a downgrade in late 2023.
China's economy expanded faster than expected in the first quarter, and the government has maintained a growth target of about 5% this year, but analysts fear U.S. tariffs could drive momentum sharply lower.
Exports beat forecasts in April, buoyed by demand for materials from overseas manufacturers who rushed out goods to make the most of President Trump's 90-day tariff pause.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
UK backs Morocco's autonomy plan for Western Sahara, Lammy says
RABAT (Reuters) -Britain's foreign minister, David Lammy, said on Sunday that the UK considers Morocco's autonomy proposal as the most feasible basis to resolve the conflict over Western Sahara. The long-frozen conflict pits Morocco, which considers the territory as its own, against the Algeria-backed Polisario front, which seeks an independent state in the desert autonomy plan submitted by Morocco in 2007 stands "as the most credible, viable and pragmatic basis for a lasting resolution of the dispute," Lammy told reporters after talks with Morocco's foreign minister. "The UK will continue to act bilaterally, including economically, regionally and internationally in line with this position to support the resolution of the conflict," Lammy said on a visit to Rabat. The position places Britain as the third permanent U.N. Security Council member to endorse Morocco's autonomy plan for Western Sahara, following the United States and France. Morocco's foreign minister, Nasser Bourita, hailed the UK's position as historic, saying it was part of "a momentum to speed up the solution of the conflict."UK investments in the territory were under examination, Bourita said. The two countries signed deals to cooperate in healthcare, innovation, port and water infrastructure and procurement. Lammy said the deals would "ensure British businesses score big on football's biggest stage," as Morocco pushes for infrastructure investment in preparation for the 2030 World Cup, which it will co-host with Spain and Portugal. (Reporting by Ahmed Eljechtimi, Editing by William Maclean)


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Musk's chainsawing of government spending is more like a trim
ELON Musk once famously wielded a chainsaw on stage in a theatrical demonstration of his effort to drastically cut US federal spending under President Donald Trump. As he leaves government, official data shows he achieved something closer to a trim with scissors. In the four months since Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) began slashing federal spending and staffing, a handful of the agencies he has targeted trimmed their combined spending by about US$19 billion compared with the same period last year, according to US Treasury Department summaries reviewed by Reuters. That is far below Musk's initial goal of US$2 trillion in savings and amounts to about a half of one per cent of total spending by the federal government. Musk said on Wednesday he is leaving the administration but that its cost-cutting work will "only strengthen over time." It remains to be seen, however, how enthusiastically Trump's cabinet secretaries will continue to downsize their departments. DOGE says it pulled the plug on more than 26,000 federal grants and contracts that are worth about US$73 billion, while more than 260,000 government workers have been bought out, taken early retirement or been fired. But the DOGE tallies have been riddled with errors, according to reviews by numerous budget experts and media outlets, including Reuters. That has made them difficult to verify, and some of the announced cuts are not saving the government any money because judges have reversed or stalled them. That leaves the Treasury Department's daily reports on how much the government is spending as the clearest window into the scope of the administration's cost-cutting. The view they offer so far is modest: The government has spent about US$250 billion more during the first months of Trump's administration than it did during the same period of time last year, a 10 per cent increase. And even some parts of the government Trump has cut the most deeply are, for now at least, spending more money than they did last year. One big factor driving costs is largely outside Trump's immediate control: interest payments on the United States' growing pile of debt, which amount to about US$1 in every US$7 the federal government spends. Debt interest payments are up about 22 per cent from a year ago. Spending on Social Security, the safety-net programme for the elderly and disabled, totalled about US$500 billion since Trump's inauguration, up 10 per cent from a year earlier. To be sure, the view offered by the Treasury Department's daily reports is incomplete. Many of the cuts DOGE has made to the federal workforce, grants and contracting will reduce what the government will spend in the future but do not show up in its cheque book today. For example, while thousands of workers have taken buyouts, the government will continue to pay their wages until October. So far, the Labour Department has estimated there were only about 26,000 fewer people on federal payrolls in April than were on the books in January, after adjusting the figures for typical seasonal swings. Tallying savings from future cuts, however, is seldom straightforward. "It could be that in the future we never replace these workers and we save billions of dollars, or it could be that they come back and it's even more expensive than before," said Martha Gimbel, executive director of the Budget Lab at Yale, a nonpartisan budget analysis organisation at Yale University. The White House declined to offer an explanation for DOGE's figures. Spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement that "DOGE is working at record speed to cut waste, fraud, and abuse, producing historic savings for the American people." Reuters estimated the administration's impact by tallying outlays at agencies that had been targeted for cuts and whose spending had dropped from the same time last year. Among the agencies hardest hit are the Department of Education, State Department, US Agency for International Development, National Institutes of Health, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and other independent agencies. Rachel Snyderman, an expert on fiscal policy at the Bipartisan Policy Centre, said the spending declines at agencies could be reversed if the Trump administration doesn't get congressional approval to cancel outlays from this year's federal budget, as required by law. The most obvious sign that the Trump administration is making a dent in federal spending is in the Education Department, which Trump has ordered shut down. The administration cut the department's staff by about half in March. DOGE's website lists 311 Education Department grants and contracts it says it has eliminated for a savings of about US$1.6 billion, though it is not clear how it arrived at those figures. Some cuts have not stuck. A federal judge in March ordered the administration to restore some of the grants it had cut, and another judge this month ordered it to rehire 1,400 workers. Still, the Education Department under Trump has spent close to US$11 billion less than it did over the same period last year, the Treasury reports show, far more than what DOGE says it has cut. One reason could be that layoffs have made it harder for the government to process payments for special education and low-income schools. School districts that have sued over the cuts alleged that states were already experiencing slowdowns in receiving money. Another factor for the reduced outlays: The department has stopped handing out the US$4.4 billion that remains to be distributed from the hundreds of billions of dollars approved in previous years to help schools weather the Covid-19 crisis. Other agencies targeted in Trump's overhaul are also starting to show declines in their spending compared with the same time last year. Spending is down about US$350 million at the CDC and about US$1 billion at the National Institutes of Health. The Trump administration has moved to slash spending across those agencies, cancelling grants and ending leases for office space. The Department of Health and Human Services has reported terminating close to 2,000 grants that planned to disperse more than US$20 billion. Many of the grants were to boost labs that fight new infectious diseases, or to fund state mental health programs. Some US$14 billion of the grant money had already been spent prior to the termination, with roughly US$7 billion effectively frozen, according to a Reuters analysis of the government's tallies. The administration has effectively dismantled USAID, which handled most US foreign assistance, firing nearly all of the agency's employees and cancelling most of its humanitarian aid and health programmes, though federal courts have forced the government to continue making some payments. USAID spending is down about 40 per cent, to about US$4.6 billion, from last year. Spending at the State Department – where DOGE says it has cut nearly US$1 billion in grants and contracts – is also down about 20 per cent from 2024. Measuring the impact of the administration's actions is difficult because many cuts will not yield savings for months or years even as spending elsewhere increases. Spending on federal employee salaries, for example, is up by more than US$3 billion under Trump. Some of the grants and contracts DOGE cut were due to be paid out over several years, and many remain the subject of lawsuits that will determine whether they can be cut at all. DOGE says it has saved taxpayers US$175 billion, but the details it has posted on its website, where it gives the only public accounting of those changes, add up to less than half of that figure. It says the figure includes workforce cuts, interest savings and other measures it has not itemised. It is also hard to know exactly how much the government would have spent if the administration had not started cutting.


New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Global economy withstands Trump's tariff storm for now
For all the drama surrounding US President Donald Trump's trade tariffs, the world economy is holding up better than many had expected. The latest data from the United States, China and, to a lesser extent, Europe are showing resilience and the global economy as a whole is still expected to grow modestly this year. This is in part due to US buyers and foreign sellers bringing forward business, while many of the import duties unveiled by Trump remain suspended. While that effect may prove short-lived, Trump's decision to pause tariffs and some glimpses of progress in trade talks, particularly between the United States and the European Union, have fuelled cautious optimism. "We are seeing a bit of a sugar rush in industry, with manufacturers bringing forward production and trade," said Holger Schmieding, an economist at investment bank Berenberg. "The other thing is that we have evidence that Trump pedalled back on tariffs. The bet in markets and, to some extent, in the economy is that he barks but doesn't bite." Investment banks and institutions generally expect the US to avoid a recession this year and the global economy to keep growing. The International Monetary Fund downgraded its global GDP growth forecast by just 0.5 percentage points last month to 2.8 per cent. This is roughly in line with the trend over the past decade and a far cry from the downturns experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic, the 2008 financial crisis or even the turmoil that followed the Sept 11 terror attacks in 2001. No one is venturing a prediction on where the trade negotiations will eventually settle, particularly with a US president who sees himself as unstoppable. Last week alone, separate US courts first blocked and then reinstated Trump's tariffs — creating a degree of legal uncertainty that will do little to facilitate trade deals between the US and those threatened with the levies. While the EU celebrated "new impetus" in its trade talks with the US, negotiations with China were "a bit stalled" according to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Companies are counting the cost of the ongoing impasse. A Reuters analysis of corporate disclosures shows Trump's trade war had cost companies more than US$34 billion in lost sales and higher costs, a toll that is expected to rise as ongoing uncertainty over tariffs paralyses decision-making at some of the world's largest companies. Carmakers from Japan's Toyota to Germany's Porsche and Mercedes-Benz are bracing for lower, or lower-than-previously-expected profits if they have not given up making predictions altogether, like Volvo Cars and Dutch-based Stellantis. This is likely to result in a hit, especially for Japan. The US is Japan's biggest export destination, accounting for 21 trillion yen worth of goods, with automobiles representing roughly 28 per cent of the total. "While the worst shocks may be over, there's still a lot up in the air," Xingchen Yu, a strategist at UBS's Chief Investment Office, said. "We don't really know what a new normal for tariffs would look like, unfortunately." But so far the global economy has held up pretty well. China's output and exports are resilient as its companies re-route trade to the US via third countries. Even in Europe, manufacturing activity was at a 33-month high in May, rebounding from a slump induced by more expensive fuel following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Confidence was also buttressed by the prospect of greater fiscal spending in Germany, a missing ingredient for European growth for the past couple of decades. The robustness of the world economy has surprised even professional forecasters. A measure produced by US bank Citi that tracks the degree to which global economic data has surprised to the upside is now at its highest in more than a year. Economists though still fear a triple whammy in which the front-loaded boost to the goods sector is unwound, while US household purchasing power is squeezed by higher prices and companies put off investment and hiring. At the margin, however, this scenario is starting to appear a little less likely after Trump's pause on tariffs. "The balance has slightly shifted towards more optimism, albeit with uncertainty and volatility," ING's global head of macro Carsten Brzeski said.