As commissioner, Peterson sees DDS 'through a different lens'
Peterson, who served as general counsel at DDS from 2022 to 2024, took over at the agency in September following the retirement of Jane Ryder. DDS serves more than 49,000 children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, autism spectrum disorder and acquired brain injuries, Peterson said at a recent budget hearing.
In recent months, Peterson said she's prioritized visiting DDS group homes, community-based day programs, day habilitation programs and assistive technology center facilities.
'As a lawyer for DDS, I spent a lot of time behind the desk,' Peterson told the News Service on Thursday. 'And now, getting out in the field and meeting the people who we support, meeting their families and meeting our workforce has just been really wonderful for me to see the agency through a different lens, and hear firsthand a lot of the great work that we're doing that is causing improvements in people's lives and allowing them to access the community, or gain employment or be more independent.'
DDS is grappling with surging demand from Bay Staters who need more complex care, including young adults in the Turning 22 program. The agency is in the process of consolidating group homes that had long-term vacancies to save costs and redirect resources.
DDS is also bracing for potential federal funding cuts to Medicaid and SNAP benefits, which Peterson told lawmakers 'would have a devastating impact on people with disabilities.' DDS generates $1 billion in Medicaid revenue each year that flows into the state's General Fund, which Peterson said comes from reimbursements on home- and community-based waivers.
'We're just trying to really stay closely on top of that,' Peterson said. 'I meet weekly with some of my counterparts around the country, so we can all share information to make sure that we're staying on top of what's coming out of Washington and can kind of collectively prepare for it.'
Disability advocates have called on lawmakers to significantly increase funding to the human services sector, with the aim of boosting pay for direct support professionals and paring down long wait lists for care.
Peterson acknowledged the workforce 'continues to be an issue,' though she pointed to early signs of progress after last year's budget invested $390 million into human services provider rates.
'We've seen some data that the rate increases, the Chapter 257 rate increases that were rolled out by the Legislature last year, have already started improving things in terms of our workforce,' Peterson said. 'We've seen lower vacancy rates across provider agencies.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
6 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump's tax law could cause Medicare cuts if Congress doesn't act, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The federal budget deficits caused by President Donald Trump's tax and spending law could trigger automatic cuts to Medicare if Congress does not act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Friday. The CBO estimates that Medicare, the federal health insurance program for Americans over age 65, could potentially see as much as $491 billion from 2027 to 2034 if Congress does not act to mitigate a 2010 law that forces across-the-board cuts to many federal programs once legislation increases the federal deficit. The latest report from CBO showed how Trump's signature tax and spending law could put new pressure on federal programs that are bedrocks of the American social safety net. Trump and Republicans pledged not to cut Medicare as part of the legislation, but the estimated $3.4 trillion that the law adds to the federal deficit over the next decade means that many Medicare programs could still see cuts. In the past, Congress has always acted to mitigate cuts to Medicare and other programs, but it would take some bipartisan cooperation to do so. Democrats, who requested the analysis from CBO, jumped on the potential cuts. 'Republicans knew their tax breaks for billionaires would force over half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts — and they did it anyway,' said Rep. Brendan F. Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, in a statement. 'American families simply cannot afford Donald Trump's attacks on Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare.' Hospitals in rural parts of the country are already grappling with cuts to Medicaid, which is available to people with low incomes, and cuts to Medicare could exacerbate their shortfalls. As Republicans muscled the bill through Congress and are now selling it to voters back home, they have been highly critical of how CBO has analyzed the bill. They have also argued that the tax cuts will spur economic growth and pointed to $50 billion in funding for rural hospitals that was included in the package.
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump tax law could cause Medicare cuts if Congress doesn't act, CBO says
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Democrats, who requested the analysis from CBO, jumped on the potential cuts. Advertisement 'Republicans knew their tax breaks for billionaires would force over half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts — and they did it anyway,' said Rep. Brendan F. Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, in a statement. 'American families simply cannot afford Donald Trump's attacks on Medicare, Medicaid, and Obamacare.' Hospitals in rural parts of the country are already grappling with cuts to Medicaid, which is available to people with low incomes, and cuts to Medicare could exacerbate their shortfalls. Advertisement As Republicans muscled the bill through Congress and are now selling it to voters back home, they have been highly critical of how CBO has analyzed the bill. They have also argued that the tax cuts will spur economic growth and pointed to $50 billion in funding for rural hospitals that was included in the package.
Politico
7 hours ago
- Politico
5 questions for Alexandra Reeve Givens
Alexandra Reeve Givens, a leading consumer protection advocate, is the CEO of the Center for Democracy & Technology, a nonprofit that advocates for digital rights. She previously served as the Senate Judiciary Committee's chief counsel covering technology and consumer protection, and directed Georgetown University's Institute for Technology Law & Policy. She talks to us about the problems with age verification and the importance of federal regulators in the age of artificial intelligence. The following has been edited for length and clarity. What's one big, underrated idea? Remembering that widespread adoption of AI is contingent on people's trust. AI agents that carry out routine tasks will work best if they connect with your email and calendar, know your preferences and routines — but users won't take that leap of faith unless companies are thinking seriously about privacy, security and robust user controls. Smart regulation can ensure the protections people need in our AI future, creating a baseline for consumer trust. What technology right now do you think is overhyped? I'm concerned by the wave of age verification tools being rolled out in response to new laws like the U.K.'s Online Safety Act without serious consideration of the trade-offs. The fact that sites are collecting users' driver's licenses, or images of users' faces, raises serious concerns about privacy, data breaches and people's right to access information anonymously. Many of the privacy-preserving techniques are under-theorized, relying on predictive tools that estimate users' ages from photos, which may not work well for everyone and relies on uncertain guarantees that the photos will be deleted. Or analyzing users' online behavior, which raises major privacy and accuracy questions, too. What do you think the government could be doing now about tech that it isn't? Honestly, I'm more worried about what the federal government is doing with technology right now. The Trump administration has taken extraordinary steps to access and consolidate sensitive data about hundreds of millions of people living in this country. From the Department of Homeland Security gaining access to Internal Revenue Service taxpayer and Medicaid information to target immigrants; to the administration demanding that states hand over personal information about the tens of millions of people who have applied for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits; to the Justice Department seeking the details of voter rolls with personal information and party affiliation from at least 19 states. These demands violate longstanding laws and precedents, are being used to profile and target people. [...] This moment should shock the conscience of people on the right and left. What has surprised you most this year? The political firings at the federal agencies charged with protecting consumers, workers, families and voters surprised me for their brazenness. Agencies like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Federal Trade Commission, Federal Election Commission and Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board play an essential role protecting Americans. [...] The rule of law and well-functioning government serves everyone, consumers and businesses alike. The EEOC has been doing important work on the risk of algorithmic discrimination in hiring and management and firing decisions. [...] The FEC was doing important work on how to boost authentic and trusted sources of information in elections, so also navigating this AI era. And then the PCLOB is the main body charged with overseeing the government's surveillance capabilities. What book most shaped your conception of the future? Reading deeply about the Reconstruction era changed the way I view the world. I still remember as a young person facing the sobering reminder that progress isn't linear, that might can indeed overpower right. And that we have extraordinary forebears in history who persisted in the fight for justice anyway. Obviously, CDT is a tech organization, but we are at bottom a human rights organization. And so, when I view what our job is and what our digital future is, it's about what human rights look like in 2025. That's why this period of history is so relevant. Papers, please The Supreme Court refused to pause a Mississippi age verification law, POLITICO's Gabby Miller reports. The justices on Thursday denied an emergency appeal from NetChoice to temporarily block enforcement while its lawsuit challenging the law plays out in district court. Mississippi enacted the law in 2023, which compels platforms with a substantial portion of pornographic content to implement age-gating measures. NetChoice — an industry group that represents Meta, YouTube and X — argues the age verification requirements violate its members' First Amendment rights. MaryAsa Lee, communications director at the Mississippi Attorney General's Office, told POLITICO in a statement that the state is 'grateful' for the decision as 'the case proceeds in a way that permits thoughtful consideration of these important issues.' Yet the decision isn't a slam-dunk for Mississippi. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in a concurrence that NetChoice was likely to prevail in demonstrating the law violates speech rights, but that it was too early to block it. AI bootcamp House and Senate staffers attended the fourth annual Congressional Boot Camp on AI this week at Stanford's Institute for Human-Centered AI, POLITICO's Chase DiFeliciantonio reports. Chase interviewed HAI's Executive Director Russell Wald to see how the three-day training session is helping staffers write more sophisticated laws for their bosses to push in Congress. The program included attendees from the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, who is now the director of Stanford's Hoover Institution, also joined to give her thoughts. Wald said there was particular interest in the technological advancement of smaller AI models. These models fulfill narrower tasks like answering patients' health care questions or gathering smart device data, as opposed to larger general-purpose models like ChatGPT. The event also featured a discussion on how the U.S.'s approach to AI differs from China's. The U.S. has traditionally taken a 'brute force approach' by throwing compute power into models, said Wald. U.S. models also tend to be proprietary. China on the other hand has invested more in STEM and public education, and embraced open-source systems, Wald said. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
