logo
Don't shoot the messenger: Court of Appeal says ‘offensive' online remarks to ‘annoy' can't be a crime in Malaysia

Don't shoot the messenger: Court of Appeal says ‘offensive' online remarks to ‘annoy' can't be a crime in Malaysia

Malay Maila day ago
The Court of Appeal ruled that it is no longer a crime in Malaysia to post 'offensive' online remarks intended to 'annoy', declaring part of the Communications and Multimedia Act's Section 233 as unconstitutional.
The Court of Appeal said Section 233 gave no objective standard for what is 'offensive', warning it could criminalise speaking the truth and stifle free speech just because someone feels the online remarks are offensive.
The court's decision today only applies to ongoing and future cases where individuals face charges under Section 233. The Malaysian government can still appeal to the Federal Court, but it is not known yet if it would appeal.
PUTRAJAYA, Aug 19 — The Court of Appeal today unanimously ruled that it is no longer a crime in Malaysia to make 'offensive' online comments with the intention to 'annoy', and struck down parts of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998's Section 233 that had criminalised 'offensive' and annoying online speech.
Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng, chairing a three-judge panel, said the court found these words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 to be unconstitutional, as they go against the Federal Constitution's Article 10(2)(a).
'We find the impugned words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233 constituting an offence to be violative of Article 10(2)(a) of the Federal Constitution read with Article 8.
'It is not a permissible restriction to freedom of speech under our Federal Constitution,' he said, before striking down or making these two words in Section 233 invalid.
'We declare this decision to have prospective effect, so as not to resurrect the past,' he added.
The Court of Appeal's decision's prospective effect means it will only affect ongoing or future court cases involving the crime of 'offensive' online speech intended to 'annoy' under Section 233, and will not affect past cases where the court had decided on whether those charged are guilty or not of such crimes.
In reading the broad grounds of his judgment, judge Lee pointed out that there may be some people who feel offended and annoyed even when what is spoken is the truth, and cautioned against making it a crime to speak the truth.
'A premium should be given to truth, and the fact that some truths may be unpalatable does not justify criminalising the messenger merely because some masses of the people do not like the message,' the judge said.
Among other things, the judge said that there is no uniform standard in society on what is 'offensive', and what a person finds offensive may not be offensive to another person in a diverse society.
The judge said Section 233 does not give any standards on what would be 'offensive' or what would be an 'intent to annoy', and said freedom of speech becomes illusory and enforcement becomes arbitrary when all types of speech could potentially be 'offensive' if a single person feels it is offensive.
The judge cautioned that this would result in every speech having to be 'sanitised' — whether it is true or not — to avoid committing a crime under Section 233.
Without an objective standard on what is 'offensive', the judge said regulating online civil discourse would become a 'euphemism' for the authorities to police and censor undesirable speeches, which he said would result in a 'chilling effect' over the right to freedom of speech and expression which is protected under the Federal Constitution's Article 10(1)(a).
The judge pointed out that if online remarks are found to be untrue, a person can still be charged under the CMA's Section 233(1) for making comments that are false with intent to abuse, threaten or harass another person.
The two other judges on the panel today are Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah.
When asked by reporters if the Malaysian government will be appealing today's decision, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin said he would be seeking instructions on whether to file an appeal at the Federal Court.
Lawyers Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, Surendra Ananth, New Sin Yew and Nur Izni Syazwani represented activist Heidy Quah in her successful constitutional challenge today against the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' in Section 233.
Lawyer Kee Hui Yee held a watching brief for the Malaysian Bar, while lawyers Lim Wei Jiet and Nevyn Vinosh Venudran represented Clooney Foundation for Justice and Suara Rakyat Malaysia in assisting the Court of Appeal as amicus curiae.
While the Court of Appeal's decision today has effectively removed the words 'offensive' and 'annoy' from Section 233, there is now a newer version of Section 233 that uses the words 'grossly offensive'.
MORE TO COME
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bitter brew: Company faces landmark charge over misuse of Tenom coffee label
Bitter brew: Company faces landmark charge over misuse of Tenom coffee label

New Straits Times

time30 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Bitter brew: Company faces landmark charge over misuse of Tenom coffee label

JOHOR BARU: A company and its director will make legal history tomorrow when they become the first to face charges under the Geographical Indications Act for allegedly misusing a protected label. Federal prosecutors are expected to charge the company and its director at the Johor Baru Sessions Court tomorrow morning for labelling a 2-in-1 coffee product as "KK Tanom Coffee". They are accused of using a label that could indirectly refer to a registered geographical indication, "Tenom Coffee", without the rights holder's approval. The press invitation did not specify the exact section of the Act they would be charged with. The Geographical Indications Act protects names or signs linked to products from specific regions that owe their quality or reputation to their place of origin. Examples include "Tenom Coffee" from Sabah, as well as "Sarawak Pepper" and "Bario Rice" from Sarawak. The law prevents the misuse of these labels by unauthorised producers, which safeguards consumers and the integrity of Malaysia's heritage products. This case is the first prosecution under the Act since it came into force on March 18, 2022. It replaced the Geographical Indications Act 2020 to strengthen protection for products linked to specific regions and to align Malaysia with international standards under the World Trade Organisation's Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). Adopted in 1994, TRIPS is a pact that sets minimum global standards for intellectual property protection. It requires member countries to safeguard copyrights, trademarks, patents, geographical indications, and other rights, ensuring fair competition and consumer protection across borders.

Justice for Zara Qairina must follow legal process says Home Minister
Justice for Zara Qairina must follow legal process says Home Minister

The Sun

time30 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Justice for Zara Qairina must follow legal process says Home Minister

PUTRAJAYA: Home Minister Datuk Seri Saifuddin Nasution Ismail has emphasised that justice and accountability in the case of the late Zara Qairina Mahathir must be fully upheld in accordance with the law. He stated that truth and justice for the victim cannot be determined through conversations on social media or public opinion. 'Those who organise a series of demonstrations, what are they looking for? To seek the truth. To uphold justice. So how? It must be in line with the law and legal process.' 'The truth cannot be established by taking at face value what the pathologist who was detained yesterday said, or by believing the theory of a teacher claiming Zara was murdered and abused with a washing machine.' 'Truth and justice must go through the legal investigation process. Who has the authority to conduct legal investigations? The police, and that is exactly what we are doing,' he told reporters after the Home Ministry's National Day and Malaysia Day celebration and its monthly assembly here today. Saifuddin said the ministry is aware that many rumours surrounding the student's death are being circulated and that such claims will not stop. He said although he had already presented the investigation report on the case in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday, slander and false news would continue to spread. Saifuddin said so far, a total of 195 witness statements have been recorded to ensure the investigation is truly complete and comprehensive. 'Of course, it takes some time for us to properly update the case, and that was what we submitted last Monday, which subsequently led to the Attorney-General's Chambers making an announcement (that five underage teenagers were charged today under Section 507C(1) of the Penal Code in the Kota Kinabalu Juvenile Court).' 'So that is the process I meant when I said the police must act in accordance with the law in order to seek truth and justice,' he said. Zara Qairina died at Queen Elizabeth I Hospital in Kota Kinabalu on July 17 after she was found unconscious in a drain near her school dormitory on the morning of July 16. - Bernama

JPA reviewing civil service talent policy to give younger officers senior roles, says Dr Zaliha
JPA reviewing civil service talent policy to give younger officers senior roles, says Dr Zaliha

Malay Mail

time30 minutes ago

  • Malay Mail

JPA reviewing civil service talent policy to give younger officers senior roles, says Dr Zaliha

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 20 — Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Federal Territories) Datuk Seri Dr Zaliha Mustafa said that the Public Service Department (JPA) is currently reviewing the new civil service talent development policy, including creating opportunities for younger officers to hold senior government positions. She said that the implementation details are still being finalised, with JPA reviewing every aspect to ensure careful and comprehensive planning. 'However, the implementation details still need to be finalised. JPA will carefully consider these aspects to ensure thorough planning. Any related matters concerning merits will receive focused attention,' she told Dewan Rakyat today. She was responding to a supplementary question from Pasir Gudang MP Hassan Karim, who asked whether the recently announced public service talent development policy by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim would create opportunities for young civil servants to be appointed to Chief Secretaries, similar to Singapore. Zaliha then said the policy, launched by the prime minister during the Malaysia Administrative Public Policy Awards (MAPPA) on August 15, aims to strengthen career pathways and foster a culture of excellence within the civil service. She explained that the policy focuses on two types of talent which are high-potential officers ready for greater responsibilities and competent officers skilled in their current roles. 'This policy is similar in emphasis to Singapore's Public Service Leadership Scheme, which provides faster career advancement opportunities for young civil servants,' she added. On Friday, Anwar launched the Public Service Talent Development Policy at the MAPPA 20th ceremony, highlighting the government's dedication to cultivating a skilled, ethical, and future-ready civil service. The prime minister announced the policy change alongside other civil service improvements such as the upgrades to the Malaysian Armed Forces scheme and Academic Recognition Awards (HPA) for civil servants.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store