Why Single-Turn Testing Falls Short In Evaluating Conversational AI

Forbes

08-07-2025

Tarush Agarwal is the Co-Founder & CEO of Cekura, a Y Combinator backed company pioneering Testing and Monitoring for Conversational Agents.
Conversational AI agents, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, are often evaluated on their ability to answer questions or respond to prompts in single-turn interactions. This means assessing one question and one answer at a time.
However, real conversations involve multi-turn exchanges, where context builds over time.
Evaluating an AI on isolated responses out of context can be misleading and insufficient, similar to judging a movie by a single scene. Modern research emphasizes that accurately measuring a chatbot's performance requires multi-turn simulations that capture how the AI performs throughout an entire conversation.
The Limitations Of Single-Turn Evaluation
Single-turn evaluation tests a conversational agent on one input and one output at a time. While straightforward, this approach has significant limitations for conversational systems:
• No Context Or Memory: Real dialogues build on previous turns. Single-turn tests overlook this continuity, failing to verify whether the AI retains information from previous conversations or utilizes it correctly. An answer that seems good in isolation might repeat information or miss references to earlier parts of the conversation.
• Lack Of Coherence And Consistency: A chatbot might give individually plausible answers, but the conversation as a whole could wander or contradict itself. Single-turn evaluation wouldn't catch such contradictions because each turn is scored in isolation. True coherence—a logical flow of ideas across turns—and consistency (not changing facts or personality mid-conversation) can only be judged by looking at a sequence of interactions.
• No Long-Term Goal Assessment: Many conversations have an underlying goal (e.g., solving a problem, gathering information). Evaluating turn by turn might miss whether the agent is effectively guiding the conversation toward that goal. A single-turn score won't tell us if the bot gets stuck, goes off on a tangent or needs too many turns to accomplish something.
Why Multi-Turn Simulations Are Necessary
To truly gauge a conversational agent's performance, we need to evaluate it in simulated multi-turn interactions that resemble real dialogues. This allows us to measure several critical aspects of conversation quality that single-turn tests miss:
• Context Awareness And Coherence: Multi-turn evaluation should check if the AI's responses make sense given the conversation history and if the dialogue stays on a logical track. Coherent dialogues flow naturally, which can only be observed across a chain of exchanges.
• Consistency: Over a long conversation, the agent should not contradict itself or switch its story. It should maintain consistent information and a consistent persona or tone. Multi-turn tests reveal if the agent remains consistent from start to finish.
• Memory Retention: This refers to the agent's ability to remember details provided by the user or itself in previous turns. In a multi-turn simulation, we can actively test this by requiring the AI to use past information correctly.
• Long-Term Goal Completion: For goal-oriented dialogues, multi-turn scenarios allow us to see if the AI is making progress toward the goal at each step. We can measure overall success: Did the user's problem get solved or the task get done by the end of the conversation? A single-turn score cannot capture this overall success.
Researchers and practitioners use multi-turn dialogue simulations, often having the AI chat with test users or even itself, to go through realistic back-and-forth scenarios. This kind of evaluation is necessary because multi-turn conversations introduce complexities that do not appear in one-shot interactions, such as maintaining nuance and coherence over many exchanges.
The Math Of Multi-Turn Accuracy: Compounding Errors
Suppose a voice agent has a 99% accuracy per turn. For a 10-turn conversation, the probability that every single turn is handled perfectly is: 0.99¹⁰ = 0.904 (about 90%).
So, even at accuracy, 1 in 10 conversations will have an error. Drop accuracy to 95% per turn, and only 60% of 10-turn conversations will be flawless. The result: As complexity increases, even small per-turn errors compound to limit reliability at scale.
Conclusion
Single-turn evaluations are easy but fall short of capturing what really matters in conversational AI: context, coherence, memory and long-term goal pursuit.
True evaluation means testing AIs in full, multi-turn conversations to see if they deliver a seamless, consistent experience from start to finish. As AI systems grow more capable and take on harder tasks, only holistic, dialogue-level testing can reveal their strengths and weaknesses.
Ultimately, to measure real progress, we have to judge the conversation, not just the reply—because in AI, it's the quality of the journey, not just the first step, that counts.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?