logo
Here legally since 1999, thousands of immigrants have 60 days to leave

Here legally since 1999, thousands of immigrants have 60 days to leave

Washington Post17-07-2025
They are nurses, mechanics, sanitation workers and executives. They've fallen in love, bought houses and raised children. They've opened restaurants and construction companies, paid taxes and contributed to Social Security, living and working legally in the United States since 1999.
Now more than 50,000 Hondurans and Nicaraguans stand to abruptly lose their legal status as the Trump administration seeks to end their protections, in place since the Clinton era, under the temporary protected status program, or TPS. Amid a broader campaign to crack down on immigration, the Department of Homeland Security said that because 'conditions have improved' in Honduras and Nicaragua, it is ending the program for natives of those countries in early September.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Visa Interviews To Change From September: What To Know
US Visa Interviews To Change From September: What To Know

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

US Visa Interviews To Change From September: What To Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Department of State has announced major changes to its visa interview policies that are set to take effect from September 2. Under the revised rules, most nonimmigrant visa applicants would be required to attend an in-person interview, ending broad exemptions that had been in place in recent years. Why It Matters U.S. consulates are set to adopt a much more limited version of the nonimmigrant visa interview waiver program, according to a State Department announcement. Under the revised policy, almost all applicants would be required to attend an in-person interview, with limited exceptions for most diplomatic visa applicants and certain B-1/B-2 visa holders. Notably, the new rules also mandate interviews for applicants under 14 and over 79 years of age, reversing the long-standing exemption for these age groups. The move is expected to affect thousands of travelers, students and business professionals seeking entry to the United States and underscores the State Department's renewed emphasis on in-person vetting and security checks in visa processing. A sign at the State Department in Washington, D.C. A sign at the State Department in Washington, D.C. Charles Dharapak/AP What To Know Several categories of applicants would remain eligible for an interview waiver under the revised rules. These include individuals applying for diplomatic and official visas, such as A-1, A-2, C-3 (excluding personal staff), G-1 to G-4, NATO-1 through NATO-6, and TECRO E-1. The waiver would also apply to those renewing a full-validity B-1, B-2 or B1/B2 visas or a Border Crossing Card/Foil for Mexican nationals—provided the renewal occurs within 12 months of the previous visa's expiration and the applicant was at least 18 years old when the prior visa was issued. Applicants seeking an interview waiver based on visa renewal must meet additional eligibility criteria. They must apply from their country of nationality or residence, have no history of visa refusal unless it was later overcome or waived, and must not have any apparent or potential grounds of ineligibility. Even if applicants meet these conditions, U.S. consular officers reserve the right to request an in-person interview on a case-by-case basis. This policy supersedes the previous interview waiver guidelines announced on February 18 and marks a shift toward tighter screening as global travel returns to pre-pandemic levels. What People Are Saying AK Poku Law, an immigration law firm in Virginia, wrote on X: "Due to this change, applicants should expect longer wait times and processing backlogs at U.S. embassies and consulates." Reddy Neumann Brown PC, an immigration law firm in Texas, wrote on X: "Long-standing exemptions are being rolled back, appointment demand is expected to surge, and delays could stretch for months." What Happens Next The changes are set to come into effect in September. The State Department is urging applicants to check the official website of the U.S. Embassy or consulate where they plan to apply, as procedures and processing times may vary by location.

Green Card Holder Detained by ICE After Returning From Brother's Wedding
Green Card Holder Detained by ICE After Returning From Brother's Wedding

Newsweek

time19 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Green Card Holder Detained by ICE After Returning From Brother's Wedding

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Federal immigration authorities detained a legal permanent resident pursuing his Ph.D. at San Francisco International Airport as he returned from his brother's wedding. Tae Heung "Will" Kim, from South Korea, has been living in the country since he was 5 years old and holds a green card. The 40-year-old is currently a doctoral student at Texas A&M University, where his research focuses on developing a Lyme disease vaccine, according to The Washington Post. Immigration officials detained him on July 21 during secondary inspection after he arrived from a two-week visit to South Korea for his younger brother's wedding. Why It Matters President Donald Trump has ordered the government to carry out what Republicans call the largest deportation operation in United States history. In addition to people living in the country without legal status, immigrants with valid documentation, including green cards and visas, have been detained. Newsweek has documented multiple cases involving green card holders and applicants who were swept up in the ICE raids. Immigration authorities have said that lawful permanent residents could have their green cards and visas revoked if they are found to have broken the law. What To Know In 2011, Kim was charged with minor marijuana possession in Texas, according to his attorney, Eric Lee. He completed a community service requirement and later obtained a nondisclosure order, sealing the offense from public view. "If a green card holder is convicted of a drug offense, violating their status, that person is issued a Notice to Appear and CBP coordinates detention space with ICE ERO. This alien is in ICE custody pending removal proceedings," a U.S. Customs and Border Protection spokesperson told Newsweek. Lee told The Washington Post that Kim has been denied access to legal representation. According to Lee, the government has not provided a reason for his detention, and immigration authorities have prevented Kim from speaking with an attorney or directly contacting his family, aside from a brief phone call to his mother on Friday. "If the Constitution doesn't apply to somebody who's lived in this country for 35 years and is a green-card holder — and only left the country for a two-week vacation — that means [the government] is basically arguing that the Constitution doesn't apply to anybody who's been in this country for less time than him," Lee said. Kim's mother, Yehoon "Sharon" Lee, told The Washington Post that she's deeply concerned about his well-being. "He's a good son, very gentle," she said. Sharon Lee first arrived in the U.S. with her husband on a business visa in the 1980s and eventually became a naturalized citizen. But by that time, her sons, including Kim, were too old to receive citizenship through her automatically. Both boys remained legal permanent residents, having grown up almost entirely in the U.S. Federal agent outside the Immigration Courtrooms of Federal Plaza in New York. Federal agent outside the Immigration Courtrooms of Federal Plaza in New York. Andrea Renault/STAR MAX/IPx What People Are Saying Sharon Lee told The Washington Post: "I immigrated here to the States—I thought I understood it was a country of equal rights where the Constitution applies equally." Eric Lee told The Washington Post: "This is somebody whose research is going to save countless lives if allowed to continue—farmers who are at risk of getting Lyme disease." "Trump always talks about how much he loves the great farmers of America. Well, Tae is somebody who can save farmers' lives." What Happens Next Sharon Lee told The Washington Post that she is worried about her son's health as he remains in detention. "I'm most concerned about his medical condition. He's had asthma ever since he was younger," Lee said. "I don't know if he has enough medication. He carries an inhaler, but I don't know if it's enough, because he's been there a week."

Judge to consider whether Alligator Alcatraz legal challenge was filed in wrong jurisdiction
Judge to consider whether Alligator Alcatraz legal challenge was filed in wrong jurisdiction

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Judge to consider whether Alligator Alcatraz legal challenge was filed in wrong jurisdiction

A legal challenge to a hastily-built immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades was filed in the wrong venue, government attorneys argued Wednesday in the first of two hearings over the legality of "Alligator Alcatraz" in a lawsuit brought by environmental groups. Even though the property is owned by Miami-Dade County, Florida's southern district is the wrong venue for the federal lawsuit by environmental groups since the detention center is located in neighboring Collier County, which is in the state's middle district, according to government arguments. Any decision by U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams in Miami about whether to move the case could also influence a separate lawsuit brought by civil rights advocates who say that detainees at "Alligator Alcatraz" have been denied access to attorneys and immigration courts. The federal and state government defendants in the civil rights case also argue that the lawsuit was filed in the wrong venue. At the request of a judge, the civil rights groups on Tuesday filed a revised class-action complaint arguing that the detainees' constitutional rights were being violated. Environmental groups filed their lawsuit against federal and state officials in Florida's southern district last month, asking that the project being built on an airstrip in the heart of the Florida Everglades be halted because the process didn't follow state and federal environmental laws. Besides Wednesday's hearing over venue, a second hearing has been scheduled for next week on the environmental groups' request for a temporary injunction. The first of hundreds of detainees arrived a few days after the lawsuit was filed, and the facility has the capacity to hold 3,000 people. The detention center was opened by Florida officials, but critics said it's unclear whether federal immigration officials or state officials are calling the shots. Deportation flights from "Alligator Alcatraz" started last week. Williams on Monday ordered that any agreements be produced in court between the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Florida Department of Emergency Management, a move that could shed some light on the relationship between federal and state agencies in running the facility. Critics have condemned the facility as a cruel and inhumane, as well as a threat to the ecologically sensitive wetlands, while Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and other Republican state officials have defended it as part of the state's aggressive push to support President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store