Antony Benson charged with violent rampage on Princes Hwy, Engadine
CCTV footage of a horrific alleged stabbing rampage on a busy highway in Sydney's south is being gathered by police prosecutors, a court has been told.
Police allege Antony Benson stabbed his partner with a box cutter inside his car before crashing into another car on the Princes Hwy at Engadine last August.
The 58-year-old had allegedly also turned the weapon on three others and himself by the time emergency services had arrived.
Drivers on the busy Sydney highway came to a standstill as the incident unfolded, with it alleged bystanders who witnessed the crash tried to intervene as Mr Benson stabbed his 48-year-old partner.
A 67-year-old man sustained a 20cm laceration to his abdomen when he ran to the woman's aid and a police officer was seriously injured after Mr Benson allegedly attempted to flee on foot. Both alleged victims required stitches.
Mr Benson has also been charged with assaulting Cronulla Sharks chairman Steve Mace, who was allegedly in a nearby car and attempted to assist the 48-year-old woman.
Police claim Mr Benson inflicted wounds on himself before he was tasered, taken into custody and rushed to hospital in a critical condition.
The 20-year-old driver of the Lancer was also taken to hospital after her wrist was broken in the crash, which police allege was caused by Mr Benson driving dangerously.
Mr Benson was arrested at the scene and charged with eight offences related to the alleged highway rampage.
He was also later charged breaching an apprehended violence order that was in place at the time of the incident.
Mr Benson did not appear in the Downing Centre Local Court on Tuesday, where his matter was briefly mentioned.
Crown prosecutor Lucia Cohen said there was a 'strong crown case' involving 'extremely serious' offences relating to five separate complainants.
'The brief is exceptional and there is a large amount of CCTV footage still to be received,' she said.
The matter was adjourned until June 3, by which date Mr Benson will have spent nine months in custody on remand.
He has not yet entered any pleas to the charges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
4 hours ago
- News.com.au
Rugby league player Tyson Alexander Ellul appeals conviction for raping woman on car bonnet in Kingaroy, Qld
A football player who was just 18 at the time he raped an intoxicated woman on a car bonnet has appealed his conviction, arguing a key witness at trial may have in fact been responsible for the assault. Tyson Alexander Ellul, now 23, was last year sentenced to five years in prison, suspended after two years and three months, after a jury found him guilty of rape following a four-day trial in the Kingaroy District Court. But on Friday, his defence team appeared before the Brisbane Supreme Court, challenging the jury's verdict and the way the trial was conducted. The appeal was heard by three justices, who have reserved their decision. The appeal focused largely on the identity of the offender, with Ellul's barrister submitting that the credibility and reliability of a key witness had not been properly scrutinised during the trial. 'There was a real possibility it was in fact (the witness) who was responsible for committing the offence,' the court was told. Despite this central argument, Ellul's legal team also put forward an alternative submission, that if he was in fact the one who committed the act, it may have been consensual, even though the victim had no memory of the event. The victim, who met Ellul while drinking at the Kingaroy Hotel in 2020, was described during the original trial as being too intoxicated to consent. She later woke up in hospital with injuries and no recollection of what had occurred. A major hurdle for the defence was Ellul's own conduct after the incident, which included multiple lies to police during their investigation, something the original sentencing judge described as 'strong' evidence against him. In court on Friday, his barrister acknowledged the damage these lies caused to his case but argued that the jury directions around Ellul's false statements may have unfairly influenced their deliberations. At trial, the court was told Ellul led the heavily intoxicated woman to a secluded area near a service station, placed her on the bonnet of a car and anally raped her, causing tearing and bleeding. Medical evidence, including a doctor's report, supported this. During sentencing, Judge Smith described the offence as predatory, stating Ellul preyed on the woman's vulnerability and only stopped when a passer-by interrupted the assault. 'You formed a plan to have sex with her regardless of her consent. You took her to the car in King Street, put her on the bonnet, pulled down her jeans, and anally penetrated her with your penis,' Judge Smith said. DNA evidence also linked Ellul to the crime, with his genetic material found on the victim's underwear and jeans. A date for the decision has not been set.
ABC News
8 hours ago
- ABC News
Erin Patterson's week on the stand in her mushroom murder trial
For weeks, the trial of Erin Patterson has moved carefully through vast expanses of at-times highly technical evidence. It's included contested data from mobile phone towers, reports of digital analysis carried out on seized electronic devices and tables tracking the movement of SIM cards between phones. It's even included a run-through from a fungi expert on how to distinguish the deadly Amanita phalloides (or death cap) mushroom variety from its more benign relatives. But it was in the sixth week of the Supreme Court trial that a packed courtroom in Morwell heard hours of evidence directly from the person who organised the 2023 beef Wellington meal that led to three deaths. The trial of Erin Patterson, who stands accused of using a poisoned meal to murder three relatives, continues. Look back at how Friday's hearing unfolded in our live blog. To stay up to date with this story, subscribe to ABC News. In her evidence, Erin Patterson told the jury she never intended to harm the four relatives she invited to Saturday lunch at her Leongatha home. She said she now believed foraged mushrooms had accidentally made their way into the meal in a mix-up that had seen them blended with other dried mushrooms purchased from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's south-east. The 50-year-old, who has pleaded not guilty to three charges of murder and one of attempted murder, admitted several times she had used lies and exaggeration in the past. But she maintained she was telling the truth when she rejected one of the prosecution's central claims: that her lie to her lunch guests about possibly requiring cancer treatment in the future was part of a carefully laid plot to murder them. "I suggest that you never thought you would have to account for this lie of having cancer, because you thought that the lunch guests would die and your lie would never be found out," Dr Rogers said to Ms Patterson. "That's not true," she replied. She also said while she may have indicated cancer treatment lay ahead, she never told them a diagnosis had been made. This week, Ms Patterson gave deeply personal evidence as she discussed the context in which the lunch had taken place. The evidence went as far back as her childhood, when Ms Patterson told the court her mother would weigh her "weekly". She said she had grown up with significant body image issues, engaged in binge eating and by the time of the lunch, she was planning to undergo gastric-band surgery as a way to control her weight. Ms Patterson said she was too embarrassed to tell her relatives about this, so instead she fed her parents-in-law Gail and Don Patterson a lie. The court heard Ms Patterson told them in several messages sent before the lunch that she was undergoing a biopsy and MRI for a lump on her elbow. "I remember thinking I didn't want to tell anybody what I was going to have done, I was really embarrassed about it, so I thought perhaps letting them believe I had some serious issue that needed treatment might mean they would be able to help me with the logistics around the kids and I wouldn't have to tell them the real reason," Ms Patterson said. It was a lie she expanded on at the lunch, although Ms Patterson told the court while she had indicated she may need ovarian cancer treatment, she did not believe she had told them a diagnosis was made. Her history with illnesses and the medical system was also explored in evidence. The court heard several traumatic experiences with her children's health and hospital staff had built a sense of distrust. "I just lost so much faith in the medical system that I decided that, anything to do with my health and the children's health, I'm going to have to solve that problem myself," she said. Earlier in the trial, the court heard from medical staff who said Ms Patterson needed to be persuaded to bring her children (who had eaten leftover meat from the meal) in to be tested for death cap mushroom poisoning. Ms Patterson said any perceived reluctance wasn't because she did not want her children to be treated, but because she was wary of the "drastic step" of hospital admission. "I wanted to understand that that was really necessary, because of their anxieties about being in hospital," Ms Patterson said. But she said ultimately, she understood "the logic" of that course of action. Ms Patterson also gave detailed evidence on the family dynamics at the time of the lunch. Tensions over financial matters had flared between her and her estranged husband in late 2022 and she had feared it was damaging her relationship with the Patterson family. In a bid to bring them closer, Ms Patterson had organised a lunch in June, 2023, with Gail and Don Patterson and the children, where she served up shepherd's pie. "The kids and I had such a good time seeing nanna and papa," she said. Ms Patterson said the positive engagement with her in-laws had inspired her to organise another lunch, this time with Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson and her husband Ian. "Her and Ian have been really good to me over the years, I wanted to have some more connection with them," she said. It was against this backdrop that Ms Patterson said she approached Gail and Heather after a church service in Korumburra one Sunday. "Would you like to come to lunch at my house?" Erin said she asked them. "They said 'we'd love to'." Ms Patterson told the court she decided a "special" dish was required for the event, and so decided to attempt beef Wellington for the first time. A few "deviations" were made to the RecipeTin Eats cookbook method, she said. Due to meat availability, Ms Patterson said she made individual pastry parcels rather than the one log called for in the recipe. A prosciutto layer was dropped because Don Patterson didn't eat pork, the mustard was left out and a crepe layer was swapped for the simpler option of filo pastry. Crucially, Ms Patterson told the court she believed the deadly addition to the meal likely came during the preparation of the mushroom paste, or duxelle, that coats the meat. She said on the morning of the lunch, she had cooked down Woolworths-bought mushrooms when she tasted the duxelle. "It seemed a little bland, to me," she said. "So I decided to put in the dried mushrooms that I'd bought from the grocer that I still had in the pantry. "So I put them in, like a little … strainer with a handle … and just roughly poured water over them to get the crispness out of them. "I chopped them up and I, like, sprinkled them over the duxelle and pushed them in with an egg flip." She said at the time, she had believed the dried mushrooms were the ones she'd bought from an Asian grocer in Melbourne's south-east. "Now I think that there was a possibility that there were foraged ones in there as well," she said, closing her eyes and blinking as her voice cracked. After guests arrived, Ms Patterson said the individual Wellingtons were plated up and put on the table with no great thought as to who ended up with which portion. "I said, you know, 'grab a plate guys, I'm just going to finish off the gravy.' I turned around," she said. Ms Patterson told the court she only had part of her meal and shortly after the guests had left, she binged on two-thirds of an orange cake her mother-in-law had brought, before vomiting it all up. The events after the guests left the dining table have been raked over in hours of court evidence and detailed in briefs running into tens of thousands of pages. On Friday, lead prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC questioned the "love" Ms Patterson has maintained she held for her in-laws: Rogers: You agree that you told police in your record of interview that you loved Don and Gail? Patterson: Correct. Rogers: Surely if you had loved them .. You would have immediately notified the medical authorities that there was a possibility that the foraged mushrooms had ended up in the meal. Patterson: Well I didn't. I had been told that … people were getting treatment for possible death cap mushroom poisoning. So that was already happening. The prosecution noted that these questions related to Ms Patterson's mindset on the Tuesday after the lunch, days before anyone had died. But, Dr Rogers told the court, Erin didn't tell "a single person" that foraged mushrooms may have been in the meal. "Correct," Ms Patterson replied. Further, Dr Rogers put to Ms Patterson that she had "two faces" when it came to her relationship with her in-laws. A public face of loving them, and a private face shared with her Facebook friends, where she shared anger and mocked her relatives' religious views. Ms Patterson denied it, telling the court she had "a good relationship with Don and Gail" and sobbed as she recounted how she had invited Heather Wilkinson to the lunch to thank her for the kindness she had shown her over the years. This week in court the prosecution also alleged that in the lead-up to the lunch, Ms Patterson had seen iNaturalist listings of death cap mushrooms at nearby Loch and Outtrim, and knowingly foraged the poisonous fungi. They alleged that photos taken from devices seized at her home showed she had been weighing dehydrated death cap mushrooms in the lead-up to the lunch, to determine what the lethal dosage would be for her guests. The prosecution said that her elaborate cancer lie was carefully constructed to create a pretence for a lunch without her children, and that had her estranged husband Simon attended the lunch, she would have knowingly fed him a sixth beef Wellington laced with death cap mushrooms. And they alleged her decision to dump the dehydrator and lie to police about it was done because she knew admitting to the dehydrator would have revealed her murderous plot. Ms Patterson denies it all. And the trial's not over yet. This week, Justice Christopher Beale told jurors the hearings could stretch towards the end of June, before they would be asked to deliberate and return a verdict. How long the jury will need to weigh the mountain of evidence and arrive at a verdict is impossible to know. "None of you can tell me how long you will be in deliberations … how long is a piece of string?" Justice Beale said.
SBS Australia
17 hours ago
- SBS Australia
Not guilty verdict leaves Hillcrest families devastated
Not guilty verdict leaves Hillcrest families devastated | SBS News Published 6 June 2025, 8:24 am The operator of a jumping castle involved in a fatal incident in Tasmania has been found not guilty in its criminal case. Six children died when a gust of wind tossed the inflatable object into the air and across the school in a 2021 event. The court decision has left families devastated, with one mother yelling inside the court as the verdict was handed down.
