'Gorgeous, beautiful site': Opposition mounts against Westmere helipad plan
Several submitters at the resource consent hearing before three independent planning commissioners have supported the helipad, including Andrew Haslett, who said every concern had been addressed, every environmental safeguard had been put in place, and the applicants had gone above and beyond to mitigate every potential impact.
One nearby neighbour, Matthew Lambert, said it had been a transparent process, the applicants had addressed community concerns and modified their plans, which complied with the Auckland Unitary Plan. Elena Keith at the hearing for the proposed helipad.
Elena Keith, the secretary of Quiet Sky Waitematā, today said Williams and Mowbray's property 'is a gorgeous, beautiful site' that the group wants to preserve.
She said Quiet Sky Waitematā - a group set up to oppose private helicopters in residential Auckland - was still quite young, with 17 members, and 202 donors had provided funds to challenge the proposed helipad.
The group's lawyer, Gill Chappell, said Quiet Sky was a well-organised community group that was deeply and genuinely concerned about the broad effects of helicopter activity on the environment.
She said the effects on the birds, trees, and amenity were more than minor, and the application must be declined.
Dr Matthew Baber, an ecologist providing expert evidence for Quiet Sky, believed there would be at least moderate effects on the coastal birds foraging or resting during the two hours on either side of low tide.
He also believed there would be a low likelihood but high impact of potential for bird strike from helicopter disturbance to coastal birds foraging during that low-tide window.
Waitematā Local Board member Alex Bonham said the board wanted helicopter movements in urban residential areas to be prohibited in the Auckland Unitary Plan.
She said thousands of people in Westmere and Herne Bay had opposed the application.
'Westmere is a quiet residential area with coastal walks and activities. Residents do not want to hear helicopters coming and going every week, perhaps multiple times.
'Residents of Herne Bay who already endured helicopter noise had been campaigning hard on this issue for many years because of the stress and distress experienced by those living in the proximity of already consented helipads.
'We share the concerns that if this were to be granted, it would set a precedent that might lead to more and more helipads across Auckland's coastline, impacting people's health and well being and native fauna. This is not the Auckland we want to live in,' Bonham said. Chair of Urban Auckland, Julie Stout. Photo / Nick Reed
Urban Auckland, a group of architects and other professionals dedicated to a better built and natural environment for the past 25 years, is also opposed to the application.
In a submission prepared for the hearing, chair Julie Stout said helipads in residential areas were not considered when the Auckland Unitary Plan was drawn up, and it was a developing trend that needed to be taken seriously.
She said Waiheke Island provided a lesson where 64 helipads have been granted in relatively low-density residential areas, causing a cumulative effect of prolonged noise, destroying the quiet for everyone else.
'We accept that some public services, like police and ambulance, need to use helicopters, but that is for the public good. Private use of helicopters is not in the public interest, and their acoustic and physical impact extends far beyond their immediate location.
'The Waitematā Harbour and its edges and beaches are important spaces for both birdlife and public amenity. Quiet enjoyment of these is intrinsic to the amenity for all. Sydney and Melbourne do not allow private landing pads in residential areas,' said Stout.
Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
01-07-2025
- 1News
'Just monstrous': Giant Buddha statue causes a stir with rural community
A 16-metre Buddha statue is set to disrupt the peace and tranquillity of a small rural community in Waiwera Valley. Residents of the area, about 50km north of central Auckland, said they weren't consulted about the sculpture – and because the council considered it art, no resource consent was needed. While the statue is currently still under construction, it will soon tower over the Waiwera Valley hilltop, much to the dismay of some neighbouring residents. 'The size is just... that's monstrous for a valley like this,' said Waiwera Valley Action Group spokesperson David Pennington. The structure is a representation of Buddhist master Guru Rinpoche, and belongs to Jeta's Grove Charitable Trust. ADVERTISEMENT 1News requested an interview with the group but did not hear back. Pennington argued the statue is going to be 'very visible from all the properties around here'. 'It's going to be bright gold which just doesn't make sense in a rural environment.' A 16-metre-tall Buddha statue is under construction in Waiwera Valley, 50km north of central Auckland. (Source: Supplied) Residents only learned of the building plans in recent months. After raising concerns with the council, they were told the piece had been accepted as artwork under the Auckland Unitary Plan. 'It's a faithful replication of, apparently, an image of Guru Rinpoche. To my mind, that describes a religious instalment. It doesn't describe art,' Pennington said. In a statement, the council said artwork is permitted in rural zones without a consent as long as it complies with other controls, which the statue does. ADVERTISEMENT However, if the structure is used as a site of worship, a resource consent would be required. The council also said it is currently investigating reports of gatherings at the site, after footage of what appeared to be a Buddhist ceremony was captured by a resident. A possible gathering at the construction site of a Buddhist statue in Waiwera Valley. (Source: Supplied) Pennington said concerns around possible gatherings was also raised with the council. 'Their response was 'they are allowed six such events per year'," he said. The Waiwera Valley Action Group urged the council to stop the build and request a public hearing. 'There's a hole in the council planning bylaws which allows people within a rural production area to call something art and therefore be allowed to proceed with it without notification to the public and to my mind, that's just wrong.'
NZ Herald
29-06-2025
- NZ Herald
Golden Buddhist statue set to ‘tower above' horrified rural community because council says it's art
The answer - to their amazement and horror - was that the statue of Buddhist master Guru Rinpoche had been submitted as a work of art and been accepted by Auckland Council as no resource consent was needed. And so, with no resource consent process, there was no obligation to tell neighbours and, it turns out, no way to successfully challenge council's decision. Waiwera Valley, north of Auckland, is a sleepy rural haven untouched by city life yet less than an hour's drive in to the central city. For some who live there, the peace and quiet of country life is a major drawcard they now fear is threatened. Neighbours have already witnessed a gathering and ceremony at the foot of the statue site, with chanting, cymbals and drums captured on video. Resident David Pennington described the statue as a 'monstrosity' and said neighbours had formed the Waiwera Valley Action Group to fight against it. 'It's horrifying, it's absolutely horrifying. The thought that anybody could imagine putting a 16.5m golden Buddhist statue in the middle of a rural valley would be an acceptable thing to do without talking to any of the neighbors … is quite frankly appalling.' The statue of Guru Rinpoche is being built in the centre of sleepy Waiwera Valley, north of Auckland. He said the nature of the 'picturesque rural' valley was threatened, not only by the towering structure on a prominent hill but the potential for it to attract large numbers of people wanting to see it. Pennington said homeowners feel vulnerable and sidelined by a council process that has allowed the construction of the plinth and statue without any input from neighbours because those building it had described it as art. The Auckland Unitary Plan - Auckland Council's manual for the development and use of the city's land - says art in rural areas does not need to go through a resource consent process. The problem is there is no definition of what art is Waiwera Valley resident David Pennington That means a structure can simply be built without wider consultation if it is accepted as 'art' by council. 'The problem is there is no definition of what art is,' Pennington said. 'Calling something art which is 16-and-a-half metres tall and putting it prominently on a hill where it's going to dominate the entire area around - that's a planning loophole. 'We can't get council to change their mind. Their response is, because it's artwork and it falls within the Auckland unitary plan, then they are obliged to approve it.' Waiwera Valley resident Klaudia Batten - a 27-year local - said the process followed for the statue could be repeated in any rural neighbourhood across the city. 'Anything can be erected and called artwork, and there's just no guidelines to protect yourself from it. It wasn't open to public discussion. It was done behind closed doors.' The Waiwera Valley construction site where a 16.5m Buddhist statue and plinth is being erected. Photo / David Fisher It was Batten who uncovered the existence of the statue plan after rumours started flying around local Facebook pages. Her inquiry with council quickly put fact to rumour as she discovered copies of the application for a Certificate of Compliance and architecturally-drawn plans for the proposed statue. On seeing the plans, Batten said she was 'absolutely horrified … because it's clearly not artwork'. 'I would define artwork as something you see on the Gibbs farm, you know, something abstract, but this is clearly a religious deity that's very revered in their religion and a clearly-defined building.' The plans revealed the organisation behind the project is Jeta's Grove Charitable Trust, a member of the NZ Buddhist Council. Its founding documents filed with the Charities Register declare it exists to spread and teach the Buddhist faith. They say: 'The activity will take place in the temple/retreat centre in Puhoi and other venues as decided by the trust.' Puhoi village is a few kilometres to the North of Waiwera Valley but is not home to a Buddhist retreat, sparking the Waiwera Valley residents' concerns it may refer to the statue and plinth. A lawyer acting for Jeta's Grove Charitable Trust - named for Jetavana, a famous Buddhist monastery - sent a statement saying: 'Our client advises that the statue is a gift, intended as a symbol of peaceful harmony for all faiths, while promoting the ethics and teaching of the Buddha.' Russell McVeagh special counsel Brigette Shone said - in relation to consultation with neighbours - the trust had done all it was legally required to do. Land Information NZ records show the land in Waiwera Valley on which the statue and plinth sit belong to Nature Trustee Ltd whose sole director and shareholder is Remuera resident Shaoying Li. The Herald has made contact with her through Charles Li, who lives at the same Remuera address, and sent questions by email. There has been no response as yet. Auckland councillor Greg Sayers has taken up the residents' cause, describing the piece as 'towering over all these neighbours' properties'. 'The actual location of it probably isn't appropriate and they will have to endure looking at it. The works are permitted. The community can't stop them. They've built it in the neighbour's face. It's inconsiderate.' He referred to the Gibbs farm, less than 30 minutes' drive away, saying: 'When you go past Gibbs, you can't really see it from the road.' When Sayers raised the religious aspect of it with council planners and questioned if the Buddhist statue was art, they referred him to Michelangelo's religious works which include the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel and the famous sculpture of the biblical David. In a letter to a lawyer hired by the residents' group, Auckland Council head of resource consents James Hassall pointed to a recent Environment Court ruling which said a shipping container with wooden window frames and a door - intended to raise awareness of housing shortages - was art. In the letter, Hassall said the Certficate of Compliance had the effect of a resource consent but specifically did not have the 'usual review provisions' so 'once issued, the council cannot overturn it'. Auckland councillor Greg Sayers, who represents the Rodney ward. Photo / Michael Craig. He said it was not clear what further information was needed to confirm the statue was an artwork 'given there is no definition in the Auckland Unitary Plan and that the applicant is entitled to a broad interpretation of the term'. Hassall said the artwork rule applied in rural zones as long as it met other rules, which the statue did. However, he said if the statue led to the site being used as a place of religious worship then it likely it would need resource consent. If that was the case, he said 'it is also possible that the structure would no longer be considered a permitted artwork'. If it had to be removed, the job of doing so would sit with the consent holder. Hassall said there was an inquiry underway into concerns earthworks around the statue had gone over the allowed area. He said there were also inquiries into 'concerns over gatherings that have taken place on the site during construction'. Massey University's Professor Heather Galbraith - whose expertise includes art criticism and public art - said: 'Religious and ecclesiastic sculpture has been around for millenia.' Galbraith said there was a high degree of subjectivity involved - what might be art for some could 'leave someone else cold'. Artist and associate professor Richard Reddaway, also at Massey University, said the problem appeared to be with council rules allowing art to bypass the consenting process. 'It's been pretty much established that art can be anything. Whether it's art or not is not the point - it's that it's impacting on the community.' David Fisher is based in Northland and has worked as a journalist for more than 30 years, winning multiple journalism awards including being twice named Reporter of the Year and being selected as one of a small number of Wolfson Press Fellows to Wolfson College, Cambridge. He joined the Herald in 2004. Sign up to The Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
02-06-2025
- Scoop
Auckland Council Notifies Plan Change 113 Notable Trees
Press Release – The Tree Council After more than three years of work finding and assessing amazing trees around the region The Tree Council is delighted that Auckland Council has just publicly notified Plan Change 113. This plan change proposes adding 174 new individual trees and 29 new groups of trees to Schedule 10 Notable Trees of the Auckland Unitary Plan. The Tree Council is responsible for nominating 118 of the individual trees and 9 of the groups of trees included in the plan change. We nominated over 260 trees in total. We would like to say a huge THANK YOU to all those members and supporters who suggested the locations of trees for us to assess for nomination. We would never have known about most of these trees if it wasn't for you. Plan Change 113 is open for submissions now. PLEASE take a few minutes to make a submission to say that you support the plan change in its entirety. There are bound to be landowners opposing trees on their properties being scheduled. So it is important that there is support from the public for protecting these trees. You can find the details of PC113 here: We will be reviewing the details of the plan change over the next couple of weeks and deciding whether we have additional trees we want to nominate as part of our submission. Please make a submission by filling in the online submission form at: or emailing your submission to unitaryplan@ The deadline is 23 June 2025. Anne Street Trees Petition The Devonport-Takapuna Local Board recently voted to remove two rare umbrella trees from the road reserve in Anne Street, Devonport at the request of local residents who claim they are causing flooding of the street. The Tree Council has requested that Auckland Council publicly notifies the consent application for the removal so that evidence and submissions can be presented to counter this view. Without public notification there is no opportunity for anyone to have a say or for any decision to be appealed. The more public interest there is in the case, the more likely it is to be publicly notified. Please sign this petition calling for public notification of the consent and share with your networks: These trees are Umbrella Trees (were Schefflera pueckleri now Heptapleurum calyptratum) and there are only three other locations in the Auckland Region in which they are known. They are not a pest species but a rare and valuable living asset. They do not cause flooding. Removing these trees will not prevent Anne Street from flooding. It is a flat, flood prone floodplain who's stormwater drain is prone to backing up when the tide is in. This is the cause of the flooding, not the trees. Arbor Day Planting Event The Tree Council is partnering with EcoMatters Environment Trust and the New Zealand Arboricultural Association (NZ ARB) to provide a tree planting opportunity for members and supporters for Arbor Day on Saturday 7 June 2024. The event will take place from 10am – noon in New Lynn, Auckland and will be followed by a free BBQ. Pre-registration is required for attendees so that we know how many plants & how much equipment & food will be needed. Please click this link to register. You will be given details of the location once you have registered. The site is somewhat challenging so a reasonable standard of fitness is required. You will need to wear closed footwear (gumboots or similar), wet weather gear & gardening gloves are recommended. Many thanks to the Whau Local Board and Auckland Council Parks for supporting the restoration of this public land and providing the funding for the work.
