
What The SEC's Crypto Roundtable Series Mean For Digital Assets
The SEC Crypto Task Force (CTF) is hosting a five-part roundtable series on digital assets, decentralized finance (DeFi), and the evolving role of AI in these industries. While the initiative may appear procedural, it signals a subtle but important shift: the SEC may finally be open to more transparent engagement, rather than relying almost exclusively on enforcement.
For over a decade, U.S. digital asset regulation has been driven primarily through enforcement actions. The SEC has consistently asserted that most tokens fall under its jurisdiction as securities—but has done so mostly through enforcement, not formal rulemaking. This approach has created legal uncertainty, market fragmentation, and increasing frustration among innovators and investors alike.
Meanwhile, other jurisdictions—such as the EU and Hong Kong—have introduced comprehensive regulatory frameworks for crypto. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) and Hong Kong's Virtual Asset Trading Platforms (VASP) regime provide relatively clear rules, even if not everyone agrees with their substance. Against that backdrop, the U.S. has begun to look like a laggard, regulating via subpoenas and no-action letters rather than well-defined rules. The SEC's roundtable series appears to acknowledge that status quo may not be sustainable.
WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 25: The Securities and Exchange Commission headquarters is seen on April 25, ... More 2025 in Washington, DC. SEC held a roundtable with the SEC's Crypto Task Force that was titled 'Know Your Custodian: Key Considerations for Crypto Custody' in which they heard from officials working in Crypto. (Photo by)
Led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, the CTF's mission is to 'help the Commission draw clear regulatory lines, provide realistic paths to registration, craft sensible disclosure frameworks, and deploy enforcement resources judiciously.' So far, the sessions have examined topics including securities classifications for digital assets, broker-dealer registration for crypto platforms, crypto custody, tokenization and DeFi.
The format of the roundtables—public, agenda-driven, and inclusive of industry, academic, and regulatory voices—does represent a marked shift in tone. Historically, the crypto projects have received little practical guidance for novel technologies that don't fit into the traditional securities framework.
That point came into sharp focus during the April 11 session, which asked whether crypto trading platforms—especially decentralized ones—can realistically comply with existing rules without fundamentally altering their structure. If regulation continues to demand conformity to outdated models, industry participants argue it could stifle innovation or drive platforms offshore.
Participants in the CTF Roundtables noted more listening and a willingness from the SEC to engage on operational complexity—something that has been lacking in previous years.
Adding to the urgency is the global regulatory landscape. Clearer frameworks abroad are drawing talent, capital, and innovation away from the U.S., while increasing pressure on domestic regulators to catch up.
Meanwhile, digital assets are becoming more intertwined with AI infrastructure. AI is being used to automate governance, monitor compliance, and power data analysis across decentralized systems. This convergence creates new layers of risk and complexity that the SEC has not yet meaningfully addressed. Adapting rules for blockchain has been challenging enough—adding AI into the mix will demand even more sophistication.
While these roundtables won't themselves resolve the key legal questions facing the crypto industry, they do serve a critical function: they publicly acknowledge the need for regulatory nuance and invite industry feedback on how to craft smarter frameworks. They offer the SEC a platform to hear directly from builders and operators—not just litigants—and allow for more open discussion of the friction between innovation and compliance.
The next roundtable, set for June, will focus on DeFi and the American spirit—a topic that has attracted interest from both DeFi pioneers and traditional finance (TradFi) institutions.
For industry participants, the roundtables offer more than just lip service. They may be the first step toward a regulatory environment that is more predictable, more transparent, and more compatible with the technologies shaping the future of finance.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SEC ups field and court storming fines to $500,000 for each violation
Fans rushed the field at the end of Oklahoma's win over Alabama near the end of the 2024 season. (Photo by) Fines are increasing for field and court stormings in the SEC. The conference's presidents and chancellors voted at the league's spring meetings Thursday to raise the fines for a field storming or court storming to $500,000. Advertisement Before 2025, field and court storming fines were given on an escalating basis. In the penultimate week of the regular season, Oklahoma was fined $100,000 on two separate occasions for its fans running on the field at the end of the Sooners' upset win over Alabama. Fans rushed the field before the game was over and then when the game was officially over to get the two fines. That loss effectively eliminated Alabama from the College Football Playoff. The Tide's exclusion from the 12-team format has led to the topic of future CFP formats dominating the discussion at the spring meetings. $100,000 had been the fine for the first time a school's fans had invaded and $250,000 was the fine for a second infraction. A $500,000 fine was only given for a school's third court or field storming of the season. Though the new penalties are much higher than the previous fines, there's a caveat attached going forward. SEC commissioner Greg Sankey said the league has the ability to not issue a fine if fans come onto the court or field after the visiting team and the game officials has exited. The fines were implemented in an attempt to protect the losing road teams; when a school is fined, the money is paid to the team who was on the other end of the storming.


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Trade talks with China ‘stalled' – as direct negotiations between Trump and Xi needed to make a deal, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent says
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent revealed Thursday that talks between the US and China on a permanent trade deal have 'stalled' since the tariff truce both nations agreed to earlier this month. 'I would say that they are a bit stalled,' Bessent said of discussions with China, during an interview with Fox News 'Special Report' host Bret Baier. 'I believe that we will be having more talks with them in the next few weeks, and I believe we may at some point have a call between the president and party chair [Xi Jinping],' the treasury secretary added. Bessent teased that two trade deals are approaching the finish line, but not with China. FOX News Bessent was adamant that a conversation between Trump and Xi would be necessary before any trade deal is agreed to. 'I think that, given the magnitude of the talks, given the complexity – this is going to require both leaders to weigh in with each other,' the former hedge fund manager said. 'They have a very good relationship, and I am confident that the Chinese will come to the table when President Trump makes his preferences known,' Bessent added. The White House did not immediately respond to The Post's request for comment. The US and China agreed to a 90-day pause in their raging trade war earlier this month after high-level talks in Switzerland, which included Bessent. Under the agreement, the US dropped its 145% tariff rate on most Chinese goods to 30%, while China lowered its rate to 10% from 125%. The agreement included a mechanism for talks toward a permanent deal to continue, according to the White House. Bessent indicated that Trump and Xi will need to have a direct conversation about trade before a deal can be struck. AP While talks with China have slowed, the treasury secretary indicated the Trump administration was close to striking major agreements with several other nations. 'There are a couple of very large deals that are close. A couple of them are more complicated,' Bessent said. 'And as we saw with the president's threat of 50% tariffs last Friday, the EU came to the table very quickly over the weekend – so now we've got the EU in motion also.' The Court of International Trade had ruled Wednesday that Trump exceeded his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by imposing a 10% flat duty rate on dozens of countries around the world, as well as 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico and 20% tariffs on China in response to illegal fentanyl trafficking. A federal appeals court stayed the trade court's order on Thursday as the White House appeals the initial ruling. Bessent said the legal wrangling over tariffs hasn't impacted negotiations. 'We've seen no change in [US trading partner] attitude in the past 48 hours. As a matter of fact, I have a very large Japanese delegation coming to my office first thing tomorrow morning,' the treasury secretary told Baier.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas AD Chris Del Conte explains why he wouldn't move Ohio State game to Sunday
Fox Sports confirmed to Front Office Sports on Tuesday that it had offered to move Ohio State's season-opening game against Texas to Sunday night. ESPN usually has Sunday and Monday games for Labor Day weekend, and it appears Fox wanted a high-profile game to compete--and, obviously, Buckeye fans would love to not be playing at noon again. Of course, we reported on rumors of that last week, but it's good to have confirmation. Now that it's been confirmed and widely reported, no one is scared of offering their thoughts. So, at the SEC meetings in Florida this week, Texas athletic director Chris Del Conte explained his reasoning. 'Why would I want to move the game to Sunday night and have a short week?' Is this reasoning believable? It would mean going from six full prep days for the next game to basically five. But Texas' next opponent is San Jose State. The Spartans are a middle-of-the-road Mountain West team and did go bowling in 2024. Still, they're not really a threat to Texas. (I also assume the church line was mostly in jest, but there's no video of it to be sure.) Advertisement I get it. Football programs like their schedules and consistency. Short weeks are never fun. And it's not like this game will get any more attention on a Sunday night as opposed to a Saturday morning. Neither program needs it more. It's just another example of an SEC school giving up an opportunity to be of service to the fans. This article originally appeared on Buckeyes Wire: Texas AD explains not moving Ohio State game to Sunday