Here's Why Anthropic Refuses to Offer 9-Figure Pay Like Meta
While Meta poaches talent from Apple, OpenAI and Google, AI startup Anthropic is refusing to play the game by matching competing offers.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei explained his reasoning on an episode of the "Big Technology Podcast," released earlier this week. Amodei said that he recently sent a Slack message to all Anthropic staff informing them that the company was not willing to "compromise our compensation principles" or its "principles of fairness" when individual employees receive outside offers.
He said that Meta's efforts to poach staff were a "unifying moment" for the company, citing his decision not to match offers due to potential unfairness for other staff members.
Related: AI Is Dramatically Decreasing Entry-Level Hiring at Big Tech Companies, According to a New Analysis
Amodei also acknowledged on the podcast that fewer Anthropic employees had been captured by Meta's compensation offers when compared to other companies, though "not for lack of trying." Some Anthropic staff "wouldn't even talk" to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, according to Amodei.
Meta is reportedly offering more than $200 million in compensation to one AI researcher on the superintelligence team who worked at Apple. The tech giant did manage to poach Anthropic software engineer Joel Pobar, as of a June 30 memo.
"If Mark Zuckerberg throws a dart at a dartboard and it hits your name, that doesn't mean that you should be paid 10 times more than the guy next to you who's just as skilled, just as talented," Amodei said on the podcast.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei. Photo by Halil Sagirkaya/Anadolu via Getty Images
Anthropic's compensation is tied to a level-based system. Amodei explained on the podcast that when Anthropic staff join the company, they are classified into one of many different levels, which corresponds to their compensation.
"We don't negotiate that level because we think it's unfair," Amodei said. "We want to have a systematic way."
Related: How Much Does It Cost to Develop and Train AI? Here's the Current Price, According to Anthropic's CEO.
Amodei said that Anthropic's mission of safely creating reliable, cutting-edge AI systems inspired many employees to stay, and asserted that Zuckerberg was "trying to buy something that can't be bought," which is alignment with a company's mission.
Zuckerberg, meanwhile, recently outlined his mission with his superintelligence team, a group working on creating AI that surpasses human intelligence. In a blog post on Meta's website, published on Wednesday, Zuckerberg said that Meta's goal was to bring superintelligence to every individual and allow people to reap the creative, economic and personal benefits of the technology.
He contrasted the effort with the intentions of "others in the industry" who want to use AI to automate the workforce first before giving it to individuals. Meta's mission is to empower individuals with AI, Zuckerberg wrote.
Related: Reddit Sues $61.5 Billion AI Startup Anthropic for Allegedly Using the Site for Training Data
Since its start in 2021, Anthropic has raised close to $20 billion from companies like Google and Amazon. According to a Bloomberg report from earlier this week, the startup is nearing a deal to raise funds at a $170 billion valuation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TechCrunch
16 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Anthropic cuts off OpenAI's access to its Claude models
In Brief Anthropic has revoked OpenAI's access to its Claude family of AI models, according to a report in Wired. Sources told Wired that OpenAI was connecting Claude to internal tools that allowed the company to compare Claude's performance to its own models in categories like coding, writing, and safety. TechCrunch has reached out to Anthropic and OpenAI for comment. In a statement to Wired, an Anthropic spokesperson said, 'OpenAI's own technical staff were also using our coding tools ahead of the launch of GPT-5,' which is apparently 'a direct violation of our terms of service.' (Anthropic's commercial terms forbid companies from using Claude to build competing services.) Meanwhile, an OpenAI spokesperson said, 'While we respect Anthropic's decision to cut off our API access, it's disappointing considering our API remains available to them.' Anthropic executives had already shown resistance to providing access to competitors, with Chief Science Officer Jared Kaplan previously justifying the company's decision to cut off Windsurf (a rumored OpenAI acquisition target, subsequently acquired by Cognition) by saying, 'I think it would be odd for us to be selling Claude to OpenAI.'
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump should heed, not hide, the jobs numbers
Here's a life hack for readers who are trying to lose weight and are discouraged by the numbers on the scale: Take a hammer to the thing. If that seems too destructive, donate it to the Salvation Army and, if you must keep a scale in the house, buy a new model that tops out at 150 pounds. The secret behind this hack is psychology. It's hard to eat less than your body wants, which is why people who try to lose weight often fail and feel miserable. But if no working scale is available, you can't fail: Eat as much as you like; the numbers will never climb. Sound crazy? It is. But the president has just used a version of this trick to deal with a sagging American jobs market. For months, commentators have been asking why tariffs aren't weighing on the economy more heavily. Importers — including many manufacturers — have been worried that they will. But the headline jobs and gross domestic product data have looked pretty good. Then came Friday's jobs report. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, a unit of the Labor Department, revised its estimates for May and June payrolls sharply downward, by more than 250,000 jobs, and estimated that the economy added only 73,000 jobs in July, well below analysts' expectations. Virtually all these new jobs came from health care and social services. The numbers contain no sign of the manufacturing boom that President Donald Trump has promised. This is not the sort of jobs report any president wants to see; it's the kind that portends falling approval ratings and party losses at the next election. So Trump took immediate, decisive action: He hopped on Truth Social and announced that he would fire Erika McEntarfer, the commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This move was so boneheaded, William Beach, who served as bureau commissioner during the first Trump administration, called it 'totally groundless' and 'a dangerous precedent' that 'undermines the statistical mission of the Bureau.' A hearty second to that. Trying to intimidate the Bureau of Labor Statistics is the policy equivalent of smashing your bathroom scale. It's banana republic stuff, and it won't work any better in the United States. On the margin, a few voters might be fooled into thinking economic conditions are better than they really are. But the trick can work only so far — as the Biden administration found out when it tried to gaslight voters into believing that everything in the White House was going just great. The people most susceptible to the spin fall into two groups: the president's base, who don't need it, and high-information voters who pay close attention to economic data, many of whom will understand how the numbers have been juked, and most of whom probably already know which side they're voting for next time around. Everyone will be paying closer attention to what's happening in their own experience. Are wages rising? Are their friends and relatives being laid off? Is it easy to find another job? If they're getting the wrong answers to these questions, it really doesn't matter what numbers the bureau is putting out. That is, it doesn't matter politically. Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers matter tremendously in other ways. They feed into a great deal of market activity as well as vital social science, both of which are possible only if the numbers are trustworthy. The statistics are also, of course, one of the president's essential guides to economic policy. This guide is now telling the administration that it is moving in the wrong direction. A wise politician would take heed and course-correct to avoid bumbling deeper into the woods. Instead, Trump wants to shoot the messenger so his supporters won't realize he's led them astray. He might be able to find a new BLS commissioner who will cook the numbers to make them more aesthetically pleasing, though this would not be easy. As economist Scott Winship of the American Enterprise Institute pointed out, a lot of people work on these numbers, 'So absent mass firings at BLS, this solves nothing.' But even if Trump managed to bully the guides into telling him what he wants to hear, what then? Eventually voters will look around and notice the truth: America is losing its way.
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Apple iPhone 17 Pro: Revised Leak Reveals Unprecedented Design Secret
The next iPhones are less than a month away. A recent report that seemed to relate to the iPhone 17 Air has now been updated to indicate that no, it's about the iPhone 17 Pro, after all. But there's something much more interesting hiding in the shadows of the new story. You can read my original story here, but the new update includes something that no iPhone has ever had before: different battery sizes for the iPhone based on where it will be sold. The news came from prolific leaker Majin Bu, who perhaps spoke too soon with their latest leak, which claimed to show the battery for the upcoming slim phone, nicknamed the iPhone 17 Air. They've now had to correct what they said. 'Due to a miscommunication with my source, the information I reported yesterday is incorrect,' Majin Bu has now admitted on X. Instead, they're directing readers to their latest post. In a scorched-earth policy, the original post now links instead to one headlined 'iPhone 17 Pro: Unveiling the New Battery with Steel Case,' which reveals that the information was referring to quite a different phone, the iPhone 17 Pro. The new post does not mention the mistake and indeed the word Air never appears in the story. Some of the new story is similar to the original except there's no longer any reference to the capacity of the new battery. Instead, there's an arguably much more interesting: that the L-shaped battery will come in two different versions. As you will know, U.S. iPhones no longer have physical SIM card trays. Until now, that extra real estate has been filled by a spacer. According to this updated report, for the very first time, Apple will make two different iPhone batteries: one for the U.S. market and a smaller one for international territories (which Majin Bu refers to as the Chinese version, though it's not thought that the eSIM only option for U.S. iPhones is about to be replicated anywhere else. 'The version for the U.S. market is wider, designed without the need to accommodate a physical SIM. This layout maximizes internal space, with a battery extended in width for optimized capacity without compromises,' the new report says. Which means, you've got it, U.S. iPhones could have longer battery life than other countries' models. By how much, we don't know, but every extra bit of battery size is to be welcomed.
