logo
Letters: Unionist hierarchy is at fault for fiasco over Belfast bonfire

Letters: Unionist hierarchy is at fault for fiasco over Belfast bonfire

This showed a crass lack of understanding from someone born in Belfast, when a visit to engage by any of these three parties would not only have failed abjectly, but would also have posed a significant threat to their lives and limbs.
Indeed, I remember a visit by the singer and politician Dana, acting independently and in good faith, to my native Drumcree in an attempt to engage with protesters maintaining a long vigil at the church during one of the many violent parade impasses there in the late 1990s. She was immediately escorted off site by senior Orange officials 'for her own safety' (their words).
The real abdicators of responsibility were DUP leader Gavin Robinson and his deputy leader and Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly (who was in the royal box at Wimbledon last week).
They not only failed to ­engage or visit the site, but portrayed legitimate opposition to it on the grounds of health and safety, ludicrously, as another attack on their culture.
Mervyn Gibson, a senior Orange­Order figure and Presbyterian ­minister, encouraged people to attend the asbestos-­ridden bonfire site and, I quote, 'enjoy themselves'.
The fact that the PSNI did not comply with Belfast City ­Council's democratic ­decision to dismantle the bonfire was not only an abdication of ­responsibility, but one that raises serious concerns about the continuing existence and ­malign influence of unionist paramilitaries, law enforcement and, ultimately, as to who actually runs Northern Ireland.
Tony Fearon, Poyntzpass, Co Down
Hopeless politicians are leaving us in lurch
Madam — It was so depressing to read Richard Curran ('Ireland can't afford to dismiss Trump's 30pc tariff threat', July 13) and Conor Skehan ('We will pay dearly for failing to apply a key test to big decisions', July 13) setting out clearly the awful mess we have created for ourselves.
We seem to suffer from a hopelessly incompetent political class, unable or unwilling to see where we have gone wrong and unwilling to take the radical decisions that are patently necessary to solve our numerous structural faults as a society.
The dogs in the street know what's wrong, but our politicians, of every party, only seem capable of wringing their hands and crying: 'Ochón, ochón, what's to be done?'
I respect Micheál Martin, but the man has never had a radical thought in his head. And the rest of them? They have their ministerial cars and they will make soothing noises from time to time indicating their concern. And I do acknowledge that they are concerned, but it's not enough to talk — they must do something.
When Donogh O'Malley, as minister for education, was making his way into the Dáil chamber many years ago to announce his plan for universal free secondary education, a senior civil servant ran after him imploring him not to do it as the finance was unavailable. If only he were here today.
Anthony Hanrahan, Salruck, Renvyle, Co Galway
We don't care about future generations
Madam — Conor Skehan's outstanding article last week is essential reading for every ­politician in Ireland.
He speaks of the 'common good', which is written in our Constitution, but is being completely ignored by our politicians, who are trying to please everyone. This means no decisions are made and our essential infrastructure projects move at a snail's pace.
I heard a Cork politician on the radio during the week saying the proposed Cork Luas might have its first passengers in 2040. Is this a joke? Planning processes cannot ride roughshod over objectors, but common sense must win out.
It's time for our politicians to grow a spine, make decisions for the 'common good' and think of the generations to come.
Maurice Curtin, Garryvoe, Co Cork
'Everyman' Tánaiste paying us lip service
Madam — I found myself laughing heartily on reading Mary Regan's interview with Tánaiste Simon Harris ('I do the supermarket shop — I get it. But I can't say I'm part of the squeezed middle', July 13).
He appears to be at pains to say that he is one of us. The big problem for the Tánaiste is that he cannot magic away the cost-of-living crisis with empathetic statements.
John O'Brien, Clonmel, Co Tipperary
Moaning over school costs is nonsense
Madam — It is now more ­expensive than ever to send your child back to school after the holidays, according to a report by the Irish League of Credit Unions.
This surprises me, as all schoolbooks are free for everybody, from primary to secondary. Some of our big retail stores just staged a price war on school uniforms — a full one can be bought for little as €15. Black runners are replacing expensive school shoes.
Some schools still require special crested jumpers, but most now just have a plain jumper of designated colour.
On top of this, a big grant is handed out yearly to cover the cost of getting your child kitted out if you are under a specific income threshold. A number of schools offer free lunches, and some even offer breakfast.
Back in the 1980s, I put four children through education. Because my husband was earning, a grant was out of the question. All books had to be bought and paid for. All jumpers were crested. A standard uniform would cost more than €40. There was no such thing as a free lunch, apart from Deis schools.
We always paid the necessary capitation fee for each child.
Did we complain? No. We prudently saved enough money throughout the summer to get us through. We accepted the struggle so that our children could be educated.
Sometimes I feel that the more handouts that are given, the more is expected. Now is a much better time for children's education compared with times of austerity. We should be grateful that such help is available.
C Dodd, Clonsilla, Dublin 15
Forget Gen Z stare: start valuing people
Madam — Saoirse Hanley's ­article on sitting in a pub and not engaging with those near her, reminds me of a trending topic on the internet at the moment: the 'Gen Z stare' ('Is refusing to engage in small talk the perfect example of boundary-setting – or just a symptom of Gen Z rudeness?', Life, July 13).
The 'Gen Z stare' is described as a long, blank expressionless or disengaged stare in a variety of social situations but particularly by those working in customer-facing situations.
Some experts argue that Gen Z are being misjudged while others contend the 'Gen Z stare' represents something deeper, more meaningful and far more serious than what you see on the surface.
Gen Z, those currently aged between 13 and 28, have a lot going on. They value authenticity, dislike hierarchical structures and many will have a completely different language to those of us who grew up without smartphones and the internet.
We're all aware of rude customer service, but it seems the Gen Z stare is taking this to another level. All the more reason then to value highly the person that looks you in the eye with a smile as they ask how your day has been while they pour your pint, fix your flat white or dispense your prescription.
Tom McElligott, Tournageehy, Co Kerry
MetroLink chief's salary an eye-opener
Madam — Having been born in England to Irish parents, I always remember my father's reaction to things that would be unlikely to come to pass. 'When's that going to happen, Dad?' we would ask. The answer: 'When Nelson gets his arm back.'
This came to mind as I read Niamh Horan's interview with MetroLink's Sean Sweeney ('If my minister doesn't trust me, I would need to go', July 6).
I was astounded to learn that there is a chief executive of a project where a single sod has yet to be turned, and on a salary of €550,000. Not bad for a project that will probably never get the go-ahead, never mind reach completion.
Mike Burke, Sixmilebridge, Co Clare
Kilkenny arrogance cost them semi-final
Madam — Eamon Sweeney writes that Kilkenny, their supporters and the viewers at home were blackguarded because of a mix-up on the scoreboard during their All-Ireland semi-final against Tipperary.
Granted, the players look on the scoreboard as a way to check the score but, as Sweeney himself said, on five occasions Kilkenny turned down point-scoring opportunities to try for a goal instead. If they had gone for points, and scored, they would have won the game.
Kilkenny's arrogance lost them the game. Someone made a mistake — get over it.
Pat Duffy, Limerick
Our morality compels us to enact Israeli bill
Madam — I read David Quinn's article ('Our foreign ­policy is a baffling mess', July 6) and Philip Hannigan's supporting letter ('Anti-Israel stance has isolated our nation', July 13).
I disagree with Mr Quinn as I believe enacting the Occupied Territories Bill is a moral and ethical thing to do. If, as Mr Hannigan warns, the US may impose special sanctions against Ireland as a result, then that tells us how warped the world's moral compass has become.
We in Ireland can't do much, but we can enact this bill and send a clear message to Israel and the US that we abhor their treatment of the Palestinians.
There most likely will be negative consequences for us, but that doesn't mean we should stay silent and do nothing.
At least I am allowed to ­disagree with you, Mr Quinn and Mr Hannigan, and not have negative consequences for ­myself. I suspect if I was ­writing to a paper in the US or maybe even in Britain, I would be accused of being antisemitic.
Mairéad Holsgrove, Terenure, Dublin 6W
Orphans dined on a rare 'royal' sturgeon
Madam — While reading about the sturgeon ­recently caught off Kerry ('Caviar-­producing sturgeon 'extinct in Irish waters' found off Valentia Island', July 13) I was reminded that one of my father's fishing trawlers had also caught one in relatively recent times — off Hook Head back in 1962.
My father, John Baldwin, forewent the value of the rare fish (but reimbursed his crewmen for loss of earnings) when he presented the rare 'royal' sturgeon to president Éamon de Valera. There was a tradition that the fish would be the property of the nation's leader.
Mr de Valera in turn authorised the passing-on of the fish to the Good Shepherd Convent in ­Waterford city to be used as food for the orphans living there.
Tom Baldwin, Midleton, Co Cork
Cass Review's hard lessons are ignored
Madam — I was struck by the letter criticising the Cass Review ('Cass Review shown to have deep flaws', July 13).
The Cass Review is not a political document. It is a comprehensive and sobering analysis of how experimental treatments, including puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, ­became normalised for ­distressed ­children without robust ­evidence of long-term benefit.
We are now seeing thousands of young people across multiple countries coming forward to say they were harmed by ­medical interventions they were too young to understand and too vulnerable to ­question.
The ­pattern is increasingly clear: poor evidence, weak oversight and ideological capture.
And now, in true Irish ­tradition, we are being told to ignore the warning signs yet again. Because why learn from the ­mistakes of other ­countries when we can repeat them ­ourselves with even greater ­enthusiasm? It worked so well with symphysiotomies, didn't it, when women were maimed for decades while the rest of the world moved on.
Perhaps in 30 years we'll be holding state inquiries, lighting candles and wondering how on earth it all happened. Again.
Sarah Holmes, Newcastle, Co Wicklow
Summer is only a rumour up north
Madam — Naoise Dolan may loathe the sun in Dublin, but some of us up north wouldn't mind the chance to loathe it more often ('No, I am not enjoying 'the lovely weather' — but I do like a whinge', July 13).
Here in Armagh, summer is a rumour. We get about three days of it — and two are usually damp. SPF remains mostly theoretical. And as for tourists blocking pavements, we're just pleased someone's found us.
While I admire Ms Dolan's defence of Irish whingeing, I must gently point out that ­pessimistic small talk isn't uniquely Dublin's. In the North, we've elevated it to an art form — we just do it while watching the rain fall sideways.
So let Dublin stew in its sunshine. Up here, we measure summer not in degrees but in glimpses — a shaft of light on a gable wall, the brief scent of cut grass before the drizzle returns. We don't need the sun to be grateful. We just need it to show up now and then, unannounced, like a cousin from Belfast.
Enda Cullen, Tullysaran, Co Armagh
Dublin's postal woes given scant regard
Madam — I always enjoy the unique contributions from ­Declan Lynch. However, his focus on 'rural post offices ­closing' ('Post office closures give me double vision', July 13) once again raises the often-ignored impact of 'national' decision-making on Dublin.
In addition to the closure of too many post offices in rural Ireland, every post office in ­Dublin 4 closed down in recent years with not a whimper from any media, particularly the so-called public service broadcaster based in the heart of the area.
Dermot Lacey, Donnybrook, Dublin 4
Little Richard was bought for a song
Madam — Declan Lynch tells us in his radio review ('Magical musical tour led by the great O'Connor') that Little Richard earned but a pittance from the sales of his hit Tutti Frutti. A case of 'good golly less lolly'?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Get set for the presidential election, the dirtiest in Irish politics
Get set for the presidential election, the dirtiest in Irish politics

Irish Daily Mirror

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Get set for the presidential election, the dirtiest in Irish politics

Politics is a dirty game, but it doesn't get grubbier than the presidential election. The race for the Áras has suddenly got more interesting with the news that Michael Flatley is to seek a nomination to run. The Irish-American dancer will make a bid as President, his High Court case over his Castlehyde mansion heard last week. But if the Riverdancer goes for it, he needs to be prepared for the toughest and roughest contest in Irish politics. Campaigns are known controversies, scandals and shock revelations. Fake tweets, mud-slinging, smears and anonymous letters are all part of the game. Front runners - such as Brian Lenihan in 1990 and Sean Gallagher in 2011 - were taken out at the last minute. Celebrity candidates such as Eurovision singer Dana and charity boss Adi Roche were put through the wringer. Dana recalled it as a "a truly terrible time", while Roche described it as "mental torture". Even two-term Michael D Higgins was deemed "too old" and his predecessor Mary McAleese was called a "tribal time bomb". David Norris' bid was one of the biggest surprises, with the senator being pummelled throughout the campaign until he was eventually forced to stand down. Political pundit Ivan Yates described entering the race as "a punishment beating - it's open f***ing season on your life". David Norris pulled out of the presidential race Since the role was created by Eamon De Valera in 1937, it's been controversial. De Valera, who served two terms as president himself, once joked: "I wanted to create a nice quiet job without too much work in my old age." In 1973, there was a poignant battle between Fine Gael's Tom O'Higgins and winner Erskine Childers, whose families were on either side of the Civil War. Erskine's father had been executed by the Free State authorities, while his rival's uncle Kevin O'Higgins was the justice minister who signed the orders. But it wasn't until the 1990s that the contest got really intense. Labour candidate Mary Robinson was believed to have derailed her campaign when she gave, what was then, a controversial interview with Hot Press magazine. She told the publication that she would officiate at a stall selling contraceptives, which led to a newspaper calling the interview "the longest suicide note in history". Mary Robinson Her team initially said she was misquoted, but then the journalist Liam Fay produced an audio recording of it. Then Mary Robinson was subjected to a cutting personal attack from Fianna Fáil politician Padraig Flynn. He accused her of having a "new-found interest in her family" as part of her public persona in pursuit of the presidency. But it was all nothing compared to the scandal that engulfed her rival, Fianna Fáil's Brian Lenihan Snr. He gave an interview with an academic researcher of how he had been involved in controversial attempts to pressurise President Patrick Hillery not to dissolve the Dáil in 1982. But in an RTÉ interview, he said: "I want to say I'm absolutely certain on mature recollection I did not ring President Hillery. And I want to put my reputation on the line in that respect." It led to Fianna Fáil leader Charlie Haughey firing him a week out from the election. It triggered a sympathy vote for Lenihan, who nearly caught up with eventual winner Robinson. She made a veiled reference to Flynn's jibe when she later thanked the women of Ireland who voted for her and, "instead of rocking the cradle, rocked the system". Chernobyl children's charity boss Roche had a particularly bruising time in 1997. Anonymous letters were sent to national media outlets which falsely alleged her brother Donal de Roiste had IRA connections. Some were followed up by phone calls, saying: "Do we want somebody so close to the Provos in the Aras?" The smear campaign against Roche's campaign was vicious and entirely baseless. Dana was taken out with an attack on her family during her second attempt at the presidency in 2011. Accusations were made against her brother, John Brown, in the middle of the campaign. Dana (Image: BBC) She called the claims "vile, malicious and untruthful". He was acquitted of historic child sexual abuse charges in 2014. At one stage, it was suggested her car tyres had been knifed and there was a plot to kill her. She said afterwards: "No, I don't regret anything I've done but that was a truly terrible time." Former senator David Norris withdrew from the presidential campaign following the controversy over letters he wrote to the Israeli authorities seeking clemency for his former partner in relation to a serious crime. It finally led the academic and gay activist to pull out of the race, dramatically quoting Samuel Beckett: "Ever tried. Ever failed. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." Perhaps one of the biggest surprises in a presidential election was the takedown of 2011's front runner Sean Gallagher. Cavan entrepreneur and Dragons Den star Gallagher was set to walk into the Áras when it all went drastically wrong. Standing as an Independent, he was the favourite until he was unable to answer questions about his Fianna Fáil past. At the time, the party's brand was toxic, after the financial crash bailout, recession and persistent accusations of cronyism and corruption. The tweet that downed Gallagher's 2011 presidential campaign was fake news before the term had entered the public's consciousness. Gallagher was set to win. But in the final TV debate, before a live studio audience on RTÉ, a malicious tweet was read out by Pat Kenny, which falsely claimed a man had given him money for a Fianna Fáil fundraiser. Former presidential candidate Sean Gallagher (Image: Colin Keegan, Collins, Dublin) A momentarily panicked Gallagher said he had "no recollection" of "an envelope". To many people, that response was an unfortunate reminder of previous Fianna Fail scandals. His campaign could not recover and he ultimately lost to Michael D Higgins. However, Gallagher later received substantial damages and an apology from RTÉ over the false allegations. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week

Thousands of people line streets for Belfast Pride
Thousands of people line streets for Belfast Pride

RTÉ News​

time3 days ago

  • RTÉ News​

Thousands of people line streets for Belfast Pride

Thousands of people have taken part in Belfast's annual Pride parade while thousands more lined the route as the march made its way through the city centre. The theme this year was 'Not Going Back' which organisers said reflected their belief that rights already achieved were coming under pressure. Stormont's four main executive parties, Sinn Féin, the DUP, Alliance and the UUP had been told that they were not welcome at the parade. That is because they voted to approve an indefinite ban on puberty blockers for under 18s in Northern Ireland last December. Stormont Agriculture Minister Andrew Muir who is a member of the Alliance Party took part in a personal capacity along with a church group. The parade started at Custom House Square at 1pm and made its way through the city centre before finishing at Victoria Street. Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill said she was disappointed that executive parties had been asked not to attend. She posted about Pride on social media this morning saying she wished those attending well and that she was "committed to building a future where everyone in our LGBTQIA+ is seen, valued and treated equally". A number of organisations said they would not be attending the event in an official capacity. They include the Northern Ireland Ambulance Service and the PSNI.

Don't expect votes for 16-year-olds to change the world. It's the 25-35s who are the rebels
Don't expect votes for 16-year-olds to change the world. It's the 25-35s who are the rebels

Irish Times

time5 days ago

  • Irish Times

Don't expect votes for 16-year-olds to change the world. It's the 25-35s who are the rebels

The UK government has confirmed it will deliver its manifesto pledge to lower the voting age to 16 before the next general election, due in 2029. It intends this to apply to all types of elections across the UK, including Assembly and council contests in Northern Ireland . Naturally, the first question this has raised is how it will affect the balance between unionism and nationalism. The presumption is that nationalism will benefit due to the younger age profile of the Catholic population. This explains a sharp orange-green split on the issue: in an opinion poll last year, 70 per cent of nationalists supported votes at 16 compared with 6 per cent of unionists. The consensus among experts is that while nationalism will gain, the electoral impact will be negligible, amounting to less than a 1 per cent advantage. That does imperil two marginal DUP Westminster seats, but it looks trivial in terms of Assembly and council elections, which are held under proportional representation in Northern Ireland, rather than Westminster's first-past-the-post system. READ MORE Rather than fretting over tribal headcounts, perhaps unionists should be more concerned about the remarkable incuriosity towards Britain this story reveals. Scotland has had votes at 16 since its 2014 independence referendum, extended shortly afterwards to council and Scottish parliament elections. Wales reduced the voting age to 16 for assembly elections in 2021 and council elections the following year. These changes have generated a wealth of evidence, research and debate, with specific relevance to devolution, yet Northern Ireland appears completely oblivious to it. Devolution was meant to foster engagement between the constituent parts of the UK. Votes at 16 is a striking illustration of how the regions have instead become wrapped up in their own little worlds. [ Should 16-year-olds have the right to vote? A political scientist and a youth leader debate Opens in new window ] There ought to be particular fascination with the Scottish independence referendum, the first time 16- and 17-year-olds could vote in the UK. Contrary to almost everyone's expectations, they backed the union by a similar percentage to the electorate overall. The outliers were people aged 25 to 35, who exhibited by far the strongest backing for independence. Had unionists and nationalists in Northern Ireland paid this the slightest notice, their hopes and fears over lowering the voting age might not be so pronounced. The clearest finding from research on Scotland, Wales and other countries with voting at 16 is that it boosts long-term participation in elections. A person enfranchised at that age is more likely to continue voting as they get older than would otherwise have been the case. The second-clearest finding is that this makes no long-term difference to how they vote or their interest in politics. As they get older, their voting patterns and political activity are exactly as would always have been expected given their socio-economic background. The rebelliousness of 25- to 35-year-olds in the Scottish independence referendum was repeated across the UK in the 2019 general election. Photograph: Richard Baker/Because few places had voting at 16 until a decade ago, there is only evidence for its long-term effects up to the age of about 30. Some of that evidence suggests the effect fades with time. Nevertheless, it raises total participation and this has a simple explanation: 16- and 17-year-olds are generally in the care of adults who will assist and cajole them into the habit of voting. By contrast, the few years of flux from 18 onwards are the worst time to acquire civic duties. Merely maintaining a registered address can be a challenge. The importance of family explains why young first-time voters can be surprisingly conservative. They are influenced by their parents, although there is some evidence parents are influenced in turn, especially on issues where teenagers and adults tend to disagree, such as immigration or climate change. The image of a nuclear family discussing politics around the dinner table is a cliche that will infuriate the left, which ironically helps explain why the left is not as popular as it believes. All this points to business as usual in Northern Ireland, where politics is largely seen to be hereditary. The rebelliousness of 25- to 35-year-olds in the Scottish independence referendum was repeated across the UK in the 2019 general election, when that age group backed Labour under Jeremy Corbyn far more than the younger voters he was predicted to win over. It turns out that what radicalises voters is not youth but the struggles of settling down. The implication for Northern Ireland is that relatively affordable housing may be more crucial to the union than appreciated. Voting at 16 has focused attention in Scotland and Wales on better civic education in the classroom. This can cause contention and be a lose-lose situation, with schools accused either of not doing enough or of propagandising. Northern Ireland's divided education system will have to handle this with care. It could look to Scotland and Wales for models and warnings. But first, it will have to remember the other devolved regions exist.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store