logo
New York's Brooklyn-Queens Expressway Is Crumbling

New York's Brooklyn-Queens Expressway Is Crumbling

Yahoo26-02-2025
The Brooklyn-Queens Expressway, a section of I-278 that runs between the two New York boroughs, is falling apart. No part of the so-called highway is particularly good to drive on — it's a parking lot any time before or after about 3 a.m. — but one section in particular is a nightmare: A multi-level cantilevered area that cuts through Brooklyn Heights. It has the worst traffic, the worst drivers, and the worst structural integrity. It's gotten so bad, in fact, that by next year it'll be banned from carrying trucks altogether.
The cantilever system, like all of New York's worst features, was the brainchild of one of the city's most hated individuals: Robert Moses, possibly the only urban planner universally loathed enough to show up as a villain in fiction as well as reality. The layout saves space by stacking alternating directions of the highway atop each other, but exposure to the elements has weakened the structure towards a crisis point — a crisis that no one really knows how to solve. Watch Half As Interesting break it down with some great visuals:
Read more: What's The Point Of Mid-Grade Gasoline?
The decay of the BQE has been common knowledge amongst New York's decision makers for years — a steel-supported overhang that gets coated in road salt annually was never going to last forever — but no one's yet come up with a better way to ferry trucks between Brooklyn and Queens at highway speeds. Of course, those decision makers may forget that "highway speeds" is a standard the BQE already fails to meet, especially through (and approaching) the cantilever section. Having personally baked on that road many times, in full moto gear, I can confirm that the BQE's through speeds may well be lower than the adjacent side streets.
By next year, the BQE will be too structurally unsound to support the semi trucks that are supposed to justify its existence. It already can't meet the speeds that are supposedly so important for it to maintain. Why do we bother keeping it around at all?
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hyundai Tucson N Is Reportedly In The Works With A 300-HP Hybrid Powertrain
Hyundai Tucson N Is Reportedly In The Works With A 300-HP Hybrid Powertrain

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

Hyundai Tucson N Is Reportedly In The Works With A 300-HP Hybrid Powertrain

Hyundai's N Division has shaken up the performance car world since it introduced the spicy Veloster N in 2019, and its future is looking bright. The N Division is responsible for one of the most engaging and exciting EVs we have yet to see in the Ioniq 5 N, and the Ioniq 6 N is the next N model, but news just dropped that the next-generation Tucson may also be touched by the N angels with a 300-horsepower hybrid powertrain. The news that Hyundai's N Division could be planning a proper Tucson N is huge, given that the Tucson is the brand's best selling model by far. The brand's other N models are more niche than a performance compact crossover is, since the Elantra N is only sold as a sedan, and the Ioniq 5 N is an EV. Producing a properly performance-oriented hybrid crossover might just be the division's golden ticket. As a refresher, Hyundai's N Division was spearheaded by Albert Biermann, the former head of BMW's M division who is responsible for the E39 BMW M5, the E46 BMW M3, and the skunkworks BMW 1 Series M. He retired in 2021, but he remains an executive technical advisor to Hyundai's performance division. Read more: How Much Do Car Salespeople Make? The Pay Structure Explained What To Expect From A Tucson N Vice president of Hyundai's N Management Group Joon Park told Auto Express UK that the N Division will not restrict itself to EVs, but will also include a series of lighter hybrid cars including the Tucson N. He said, "We're not limiting ourselves to EVs. We will go further with the ICE-based cars as well; this is not the end of our journey. I cannot tell you exactly – but lighter, more agile, nimble, and exciting. These are the key elements that we are heading to." Park also said that Hyundai will proceed with different hybrid powertrain strategies, one for efficiency, and one for neutral efficiency, and if an N car has a hybrid system, it will be focused more on power. He said, " If we can make a smaller model with a less-weighted battery, then it can be better.' The 300-horsepower Tucson N hybrid may end up receiving a new version of Hyundai's current 1.6-liter I4 hybrid electric powertrain, and if Hyundai's other N models are any indication, it'll be a game changer in the compact crossover space. The yet-to-be-revealed 2027 Hyundai Tucson has been caught in pre-production camouflage, but its design hasn't officially been revealed as of yet. We will keep you posted with any updates we find. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

EPA Says We Don't Really Need 'Low DEF' Limp Mode In Trucks After All
EPA Says We Don't Really Need 'Low DEF' Limp Mode In Trucks After All

Yahoo

time6 days ago

  • Yahoo

EPA Says We Don't Really Need 'Low DEF' Limp Mode In Trucks After All

The EPA has been taking a hatchet to emission regulations, which "don't mean a damn bit of difference to the environment" according to "Home Alone 2" actor, President Donald Trump. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin just announced the latest chop at the Iowa State Fair, demanding the elimination of speed and power reduction limp modes when diesel engines run low on diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) starting with 2027 model year trucks. He also strongly urges manufacturers to update older trucks to eliminate this nagware. Admittedly, it's quite annoying to have your truck nerf itself just because you haven't kept the AdBlue fluid topped off. But the annoyance is the point. DEF mixes with the gases in a diesel engine's exhaust to reduce harmful nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. This helps prevent smog and acid rain, according to the EPA website, unless they've scrubbed this information by the time you read it. Asthma sufferers are particularly vulnerable to breathing difficulties from NOx emissions, but I don't think any of us enjoy breathing dark clouds of smoke from a truck that's rolling coal. Read more: These Are Your Favorite Factory Exhaust Designs Breaking The Law, Breaking The Law These new regulations actually violate the EPA's requirements already on the books for diesel vehicles using DEF. From the EPA's own website, one such requirement is: Tamper Prevention System: The system must be designed to prevent tampering or bypassing DEF usage. However, the EPA's new guidance to eliminate annoying speed limiters and power reductions effectively tampers with the tamper prevention system. Is there anything preventing drivers from simply not using DEF anymore? When I lived in the north, I drove all winter with the TPMS warning light on because I was too cheap to buy tire pressure sensors for my winter wheel and tire set. Similarly, a dashboard warning light for low DEF isn't going to stop anyone from running without it, effectively bypassing DEF usage against EPA regulations. Such a warning would probably fail a state emission test, but it's simple enough to add just enough DEF to shut it off, then not refill until the next inspection. I don't like the idea of a diesel vehicle holding itself ransom until you comply with its demands. However, I do like breathing clean air, not having smog or acid rain, and not suffering from an asthma attack when riding my motorcycle behind a diesel truck. Sadly, I don't think we can trust drivers to do the right thing without some sort of penalty, especially if what we're asking them to do is inconvenient. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

California Is Giving Incentives For Apartments To Install EV Chargers
California Is Giving Incentives For Apartments To Install EV Chargers

Yahoo

time06-08-2025

  • Yahoo

California Is Giving Incentives For Apartments To Install EV Chargers

The ability to recharge an EV at home is an advantage that no vehicle that runs on fossil fuels can match. Yet this advantage remains elusive for many, particularly apartment or condo dwellers. California recognizes this need and has announced a $56.5-million subsidy available to multi-family homes and nearby sites to install EV chargers for residents to use. The Communities in Charge Project, with funding from the California Energy Commission Clean Transportation Program, wants to fill this as yet unanswered need with an emphasis toward disadvantaged and low-income communities. Up to $8,500 is available to site owners for every Level 2 charger they install, and up to $2,000 for Level 1 chargers. Tribal communities are eligible for additional incentives as well. The idea is to put chargers into less well-off communities that might not otherwise receive them. Although cars are more expensive than ever, EVs are shockingly cheap to lease these days, and used examples can be affordable to buy as well. Read more: These Are The Worst Tire Recalls In Recent History Filling An Important Gap This program helps solve one of the biggest gaps in the entire EV infrastructure. Currently, unless you own your home, you will likely not be able to install your own charger. This leaves apartment and condo dwellers at the mercy of public chargers, which, while improving, are still not particularly reliable. With home prices at an all-time high, most of us will probably rent and keep our gas cars longer to avoid public charging hassles. Giving apartment renters or condo owners the ability to charge at home might be just the incentive residents need to swap their gas guzzlers for EVs. Back in the day, the federal government used to plan and fund infrastructure projects. The Interstate Highway System is a great example of what we can accomplish with proper oversight and funding. However, EV infrastructure has been left mainly to private companies, which has resulted in a piecemeal approach. Electrify America was supposed to be the gold standard, except it's not so good after all. Tesla has thrown a lot of money at Superchargers, just for itself at first, but now basically every car company can use them. With federal EV tax incentives going away, it looks like it'll remain up to individual states and businesses to work out charging infrastructure amongst themselves. Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox... Read the original article on Jalopnik.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store