
Farmers in US midwest squeezed by Trump tariffs and climate crisis
And still, the past two years have been immensely challenging amid the twin threats of the climate crisis and the Trump administration.
Last year, regions of the eastern corn belt saw just 20% of crops harvested due to a drought that brought little precipitation between June and October. It was part of a climatic cycle that involved drought, heat and wildfires that cost crop producers $11bn nationally.
'Last year, we got a good crop started, and then it just quit raining. Our yields were definitely reduced by at least 25-30%,' says Harbage.
This year, it's been almost the complete opposite.
Excess rainfall has fueled severe disease and pest pressure on the several thousand acres of soybeans and corn he planted in the spring.
'There were three-day windows, it seemed like. It would just start to get dried out and it would rain,' he says.
'We finished up [planting] at the beginning of June. We like to be finished by 15 May. Anything that's planted later means that it was probably planted in marginal conditions since we were rushing to get it in, and secondly, it doesn't have near enough time to mature before harvest.'
With the 2025 harvest of corn and soybeans approaching – America's biggest two crops and the linchpins of agriculture – crop growers are facing down the gauntlet. Climatic swings, rocketing operating costs and low international demand, caused, in large part, by government policy in the shape of tariffs, has created the perfect storm.
'Farming is not for the worrisome,' says Harbage. 'We always kid that we are crisis managers.'
Suicide rates among farmers are 3.5 times the national level.
In 2023-24, China bought 24.9m metric tons of soybeans worth $13.2bn, largely used to feed its 427-million-strong pig herd. At under 6m metric tons, US farmers' second biggest international soybean market, Mexico, lags far behind.
Since 2017, when tariffs were first introduced by President Trump, crop farmers have been struggling with the decline of China as the leading market for soybeans and an important market for corn exports.
Last month, reports emerged that exports of soybeans – America's largest grain export by value – had hit a 20-year low.
'Tariffs are probably something that will help in the long run, for the whole country; in the short run it's terrible for farmers,' says Harbage.
'We're really taking it on the chin now because if we can't export, our prices are low. And if we can't export and we have a terrible crop then it's a one-two punch. I see what the government wants to do, but it's hurting me in the near term.'
Farmers and rural Americans are keen to highlight that their political and voting preferences are rarely fueled by a single issue or event such as tariffs. Many continue to back Trump, despite the obvious financial challenges the president's policies are fomenting.
Trump has been largely silent on addressing the pain his tariffs have caused farmers and ranchers, despite rural voters being a cornerstone of his political base. On 10 August, he posted to Truth Social a demand that China quadruple its purchases of American soybeans. The president claimed that China was 'worried' about having a soybean shortage, although China has vowed to increase its domestic soybean production yield by 38% by 2034.
What's more, some market analysts say that Trump's post didn't make the rounds on Chinese social media, suggesting his demand may not have been heard by the country's political leaders.
With the soybean harvest in the midwest set to start about a month from now, and corn following weeks later, the fear that China may not buy a single shipload of grain this season is growing for many.
'With [tariffs] in place, we are not competitive with soybeans from Brazil. Our marketing year starts 1 October and usually by now we'd see China making commitments to pre-purchases for soybeans. China has not made a single purchase for US soybeans,' says Virginia Houston, director of government affairs at the American Soybean Association, a lobbying organization.
'No market can match China's demand for soybeans. Right now, there is a 20% retaliatory duty from China.'
To appease his farming base, the Trump administration announced $60bn in subsidies for farmers over the next decade in the recent tax bill, but that has drawn criticism from those who say that farmers shouldn't be subsidized on taxpayers' dime.
Others have reported that funding is going to select producers in specific regions of the US, benefiting bigger producers rather than family farms. Adding to the export challenges, the price of commodity crops in the US has been in steady decline for the past three years due to a smaller cattle herd and falling ethanol production.
Houston says that when she speaks with the White House and Congress to share the struggles farmers are facing due to tariffs, the response is that 'they support farmers [but] we are one cog in the wheel of this complex relationship.
'The farm economy is in a much tougher place than where we were in 2018 [during Trump's previous China trade war]. Prices have gone down while inputs – seed, fertilizer, chemicals, land and equipment – continue to go up.'
All the while, unpredictable weather conditions continue to make planning more difficult.
For much of this summer, afternoon storms had been a near-daily occurrence in Indiana, Ohio and elsewhere in the eastern corn belt, causing ponding that kills early plant growth. Diseases such as northern corn leaf blight, gray leaf spot and tar spot soon followed.
'When it's being attacked by disease, it's not growing to its full potential because it's trying to fight off the disease,' says Harbage.
Although he treated his crops for disease, the heat and humidity that have been an uncommon feature of life this summer can overcome the effects of fungicides.
On top of that, Harbage says he'll have to spend additional money on propane to dry his corn before sending it to consumers, again due to the high moisture content.
If Trump walked into his farm today, Harbage says he'd have one message.
'The exports is number one. That's the number one fix. We have to get rid of what we're growing, or we have to be able to use it,' he says.
'China, Mexico and Canada – we export $83bn worth of commodities to them a year. So if they're not buying, we're stuck with our crop.'
In the US, you can call or text the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 988, chat on 988lifeline.org, or text HOME to 741741 to connect with a crisis counselor. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email jo@samaritans.org or jo@samaritans.ie. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at befrienders.org
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
HAMISH MCRAE: Why now could be the time to sell your shares
It's a tricky time for investors. Quite aside from all the geopolitical stuff in Alaska, the trade disruption, inflation climbing again, and all that, there are troubling signs for the world economy. Yet there is also FOMO, the fear of missing out, and anyone who has remained fully invested in global equities will so far have been well rewarded. You can see this tension in the markets. The FTSE 100 duly hit an intraday all-time high of 9,222 early on Friday morning, only to worry that this might not be such a great idea after all and slither back down. The S&P 500 closed on Thursday at a record high, but weakened on Friday too. There's that nagging doubt that we're in the final phase of what has been a great bull market and something nasty is around the corner. The professionals are picking this up. Goldman Sachs has warned of the possibility of a sharp sell-off in the S&P 500, with more than a 10 per cent chance of a decline in the next three months and more than a 20 per cent chance next year. Those percentages may not sound very high, but if there is to be one of those classic October crashes, it's good to have a warning on the record. Here in London, Longview Economics has a model that is signalling that the S&P 500 is a strong sell, noting 'signs of froth and speculation' and asking that tough question: 'Is the market about to sell off (or even crash)?' It is neutral on this, acknowledging that it might be being overcautious. But it also points out that whenever a company produces disappointing results, its shares get hammered. Taking the US market as a whole, it is one of those situations where it has to keep pedalling hard to keep the bicycle upright, with any slowdown or wobble potentially ending up in a crash. There is a long list of things that might lead to a wobble. Looking at the world economy, we don't yet have any real feeling for the damage to growth or inflation from Donald Trump's tariffs. But put it this way: tariffs cannot boost global growth or cut overall inflation. They have to be negative, and it is not as though the world economy is in great shape. Look at us here. Thanks to a not-too-dreadful second quarter after the strong start, the UK does seem to be the fastest-growing economy in the G7 so far this year, as Rachel Reeves has said. Sure, that follows a very weak second half last year, and sure, it is puffed up by an unsustainable increase in public spending. But you do have to ask that if we are the best, what on earth is happening to the others? There's the evidence of rising inflation, particularly here but also in the US, and the impact that will have on long-term interest rates. Our ten-year gilt yield touched 4.7 per cent in Friday trading. Some institutions are forced to hold Government debt, but for the rest of us, it can't be a good idea to lend to governments that have no serious intention of cutting their fiscal deficits. There are all sorts of troubling signs of a slowdown. Houses are taking longer to sell in America and demand for graduate jobs there is weak. Walk down any High Street and count the number of voids. Our hospitality sector is struggling. We know we will be clobbered with higher taxes come the autumn. The fact that things feel fragile here does not mean FTSE 100 shares will be directly hit because more than three-quarters of their profits come from abroad, either in exports or earnings from overseas. But there are parallels: a lot of people across Europe as well as in America are tightening their belts. How long before that shows up in the profit and loss accounts of multinationals? You see the point. On a very long view, it is always right to invest in global equities. If you get out, it's always difficult to know when to get back in. The UK market certainly offers good value vis-a-vis the US one but, as Bloomberg reported on Friday, the strategists do not expect the FTSE 100 to end the year above 9,000, the average being 8,950. If shares are likely to fall, it may not be a bad idea to sell a few before they do. To be clear, I am not predicting an October crash, but these are indeed tricky times and it would be nuts not to acknowledge that.


Daily Mail
4 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump launches 'Manhattan Project' as one of America's largest companies set to be nationalized
The Trump administration has launched their own 'Manhattan Project,' as reports have suggested one of America's largest chipmakers could be partly nationalized. Intel. Corp, one of the most capable semiconductor manufacturers in the US, has been in talks with the Trump administration as the US government is seeking a stake in the company. 'This feels like the Manhattan Project - or the run-up to World War II,' MIT AI computer scientist Dave Blundin said on a podcast with MIT engineer Peter Diamandis. 'It's every bit as important as the space race was, as the nuclear arms race was. Actually, it's more important.' The consideration to nationalize the company, a move typically done in times of national urgency, comes as the US is looking to get ahead of China in the AI and tech arms race. Intel's advanced abilities to manufacture semiconductors would allow the US to give up its reliance on foreign fabrication plants (fabs), especially in Taiwan which controls more than 60 percent of the market, in order to power artificial intelligence, defense and the economy. The talks remain ongoing and finer details continue to be made clear, but the idea would be that the US government would pay for the stake in the company, one person close to the matter told Bloomberg. Another stressed that the talks do not ensure that the deal is definitive, and the discussion could end without a deal being made. The move, according to AI and tech experts on Diamandis' podcast Moonshots, echoes the 'Manhattan Project' as a sort of a 'national survival strategy.' 'The reason the US needs to protect Taiwan fundamentally... is because the fabs are there. If the fabs all move to the US, then why would the US defend Taiwan?' Blundin said. Concerns have been raised about the decision to nationalize the company, as he added: 'They're putting the whole industry on a kind of war footing, like mobilization for conflict, except the battleground is supply chains and chip fabs.' Intel told Bloomberg, while declining to comment on the discussion with the Trump administration, that the company is 'deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen US technology and manufacturing leadership.' 'We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation,' the company added. White House spokesman Kush Desai told the outlet: 'Discussion about hypothetical deals should be regarded as speculation unless officially announced by the administration.' The move comes after two AI companies agreed last week to hand over 15 percent of their chip sales revenue in China to the US government in exchange for export licenses. Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) entered an unprecedented arrangement with the White House to promote and sell their semiconductors in China last week, three people familiar with the situation told the Financial Times. 'In the short term, this is fantastic. In the long term, wow, could this turn bad in a hurry,' Blundin said. 'It's good for the US economy, but we're going to use that to fund [the] US catching up in the chip wars.' 'Very, very good business deal and incredibly slippery slope precedent.' The deal could pour more than $2 billion into the US government, the New York Times reported, although Trump did not reveal what the money may be used for. Just as sources say Trump and the AI companies entered the agreement, the president declared he would impose a 100 percent tariff on the imports of semiconductors and chips unless the company is 'building in the United States.' News of Trump's discreetly entered agreement with Nvidia and AMD has been slammed by experts who say the move could have detrimental repercussions when it comes to US-China relations. 'This is an own goal and will incentivize the Chinese to up their game and pressure the administration for more concessions,' Liza Tobin, who previously served as China director at the National Security Council, told The New York Times. The move to sell microchips to China has been heavily criticized, as many see it as a threat to national security and a move against America's best interests.


Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
2026 Toyota Camry Trim Matchup: Base LE Vs. Flagship XSE
You have to build these Bronco and Bronco Sport projects yourself if you really want one. Good news is, Ford's selling the parts for you to do just that. The Fenomeno is the latest model to join Lambo's Few Off lineup, limited to just under 30 units worldwide. Ford cut 2026 Explorer prices, but heavy discounts on 2025 models may offer even better deals for buyers willing to skip the newest model year. View post: 2026 Ford Explorer Is Less Expensive — But Should You Get a 2025 Model Instead? Base Camry offers unbeatable value, while top model threatens some premium models Although still early in its life, it's safe to say that the all-new Toyota Camry has been a success. Not only is this hybrid-only sedan highly efficient and good to drive, but it has been performing well on the sales charts, too. If you're considering a new Camry, you may wonder which of the four trims is best. We've already compared the lower two trims, but how different is the entry-level LE to the top-spec XSE, and is the latter worth its $6,200 price premium? Let's find out. Camry LE Vs. XSE Pricing We'll start by looking at the pricing of the 2026 Toyota Camry. It starts at $29,000 for the base LE and goes all the way up to $36,725 for the XSE AWD. Between these trims, there is the SE ($31,300), Nightshade Edition ($32,300), XLE ($34,000), and XSE ($35,200). All these trims are available with AWD. Even after its 2026 price increase, the base Camry LE is tremendous value, but the range-topping XSE adds a number of desirable amenities, aesthetic upgrades, and tech features. Surprisingly, the driving experience is also markedly improved. Design: Rental Car Vibes Vs. Near-Premium Appeal Toyota Camry LE Toyota Camry XSE Sitting on rather small 16-inch wheels and with white paint (other colors are available), the base Camry LE does look a little plain. The XSE immediately makes a better first impression with its 19-inch wheels, a color-keyed sport mesh front grille, gloss-black air curtains, a black rear spoiler, and a color-keyed rear sport lower diffuser. Bi-LED projector headlights are standard on the LE, while the range-topping XSE gets dual LED headlights, premium LED taillights, and a sportier exhaust with dual chrome tips. Although not visible to the naked eye, acoustic noise-reducing front side glass helps to keep noise levels lower in the XSE. Toyota Camry XSE — Source: Toyota The LE is available with a few more interesting colors than the white pictured above, but only the XSE gets access to a color palette with a black contrast roof. These changes don't necessarily make the XSE a better car, but it looks a lot better than the basic LE. Interior: It's Easy To See Where The Extra Cash Goes Toyota Camry LE Toyota Camry XSE All new Camrys get a smartly designed and practical cabin, but there are substantial differences between the base LE and the range-topping XSE. The LE is the only Camry trim with fabric-trimmed seats and manual adjustment for the driver's seat, whereas the XSE gets genuine leather upholstery, eight-way powered front seats, and standard heated seats. Touchpoints like the steering wheel and shift knob have a leather covering in the XSE. In the XSE, you also get the option of a Cockpit Red interior, a much more expressive look than the LE's black or grey interior colors. Toyota Camry XSE — Source: Toyota Other features you get as standard on the XSE but which are not available for the LE include the following: Aluminum sport pedals Paddle shifters White LED ambient interior lighting 12.3-inch touchscreen 12.3-inch digital gauge cluster The LE has a smaller eight-inch touchscreen and seven-inch digital gauge cluster. On the options list, the LE can't be equipped with features like ventilated front seats, a head-up display, a panoramic glass roof, or the upgraded nine-speaker JBL sound system, all of which are available on the XSE. It's inside where one can most tell the difference between the base Camry and the top-of-the-range model. Safety Equipment Source: Toyota The LE matches the XSE in terms of the standard specification. Both trims come standard with eight airbags, blind-spot monitoring, pedestrian detection, radar-based cruise control, lane departure alert, road sign assist, and more. The main difference exists on the options list. Here, you can upgrade the XSE with advanced features such as traffic jam assist, a surround-view monitor, lane change assist, front/rear parking assistance, and front cross-traffic alert. None of these are available on the XSE. Performance: Same Performance, But LE Is More Efficient Than XSE Both the Camry LE and Camry XSE are equipped with the same 2.5-liter four-cylinder hybrid engine. It produces 225 horsepower with front-wheel drive or 232 hp with all-wheel drive, so straight-line performance is comparable regardless of whether you go for the base model or the top one. All models have an electronically controlled continuously variable transmission. In our review, we found the Camry to be an excellent drive. The powertrain is quiet and the gas engine kicks in more smoothly than before. There is more of a difference between the LE and XSE when the road begins to twist, though, as only the latter gets sport-tuned shocks and springs. 2026 Toyota Camry — Source: Toyota Whereas the LE prioritizes comfort, the XSE remains tolerable on rough roads but exhibits much tauter steering. Turn-in is more responsive and its body stays flatter through corners, so the XSE is the easy pick for more enthusiastic drivers. Due to its lower weight and smaller wheels, the LE is more efficient, though. With FWD, the base trim gets 53/50/51 mpg city/highway/combined, a superb effort for a spacious sedan. AWD drops that to 51/49/50 mpg. In the sportier XSE, expect 48/47/47 mpg with FWD and 44/43/44 mpg with AWD. When both are equipped with FWD, the LE will get an extra 52 miles per tank, which isn't insignificant. Final Thoughts Toyota Camry XSE — Source: Toyota You can easily make a case for the base Camry or its fully loaded sibling. The LE is incredibly efficient, yet has the same outputs as the pricier XSE. Toyota has also done a good job of equipping the LE with all the essential tech features, whereas the nice-to-haves are reserved for the XSE. The range-topping Camry looks and feels like a much more premium product, and even though it has the same power, we were surprised at how much more engaging it was to drive than the LE. Many top-spec trims come across as superfluous, but that's not the case with the Camry XSE. If you can afford the price bump, it's still a bargain when compared to base midsize sedans from luxury brands. About the Author Karl Furlong View Profile