Watch: SpaceX Starship explodes during test in Texas. What's next for Elon Musk's company?
The dramatic failure marked the latest setback for Elon Musk's spaceflight company, founded in 2002, as Starship continues to face challenges. The rocket has struggled to replicate earlier mission successes, with all three of its 2025 test flights ending in failure.
The spacecraft, standing nearly 400 feet tall when fully stacked, did not injure or endanger anyone when it exploded in a fireball that could be seen for miles, SpaceX said.
Musk, whose public rift with President Donald Trump recently cast into doubt the future of the U.S. spaceflight program, appeared to initially make light of the mishap – saying "Just a scratch" in a post on social media site X, which he also owns.
More: Elon Musk hits back after Trump threatens contracts. SpaceX's government ties, explained
The explosion occurred around 11 p.m. local time Wednesday, June 18, while SpaceX was preparing for Starship's upcoming flight test, known as Flight 10, from Starbase – the company town in South Texas near the U.S.-Mexico border.
The Starship spacecraft was standing alone on the test stand prior to being mounted on top of the booster when it blew up.
In this case, the Starship vehicle had already undergone a single-engine fire earlier in the week and SpaceX was preparing to test all six when the explosion occurred.
The mishap, which SpaceX later referred to on its website as "a sudden energetic event," completely destroyed the spacecraft and ignited several fires that caused damage in the area surrounding the test stand.
While SpaceX is investigating the mishap, Musk said in a post on X that preliminary data suggest a pressurized tank failed at the top of the rocket.
The company attributed it to a "major anomaly,' and said all personnel were safe.
SpaceX's latest Starship launch marked a failure, following two earlier explosions this year and marking the ninth test flight overall.
From launch to loss of the ship, high-quality footage was sent to the live coverage via Starlink. The world watched as, once again, the massive launch system failed to go as planned. The May 27 flight was aimed at testing much more than what transpired. While the ship coasted this time for close to 40 minutes and made it to the planned area of reentry, it ended up in a spin, which caused it to break apart over the Indian Ocean.
Of the eight previous flights, outcomes were evenly split between successes and failures, making Tuesday's mission, which ended in another explosion, a continued challenge in the company's quest for orbital launch reliability.
Starship's first two flight tests of 2025 – on Jan. 16 and again on March 6 – ended in dramatic explosions that sent cascades of fiery debris streaking across the sky. In both mishaps, the upper stage, the vehicle where astronauts and cargo would ride, came apart mere minutes into its flight instead of landing as planned in the Indian Ocean.
In the Flight 9 test mission, SpaceX made modifications to the 400-foot vehicle as the company continues to develop Starship for future expeditions to the moon and Mars.
For the first time, SpaceX reused a Super Heavy booster rocket that had previously flown. The booster was first used during Starship's seventh test flight in January, which ended in failure. While some components were new, including a replaced heat shield, most of the hardware was reused, or what SpaceX calls "flight-proven," including 29 of its 33 Raptor engines.
All of SpaceX's Texas operations — including the explosion during Wednesday's engine test — take place at the company's Starbase facility in Boca Chica, a beachside community near Brownsville. The site sits along the Gulf of America, about 20 miles from the U.S.-Mexico border.
Although Starbase is closed to the public during launches, a nearby location has become a favorite among Texans and space enthusiasts hoping to catch a glimpse of Starship in action.
Isla Blanca Park, 33174 State Park Road 100, is located on the southernmost tip of South Padre Island. With more than a mile of beaches, the park reliably attracts sizable crowds anytime Starship is due for its latest flight test.
More: Where is Starbase, Texas? Elon Musk's SpaceX headquarters voted to become a city
But Starship still has a long way to go in its development before it's ready to take humans to the moon or Mars.
It does not appear as if the Federal Aviation Administration will conduct an investigation into the latest explosion since "the activity and anomaly were not associated with licensed activity," the agency said Friday, June 20, in an email to the USA TODAY Network.
But in addition to simply being able to fly safely – in other words, without exploding – Starship also needs to be capable of refueling in orbit. The maneuver would be an especially difficult one that's never before been accomplished.
SpaceX is planning to increase the number of Starship launches after receiving key regulatory approval to conduct 25 flight tests a year. Just four Starship test missions were conducted in 2024.
Following the latest Starship launch in late-May, Musk had previously said the next three test flights would occur in quicker succession, with a Starship launch taking place every three to four weeks.
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: SpaceX Starship explodes in latest test. See video from Texas

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
China Urges Local Firms to Avoid Nvidia H20 Chips
Bloomberg's Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow discuss reports that China is urging its domestic companies to avoid using Nvidia H20 chips. Plus, Elon Musk accuses Apple of favoring OpenAI above other AI companies in its app store, even threatening possible legal action. And Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire discusses plans for new products as shares of the company soar following its earnings report. (Source: Bloomberg)


Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Musk-Altman rivalry devolves into lawsuit threats, insults in social media brawl
Tech titans Elon Musk and Sam Altman bickered over their relative trustworthiness on Tuesday, with each of their artificial intelligence platforms contributing to the feud. The big picture: The two tech giants' acrimonious relationship has become increasingly public since Musk sued Altman for breaching OpenAI's founding mission last year. Driving the news: Musk alleged that Apple engaged in an antitrust violation "that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the app store." "xAI will take immediate legal action," Musk wrote. "This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like," Altman responded. Apple did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment. Zoom out: Grok, powered by Musk's xAI, said Altman was right in the dispute. DeepSeek and Perplexity, other AI platforms, reached top App Store slots this year. "Musk has a history of directing X algorithm changes to boost his posts and favor his interests, per 2023 reports and ongoing probes," the Grok response said. "Hypocrisy noted." "good bot," ChatGPT's X account responded. Musk separately shared a screenshot asking ChatGPT 5 Pro whether he or Altman is more trustworthy. ChatGPT answered: "Elon Musk." State of play: Altman and Musk have had repeated spats since Musk stepped down from OpenAI's board in 2018, as they both vie for leadership in artificial intelligence. Last year, Musk sued OpenAI, Altman and another founder claiming that they "deceived" Musk a decade ago. A federal judge in March denied Musk's request to pause OpenAI's transition into a for-profit model, but agreed to a fast-track trial this in the fall of this year. In February, a feud between the two escalated as they both tried to wield influence in President Trump's AI plan. Musk was reportedly interested in buying OpenAI for $97.4 billion — which Altman refused. interview.


Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Sam Altman and Elon Musk Trade Barbs Over Who Is More Full of Shit
In happier times, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Tesla CEO Elon Musk were buddies and business partners, but their bromance notoriously turned sour a long time ago. For the past several years, the two have very publicly hated each other and taken every opportunity they can to dunk on one another's business pursuits. This week, Altman and Musk's animosity spilled out into public view again, as the two attempted to determine who was the biggest liar. The whole kerfuffle was predictably kicked off by Musk, who instigated the fight by claiming that there was some sort of corporate conspiracy to keep apps like Grok from hitting #1 on the App Store. 'Apple is the gateway to the Internet for half of America,' Musk posted on Tuesday. 'They are making it impossible for any other AI company to succeed by relentlessly promoting OpenAI in every way possible!' Onlookers were quick to point out that there was substantial evidence to the contrary. Indeed, several community notes appended to Musk's tweet pointed out that other AI apps—such as DeepSeek and Perplexity—had managed to climb to the top of the App Store this year, a fact that would seem to disprove Musk's theory of an OpenAI bias. Not long after Musk's tweet, Altman decided to jump into the fray: 'This is a remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like,' the AI CEO said. 'You got 3M views on your bullshit post, you liar, far more than I've received on many of mine, despite me having 50 times your follower count!' Musk replied, in a post whose tenor seemed to resemble that of a petulant 8th grader. Altman shot back with a challenge: 'Will you sign an affidavit that you have never directed changes to the X algorithm in a way that has hurt your competitors or helped your own companies? i will apologize if so.' An X user jumped into the thread and asked Grok what it thought of the argument. Humorously, Grok appeared to agree with Altman: 'Based on verified evidence, Sam Altman is right. Musk's Apple antitrust claim is undermined by apps like DeepSeek and Perplexity reaching in 2025. Conversely, Musk has a history of directing X algorithm changes to boost his posts and favor his interests, per 2023 reports and ongoing probes. Hypocrisy noted.' Not long afterward, the X account for ChatGPT shared Grok's tweet, writing: 'good bot.' Musk subsequently sought to explain why Grok would ever say such dastardly things about its creator (newsflash: it's the news media's fault): 'The fact that Grok is allowed to say false defamatory statements about me and they don't get blocked or deleted (which would be easy to do) speaks to the integrity of this platform,' the billionaire claimed. 'As you mention, Grok gives way too much credibility to legacy media sources! This is a major problem and we're working to fix it,' Musk said, seemingly hinting that his chatbot is due for another lobotomy. Musk later replied to ChatGPT's post with a screenshot purporting to show Altman's chatbot stating that Musk was more trustworthy than Altman. Musk has been accused many times of having rigged his social media platform in favor of his own preferred content. A study published last year claimed to show evidence that conservative content was being algorithmically amplified on X. In a similar vein, Altman shared an article on Tuesday that claimed Musk had 'created a special system [on X] for showing you all his tweets first.' 'I hope someone will get counter-discovery on this, I and many others would love to know what's been happening,' Altman wrote. 'But OpenAI will just stay focused on making great products.' Musk later retaliated. 'Scam Altman lies as easily as he breathes,' the billionaire posted, re-sharing a post from another user that had pointed out allegations that Altman was a liar. Gizmodo reached out to Altman via OpenAI, to Musk via Tesla, and to Apple. When it comes to who is winning the AI war, the answer is clearly: Altman. Despite recent stumbles (GPT-5 has been hailed by many as a piece of shit) and advances from competitors (the genAI space has become notably more crowded since the first days of ChatGPT), OpenAI remains one of the most powerful and well-positioned AI companies on the market. By contrast, Musk's xAI has made a name for itself largely by promoting the kooky personality of its chatbot, Grok. xAI is growing, however. Recent reports show that the company is burning through cash as it attempts to stand up its own expanding AI infrastructure. Despite all the money and resources that both men and their companies have managed to accrue, they don't seem to have created chatbots that can decide which man is more trustworthy.