logo
UP Woman Had Affairs With Dead Husband's Father & Brother, Then Killed Mother-In-Law For Land

UP Woman Had Affairs With Dead Husband's Father & Brother, Then Killed Mother-In-Law For Land

News18a day ago
Last Updated:
Pooja Jatav, 29, from Jhansi, is under investigation for her mother-in-law Sushila Devi's murder, involving land disputes, multiple marriages, and betrayal
In a case that shook the Jhansi police, a 29-year-old woman named Pooja Jatav is now at the centre of a sensational murder investigation involving the killing of her mother-in-law. But what appeared to be a dispute over family land quickly unravelled into a disturbing story of multiple marriages, shifting relationships, betrayal, and cold-blooded crime.
The incident took place on June 24, when 60-year-old Sushila Devi, a resident of Jhansi's Tahrauli area, was found dead under mysterious circumstances. Initially treated as a possible robbery, the case took a dark turn when Sushila's daughter-in-law, Pooja Jatav, went missing after the murder. Her sudden disappearance raised suspicions, and police began to dig deeper.
Plot Behind The Murder
Pooja Jatav allegedly wanted to sell 18 bighas of an ancestral land belonging to her in-laws in Jhansi and settle in Gwalior permanently. The land legally belonged to her deceased husband Kalyan and was currently under family control. While other family members, including her brother-in-law Santosh and father-in-law, were reportedly willing to give her a share, Sushila Devi strongly opposed the sale. She distrusted Pooja and refused to sign off the property, fearing the daughter-in-law's increasing demands and questionable intentions.
Faced with the obstacle, Pooja allegedly hatched a sinister plan to eliminate her mother-in-law and take control of the land. She enlisted the help of her younger sister Kamala alias Kamini, and Kamini's boyfriend Anil Verma, a resident of Hajira in Gwalior.
On the night of June 24, Kamini and Anil travelled 125 km to Jhansi, waited for the house to be empty, and as per the plan, injected Sushila Devi with poison before strangling her to death. The duo then looted gold jewellery worth Rs 8 lakh and fled the scene.
The case began to crack when Pooja failed to return home after the funeral. Her absence, coupled with inconsistencies in her statements and mobile tower data, prompted police to bring her in for questioning. Under sustained interrogation, she eventually confessed to masterminding the murder, admitting that she lured Kamini and Anil into the conspiracy.
Following her confession, Pooja and Kamini were arrested and sent to jail. Meanwhile, Anil Verma was traced and apprehended after a police encounter on Tuesday night, bringing the core trio of accused into custody.
But as police delved deeper into Pooja's past, the case became even more unsettling.
Pooja Jatav's Disturbing History
The police were shocked to uncover a trail of multiple marriages, live-in relationships, and possible criminal acts spanning both Gwalior and Jhansi.
Pooja was first married in Gwalior. That marriage ended bitterly after a violent domestic dispute. According to reports, her first husband once had her shot during a conflict, a case that dragged into court. It was during the court hearings that Pooja met Kalyan, a man who took sympathy on her, believing she was a victim of abuse. Their friendship turned romantic, and Kalyan married her, unaware of what lay ahead.
Kalyan died six years later in a road accident. With her second husband gone, Pooja became alone and got involved with her late husband's elder brother, Santosh, who was already married. Despite this, she moved into the house and began living in a live-in relationship with him, claiming marital rights and sparking domestic chaos.
Tensions escalated when Santosh's first wife began to protest, leading to frequent fights within the household. It was during this time that Pooja began pressuring the family for a 50% share in the ancestral land, arguing that she was Kalyan's legal widow and deserved his portion. Santosh and his father were reportedly ready to settle, but Sushila Devi stood firm in opposition.
Police sources also hint at a rumoured inappropriate relationship between Pooja and her father-in-law, further adding to the family's disintegration. Sushila's growing suspicions and refusal to allow Pooja to claim the land may have ultimately sealed her fate.
After being sidelined by Santosh and feeling increasingly isolated, Pooja became desperate to secure her financial future. With the property slipping out of her control and her support within the family eroding, she saw murder as the only path left.
She called her sister Kamini and boyfriend Anil to help execute the murder. The plan was precise and after the act, Kamini and Anil vanished with valuables, hoping it would pass off as a burglary gone wrong.
Four days after the murder, Sushila Devi's husband filed an FIR at Tahrauli Police Station, sparking a full investigation. The local police quickly zeroed in on inconsistencies in Pooja's behaviour and location records. Once the plot was confirmed, she was arrested and the network of lies began to fall apart.
Pooja and Kamini are now behind bars, while Anil Verma was injured and arrested in a late-night encounter operation by the police on Tuesday, July 1. All three now face charges of murder, conspiracy, and robbery, among others.
The Jhansi case has become the talk of the town, not just for the brutality of the murder but for the calculated manipulation, greed, and repeated deceit behind it. The police are continuing to investigate Pooja's history to determine if other cases, including the suspicious death of her husband Kalyan, may also be connected.
First Published:
July 02, 2025, 15:07 IST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Congress created firm to launder money to avoid its direct name in news headlines: ED to court
Congress created firm to launder money to avoid its direct name in news headlines: ED to court

Indian Express

time20 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Congress created firm to launder money to avoid its direct name in news headlines: ED to court

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) told a Delhi court Thursday that the Congress created a company called Young Indian to allegedly launder money worth Rs 2,000 crore from Associated Journals Ltd. (AJL) — the company which used to publish the National Herald newspaper — to avoid its 'direct name' appearing in news headlines. Additional Solicitor General S V Raju, who appeared for the agency, made these submissions before the court of Special Judge Vishal Gogne while it was hearing arguments on the point of cognizance of the chargesheet filed against senior Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi in the National Herald money laundering case. The ED's case is that the Congress provided an interest-free loan of Rs 90 crore to AJL, which had assets worth Rs 2,000 crore, for a 'consideration of just Rs 50 lakh'. As per the ED, this debt, which AJL overtook, was allegedly converted into equity in favour of the not-for-profit company Young Indian (YI), in which Sonia and Rahul Gandhi held a majority 76% stake. '… such a crucial decision of vesting 99% shareholding of AJL with Young Indian was taken by only 7 members, including the two accused (Sonia and Rahul Gandhi)… there were a total of 1,089 shareholders who weren't consulted. This shows that the whole thing was a fraud,' Raju, who was accompanied by Special Counsel Zoheb Hossain and Special Public Prosecutor NK Matta, told the court. 'They've (Congress leaders) deprived the shareholders of AJL of their right. Young India invested just Rs 50 lakh and got Rs 2,000 crore. YI gained wrongfully and the shareholders suffered,' he added. 'From 70% ownership, the shareholders of AJL dropped to 2%. Nobody in their right mind would agree to this. There can't be a bigger fraud than this,' the ASG submitted. Special Judge Gogne then asked Raju, 'Are the shareholders also witnesses in this case? This is a little peculiar… so shouldn't they also be made witnesses? The ED has not investigated the 1,000 shareholders. So will this trial go on without them being witnesses?' Raju replied: 'The record speaks for itself. This is a classic case of money laundering… the real culprits are these 7 persons, once you pierce the veil… Today, Sonia and Rahul Gandhi hold almost all shares. They're the beneficial owners of the company.' Other than the Gandhis, the ED has also named Congress leaders Suman Dubey and Sam Pitroda as accused in the case. Along with this, firms Young India and Dotex Merchandise Pvt. Ltd have also been named. The case originated in 2012 from a criminal complaint filed by the then-BJP Rajya Sabha MP, Subramanian Swamy, against the Gandhis and other leaders of the Congress, where he had accused them of fraud in acquiring AJL's property. In its chargesheet, the ED alleged that YI, which was incorporated in 2010, had the same set of people appointed at various positions as AJL. The Rs 90 crore loan was converted into equity after AJL stated that they wouldn't be able to repay it, alleged the ED. Via this conversion of the loan into equity, claimed the agency, YI, a loss-making company, got 99% ownership of AJL, a company with assets worth Rs 2,000 crore. With the transfer of these shares, the assets of AJL also got transferred to YI, whose beneficial owners were Sonia and Rahul Gandhi, the ED claimed. While the ED has completed its arguments on the cognizance of the chargesheet, senior advocates Abhishek Manu Singhvi and RS Cheema are likely to argue on behalf of the Gandhis on Friday.

Court rejects Jacqueline Fernandez's plea to quash Rs 200-crore ED case
Court rejects Jacqueline Fernandez's plea to quash Rs 200-crore ED case

India Today

time21 minutes ago

  • India Today

Court rejects Jacqueline Fernandez's plea to quash Rs 200-crore ED case

Delhi High Court on Thursday dismissed the actor Jacqueline Fernandez's petition challenging the Enforcement Directorate's complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).Fernandes had sought the quashing of the ED's case against her related to the Rs 200 crore money laundering case involving alleged conman Sukesh Anish Dayal dismissed her plea, which also sought to quash the second supplementary chargesheet of the Enforcement Directorate in the case and proceedings are pending in a Delhi trial court, as reported by the news agency ED counsel opposed the petition on the ground of maintainability, saying a special court had taken cognisance of the prosecution complaint (chargesheet) and prima facie found a case. The cognisance order was not challenged, the counsel the plea, Jacqueline challenged the ED's complaint and the second supplementary chargesheet under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. In her appeal, Jacqueline claimed that Sukesh trapped her. The plea claimed that Jacqueline Fernandez did not commit any offence of money laundering as defined under the scheme of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 20202 and neither was she in possession of proceeds of further said that the complaint by Aditi Singh, wife of former Ranbaxy owner Shivinder Singh, does not allege that the petitioner (Jacqueline Fernandez) in any manner actively aided or abetted the main accused, Sukesh Chandrashekhar, to commit the alleged Delhi Police had charged Chandrasekhar for allegedly duping the spouses of former promoters of Ranbaxy, Shivinder Singh and Malvinder Singh, of Rs 200 crore. There are other ongoing investigations against him in several cases across the and his wife Leena Paulose, facing proceedings in a money laundering case of the ED, were arrested by Delhi Police along with others. The police invoked the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) in the and Chandrasekhar were alleged to have used hawala routes and created shell companies along with other accused persons to park the money earned as proceeds of crime.- EndsWith inputs from Watch IN THIS STORY#Jacqueline Fernandez

Money laundering case: Delhi HC junks actor Jacqueline's plea to quash FIR
Money laundering case: Delhi HC junks actor Jacqueline's plea to quash FIR

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Money laundering case: Delhi HC junks actor Jacqueline's plea to quash FIR

The Delhi High Court on Thursday dismissed a plea by Bollywood actor Jacqueline Fernandez for quashing an FIR against her in a Rs 200 crore money laundering case , involving alleged conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar . Justice Anish Dayal dismissed her plea, which also sought to quash the second supplementary chargesheet of the Enforcement Directorate in the case and proceedings pending in a Delhi trial court. The ED counsel opposed the petition on the ground of maintainability, saying a special court had taken cognisance of the prosecution complaint (chargesheet) and prima facie found a case. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bank Owned Properties For Sale In Khanh Thuong (Prices May Surprise You) Foreclosed Homes | Search ads Search Now Undo The cognisance order was not challenged, the counsel added. Fernandez is an accused in the money laundering case lodged against Chandrasekhar and had appeared before the ED for questioning in the investigation. Live Events Delhi Police had booked Chandrasekhar for allegedly duping the spouses of former promoters of Ranbaxy , Shivinder Singh and Malvinder Singh of Rs 200 crore. There are other ongoing investigations against him in several cases across the country. Chandrasekhar and his wife Leena Paulose, facing proceedings in a money laundering case of the ED, were arrested by Delhi Police along with others. The police invoked the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) in the case. Paulose and Chandrasekhar were alleged to have used hawala routes and created shell companies along with other accused persons to park the money earned as proceeds of crime.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store