Post-Brexit chaos as EU citizens living in Britain wrongly barred from UK
The Independent Monitoring Authority for Citizens' Rights Agreements (IMA) has expressed 'serious concerns' after individuals who left to go on holiday or visit family were barred from entering Britain on their return.
Among those affected was a 34-year-old Spanish woman who was removed from the UK despite showing Home Office documents which proved her right to live and work in the UK. She had flown to Spain to see her sister and her new baby at Christmas, The Guardian reported.
Another EU citizen, Greek Cypriot Costa Koushiappis, was forcibly removed after taking a short trip to Amsterdam in November, the paper said.
The IMA has now written to the Home Office, warning that those waiting for a decision on their residency should not be removed if they make short trips overseas, including for business or leisure.
It is advised that those who hold a valid 'certificate of application' (CoA) from the Home Office show it to Border Force officials at airports or ports to prove they are allowed to travel.
Miranda Biddle, chief executive of the IMA, said: 'Our position is that a citizen with a valid certificate of application has a right to exit and enter the UK while waiting for a decision on their EU settlement scheme application, subject to providing additional documentation required at the border.'
She said she was 'keen to continue to work with the government' to 'ensure citizens are not discouraged from exercising their rights'.
The group has called on the Home Office to clarify the CoA rules before a new system requiring visitors to the UK to have 'electronic travel authorisations' (ETAs) is enforced.
Campaign group the3million said it was 'very disappointed' that the IMA had agreed with Border Force's approach of asking EU citizens to carry documents to prove their residence before Brexit took effect on 31 December 2020.
A CoA was sufficient proof of rights until such time as a final decision is taken, the group said.
A Home Office spokesperson said: 'All individuals with a certificate of application are made aware that they may be asked for evidence to show that they qualify under the scheme before they are allowed entry to the UK. Equivalent guidance has been issued to Border Force officers and published online.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Sobbing influencers blame ChatGPT for ruining a dream vacation
AI is only as intelligent as its users. An influencer couple has gone viral after missing their flight to Puerto Rico — thanks, they claim, to a visa mix-up caused by ChatGPT. An influencer is claiming that ChatGPT gave her the wrong information for her international trip, which caused her to miss her flight. Getty Images Advertisement In a now-viral TikTok video, which has clocked over 13 thousand views, Mery Caldass — a content creator with nearly 100,000 followers — can be seen in tears, roaming the airport as her boyfriend, Alejandro Cid, tries to console her. 'Look, I always do a lot of research, but I asked ChatGPT and they said no,' Caldass, speaking Spanish, tearfully explains, referring to whether the couple was required to obtain a visa to visit Puerto Rico. However, if they had checked official government sites, they would have learned that while Spanish citizens don't need a visa, they do need an ESTA (Electronic System for Travel Authorization). Advertisement Unfortunately for the couple, they relied on artificial intelligence without fact-checking it. Adding some comic relief to her meltdown, Caldass accused ChatGPT of holding a grudge. 'Look, I always do a lot of research, but I asked ChatGPT and they said no,' Mery Caldass tearfully explains, referring to whether the couple was required to obtain a visa to visit Puerto Rico. TikTok/merycaldass 'I don't trust that one anymore because sometimes I insult him. I call him a bastard, you're useless, but inform me well … that's his revenge.' Advertisement Some users have applauded her ability to find humor amid her devastation. Others were less forgiving. @merycaldass si hay una revolución de las IAs voy a ser la primera 4niquil-hada🧚♀️ ♬ sonido original – Mery Caldass 'Well, natural selection, I guess,' wrote one unimpressed commenter. 'If you are going to take a transoceanic trip and you put all your advice in ChatGPT, little has happened to you.' Another added, 'But who trusts ChatGPT for those types of situations?' Advertisement To be fair to the AI, some commenters defended ChatGPT, pointing out that the couple may have simply asked the wrong question — they didn't need a visa, but they never asked about an ESTA. The pair eventually made it to the island to catch a show by one of their favorite artists, Bad Bunny. Caldass and Cid's travel tragedy follows hot on the heels of other AI horror stories. Dangerous advice from ChatGPT recently landed a 60-year-old man in the hospital with hallucinations, instructed 13-year-olds how to get drunk and high, and sabotaged women by advising them to ask for lower salaries.

Miami Herald
8 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Coral Gables mayor and Spanish radio station reach settlement in defamation suit
Coral Gables Mayor Vince Lago and Actualidad Media Group have reached a settlement in a defamation lawsuit the mayor filed in reference to remarks made on a local Spanish-language radio station, court records show. The recent settlement ends a lengthy court battle between Lago and the station, which aired host Roberto Rodriguez Tejera's show on Actualidad 1040 AM. Details of the settlement have not been disclosed. Lago sued in 2023, saying his personal and professional reputation were damaged after Tejera and Coral Gables Commissioner Ariel Fernandez, who was then a candidate, falsely claimed during an on-air segment that Lago was the subject of a Miami-Dade Ethics Commission investigation regarding a potential conflict of interest. At the time, Lago was under a preliminary review by the commission after it was alleged that his family had financial ties to a trailer park at the center of a city annexation battle. The Ethics Commission has said it does not consider a preliminary review to be an investigation. The ethics commission later closed out the matter, writing that 'the preliminary information gathered does not support further investigation.' Lago claimed the radio station 'deliberately fabricated the narrative' that the mayor was under an ethics investigation 'to falsely suggest to its listeners that the ethics commission had found evidence of unethical or illegal behavior by Lago.' The media company argued that the statements were not fabricated. 'Even assuming, arguendo, that the Statement was not perfectly or technically accurate, the 'gist' or the 'sting' of the Statement is still true or, at a minimum, substantially true,' the company wrote in court documents. The settlement was reached last week, according to a notice filed by Joseph P. Farina, a retired Miami-Dade chief circuit court judge who has served as a mediator in the case since April. Attorneys for the two parties sent the Miami Herald the same statement on Wednesday: 'Actualidad 1040 AM would like to clarify: On February 27, 2023, it was reported on the Contacto Directo radio show on Actualidad 1040 AM that there was an ethics investigation against Mayor Lago. To clarify, the Miami-Dade Commission on Ethics and Public Trust had opened a 'matter under initial review.' The matter was opened because unnamed concerned individuals had lodged a confidential ethics complaint against Mayor Lago. After undergoing its internal process, on August 23, 2023 the Ethics Commission determined that the complaint was 'not legally sufficient to commence an investigation' and closed the matter. The parties have amicably resolved their dispute, and Mayor Lago has agreed to dismiss his lawsuit.' Miami Herald staff writer Tess Riski contributed to this report.


The Intercept
8 hours ago
- The Intercept
ICE Removes Spanish-Language Training Requirement for New Recruits
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement recently removed a long-standing five-week Spanish-language training program requirement for new recruits. The removal of the requirement, which was confirmed by the Department of Homeland Security, reflects both collapsing non-English government services and the softening of qualifications to become an immigration agent. 'This is consistent with DHS under this administration,' said Scott Shuchart, a former ICE assistant director under the Biden administration, 'lowering hiring standards to prioritize getting warm bodies behind masks and guns, rather than getting qualified and vetted people into a job that can be dangerous and demands real training and skill.' Though ICE doesn't release information on languages spoken by detainees, available statistics show that the vast majority of arrestees hail from primarily Spanish-speaking countries. On Reddit threads, people claiming to be potential ICE recruits met rumors of the change in requirement with a mix of support and disdain. ICE is on a hiring spree following a boost of $175 million to immigration enforcement in President Donald Trump's budget. ICE's budget for officers is now higher than the FBI's. In recent months, after Trump's executive order designating English as the official language of the U.S., government agencies have cut back on services for other languages. Though Trump's diktat says that nothing in the order 'requires or directs any change in the services provided by any agency,' several agencies have nonetheless reduced non-English-language support. The Department of Homeland Security, for instance, will no longer provide translation services for those calling in with questions about their employment status or benefits. In an email to The Intercept, Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin confirmed the five-week Spanish-language training was no longer required. 'ICE simply replaced the 5-week in-person Spanish course with a more robust translation service for all officers regardless of when they entered on duty,' she said. 'We are using technology not only to save U.S. taxpayer dollars but to also broaden our ability to communicate with illegal aliens we regularly encounter from countries across the globe.' McLaughlin did not respond to a follow-up on what the technology in question would be, but regular law enforcement suppliers have been rolling out translation tools in recent years. Axon, for instance, the company made famous for making the Taser stun gun, has a $5.1 million contract to provide Homeland Security with body-worn cameras. The firm advertises that its latest body camera has real-time 'push-to-talk voice translation' in over 50 languages. The decision to replace language skills with technology could create problems, said Shuchart, who is currently a lawyer in private practice. 'It bespeaks a real disrespect for ICE officers and agents, and noncitizens,' he said, 'to think that their life-and-death encounters can just be mediated by commercial AI tools that have never been tested in a law enforcement environment.' Read Our Complete Coverage The history of ICE's Spanish-language training requirement crisscrosses with the agency's winding history. The Office of Detention and Removal Operations, the main deportation division of what was then called the Immigration and Naturalization Service, had the requirement in place until March 2003, when the agency was subsumed by ICE under the aegis of the newly created Department of Homeland Security. ICE went on to reinstate the requirements in 2007. In 2010, Detention and Removal Operations was renamed to Enforcement and Removal Operations, or ERO, the name the office bears today. That same year, in 2010, Congress's official research agency, the Government Accountability Office, produced a report on the dangers of Homeland Security's failures to assess its language needs. 'According to DHS officials, foreign language skills are an integral part of the department's operations,' the report said. 'These officials told us that while Spanish language proficiency may be identified as an existing capability, it may not always be available and generally the levels of proficiencies vary.' In a 2007 memo, ICE described its Spanish Language Training Program as a five-week course designed to reinforce four skills in listening, speaking, reading, and writing Spanish. 'Emphasis is placed on speaking and listening; the two skills most needed by DRO Law Enforcement Officers,' the ICE memo said. By 2016, the document had been revised to remove reading from the core skills list. The two most-needed skills were also changed from speaking and listening to 'grammar concepts and the ability to perform an arrest of an alien and complete the requisite corresponding documentation, which are the two skills most needed by ERO Law Enforcement Officers.' An ICE press release from 2018, which mentioned the Spanish-language program, touted ICE officers as being 'among the most highly trained federal law enforcement officers in the United States.' (A disclaimer at the top of the press release points out that the 2018 release is now outdated and is 'not reflective of current practice.') Amid a huge increase in its budget, ICE is on making a recruitment push to add 10,000 new agents. In August, DHS announced that ICE is removing age restrictions for new applicants so that 'even more patriots will qualify to join ICE.' The starting age for ICE agents is being lowered from 21 to 18, and the age cap, previously ranging from 37 to 40, is being removed entirely. 'If ICE agents lack the basic language skills, they put at risk both themselves, citizens, and lawful immigrants as well.' The DHS announcement also unveiled several incentives to join ICE, including a signing bonus of up to $50,000 and student loan repayment for ICE officers. The announcement didn't mention that the Spanish Language Training Program requirement had also been removed for new officers. Fielding immigration enforcement agents without direct Spanish-language skills could create dangers to all involved, said Richard Seifman, a former World Bank adviser and Foreign Service officer who has written on the degradation of foreign language capabilities in government. 'If not clearly stated and papers shown to a person who is strictly a Spanish speaker or with limited language skill in English, the situation can be fraught with misunderstandings on both sides,' he said. 'If ICE agents lack the basic language skills, they put at risk both themselves, citizens, and lawful immigrants as well.'