logo
Anja Murray: Radical changes required to let the oceans recover

Anja Murray: Radical changes required to let the oceans recover

Summertime is when many of us love taking time out by the seaside. Watching over the open expanse of ocean, feasting our eyes on stunning turquoise depths of each incoming wave, feeling the invigorating freshness of sea air.
Walking along the shoreline we might watch and listen to terns, global migrants who breed on Irish coastlines during the summer months, feeding on small fish caught fresh from the surface of the sea, enthralling us with their elegance as they swoop and dive. We might immerse ourselves in the blue-green waters, exhilarating and energising mind and body with the joy of sea swimming.
As conscious as we are of our island nation state, we are only vaguely aware that Ireland's marine territory spans more than 10 times our territorial land mass.
We are also generally aware of our dependence on the sea for much of our wealth and resources, yet don't tend to consider just how much we impact the health of ocean ecosystems with our activities. For most of history, humans have rightly considered the oceans as being far too large for us to ever inflict much of an influence upon.
Everything is ready in Nice, France, for the UN Ocean Conference.
Starting Monday, world leaders, scientists and other civil society representatives from around the world will come together to share their perspectives and solutions to #SaveOurOcean. https://t.co/1qJ91HbXkN pic.twitter.com/s4FJebCyJk — United Nations (@UN) June 8, 2025
Yet over the past 50 years, it has become clear that human activities are causing life threatening harm to the fabric of ocean life.
This is the subject of the third United Nations Ocean Conference that has been taking place this week in Nice, France. As international law and multilateral cooperation are being sorely tested and challenged on several fronts at present, the Ocean Conference is a vital opportunity for international governance and policy to prevail, with the task none other than charting a path to a liveable future for all of us.
Oceans, and the life they contain, actively shape conditions for life on land. Marine plankton constitute as much as 90% of life in the open seas and maintain the balance of atmospheric gasses that sustains all the rest of us, including regulating climate by absorbing excess carbon dioxide, moving heat around the planet, and producing the oxygen that all other lifeforms depend on. Plankton of course are the basis of every marine food chain, their distribution and abundance tightly embroiled with the millions of species on both land and in water.
Perhaps beginning with hunting whales, the largest animals on the planet, until many species were threatened with extinction, humans started to exert a significant impact on the health of marine ecosystems. Fishing has always taken place, and is not inherently bad for the ocean.
But the combination of technological advancements, rapid growth in fleet size and massive subsidies for industrial fishing that have caused fish to be harvested faster than stocks can replenish. Overfishing is now officially recognised as the most significant driver of declines in ocean wildlife, pushing target and non-target populations to the brink of collapse.
And lest we think that Ireland is innocent in this, we are one of the worst offenders when it comes to overfishing.
On top of these pressures, the oceans have been absorbing excess carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, a process that has, until recently, been buffering and delaying the impacts of climate change, but has been causing acidification in marine waters. Ocean temperatures, specifically sea surface temperatures, have been soaring, with about a quarter of the world's oceans experiencing marine heat waves in 2024. Last summer's extreme marine heatwave off the coasts of Ireland raised sea temperatures by 5°C. There is another marine heatwave underway currently. It is hardly surprising that the ecological equilibrium of the world's oceans are wobbling toward a fall. And if that happens, we will all go down.
All of this is to say that international cooperation to address the pressures and implement solutions is crucial. This is why the gathering of more than 50 heads of state this week in France, along with scientists, activists, and business executives, is a deeply hopeful event.
While many have turned to scepticism about the potential of such UN conferences to chart international agreements that go far enough to be effective, it is worth remembering that international summits such as these are still the most viable way of collectively agreeing and implementing solutions to global problems. These processes are also the only opportunity that small island states have to influence global politics.
The UN Ocean Conference has been working to develop international governance and mobilise financial resources for a suite of measures to protect the healthy functioning of the world's oceans. One of the key aspects of this is securing the ratification of the 'High Seas Treaty', a legally binding instrument to protect the high seas beyond national jurisdiction. A moratorium on deep-sea mining is also on the agenda.
Many civil society groups across Ireland and internationally have also been focusing energy on the need for a scaling up of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs). Ireland has made progress in recent years, having increased the area of MPAs from less than 2.5% in 2022 to just over 9% by 2024, though still leaving a long way to go to achieve the EU Biodiversity Strategy target to protect at least 30% of the Irish Maritime Area by 2030.
A swathe of marine biodiversity hotspots that are in urgent need of legal protection have been identified and proposed by the Fair Seas campaign, a coalition of civil society groups across Ireland. Another essential component of progressing the Irish MPA network is the long awaited Marine Protected Area Bill. The UN Ocean Conference puts much needed pressure on Ireland, as an island national, to progress long overdue national policy while simultaneously being part of the momentum for urgent multilateral action.
Globally, the oceans are changing faster than any time since the ice age. This time, it is human activities that are the agents of the transformation. We, too, are capable of transformation, once we understand that radical change in human activities is the only way we can allow the oceans to recover. For this, the success of international cooperation is a prerequisite, a necessity for a viable future.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump 'wants trade deal with EU'
Donald Trump 'wants trade deal with EU'

Irish Examiner

time17 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Donald Trump 'wants trade deal with EU'

US president Donald Trump wants to reach a trade deal with the EU, Tánaiste Simon Harris has said. Mr Harris said there are now 'real and meaningful' trade talks underway between the EU and US, after a call with US trade representative Jamieson Greer. While Mr Harris said the talks are now moving in a more positive direction, he believed there is still a 'way to go' before a deal is reached between the EU and US on trade. I think it's fair to say there is a way to go in relation to this, but I am encouraged by the fact that engagement has now begun in earnest between the EU and the United States. "I know from an EU perspective and from an Irish perspective, we want a negotiated outcome. From my conversation with president Trump's trade representative today, I think he wants that as well." 'What we need to find out in the days ahead, is there a landing zone that can work for everyone. Quite frankly, there has to be, because this transatlantic relationship matters.' Mr Harris acknowledged the deadline would run out next month, adding it was important for negotiators to 'intensely engage' and there 'isn't a day to lose here'. He added: I do now think the mood music, in terms of trying to find a deal, trying to find an agreement, is somewhat better than it was days ago. 'This will require the US and the EU to be really willing now to work to try find some common ground.' Mr Harris said the trading relationship between the EU and US was worth more than €1.4 trillion and this should not be 'snuffed at'. In an Irish readout of the call between Mr Harris and Mr Greer, the two had a 'constructive exchange of views' on the ongoing negotiations. Mr Greer recently met with EU Commissioner for trade, Maros Sefcovic, while Mr Harris travelled to Washington DC in recent months to meet with US commerce secretary Howard Lutnick. The ongoing negotiations come weeks after Mr Trump threatened to introduce a 50% tariff on all imports from the EU, after saying the talks between the two were 'going nowhere'. It led to a flurry of activity, with EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen calling Mr Trump, before the US president opted to delay their introduction to allow for 'serious negotiations'. The deadline for negotiations to be completed are now July 9.

Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'
Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'

Irish Examiner

time33 minutes ago

  • Irish Examiner

Defence Forces taking part in EU missions without triple lock 'could breach neutrality'

Ireland's Defence Forces could become embroiled in peacekeeping missions that could jeopardise Ireland's military neutrality if Government proposals to scrap UN authorisation for such deployments is passed, an Oireachtas committee has heard. Ray Murphy, a professor at the Irish Centre for Human Rights, University of Galway, said if Ireland took part in an EU force without a UN mandate — with the monitoring and controls coming with that — it could end up in situations not originally envisaged that would end up breaching our neutrality. Prof Murphy was one of three academics who took part in a three-hour session at the Oireachtas defence and national security committee, which is holding hearings on the Defence Bill 2025. The draft legislation proposes to remove the requirement for UN approval to send Defence Forces abroad. It also plans to increase from 12 to 50 the number of personnel that can be sent overseas without the Government needing the support of the Dáil. Defence Bill 2025 The bill would authorise Irish troops to take part in an 'international force' for the purposes of peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and international security 'consistent with the principles of the United Nations charter'. Examples of such bodies include the OSCE, the EU, or 'any other body' that operates in manner consistent with UN principles. All three academics at the committee are strongly opposed to the Government proposals to remove the 'triple lock'. It is not clear if the committee is due to hear from academics who are non-committed on the issue or who are in favour of removing the triple lock. Prof Murphy said: 'Any deployment of Defence Forces with an international force will be subject to certain mandatory principles. These are that the particular international force will be mandated to operate for peacekeeping, conflict prevention, and/or strengthening international security, in accordance with international law and consistent with the principles of the UN.' He asked who would determine if a regional body 'operates in a manner consistent' with the UN charter and international law, especially if Security Council or General Assembly approval is not obtained. Situations on the ground 'can change' Prof Murphy said situations on the ground can change and that Irish troops 'could become embroiled in something' that wasn't originally envisaged — and that such a situation could 'certainly jeopardise' military neutrality. He described the proposals as a 'betrayal' to commitments made by governments to its citizens and that they would grant any government 'excessive authority'. Karen Devine, lecturer in European politics at DCU, told the committee that as an academic her job is to 'tell the truth'. She said public support for neutrality has been consistent over the decades, with four in five people in favour of it. She alleged that 'militarists', consisting of the EU, Nato, and the military-industrial complex, 'seek to eradicate' Irish neutrality including the triple lock and want to 'militarise' the EU. She further alleged that these were joined by 'university agents', (professors she effectively identified), think tanks, and the 'mass media', who promoted this agenda.

Government intends to change defamation laws in this term
Government intends to change defamation laws in this term

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

Government intends to change defamation laws in this term

Taoiseach Mícheál Martin has said that the Government intends to change Irish defamation laws. Speaking in response to a question on Gerry Adams recently winning a defamation case against the BBC, Mr Martin said that a change in the laws was needed to allow for a balanced environment. "I think the defamation laws need to be changed. We're going to change them. We've published heads of the bill, and Minister (for Justice, Jim) O'Callaghan is going to proceed. We're going to do it in this Government. We said we would," he said. "We will look at the pre-legislation, it'll go to the Oireachtas, but a lot of work has been done on it. Minister James Browne did a lot of work on that in the previous Government, he's a good legislator. "I think we do need to get it through to create a balanced environment for commentary and for investigative journalism," the Taoiseach added. Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Fein official Denis Donaldson, in which he denies any involvement. Last month, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000, after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC, which was found by the jury not to have acted in good faith nor in a fair and reasonable way, was also ordered to pay the former Sinn Féin leader's legal costs. At the time, the director of BBC Northern Ireland Adam Smyth said there were "profound" implications from the jury's decision. "As our legal team made clear, if the BBC's case cannot be won under existing Irish defamation law, it's hard to see how anyone's could - and they warned that today's decision could hinder freedom of expression," he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store