Shekhar Kapur talks about humans, dolphins and AI
The filmmaker recently took to his Instagram, and shared a picture of a dolphin. He also penned a long note in the caption, as he spoke about the AI project.
He wrote, 'The scientists were studying the intelligence of a dolphin in a tank. Sending signals and stimuli to the dolphin, as computers through the latest AI technology would record and analyse the dolphin's response. They continued the study over several months looking for patterns. 'How intelligent are the dolphins really ?', they asked. What unnerved the scientists was the way the Dolphin would always come back and stare at the scientists as if to say 'Hey, what's your next signal?'. As if this was a game the dolphin was enjoying 'Was the dolphin just enjoying the play?' Does play have a pattern?'.
The filmmaker was talking about the recent DolphinGemma project by Google in which AI documents and studies communication patterns by dolphins.
However, what he wrote next seems to be fictitious. He shared, 'When they analysed the Data, they could not find a cohesive response, no cohesive pattern from the dolphin even through the latest AI engine they found the responses completely random. Random?'. One day the 10 year old daughter of one of the scientists came to visit. As soon as the dolphin saw her, she got visibly excited, and started to roll up and down .. as if she wanted to play with the little girl. The voice of the dolphin started to almost sing and hum, the little girl hummed back, the scientists were astounded'.
He further mentioned, 'They asked the little girl what was going on? 'We're singing together', she said. The AI engine quickly analysed. It found that all the while the scientists were trying to study the dolphin, the dolphin was actually analysing and studying them back. Which is why they couldn't find a pattern to the dolphin's responses'.
'They should have been looking for their own patterns. 'What is the song you're singing with the dolphin asked the scientists. 'It's the song of the Planet Earth', said the little girl. The dolphin stared at the scientists, the scientists asked what the dolphin wanted, why is the dolphin studying us? 'She wants to understand what kind of species would want to destroy its own home. Its own planet', replied the little girl. 'How intelligent are humans really?' The dolphin was asking', he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Turkey Earthquake: Google's AEA miscalculated magnitude, issued only 469 major alerts
Google has acknowledged serious shortcomings in its Android Earthquake Alerts (AEA) system, which failed to provide adequate warnings ahead of the devastating earthquake that struck Turkey in February 2023, reported Euro News. Reportedly, the quake, one of the deadliest in the country's recent history, killed more than 55,000 people and injured over 100,000. Despite the system's potential to deliver high-level alerts to millions within the quake zone, the report suggests that only 469 'Take Action' notifications, designed to wake users and prompt immediate protective measures, were sent ahead of the initial 7.8-magnitude tremor. The disaster struck at 4:17 am local time, a time when most victims were asleep indoors. In contrast, around 500,000 people received the far less urgent 'Be Aware' notifications, the report added. These alerts, which do not override Do Not Disturb settings, are intended for minor tremors and do not prompt life-saving action. The failure has been attributed to the system's miscalculation of the quake's magnitude. At the time, the AEA initially estimated the shaking to be between 4.5 and 4.9 on the moment magnitude scale, vastly underestimating the actual seismic impact. The misjudgement severely limited the scope and intensity of alerts issued. Following scrutiny from the BBC and independent experts, Google reportedly admitted in a paper published inScience that there were flaws in its detection algorithms. It later ran a simulation of the event using its updated system, which it claims would have sent 10 million 'Take Action' alerts and 67 million 'Be Aware' notifications had the new version been active at the time. A second major quake later the same day saw a somewhat improved response from the system, with over 8,000 'Take Action' alerts sent and nearly four million 'Be Aware' notifications issued. However, experts argue that the damage had already been done and that the system's failure during the initial quake cost crucial seconds of warning. Elizabeth Reddy, assistant professor at the Colorado School of Mines, criticised the delayed transparency. 'I'm really frustrated that it took so long,' she said. 'This wasn't a minor incident, people died. And the warning system did not perform as needed.' The AEA operates independently of government-run warning services and functions using data from Android phones, which account for over 70 per cent of mobile devices in Turkey. Google has maintained that the system is meant to supplement national alert networks rather than replace them. Still, seismologists and emergency management experts warn that some nations may rely too heavily on Google's system, potentially neglecting the development of robust public warning infrastructure. 'Would some places make the calculation that Google's doing it, so we don't have to?' asked Harold Tobin, director of the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network. 'Transparency about its effectiveness is critical.'
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
The unnerving future of AI-fueled video games
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills It sounds like a thought experiment conjured by René Descartes for the 21st citizens of a simulated city inside a video game based on "The Matrix" franchise were being awakened to a grim reality. Everything was fake, a player told them through a microphone, and they were simply lines of code meant to embellish a virtual world. Empowered by generative artificial intelligence like ChatGPT, the characters responded in panicked disbelief."What does that mean," said one woman in a grey sweater. "Am I real or not?"The unnerving demo, released two years ago by an Australian tech company named Replica Studios, showed both the potential power and the consequences of enhancing gameplay with artificial intelligence. The risk goes far beyond unsettling scenes inside a virtual world. As video game studios become more comfortable with outsourcing the jobs of voice actors, writers and others to artificial intelligence, what will become of the industry?At the pace the technology is improving, large tech companies such as Google Microsoft and Amazon are counting on their AI programs to revolutionise how games are made within the next few years."Everybody is trying to race toward AGI," said tech founder Kylan Gibbs, using an acronym for artificial generalised intelligence, which describes the turning point at which computers have the same cognitive abilities as humans. "There's this belief that once you do, you'll basically monopolise all other industries."In the earliest months after the rollout of ChatGPT in 2022, the conversation about artificial intelligence's role in gaming was largely about how it could help studios quickly generate concept art or write basic applications have accelerated quickly. This spring at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco, thousands of eager professionals looking for employment opportunities were greeted with an eerie glimpse into the future of video from Google DeepMind, an artificial intelligence laboratory, lectured on a new program that might eventually replace human play testers with "autonomous agents" that can run through early builds of a game and discover developers hosted a demonstration of adaptive gameplay with an example of how artificial intelligence could study a short video and immediately generate level design and animations that would otherwise have taken hundreds of hours to executives behind the online gaming platform Roblox introduced Cube 3D, a generative AI model that could produce functional objects and environments from text descriptions in a matter of were not the solutions that developers were hoping to see after several years of extensive layoffs; another round of cuts in Microsoft's gaming division this month was a signal to some analysts that the company was shifting resources to artificial have suffered as expectations for hyperrealistic graphics turned even their bestselling games into financial losses. And some observers are worried that investing in AI programs with hopes of cutting overhead costs might actually be an expensive distraction from the industry's efficiency experts acknowledge that a takeover by artificial intelligence is coming for the video game industry within the next five years, and executives have already started preparing to restructure their companies in anticipation. After all, it was one of the first sectors to deploy AI programming in the 1980s, with the four ghosts who chase Pac-Man, each responding differently to the player's real-time movements. Sony did not respond to questions about the AI technology it is using for game Lee, a spokesperson for Microsoft, said, "Game creators will always be the centre of our overall AI efforts, and we empower our teams to decide on the use of generative AI that best supports their unique goals and vision."A spokesperson for Nintendo said the company did not have further comment beyond what one of its leaders, Shigeru Miyamoto, told The New York Times last year: "There is a lot of talk about AI, for example. When that happens, everyone starts to go in the same direction, but that is where Nintendo would rather go in a different direction."Over the past year, generative AI has shifted from a concept into a common tool within the industry, according to a survey released by organisers of the Game Developers Conference. A majority of respondents said their companies were using artificial intelligence, while an increasing number of developers expressed concern that it was contributing to job instability and all responses were negative. Some developers praised the ability to use AI programs to complete repetitive tasks like placing barrels throughout a virtual the impressive tech demos at the conference in late March, many developers admitted that their programs were still several years away from widespread use."There is a very big gap between prototypes and production," said Gibbs, who runs Inworld AI, a tech company that builds artificial intelligence programs for consumer applications in sectors such as gaming, health and learning. He appeared on a conference panel for Microsoft, where the company showed off its adaptive gameplay said large studios could face costs in the millions of dollars to upgrade their technology. Google, Microsoft and Amazon each hope to become the new backbone of the gaming sector by offering AI tools that would require studios to join their servers under expensive intelligence technology has developed so fast that it has surpassed Replica Studios, the team behind the tech demo based on the "Matrix" franchise. Replica went out of business this year because of the pace of competition from larger companies like chief technology officer, Eoin McCarthy, said that at the height of the demo's popularity, users were generating more than 100,000 lines of dialogue from nonplayer characters, or NPCs , which cost the startup about $1,000 per day to cost has fallen in recent years as the AI programs have improved, but he said that most developers were unaccustomed to these unbounded costs. There were also fears about how expensive it would be if NPCs started talking to one Replica announced it was ending the demo, McCarthy said, some players grew concerned about the fate of the NPCs. "'Were they going to continue to live or would they die?'" McCarthy recalled players asking. He would reply: "It is a technology demo. These people aren't real.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Garena Free Fire Max redeem codes for today, July 28: Check nearly 20 active rewards here
Garena Free Fire Max players have a new opportunity to unlock exclusive in-game rewards. A fresh batch of redeem codes for July 28 has been released, offering items like outfits, weapon skins, and diamonds. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Garena Free Fire Max Active redeem codes for July 28 NPTF2FWSPXN9 RDNAFV2KX2CQ FF6WN9QSFTHX FF4MTXQPFDZ9 FFMTYQPXFGX6 FFNFSXTPVQZ9 FVTCQK2MFNSK FFM4X2HQWCVK FFPURTXQFKX3 FFYNCXG2FNT4 QWER89ASDFGH BNML12ZXCVBN FFMTYKQPFDZ9 FFPURTQPFDZ9 FFRSX4CYHXZ8 FFDMNQX9KGX2 FFSGT9KNQXT6 XF4S9KCW7KY2 How to use Garena Free Fire Max redeem codes To claim these rewards, players must follow these steps: Visit the official Rewards Redemption site for Garena Free Fire Max. Log in using a preferred method — Facebook, X, Google, or VK ID. Copy one of the redeem codes listed above and paste it into the text box provided on the site. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Garena Free Fire Max has issued a fresh batch of redeem codes for July 28, giving players a chance to unlock limited-time rewards including outfits, weapon skins, diamonds, and other in-game items. These codes are valid for a short period and have a limited number of uses, so players are encouraged to redeem them quickly. The redemption process is simple, and the codes must be claimed early due to limited availability and short active Garena Free Fire Max redeem codes for today are:Each code is typically valid for 12 hours and is limited to 500 redemptions per day. These codes offer access to in-game rewards like Rebel Academy outfits, Revolt Weapon Loot Crates, Diamond Vouchers, and other cosmetic a code is redeemed, the rewards will be sent directly to the player's in-game mailbox. Any diamonds or gold will be credited to the player's account balance redeem codes are designed for quick use and high competition. Players are advised to redeem them as early as possible to avoid missing out.
