Sand and dust storms affect about 330 million people in over 150 countries, UN agency says
'About 2 billion tons of dust are emitted yearly, equivalent to 300 Great Pyramids of Giza' in Egypt, the organization's U.N. representative, Laura Paterson, told the General Assembly.
More than 80% of the world's dust comes from the deserts in North Africa and the Middle East, she said, but it has a global impact because the particles can travel hundreds and even thousands of kilometers (miles) across continents and oceans.
The General Assembly was marking the International Day of Combating Sand and Dust Storms on Saturday and its designation of 2025 to 2034 as the U.N. decade on combating sand and dust storms.
Assembly President Philemon Yang said the storms 'are fast becoming one of the most overlooked yet far-reaching global challenges of our time.'
'They are driven by climate change, land degradation and unsustainable practices,' he said.
Yang, in a speech Thursday that was read by an assembly vice president, said airborne particles from sand and dust storms contribute to 7 million premature deaths every year. He said they trigger respiratory and cardiovascular disease, and reduce crop yields by up to 25%, causing hunger and migration.
Undersecretary-General Rola Dashti, head of the U.N. Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia, told the assembly the storms' economic costs are "staggering.'
In the Middle East and North Africa, the annual cost of dealing with dust and sand storms is $150 billion, roughly 2.5% of GDP, she said.
'This spring alone, the Arab region experienced acute disruption,' Dashti said, citing severe storms in Iraq that overwhelmed hospitals with respiratory cases and storms in Kuwait and Iran that forced schools and offices to close.
Dust from the Sahara Desert in Africa has reached as far as the Caribbean and Florida, she said,
Dashti, who also co-chairs the U.N. Coalition on Combating Sand and Dust Storms, said over 20 U.N. and international agencies are working to unite efforts on early warning systems for storms and to deal with other issues, including health and financing.
She urged all countries to put sand and dust storms into global and national agendas.
'From land restoration and sustainable agriculture to integrated early warning systems, we have the tools to act," Dashti said. "What we need now is collective determination and financing to bring these solutions to scale.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Iraqis battle extreme heatwave with ice, mist and river dips
STORY: :: July 28, 2025 :: Iraqis seek relief in rivers and misting fans as an extreme heatwave grips the country :: Baghdad, Iraq :: The government declared a public holiday in several provinces in response :: Najaf, Iraq :: Basra, Iraq In Baghdad, residents jumped into the Tigris River to cool off while others gathered near roadside fans spraying water or bought cooled bottled water from vendors. 'There is a rise in the temperature, it's currently over than 50 degrees, it's hitting 52 degrees during this recent period,' said Mohammed Sadeq, a resident of Baghdad. 'What can one do? You head back home, there's no electricity, and it's so hot - it feels like you're burning. One goes out to work, you have to, we have families and responsibilities.' The United Nations puts Iraq among the most vulnerable countries to climate change globally, citing water scarcity, drought, and extreme temperatures.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Experts issue warning over slow-moving 'catastrophe' threatening food and water systems: 'The worst I've ever seen'
Experts issue warning over slow-moving 'catastrophe' threatening food and water systems: 'The worst I've ever seen' A new report warns that drought is fueling a global hunger crisis, with more than 90 million people in Africa on the brink of starvation and key food supplies disrupted worldwide. Experts say this slow-moving disaster, worsened by a warming world, threatens water, food, and energy systems across continents. What's happening? The dire report issued by the National Drought Mitigation Center and the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification says that the world has experienced some of the largest and most destructive droughts ever recorded since 2023. "Drought Hotspots Around the World 2023-2025" was produced with support from the International Drought Resilience Alliance. It outlines how droughts exacerbate poverty, hunger, energy insecurity, and the breakdown of ecosystems. "Over 90 million people across Eastern and Southern Africa face acute hunger," according to a news release about the report. "Some areas have been enduring their worst ever recorded drought." The report notes that drought-ravaged southern Africa saw a staggering 68 million people, or roughly one-sixth of its population, in need of food assistance in August 2024. "This is not a dry spell," said Mark Svoboda, the founding director of the NDMC and co-author of the report, per The Guardian. "This is a slow-moving global catastrophe, the worst I've ever seen." Why is this report on drought around the world important? "Drought is a silent killer," said UNCCD Executive Secretary Ibrahim Thiaw in a summary of the report. "It creeps in, drains resources, and devastates lives in slow motion. Its scars run deep." Per the news release, the report says that "women, children, the elderly, pastoralists, subsistence farmers, and people with chronic illness" are most vulnerable to the health risks raised by drought, which include "cholera outbreaks, acute malnutrition, dehydration, and exposure to polluted water." "Drought is no longer a distant threat," added Thiaw. "It is here, escalating, and demands urgent global cooperation. When energy, food, and water all go at once, societies start to unravel. That's the new normal we need to be ready for." Our overheating planet is supercharging many forms of extreme weather. The United States Geological Survey warns that our warming world is making droughts more frequent, longer, and more intense. Do you worry about the quality of the air inside your home? Yes — often Yes — but only sometimes Only when it's bad outside No — I never do Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What's being done about severe droughts? The NDMC and UNCCD report recommends urgent investment in stronger early warning systems, nature-based solutions, resilient infrastructure, gender-responsive adaptation, and global cooperation as ways to mitigate the devastation caused by droughts. It cautions that drought disproportionately impacts people who have the fewest resources to deal with it. Advances in technology provide hope for finding ways to help people hit hardest by drought. U.S. researchers have developed a solar-powered device that can produce clean drinking water from saltwater day and night, even after sunset. Rwandan farmers are increasingly relying on solar-powered irrigation for their small-scale farms, leading to better harvests and lower expenses across the drought-prone country. Talking to friends and family members about climate issues and donating to organizations focused on our climate can help. Supporting pro-climate politicians who are fighting for the future of our planet is another way to make a difference. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Is Fashion Ready for Climate ‘Crunch Time'?
'We are playing Russian roulette with our planet,' United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres warned at the American Natural History Museum in New York City last month, citing a World Meteorological Organization that predicted even more record-breaking temperatures over the next five years. 'We need an exit ramp off the highway to climate hell.' The traffic metaphor could not have been more apt. With extreme heat currently gripping vast swathes of the United States and Europe, subjecting tens of millions of people to dangerous temperatures far above what is usual for this time of year, even Germany's famed autobahn is buckling under the strain, requiring emergency repairs. Over in Greece, mandatory work breaks have been imposed in parts of the country where temperatures are expected to exceed 104 degrees Fahrenheit. On Monday, scientists said that the Fourth of July flash floods in Texas that killed at least 100 people—27 of them children and counselors from a summer camp—were caused by 'very exceptional meteorological conditions' that could not be explained by natural variability alone. More from Sourcing Journal Are Unionized Garment Factories Being Targeted for Closures? Long Excluded in Climate Conversations, Fashion's Suppliers Create Own Seat at Table Ecuador Apologizes to Abused Abacaleros, Plantation Remains Silent If humanity still has 'control of the wheel,' as Guterres said, it may not be for long. Despite having 'what we need to save ourselves,' he said, referring to technologies that can slash emissions and protections that can safeguard carbon-absorbing forests, wetlands and oceans, 'the battle to limit temperature rise to 1.5 degrees will be won or lost in the 2020s—under the watch of leaders today.' The global financial system must be part of the climate solution, too, he added. Right now, for every dollar needed to adapt to extreme weather, only roughly five cents is available. Fashion, a trillion-dollar industry, could also be accused of distracted driving under these conditions. While major brands such as Adidas, H&M Group, Lululemon, Zara owner Inditex and even Shein show 'promising signs of improvement' in their climate strategies, even raising their ambitions, according to a sectorial deep dive by the NewClimate Institute and Carbon Market Watch in June, their credibility is being thwarted by limited transparency on implementation plans, a reliance on problematic substitutions and a failure to shift completely away from the fast fashion business model. 'You can't only set targets,' said Benja Faecks, expert on global carbon markets at Carbon Market Watch, which is based in Brussels. 'You also need to substantiate them with measures. For the fashion sector, one of the biggest things is that you need to electrify your supply chain. And while all the companies are talking about how renewable energy is needed, there's almost no talk about how other processes that are not yet electrified need to be electrified.' Among those so-called 'false solutions,' the report said, is replacing coal with biomass as a power source. Companies like H&M and Inditex say they are sourcing biomass with the lowest risk of adverse impact to help bridge efforts where barriers such as unreliable grid connections make transitioning to renewable energy difficult. Faecks said, however, that doing so doesn't substantially reduce emissions and, instead, risks locking in carbon-intensive technologies. Unbundled, stand-alone renewable energy certificates, or RECs, are another problem. Two decades of REC procurement, meant to help finance new renewable energy projects, have mostly failed to create additional capacity on the grid, creating a 'misleading narrative' about progress, she added. Faecks said that it's the same with overproduction. Despite increasing industry chatter about the need to curtail the constant churn, no company has set measurable targets to do so. Rather than changing tack, Faecks said, businesses are still leaning on overproduction as a default strategy, creating tens of millions of metric tons of textile waste every year as a direct consequence. There's a climate corollary, too: One 2020 McKinsey study estimated that reducing the quantity of pre-consumer unsold clothing by 10 percent through more efficient supply chains and more accurate forecasting tools could reduce industry-wide emissions by 9 percent by 2030. It's why the French legislature is embracing new rules that could regulate fast fashion's even speedier counterpart, emblematized by Shein. 'And it's not only for household brands like H&M and Inditex, but also for Gucci, Prada and the higher-value brands that are overstimulating customer demands,' Faecks said. 'So I think we need a rethinking of what fashion is, and how we can go from cradle to grave without exceeding planetary boundaries.' Other key transitions listed by the NewClimate Institute and Carbon Watch report—lower-impact fibers and low-emission logistics—have likewise seen middling progress, though not to the extent that they could be accurately referred to as 'transitions,' she said. A more recent McKinsey study found that nearly two-thirds of clothing and footwear purveyors are behind on their 2030 decarbonization goals, with many shunting sustainability down their list of priorities and scaling back their commitments by pushing back or rescinding their net-zero targets. Only 18 percent of fashion executives ranked sustainability as a top-three risk to growth in 2025 versus 29 percent in 2024, it noted. Global Fashion Agenda CEO Federica Marchionni alluded to this at the Global Fashion Summit in Copenhagen last month, where she said that the only certainty in an uncertain world is and will be climate change. But the cold calculus is that companies, ponying up more for, say, the Trump White House's increased tariffs, will see thinner profit margins with less wiggle room for long-term investments bearing less tangible returns. 'As we adapt, countries and communities must be supported to respond to current and future climate change impacts,' she said. 'As fashion is contributing to the climate crisis, too, it must not only mitigate its environmental impact but also support value chain adaptation to build long-term resilience.' It's not only brands that bear responsibility, Faecks said, but also standard setters such as the GHG Protocol and the Science Based Targets initiative, which could require transition alignment targets to better shepherd companies. Regulatory interventions are similarly crucial because otherwise companies would only be guided by voluntary initiatives. One problem, she said, is that there's too much finger-pointing about who's to blame for the current predicament and too little seizing of the reins. This phenomenon could worsen as companies face more existential issues—immediate-term financial health, for one—amid proliferating economic and geopolitical challenges that make the material risks of global warming feel, well, less material. 'You could also say that it's the consumer's responsibility to demand fewer clothes,' she said. 'So I think instead of shifting the blame, it's important to take leadership. Brands do have a role to play in engaging their suppliers. There are whole policy papers on how supplier engagement should work and should be encouraged. But without real frameworks and regulations, this game of blaming will continue.' A just transition? If fashion's climate plans are riddled with half measures, there's at least one area with a massively missing element: its workers. A June report by the Business & Human Rights Resource Center, which is headquartered in London and New York, found that while more than half of the 65 brands it examined have made commitments to reduce supply chain emissions by 2030, not one target involves engaging with or mitigating the impact on workers. Of the seven companies with the most ambitious climate goals, just one—Inditex—has a public climate transition plan that mentions workers. This despite the fact that climate breakdown will disproportionately impact garment-producing hubs in the global South. That no brand has laid out a stand-alone 'just transition' policy—defined by the United Nations as 'leaving no person or country behind'—came as a surprise to Natalie Swan, labor rights program manager at BHRRC. She had assumed, going in, that it would have been an overutilized term, considering how often it's bandied about. 'I don't think that it is acceptable for a fashion company, or any business for that matter, to have ambitious decarbonization targets and not link workers intrinsically to a just transition,' she said. 'There is shared prosperity around this: there are rights holders along supply chains who are making the clothes that brands are selling, who absolutely have skin in the game on what a transition looks like.' Not mentioning workers beyond a throwaway line about engaging with stakeholders is a 'wilful omission,' she said. Speaking to workers in Bangladesh and Cambodia, it was clear to her that they understand the climate emergency and the implications thereof, including how the growing use of new technologies or machinery could dramatically alter their employment landscape without reskilling or upskilling support. 'Their expertise was absolutely palpable on what the impact of heat was in factories, what they needed to feel safe at work and at home, and what they saw as the vision for a genuinely 'green' factory, rather than just an LEED-certified one,' Swan said. Existing heat standards for workplaces are vague, pithy, non-existent or subject to lax oversight regimes that render any modicum of guidance just a hair's breadth above meaningless. Workers are also the ones bearing the brunt of extreme heat and flooding that can create operational disruptions and drive respiratory illnesses, cardiac issues and infectious diseases. Between March and April, for instance, members of the Tamil Nadu Textile and Common Labour Union reported temperatures between 95 and 113 degrees Fahrenheit in garment factories across the South Indian state, or far above what a human body can reasonably tolerate under industrial conditions. If brands propel the transition with the current status quo of supply chain inequality 'baked in,' they will only perpetuate the 'unjust and self-defeating' power differential that undergirds current production systems by ignoring the people on the frontlines, she added. 'There is an opportunity—a business opportunity—to have a shared agenda and vision for what the future of fashion means,' Swan said. 'It's an absolute requirement because these rights holders will be at increased risk if international brands don't engage with workers and their representatives. They're not outside their business models. They're within and critical to their business models.' Even 'stakeholder engagement' can mean very different things to different people. Swan broke it down: 'Does it mean utilizing worker voice technology? Does it mean having a conversation with a few individual workers along your supply chain? Does it mean having a conversation with participation committees that do not make up stakeholder engagement, particularly when you do have the ability to have unionized workforce forces along your supply chains?' Writing in an article that BHRRC published last month, labor campaigners Nandita Shivakumar and Apekshita Varshney recounted how one factory employee told them that brands are writing their sustainability policies in air-conditioned rooms at 68 degrees Fahrenheit for people working in 104-degree Fahrenheit heat. Workers aren't asking for luxuries, they said, just the 'bare minimum to survive,' such as cold drinking water, a functioning fan for every five to 10 people and clean bathrooms to rinse off their sweat. 'The cost of meeting these needs is negligible,' they wrote. 'The question is not about affordability: it's about willingness.' Brands, investors and multi-stakeholder initiatives, they said, must recognize heat stress as a human rights issue and incorporate it into human rights due diligence, occupational safety and climate adaptation plans. Equally important, they must share the financial burden of adaptation by funding infrastructure improvements, particularly for low-margin suppliers. Back in New York City, Guterres described the present as the 'moment of truth' for climate action. Because every fraction of a degree of global heating counts, amounting to the 'difference between minimizing climate chaos or crossing dangerous tipping points,' now is the time to mobilize, act and deliver, he said. 'Our planet is trying to tell us something, but we don't seem to be listening,' Guterres said. 'It's climate crunch time. The need for action is unprecedented but so is the opportunity—not just to deliver on climate, but on economic prosperity and sustainable development.' Solve the daily Crossword
