logo
‘I'll protect trans people to the end,' vows Co-op boss

‘I'll protect trans people to the end,' vows Co-op boss

Yahoo04-05-2025

The boss of Co-op has vowed to 'protect trans people to the end' after the Supreme Court's ruling on the definition of a woman.
The judges' decision last month forced businesses and institutions across the country to rip up policies on how to treat transgender people.
Shirine Khoury-Haq said the trans community brought a 'massive business benefit' to the Co-op. She told The Telegraph: 'These are highly talented people who, if they feel loved, if they feel valued, if they feel like they can bring their whole selves to work, their contribution is immense.'
The Co-op's Beirut-born chief executive wrote to its 54,000 staff in the wake of last month's Supreme Court ruling saying she would 'continue to advocate' for them and 'speak out against hate'. More than 1,000 staff identify as trans or non-binary.
Ms Khoury-Haq, 53, said in her letter that she wanted to extend her 'personal support to all of our trans and non-binary colleagues, those with trans and non-binary loved ones and anyone who will be feeling the impact of [the] ruling'.
Judges last month unanimously ruled that the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act referred to biological sex rather than acquired gender.
The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), which regulates the Equality Act, subsequently issued interim guidance saying that companies should no longer allow trans women into female-only facilities. It said this would 'mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities and must be open to all users of the opposite sex'.
Like other companies, the Co-op is now looking at what this means for its HR policies. An initial assessment has found that single-sex spaces are available in most of Co-op's locations, but the sprawling nature of the business means there are challenging areas. The Co-op runs more than 2,300 convenience stores, more than 800 funeral parlours and has insurance, legal and wholesale teams in the UK.
Ms Khoury-Haq said 'the key areas that we will need to look at differently are changing rooms', which are in funeral branches, funeral care centres and depots.
Some companies have already begun updating policies. Barclays, for example, has banned trans women from using female lavatories, reversing an earlier policy of allowing them to use whichever bathroom they feel most comfortable in.
However, Co-op has said it will wait until the EHRC publishes full guidance, expected in June, and until then will allow staff to 'continue to use toilets and changing facilities in accordance with their gender identity.'
Ms Khoury-Haq's staunch support of trans staff risks attracting attention from gender-critical campaigners, who for years have accused companies of promoting trans ideology under the banner of equality.
She said Co-op would continue to be a 'safe place for people, where they can do a great job but also be themselves', adding: 'If that's 'woke', I'm fine with it.'
Co-op follows Lloyds Bank in vowing to stand behind trans staff in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling. Britain's biggest lender has pledged 'solidarity' with transgender staff.
Ms Khoury-Haq said: 'On a personal level, I need to take care of my trans colleagues. I always will, and, as long as I'm there, they will be protected. I will absolutely protect those people to the end.'
The Supreme Court ruling on the definition of gender is one of many fast-moving issues Co-op's chief has to navigate. Just hours after sitting down with the Telegraph, Ms Khoury-Haq was told by her IT team that the company was the victim of an attempted hack.
Some back-office and call-centre systems were quickly taken down as part of 'proactive steps to keep systems safe'.
In a letter to staff, Co-op said security was of 'paramount importance' given the 'recent issues surrounding M&S and the cyber attack they experienced'.
On Friday, Co-op admitted that hackers had breached its systems and stolen data 'relating to a significant number of our current and past members.' While financial data is not thought to be included, cyber attackers have accessed people's names and contact details. Hackers claimed to the BBC that had details on 20 million Co-op members, though the retailer has not confirmed the number.
The cyber attack came in the wake of the crippling IT breach that has plagued Marks & Spencer for the past two weeks. Co-op declined to provide any additional comment on the incident. It said Ms Khoury-Haq would not be able to speak about the breach.
Speaking last week, the Co-op chief said she was planning to add more technology to shops to help offset the £150m in extra costs hitting the business this year. This includes rolling out electronic shelf labels, where prices are displayed virtually and can be updated more easily.
'There's a heavy burden on business at the moment when you look at it across the board,' Ms Khoury-Haq said. 'When labour is much cheaper, it's hard to make a business case for a large-scale technology rollout, but when labour is more expensive, that business case starts to look very different.'
Collectively, retailers face £7bn of extra costs as a result of Rachel Reeves's tax raid last October. The rise in the minimum wage and National Insurance changes that took effect on April 1 mean the cost of employing a worker in an entry-level retail job has risen by 10pc.
Ms Khoury-Haq wants ministers to do more to help retailers, rather than simply piling on extra costs. She said: 'We've been saying to ministers, if you can help us reduce the loss from our stores, then the National Insurance becomes something that we can balance.'
A shake-up of business rates would help the majority of Co-op stores but that is still some way off.
In the meantime, retailers have been hit by a recycling levy forecast to cost the industry £2bn. Ms Khoury-Haq tried to make the case for this to be delayed 'but they decided to bring it in anyway'.
The wave of costs have already started to feed into higher prices. Last month, food inflation rose to its highest level in 11 months, according to the British Retail Consortium. Ms Khoury-Haq said Co-op will 'absorb as much as we possibly can, as we have been all along, to keep prices as low as possible'.
Aside from the Co-op, Ms Khoury-Haq also co-chairs the Net Zero Council alongside Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, reprising a role she held with the previous government. The advisory group was set up to help businesses and the Government work together on net zero as Britain races to decarbonise its energy system by 2030.
The project has been the centre of controversy over the last week, following widespread power cuts in Spain, Portugal and France that may have been linked to a heavy dependence on solar power.
Sir Tony Blair last week claimed net zero policies were doomed to fail amid concerns the public was being asked to make 'financial sacrifices' with little impact on global emissions.
While the former prime minister later appeared to row back on the criticism, questions have continued to mount over the Energy Secretary's net zero policies.
Ms Khoury-Haq said: 'If we think net zero is not important, we need to think again. Because by the time our children grow up, it will be on their doorstep.
'We need to make sure that we do the right things in order to have energy security and food security, and make sure our GDP continues to grow.'
Again, the 'w' word comes up. For Ms Khoury-Haq, this 'is not about being 'woke''. 'It's about saying, 'Actually, sustainability is important for the planet. How can the UK benefit from this?''
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alex Polikoff, Who Won a Marathon Housing Segregation Case, Dies at 98
Alex Polikoff, Who Won a Marathon Housing Segregation Case, Dies at 98

New York Times

time6 hours ago

  • New York Times

Alex Polikoff, Who Won a Marathon Housing Segregation Case, Dies at 98

Alex Polikoff, who won a landmark discrimination case before the Supreme Court in 1976 showing that the City of Chicago had segregated Black and white public housing residents, and who then spent decades fighting to make sure that the court's will was enforced, died on May 27 at his home in Keene, N.H. He was 98. His daughter Eve Kodiak confirmed the death. Mr. Polikoff's class-action lawsuit, known as Gautreaux after its lead plaintiff, Dorothy Gautreaux, ranks among the most important decisions in the history of civil rights litigation. Ms. Gautreaux, a public-housing resident, and her five co-plaintiffs claimed that the Chicago Housing Authority had systematically funneled Black residents into a small number of poorly constructed high-rise complexes, which became havens of crime and drug use. Such segregation was an open secret in Chicago, and the subject of decades of protest — Mr. Polikoff filed the case in August 1966, just months after the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. began his own grass-roots campaign to desegregate the city. But Chicago, under Mayor Richard J. Daley, pushed back. Dr. King left the city without success, while Mr. Polikoff spent a decade fighting the city in court. Ms. Gautreaux died in 1968, eight years before the case reached the Supreme Court. By then, the lawsuit had been combined with a similar suit against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. In oral arguments before the court, Mr. Polikoff squared off against one of his former classmates from the University of Chicago Law School: Robert H. Bork, the solicitor general. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Transgender activists and allies call for 'basic human rights' at protest
Transgender activists and allies call for 'basic human rights' at protest

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Transgender activists and allies call for 'basic human rights' at protest

Crowds of protestors have taken to the streets in Swindon to demand 'basic human rights' for the transgender community. The protest, which took place on Sunday morning, June 15, comes after a recent ruling by the UK Supreme Court means that transgender women, even those with Gender Recognition Certificates, are not legally recognised as women in the context of the Equality Act. Transgender activists and allies gathered outside Regent Circus in Swindon from 10.30am to make their stance on the decision clear, in a call for 'basic human rights'. Max Downey, who was among the protestors, told the Swindon Advertiser: "It should be a basic human right to have access to health care. Wiltshire Police 101 line now responds faster to incoming calls Anger after burst pipe leaves families without water for over 12 hours Highworth care home rated 'Good' by inspectors, but management must still improve "As a trans man, I have been struggling just to get the basic hormones. I'm now on my second GP and still having the same argument." Andrea Downey added: "I used to be a GP and so I can say with confidence that it's difficult to find trans-friendly GPs. We need more services that support trans individuals and more support in healthcare." Ash, Danni and Carmen were also among those who attended the Regent Circus protest dressed in pride colours and wrapped in transgender flags. Ash told the Adver: "We're here today because we can't let our rights continue to be infringed. "Whatever happens to the trans community affects everyone. You think it won't happen to you, but once they start taking away human rights, everybody is at risk. "That's why we have to keep standing up for what's right and living authentically." Joining crowds of protestors were famous Swindon twins Billy and Louie, who represented Swindon in the final of The Voice UK and have openly supported the Pride movement at various events. The twins have previously performed at Swindon and Wiltshire Pride, the group behind this recent protest. A spokesperson for Swindon and Wiltshire Pride said: "We have amazing speakers, a trans wall of support in our Pride hub, and we are ready to make our voices heard. "Now, more than ever, our trans family need our voices to show support, solidarity, and create change. "We have seen too much in the recent news about our rights being stripped away, for simply existing. "Pride started as a protest, and that is what we shall be doing. We are using our voices."

Same Role, Same Experience—One Tech Worker Found Out Colleague Made Nearly Double The Money. It Could End Up Badly For One Of Them
Same Role, Same Experience—One Tech Worker Found Out Colleague Made Nearly Double The Money. It Could End Up Badly For One Of Them

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Same Role, Same Experience—One Tech Worker Found Out Colleague Made Nearly Double The Money. It Could End Up Badly For One Of Them

A tech employee recently discovered a jaw-dropping pay gap between them and a colleague with the same title and similar experience. While they earn $60,000 a year, their coworker, 'John,' makes $115,000. The two work at a large tech company, and the disparity sparked a flood of advice and opinion on Reddit. The original poster explained that they lead two teams—including one that the poster built from scratch—while John is just a member of one. They have been at the company for two years; John has been there for three. The key difference is that John came from a startup that was acquired by the tech giant, keeping his original salary intact. The poster, on the other hand, was hired post-merger through a staffing agency. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can 'He was hired as part of a startup that was bought by this tech company,' OP wrote. 'As such, his higher pay carried over after the merge. I was hired after the merge through a staffing agency.' OP later updated the post to add: 'I found out today that the company is trying very hard to find a reason to get rid of John, which is at least partially because he makes so much. Maybe our pay difference was for the best lol!' This revelation added a surprising twist to the situation. While OP may be underpaid, John's inflated salary appears to have made him a target. Many companies are always looking for ways to cut costs. If they think someone is overpaid and replaceable, some start building a case to get rid of them. What started as a frustrating realization for OP might ultimately end in job loss for John. The title of 'highest-paid peer' can sometimes come with a bullseye. Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. Commenters were quick to point out a harsh truth: negotiating power is everything. 'Apply to another job and get an offer. Use that offer to negotiate higher pay at your current job. Then—maybe—take the new job, it might be time to move in a new direction,' one commenter advised. Another added, 'There is no maybe. Take the new job.' Many echoed the same idea: internal raises tend to be small, and significant jumps usually come by switching employers. Others cautioned that bringing up John's name directly in negotiations would be a mistake. 'Try to negotiate a raise and don't bring John up in any way, shape or form,' someone warned. 'You now know how high the ceiling is and they don't know that you know. Use that to your advantage.'Many highlighted how hiring timing and negotiation skills play a bigger role than job performance. John kept a premium salary due to his previous startup role, while OP started at the lower end because of agency involvement and timing. '60k in tech is low, and that has nothing to do with the 'pay gap,' it's just low, period,' one compensation expert wrote. 'You should be looking and interviewing, and the same would be true if you didn't have a better-paid colleague.' Some speculated that John's days may be numbered. 'If they had someone that they thought was capable of doing John's job for $60k, they would fire John today and hire that person,' a person foreshadowed what could happen before the post was updated. The overwhelming consensus is not to count on your company to fix pay discrepancies. Use market research, get external offers, and be willing to leave. 'You're only as valuable as someone is willing to pay you,' one person summarized. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Inspired by Uber and Airbnb – Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets – Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Same Role, Same Experience—One Tech Worker Found Out Colleague Made Nearly Double The Money. It Could End Up Badly For One Of Them originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store