logo
KCAL News partners with Sycamores for Mental Health Awareness Month

KCAL News partners with Sycamores for Mental Health Awareness Month

CBS News11-05-2025

As May continues, KCAL News has partnered with another local nonprofit organization, continuing their initiative to highlight those working to help the so many that were impacted by January's devastating wildfires.
Each week, a local nonprofit that addresses the immediate and long-term mental health needs of children, family and the elderly will be featured. This week's organization is the Sycamores.
San the QR code to access the Sycamores website and make a donation.
KCAL News
For more than 100 years, Sycamores has been fighting to help vulnerable children and families earn a better life by helping during times of need. It was previously known as two separate entities in the Kiddie Koop and The Pasadena Children's Training Society before a merger in the 2000s, continuing their mission to cultivate hope and resilience by providing a voice to those who are rarely heard, speaking out for policy change on local, state and national levels.
If you know someone struggling or looking for help with mental health, a full list of resources can be found on the KCAL Cares Mental Health Awareness Resources Page.
Last week, KCAL Cares partnered with the Special Needs Network Los Angeles.
Mental Health Awareness Month started in 1949 to help break the stigma surrounding mental health treatment, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness.
May's initiative is the latest under the KCAL Cares banner, a commitment KCAL News made after the January wildfires. Soon after the Palisades and Eaton fires, KCAL News partnered with the American Red Cross to help raise money for those impacted by the devastation.
We're also hosting Coffee with KCAL, an ongoing segment in which the KCAL News staff connects with communities impacted by the wildfires to help them rebuild and recover.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prime Healthcare cutting about 100 jobs across its Illinois facilities, months after acquiring hospitals from Ascension
Prime Healthcare cutting about 100 jobs across its Illinois facilities, months after acquiring hospitals from Ascension

Yahoo

time43 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Prime Healthcare cutting about 100 jobs across its Illinois facilities, months after acquiring hospitals from Ascension

Prime Healthcare, which bought eight Illinois hospitals earlier this year, is eliminating more than 100 jobs, the hospital system confirmed Monday. Prime made most of the reductions Friday, and will continue cutting other jobs through July. 'As we continue to offer and create opportunities, we are also evaluating alignment with best practices and support from our national and regional teams,' Prime said in a statement. 'Through this process, there is a small number of positions that are duplicated or not aligned with the care model and service line offerings — most of them not directly providing patient care — that will be consolidated.' None of the affected jobs are union positions, according to Prime. Prime hired 13,000 workers from Ascension when it bought the hospitals from that health system, and has created nearly 1,000 new jobs since the acquisition. The job cuts represent less than 1% of the combined 14,000 employees, according to the statement. 'Importantly, these efforts will not affect the quality of care we deliver to the communities we serve and in fact will help expand best practices from across the nation,' Prime said in the statement. 'All decisions made at our Illinois facilities are guided by our mission to improve quality, strengthen care delivery, preserve access in underserved areas and ensure long-term sustainability.' The California-based Prime bought the Illinois hospitals for more than $370 million in March. Six of the hospitals sold to Prime changed from being nonprofit hospitals to for-profit hospitals as part of the sale. Hospitals that were sold include St. Mary's Hospital in Kankakee, Holy Family Medical Center in Des Plaines, Resurrection Medical Center in Chicago, St. Francis Hospital in Evanston, St. Joseph Medical Center in Joliet, St. Joseph Hospital in Elgin, Mercy Medical Center in Aurora and St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital in Chicago. The job cuts are the latest in a string of changes Prime has made since closing the deal, drawing criticism from elected officials and a nurses union. Prime announced in April that it planned to suspend inpatient pediatric care at St. Joseph Medical Center in Joliet, saying at the time that the unit had been averaging less than one patient a day, while the need for other services such as advanced surgical, neurosurgical and spinal care had grown. The Illinois Nurses Association condemned the move, arguing it would hurt the community, which only has one hospital. Also, Mercy Medical Center in Aurora lost its designation in April as a Level II trauma center. Prime also suspended obstetrical services at St. Mary's in Kankakee after the hospital's 'nearly sole obstetrics physician' retired, and because of low demand, Prime has said. Sens. Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth sent a letter to Prime's chairman, founder and CEO Dr. Prem Reddy in May expressing concern about those changes and asking Prime to elaborate on the reasons behind them and its future plans for the hospitals. Prime responded to that letter last week, emphasizing its mission of turning around struggling community hospitals across the country. Prime said that before it bought the hospitals in Illinois they were losing about $200 million a year. Prime said maintaining services with low patient demand is not sustainable, nor good for the quality of care. Prime also told the senators it plans to expand behavioral health care services for seniors at its Illinois facilities. In its statement Monday, Prime said it has started fulfilling a previously stated commitment to invest $250 million across the Illinois hospitals. Prime said those affected by the job cuts are invited to apply for any of the more than 900 open positions across its Illinois facilities. The job cuts were first reported by the Herald News.

Secretary Of HHS Kennedy Fires Entire CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee
Secretary Of HHS Kennedy Fires Entire CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

Secretary Of HHS Kennedy Fires Entire CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee

Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is making good on his promise to radically reshape the vaccine policy landscape as he ousts the entire Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. In a press release issued by the Department of HHS on June 9th, Kennedy says he's doing this in order to restore the public's trust in vaccine science in America. It's unknown who Kennedy will hire to replace committee members, but it's possible they may share his skeptical views of vaccines. In turn, this could have the effect of increasing the public's vaccine hesitancy. ACIP advises the director of the CDC on which vaccines approved by the Food and Drug Administration should be used; for example, recommending which groups of people ought to be vaccinated, at what doses and when. ACIP's guidance is not binding, though CDC almost always follows it and provides recommendations to the public on what is to be included in the United States adult and childhood immunization schedules. Neither the Secretary of HHS nor the CDC director can unilaterally ban vaccines. But they can alter the CDC's messaging, fire and hire ACIP committee members and revise vaccination scheduling. Moreover, the Secretary of HHS together with heads of agencies under his oversight can pursue changes in guidance that restructure regulatory pathways for vaccine development and revise recommendations to the public on who should get vaccinated. In a major policy shift last month, Food and Drug Administration officials proposed requiring new clinical trial research with respect to the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in healthy people under 65, including pregnant women, before issuing an updated approval for a broader population. And we observed a preview of the new FDA approach when the agency made an unusual decision in May to limit the approval of the nation's only non-mRNA coronavirus vaccine, Novavax's nuvaxovid, for use only in adults 65 and older or those 12 to 64 who have at least one health problem that puts them at increased risk from COVID-19. And on May 31st, Moderna won approval for its latest COVID-19 vaccine with a similar set of limits. To be indicated for a broader population, the FDA plans to require that vaccine makers conduct booster trials to demonstrate effectiveness in people under 65 or without certain risks. These trials could take a year to complete, according to a STAT report. As such, it's not something that can be accomplished prior to the autumn, even if Novavax, Pfizer, or Moderna, wished to pursue this pathway. Changes are also occurring at CDC in terms of its messaging on vaccines. While all the standard childhood and adult vaccines are still on the website, the messaging in some instances incorporates more of an 'informed consent' approach than a recommendation. Informed consent is the principle that people should be notified of all the risks, as well as benefits, of any medical intervention they receive or any therapeutic they are prescribed. All of the changes we're seeing shouldn't come as a surprise. Kennedy's vaccine-skeptic views are well-known. And while he told the podcaster Lex Fridman in 2023 that some vaccines 'are probably averting more problems than they're causing,' he also maintained that 'there's no vaccine that is, you know, safe and effective.' In March, he commissioned a large-scale study to investigate debunked theories that link autism to the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine. And, amid an outbreak of measles this year that started in Texas and spread to surrounding states and cost the lives of three people, Kennedy appeared at times to downplay its severity. Kennedy has also been outspoken about the existing organizational framework within his department, in which he says that with respect to vaccines there are conflicts of interest. In announcing today's purge of the entire ACIP committee, Kennedy cited the pharmaceutical industry's close relationship with government agencies and ACIP that advises them. But it's unclear what Kennedy means when current ACIP members include academics, a chief medical officer of a community health center, a state public health higher-up and the owner of a family medicine practice. Kennedy defends himself as merely wanting placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure and no more strict vaccine mandates. However, the vaccines he criticizes are typically subject to such clinical trials. Furthermore, arguably the mandates Kennedy opposes, which have been in place since the 1960s, have helped to contribute to a dramatic decline in childhood infectious diseases. From smallpox inoculations—which began in the late 18th century and ended when the disease was eradicated in the 1970s—to mumps, rubella, tetanus, diphtheria, polio and measles immunizations, vaccinations have saved millions of lives and prevented crippling and life-threatening illnesses from occurring. To illustrate, mass vaccination programs with single or combination—measles, mumps and rubella—shots began in the 1960s and quickly suppressed the spread of measles in most developed countries. The measles vaccine is 'sterilizing,' which means it not only prevents illness, but also transmission. The American public is already increasingly vaccine-hesitant around standard childhood immunizations. This is likely to lead to more outbreaks and preventable severe illness and death. Should Kennedy appoint like-minded vaccine skeptics to the ACIP committee, that could undermine the public's trust in vaccines even further.

Minnesota Legislature votes to remove undocumented immigrant adults from state health program
Minnesota Legislature votes to remove undocumented immigrant adults from state health program

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Minnesota Legislature votes to remove undocumented immigrant adults from state health program

A contentious proposal that will remove undocumented immigrant adults from a state health care coverage program cleared the Minnesota Legislature on Monday — a key part of the compromise in the divided Capitol to pass the next two-year state budget. The measure makes undocumented adults no longer eligible for MinnesotaCare by the end of this year, just months after the DFL priority took effect in January. It's on its way to Gov. Tim Walz's desk, and he's expected to sign it. There is a provision in another proposal that will withhold funding for the health department if he doesn't. The change was a sticking point during negotiations between Democrats and Republicans, for whom repealing that law was a top priority in the divided Legislature. GOP lawmakers are concerned about growing enrollment and the cost to the state in future years. "If California and Illinois can't make the numbers work, what makes us think Minnesota can? The question before us is simple: Will we continue down a path of fiscal recklessness or will we act now to protect Minnesota taxpayers," said Rep. Harry Niska, R-Ramsey. Meanwhile, the bill sparked fierce pushback and emotional testimony from DFL lawmakers who said the change will cause irreparable harm. Former DFL House Speaker Melissa Hortman, who negotiated the budget deal, was the sole Democrat to vote for it in the tied House chamber-despite her personal opposition-clearing the way for its passage. "This bill is cruel. It is inhumane. And it will cost real human, Minnesotan lives," said Rep. Jamie Long, DFL-Minneapolis. More than 20,000 undocumented immigrants are enrolled in MinnesotaCare, which is more than expected for the first four months of the year, and 24% of them are children under 18, according to data from the Minnesota Department of Human Services. The cost to the state is slightly more expensive than originally estimated for this period. From January through the end of April, paid claims totalled $3.9 million, DHS data showed, but a spokeswoman said it is too early to know if it would have been as costly in a few years as Republicans claimed. The House took up the bill first during the one-day special session that began Monday to wrap up the next two-year state budget, and debated it for four hours. There were demonstrators outside the chamber before they gaveled in Monday with signs that read, "health care cuts kill." The Senate followed suit later with all GOP votes plus four Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Erin Murphy, DFL-St. Paul, who held back tears as she spoke about the bill. "We will regain coverage for people because we are compassionate people and that's what we do in Minnesota. I made an agreement. I gave my word. I will vote for this and it's among the most painful votes I've ever taken," she said. For three weeks, lawmakers worked largely behind closed doors to fine tune the bills that together will make up the roughly $66 billion state budget for the next two years. They gaveled in to begin on Monday for what they planned to be a one-day special session to end Tuesday morning. Passing the MinnesotaCare coverage rollback was the most contentious proposal on the to-do list, which includes 14 bills.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store