US and China agree on a framework to resolve their trade disputes
The US and China have agreed in principle on a framework to carry out an agreement they reached on resolving their trade disputes last month.
The announcement by US and Chinese officials followed Tuesday's conclusion of two days of talks in London.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters the framework deal puts "meat on the bones" of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs.
Li Chenggang, a vice minister of commerce and China's international trade representative, said the two sides had agreed in principle on a framework for implementing the consensus reached between the two leaders and at talks in May in Geneva, the official Xinhua News Agency said.
Further details, including plans for a potential next round of talks, were not immediately available.
Mr Lutnick said as he arrived on Tuesday morning that the talks were "going well," and he expected them to continue all day.
Mr Li also said a trade framework had been reached that would be taken back to US and Chinese leaders.
Asked late Monday how the negotiations were going, President Trump told reporters, "we are doing well with China. China's not easy".
The two sides sought to build on negotiations in Geneva last month that agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100 per cent-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession.
Since the Geneva talks, the US and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, visas for Chinese students at American universities and rare earth minerals that are vital to car manufacturers and other industries.
Mr Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last week in an attempt to put relations back on track, then announced the trade talks would resume in London.
China, the world's biggest producer of rare earths, has signalled it may ease export restrictions it placed on the elements in April, alarming automakers around the world who rely on them.
Beijing, in turn, wants the US to lift restrictions on Chinese access to the technology used to make advanced semiconductors.
Mr Trump said that he wants to "open up China", the world's dominant manufacturer, to US products.
"If we don't open up China, maybe we won't do anything," he said at the White House. "But we want to open up China."
AP/Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
30 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Meta to announce massive $23 billion move in race towards ‘superintelligence'
Meta is preparing to drop a staggering $15 billion (A$23.09bn) on a stake in AI startup Scale AI, in a bold new play to push beyond current artificial intelligence capabilities and reach so-called 'superintelligence'. The move would give Meta a 49 per cent stake in the company, which is currently led by 28-year-old Alexandr Wang. The deal is yet to be officially confirmed, but multiple reports suggest Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is set to unveil the investment in the coming days. Analysts say this is the behaviour of a 'wartime CEO', referring to the escalating technological arms race taking place between the world's most powerful companies and governments. They all want the same thing, but nobody can tell exactly what happens once they get there. Superintelligence refers to a hypothetical AI system that can outperform humans at all tasks, not just the specific functions currently delegated to today's large language models or image generators. The industry isn't there yet, but given the gargantuan leaps we've witnessed over the past 18 months, it is getting increasingly likely we will see something major before the end of the decade. Even as systems like GPT-4, Claude and Gemini dominate headlines, experts routinely point out their patchy reliability. Several language models still falter on complex reasoning and struggle with logic puzzles that your average Joe could solve. At the moment, AI is about speed. It can effectively eliminate the legwork for a wide rage of everyday tasks performed on a computer. Humans are currently required to prompt their request, but there is still an issue of AI being sycophantic to the user. They are designed to impress, and therefore become confused at times when given a great deal of data, especially if some of it is conflicting. At any rate, Zuckerberg wants in on the party. Meta's attempt to leapfrog the crawl toward artificial general intelligence (AGI) is widely seen as an effort to re-establish dominance in an ecosystem now defined by competitors like OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and Anthropic. It comes in the wake of Meta's ill-fated Metaverse experiment, which soaked up tens of billions in investment only to be largely shelved and mocked in equal measure. Meanwhile, Scale AI recently made headlines for securing a deal with the US Department of Defense to develop ThunderForge, a military AI platform intended to support strategic planning in the Indo-Pacific and Europe. The company also counts Peter Thiel's Founders Fund among its early backers. Observers say the mega-deal from Meta should reignite conversations in Europe about the need for publicly accountable AI research, something on par with CERN, the European particle physics laboratory. Michael Wooldridge, Professor of the Foundations of AI at Oxford University, argued such an initiative would build trust through openness. 'There's a good argument that there should be a CERN for AI where governments collaborate to develop AI openly and robustly,' Prof Wooldridge said. 'That's not going to happen if it's developed behind closed doors. [AI] seems just as important as CERN and particle accelerators.' Global arms race heats up, but oversight matters With staggering sums of capital, military interest, and corporate strategy all converging, it is clear which way authorities want us to head as they scramble for AGI supremacy. The race has been loosely compared to the frantic efforts in the 1940s to produce the world's first nuclear bomb. Startups are being snapped up at record speed, university research labs are being drained of talent, and AI labs are increasingly moving into secrecy. Global experts have already raised the alarm and called for robust oversight, but for those pessimistic about futurism, it has come as too little, too late. In a report published ahead of the UN's highly anticipated 'Summit of the Future', pundits raised current lack of international oversight on AI. Among the concerns are the very obvious opportunities for misuse, internal biases, and humanity's growing dependence. One man known as the 'godfather of AI' famously quit Google in 2023 over concerns the company was not adequately assessing the risks, warning we could be walking into a 'nightmare'. While the immediate benefits are already being seen in terms of productivity, the main concern is that we are charging full steam ahead towards an event horizon that is impossible to predict the outcome of. What we do know is that those spearheading AI development are becoming absurdly wealthy incredibly quickly and thus hold more and more power over the trajectory of the planet as each day passes. Around 40 experts, spanning technology, law, and data protection, were gathered by UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to tackle the existential issue head-on. They say that AI's global, border-crossing nature makes governance a mess, and we're missing the tools needed to address the chaos. The panel's report drops a sobering reminder, warning that if we wait until AI presents an undeniable threat, it could already be too late to mount a proper defence. 'There is, today, a global governance deficit with respect to AI,' the panel of experts warned in their report, stressing that the technology needs to 'serve humanity equitably and safely'.
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
'We are concerned': Opposition Leader Sussan Ley calls on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to meet with Donald Trump at earliest opportunity amid AUKUS crisis
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley has expressed dire concern for the nation's defence, after the Trump administration launched a formal review of the AUKUS deal, suggesting it is considering "backing away" from the Biden-era pact with Australia and the United Kingdom. "We are reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the President's America First agenda," the official said of the review, which was first reported by Financial Times. "Any changes to the administration's approach for AUKUS will be communicated through official channels, when appropriate." Ms Ley told Sky News on Thursday night the Opposition is "concerned" about the AUKUS review due to the party's lack of confidence in the Albanese government's relationship with US President Donald Trump. She further urged the PM to secure a meeting with Trump at the "earliest opportunity" to safeguard the future of the AUKUS pact. "We are concerned about the Pentagon reviewing AUKUS because we're not sure of the standing that this government has with the President and with the US administration," she told Sky News host Kieran Gilbert. "I feel there's something of a bystander approach from Anthony Albanese." The Opposition Leader added she wants to see the PM do well on "team Australia moments" and her party is willing to get behind the government on initiatives that strengthen the nation. However, she advised Mr Albanese to focus on harbouring a personal relationship with Trump as the AUKUS deal is "critical" to the nation's security in the Indo-Pacific, and "its delivery matters a great deal''. When asked what Ms Ley thought about Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles asking the Coalition to "take a deep breath" with the AUKUS panic, she urged the Albanese government to "simply focus on the task at hand". "I would say simply focus on the task at hand, which is building that relationship, that I've not been confident has been built from the get-go in this second Trump administration," she said. "It is all about the personal relationship and I'm not suggesting that it's not there. "But this does look as if the government has been caught somewhat flat-footed by the announcement of this review." Ms Ley suggested the Labor government was not aware of the AUKUS review coming up and was instead caught off-guard. "I just want to encourage the government to build that relationship and I haven't heard the Deputy Prime Minister point to a meeting that's coming up between our Prime Minister and the President," she added. "Until that happens, we secure that face-to-face conversation. I don't think we will rest on this issue." Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he would not react to political pressure but that he would address defence policy according to need and capability. Mr Marles also defended the Albanese government's commitment to AUKUS after the Trump administration launched their review into the $368 billion deal. 'We are committed to AUKUS and we look forward to working closely with the US on the review,' Mr Marles said in a statement response to the US review. 'It is natural that the administration would want to examine this major undertaking including progress and delivery. 'Our engagement with the Trump administration and across the full political spectrum of the United States has shown clear and consistent support for AUKUS.'
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘National embarrassment': Australia ‘forced' to spend more on defence by the US
Strategic Analysis Australia Director Michael Shoebridge discusses the 'national embarrassment' regarding Australia's lackluster spending on defence. Ties between Canberra and Washington have frayed as the Trump administration launches a review of the AUKUS deal after the Albanese government resisted requests to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. 'Australia shouldn't be forced by America into investing enough in our own security,' Mr Shoebridge said.
