Ireland and 16 other EU countries sound alarm over Hungary's gay pride ban
Ireland has accused Hungary of contravening fundamental EU values by passing laws that target LGBTQ+ people, as tensions deepen between Budapest and a majority of member states.
Hungary's parliament passed legislation in March that creates a legal basis to ban Pride marches there and lets police use facial recognition cameras to identify people who attend. It also approved constitutional changes in April stipulating that Hungary recognises only two sexes, male and female.
Advertisement
"We are highly alarmed by these developments which run contrary to the fundamental values of human dignity, freedom, equality and respect for human rights," Ireland and the governments of 16 other EU countries said in a joint statement.
They called on Hungary to revise the measures and asked the European Commission to make full use of its powers if Budapest does not do so. The Commission can take legal action against member states if it believes they are violating EU law.
The statement was backed by Ireland, Austria, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden.
The declaration came ahead of a hearing on Tuesday in a long-running process where EU ministers examine concerns that Hungary is at risk of breaching core EU values.
Advertisement
The process could in theory lead to Hungary being stripped of its right to vote on EU decisions. But diplomats say there is not sufficient support among the 27 EU member states to take that step.
Arriving at the meeting, Hungary's minister for European Union affairs Janos Boka said: "There is no such thing in Hungary as a Pride ban".
"I hope that after these discussions my colleagues around the table will walk out with a more nuanced view on the Hungarian legislation," he said.
But activists say the measures amount to a de-facto ban.
Advertisement
Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban has said Pride organisers "should not even bother" this year, while his chief of staff Gergely Gulyas has said Hungary "does not have to tolerate Pride marching through downtown Budapest".
Orban, who has been in power since 2010, has repeatedly clashed with the EU and its member countries over democratic standards, minority rights and foreign policy.
Critics have accused Orban of undermining the rule of law, which the Hungarian government denies.
Ireland
Viktor Orban criticises Taoiseach over Hungary com...
Read More
His ruling Fidesz party has said the Pride march could be considered harmful to children and that protecting them would supersede the right to assemble.
European Commissioner Michael McGrath, who oversees democracy, justice and rule of law issues, said on Tuesday there were serious concerns about the situation in Hungary.
"Freedom of assembly is a fundamental right," he told reporters.
"It is not a threat to children. It's not a threat to anyone, and it must be protected and upheld at all times, and so the Commission is examining all of its options," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Former French president Sarkozy stripped of Legion of Honour medal
PARIS, June 15 (Reuters) - Former president Nicolas Sarkozy has been stripped of his Legion of Honour, France's highest distinction, after being convicted of corruption and influence peddling last year, according to a decree published in Sunday's Official Bulletin. The centre-right politician has been embroiled in legal battles since leaving office in 2012. Last year, France's highest court upheld his conviction for corruption and influence peddling, ordering him to wear an electronic tag for a year, a first for a former French head of state. Also last year, an appeals court confirmed a separate conviction for illegal campaign financing in his failed re-election bid in 2012. The rules of the Legion of Honour award meant that the revocation had been expected.
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
University of Nottingham cuts target language teaching staff
A decision to cut casual staff at the University of Nottingham's Language Centre will diminish its status as a "global university", critics have Poujades, 54, who has worked for the university since 2019, said it had left her having to "rethink everything".Those affected deliver evening language classes to students and the general public, as well as offer language studying options to existing undergraduate students.A spokesperson for the university said it had been dealing with "significant financial challenges" and that the classes did not generate a "financial surplus". Ms Poujades said as a casual member of staff, the university did not need to consult or provide a notice period."There was no letter, nothing, just an e-mail from [a senior member of staff] so it came as quite a shock to everybody," she French teacher had already struggled with money, and during a gap in work at the university last summer she said she had to go on universal credit."I do not want to give up teaching, but this has left me with quite a few question marks," she said."It's left me having to go to the job centre very soon I think." Santosh Ghosh, 58, has been teaching modern languages for 33 years and started working at the university in early said the move had been a "kick in the teeth"."I am registered visually disabled, which means that rightly or wrongly it has always been a lot more challenging for me to secure employment," he said."The university however had faith in me, they took me on... [this move] would be a very difficult and a very bitter pill to swallow."Mr Ghosh also said the UK had a "shocking reputation" when it came to modern languages, and that the closure of language classes would "constitute a missed opportunity" to promote cultural understanding. Hundreds of people have signed an open letter against the closure of evening language classes at the University of Collard, from the University and College Union, said the courses had been "really popular" with the said cuts to the British Sign Language (BSL) teaching in particular was a "national issue" because of the limited opportunities to learn BSL added that staff now felt "disposable", even after years of working for the university. 'Tough choices' In a statement, the University of Nottingham said it had to make "tough choices to safeguard the financial future of our institution"."We understand the disappointment that this will cause," it university said it needed to focus spending on "providing a high-quality experience for our undergraduate and postgraduate students"."We are really proud of the role that our Language Centre has played in supporting language learning in our local communities," it added."We will revisit this once the university is in a more stable financial situation."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Fighting Russia is now Europe's problem: America is about to leave the stage
So it's official: Washington is pulling the plug on military aid to Ukraine. At Congressional hearings this week US secretary of defence Pete Hegseth confirmed the Trump administration has a 'very different view' of the war in Ukraine to that of Joe Biden's – and insisted that a 'negotiated peaceful settlement is in the best interest of both parties and our nation's interests.' Given that the topic of the hearings was the US's 2026 military budget, the message could hardly have been clearer. Fighting Russia is now Europe's problem. Washington has given Ukraine some $74 billion in military aid since Putin's invasion in February 2022. That includes game-changing equipment such as Patriot air defence systems that are Ukraine's only effective defence against Russian ballistic missiles, ATACMS and HIMARS missiles, long-range M777 artillery, tanks, armoured vehicles, and millions of artillery rounds. Some of the Biden-era packages are still coming down the procurement pipeline. But the bitter bottom line for Kyiv is that it has been abandoned by its most powerful and deep-pocketed ally. That leaves Ukraine three options. The first is to rely on Europe stepping in to supply the weapons and equipment it needs. The second – proposed earlier this month by Zelensky – was to buy US made weapons from Washington with European money. The third is to make the weapons it needs in Ukrainian factories, funded by money from European allies. Happily for Ukraine, Europe's leaders have repeatedly promised to step up to the plate and deliver what Ukraine needs to fight on. Less happily, in practice, Europe seems better at promising than actually stepping. Back on February 9, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen announced a 'ReArm Europe' package in Brussels that 'could mobilise close to €800 billion of defence expenditures over five years … This is a moment for Europe, and we are ready to step up.' But it soon emerged that this staggering sum was not, in fact, ready money but represented an easing of borrowing constraints on EU members if they chose to increase their defence budgets. On March 19 EU high representative for external relations, Kaja Kallas, proposed a €40 billion arms aid package for Ukraine. But that plan was shot down by doubters such as Hungary, Slovakia, Croatia, Spain and Italy. Last month Europe finally put some cash (albeit someone else's cash) on the table by directing €1 billion from the EU's Peace Facility – made from frozen Russian assets – towards financing Ukraine's domestic arms industry. Kyiv will certainly put that aid to good use. Domestic production now meets up to 50 per cent of Ukraine's military needs, despite repeated Russian strikes on factories. And Ukraine already outproduces the EU in the production of many weapons. Output of Ukraine's Bohdana howitzer is now 20 per month, outpacing the production of French Caesars, and could double with more EU funding. Drone production is scaling up fast, with five million small First Person View (FPV) drones planned for 2025, plus 30,000 long-range drones, and 3,000 cruise missiles. Plus some of the new Ukrainian kit is actually better than foreign supplied equipment because it's tailored more precisely to the specific needs of the killing fields of Donbas. Ukraine's Limma Electronic warfare system outperforms Russian and Western tech in jamming Russian glide bombs. And of course there's Ukraine's extraordinarily bold and sophisticated mass drone attack on Russian strategic bombers deep inside Siberia and the Arctic earlier this month, which featured drone swarms hidden in the roofs of prefabricated housing units and trucked right to their targets by unwitting freelance drivers. So there's no doubt that Ukraine has the technical sophistication, the industrial capacity and the tactical imagination to create its own formidable defences. Indeed, by many metrics the Ukrainian army is not only the largest but also the best-equipped on the European continent, bar Russia's. But Ukraine also has deep vulnerabilities further down the defence-procurement totem pole when it comes to the nuts-and-bolts sinews of war, from artillery shells to bullets to spare parts. And the most urgent military and political problem of all is a looming chronic shortage of bodies to man the front lines. Videos of violent press-gang tactics used to round up military-age men – often featuring posses of citizens rallying to save the men targeted – are the subject of daily online anger on Ukraine's social media. Stories of Russia's imminent economic and military collapse make for feel-good reading – but aren't borne out by ongoing and relentless assaults in the air and on the ground. Russia is set to spend $160 billion on defence this year, and thanks to purchasing power disparities a dollar spent in Russia gets far more bang for the buck. A Russian T-90 costs approximately $4.5 million, a US M1 Abrams can cost as much as $9.61 million. Western defence experts have warned that US-made Patriot missile systems, in production since 1981, are increasingly ineffective against Russian hypersonic cruise missiles and massed swarms of Iranian Shaheed drones. Can Ukraine survive just on its own resources, and Europe's intermittent money? The deepest irony of all is that much of the Kremlin's lavish defence spending is directly financed by Europe itself, which is due to spend over €20 billion buying oil, gas, coal and uranium from Russia in 2025.
