
UN agency calls for global pause on deportations back to Taliban-ruled Afghanistan
The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (Unama) said it had documented evidence that forced returnees, deported against their will in large numbers by countries including Iran and Pakistan in recent months, have been targeted by the Taliban regime and face serious human rights violations.
The report came just three days after the Trump administration lifted legal protections for Afghan nationals that prevented them being deported from the US.
The Unama report, shared with The Independent, found that women and girls, journalists and activists and former security or government officials were at the highest risk of reprisals from the Taliban upon their return to the country.
More than 1.4 million people have returned or been forced to return to Afghanistan this year alone, including over one million from Iran. Millions of Afghans fled their homeland in July and August 2021 as the Nato-backed government fell and Taliban militants swept to power in Kabul.
The UN said the rapid pace and volume of Afghans being sent back from other nations was creating a multi-layered human rights crisis. With Afghanistan's formal economy almost non-existent under the Taliban, returnees are living in NGO-run camps and forced to rely on humanitarian aid to survive.
Although the Taliban has previously offered an amnesty to those from the Nato-backed government and said it would not hunt them down, the new report shows that it continues to target its critics from the previous administration with arbitrary detention, physical assault and torture tactics such as mock executions and waterboarding.
'Nobody should be sent back to a country where they face risk of persecution on account of their identity or personal history,' UN human rights chief Volker Türk said. 'In Afghanistan, this is even more pronounced for women and girls, who are subjected to a range of measures that amount to persecution on the basis of their gender alone.'
Unama noted that sending people back to a country 'where they are at risk of persecution, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, enforced disappearance or other irreparable harm, is in violation of the principle of non-refoulement and a serious breach of international law'.
Some of those already forcibly returned to Afghanistan told UNAMA about the abuse they had faced.
Two months after Abdul*, a former government official, returned to Afghanistan in late 2023, he was arrested by Taliban militants and was subjected to vicious torture that culminated in his leg being broken.
He was arrested on his way to a grocery store and detained in a house for two nights where he was beaten with sticks, cables and wood. Abdul said the Taliban officials cut off his hair and he was forced to watch a 'mock execution', mimicking the killing of those arrested by the de facto officials. He said he was also subjected to waterboarding.
A former female journalist who was sent back to Afghanistan told UN officials she was 'effectively under house arrest' as the Taliban authorities have banned women from public spaces, job opportunities and moving around without a male guardian.
'There are no job opportunities, no freedom of movement, and no access to education, either to learn or to teach, for women and girls,' she said.
Another woman sent back to Afghanistan against her wishes told Unama that she is now dependent on a family that is not her own and has no financial means to support herself.
'I live with my uncle's friend. My uncle from Kabul sends them 3000-4000 Afghanis (£32-£42) for my expenditures. But I never get to see the money. I am completely hidden, without any support, any assistance… I cannot travel anywhere. I do not have a mahram (male guardian). This is the biggest dilemma and challenge for me, that my sister and I are without any male companion. So we cannot move,' she told Unama.
In its message to the international community, Unama said: 'Member States should refrain from returning Afghan migrants and refugees to Afghanistan in the absence of an individualised assessment to ensure their return is not a violation of their human rights.'
Officials at the UN agency told The Independent the outlook for returnees was 'extremely negative' given the state of Afghanistan's economy and a humanitarian crisis exacerbated by natural disasters such as cyclical droughts and floods.
They also pointed to a loss of aid support for the agencies dealing with these crises since the US and other Western nations announced cuts, with one Unama source noting that there were not enough 'resources available to fulfil basic health functions, whether that's maternal health or whether that's health across the population. To add to that, the UN and other international NGOs have been hit by a significant decrease in funding.'
The Taliban's foreign affairs ministry, interior affairs ministry and its intelligence wing rejected the allegations of ill-treatment and prison torture presented by Unama in their report.
'No former military or civilian individual has been arrested solely because of their previous affiliation,' the foreign affairs ministry said, according to their response to the report seen by The Independent.
Foreign ministry officials in Iran and Pakistan have defended their policies for returning Afghan citizens, saying this was done so with humanitarian principles kept in consideration.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Veteran journalist reveals his private talks with Trump
When history teachers of the future attempt to explain Donald J. Trump to bewildered students, they may reach for the usual adjectives — bombastic, disruptive, idiosyncratic, theatrical. But the most accurate descriptor might be simpler: Decisive. Not always right. Not always tactful. Not always early. But always decisive — on his own terms. Covering Trump over a two-decade span has taught me many things. Topmost amongst them: whatever else he is, Trump is a singular decision-making machine. His presidency, for all its chaos and contradiction, has revealed a consistent internal logic behind the madness — call it instinctual realism, or perhaps just gut-based governance. Either way, the former real estate mogul, reality TV impresario, and now, for the second time, commander-in-chief, has honed a seven-step process for making decisions that only Trump could pull off — and only Trump would dare try. And if this Trumpian process feels curiously designed for a live camera feed? Well, that's because it is. 1. Know Who to Ask (Even If It's a Golf Caddy) Conventional presidents lean on national security advisors and policy briefings. Trump? He'll ask the gardener at Mar-a-Lago if bombing Iran seems like a good idea. That's not a joke. Trump consults generals and cabinet members, to be sure — but also Bedminster Club members, business pals, restaurant servers, and occasionally his kids. These on-the-fly dialogues might seem random and unserious, but here's the kicker: Trump has a very high human intelligence radar. He knows how to extract insights from unexpected sources, and he values street smarts as much as Ivy pedigrees. 2. History Buff in a Red Hat Trump is not generally considered a scholar or an intellectual, and he has been derided for occasionally confusing historical facts or offering up sham data. Yet, as I have observed in private conversations with Trump and from his public statements, the president is surprisingly astute and knowledgeable about past events and the lessons they offer. Trump's fascination with his presidential brethren is genuine. He drops obscure facts about John Adams and Dwight Eisenhower with the glee of a 'Jeopardy!' contestant. His Oval Office décor is part war room and part presidential history museum. He channels Nixon's 'madman theory,' Reagan's crackerjack camera instincts, and even Clinton's political elasticity. This isn't mere cosplay. It's tactical. Trump sees history as both a cautionary tale and as a playbook. He studies the winners and the losers, not only to avoid short-term quicksand and grasp splashy successes, but to keep an eye on the long-term allure of his legacy. 3. Deadlines Are for Mortals Tell Trump on Monday that he needs to decide by Wednesday, and he'll circle back around on Friday… of the following month. The man does not operate on government time. Trump decides when he's ready and not a moment before. That nebulous schedule frustrates some staffers, foreign leaders, and journalists — but it's also part of his process. A swift Trump decision is a rare thing; he marinates, digests, delays. And then, in a snap, when everyone else has moved on, he acts. Trump's tacit motto? 'Make no decision before its time.' He is the sort of person who arrives late for a neighborhood tag sale and walks off with the priceless artifact. 4. Match the Method to the Moment Some bureaucratic choices are moral. Others are strategic. Trump doesn't pretend one size fits all. While Bush 43 sometimes made decisions by gut and Obama by measured deliberation, Trump toggles between instinct and data based on what the moment demands. When he sent bombs to Iran, it wasn't about ideology — it was about leverage. When he changes his tariff play, it isn't always about doctrine — it is about control. And his goal is to maintain that control for the remainder of his term and beyond. 5. Execution Is Everything For Trump, a decision isn't over when it's made — it's just beginning. Think of the 2023 catastrophe in East Palestine, Ohio, during the Biden Administration, when a train derailment spilled highly toxic chemicals into the region. Most politicians would have issued a brief statement from afar. Trump, in the middle of his presidential campaign, flew straight to the disaster site, connected the small-town tragedy to big-time governmental implications, and created a viral campaign moment that he would later echo with his iconic visit to a Pennsylvania McDonald's in October 2024, mere weeks before the 2024 presidential election. To Trump, therefore, implementation is as significant as the choice. His mind is a movie set. Every detail matters. The head shots, the applause lines, the backdrop, the lighting, the cast of characters. And Trump is not just the star. He's the director, the screenwriter, the cameraman, and the publicist. 6. Frame It Before They Do One of the oldest lessons in politics remains one of the most important: define yourself before others do. Trump follows this directive with religious fervor — only his church is built with social media posts and mugshot merch. Trump not only makes decisions, he narrates, reframes, rebrands, and rewinds them. The media can chase the story, but Trump keeps control of the narrative. This is why he never fears flip-flopping, a conundrum that has felled many a politician in the past. For Trump, flips-flops are for the weak, but changing your mind is for the strong — if you know how to sell it. And no president, other than FDR or Clinton, has ever sold decisions quite like Trump. 7. Trust the Gut In the end, after all the Oval Office powwows, the family meetings, the phone calls with foreign leaders, the Fox News hits, the Mar-a-Lago tête-à-têtes, Trump always returns to the one thing he trusts the most: his instincts. Trump may experience the same doubts as any president who must make global-scale decisions. But when judgment day arrives, Trump follows his internal compass. Sometimes that leads him into storms. Sometimes it lands him a bullseye. Either way, he owns it. When Trump makes mistakes, he doesn't obsess, he pivots past them. And while other presidents may anguish over moral reckonings and political consequences, Trump is confident that decisive leadership is the real virtue. Better to act and adjust than dither and decay. So, what does it all add up to? It's not 'Game Theory.' It's not 'Decision Points.' It's not even 'The Art of the Deal.' It's Trumpian, modern, perhaps uniquely American. The result is a presidency that operates like a casino floor, a cable set, a boardroom, and a battlefield — all at once. Call it chaotic, call it clever, call it dangerous, but don't call it accidental. Because, as strange as it may seem, this is the plan. And whether President Trump ultimately will end up as a transformational leader or a foundering maverick, one thing's clear: Trump is the decider's decider. And he's still not done deciding. Mark Halperin is the editor-in-chief and host of the interactive live video platform 2WAY and the host of the video podcast 'Next Up' on the Megyn Kelly network.


Metro
39 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump says Gaza children 'look very hungry' after Israel denies any starvation
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Donald Trump has pushed against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the issue of starvation in Gaza, saying children in the region 'look very hungry'. Yesterday, Netanyahu flatly denied there were any such problems in Gaza after his government was accused of deliberately blocking off food. He told a Christian conference in Jerusalem this is a 'bold-faced lie', adding: 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza and there is no starvation in Gaza.' Despite the status of the US as Israel's biggest international supporter, President Trump appeared to disagree with this assessment while answering questions ahead of a meeting with Keir Starmer today. Asked by a reporter if he agreed with Netanyahu's comment, Trump replied: 'I don't know. 'Based on television, I would say not particularly, cause those children look very hungry. 'But we're giving a lot of money and a lot of food, and other nations are now stepping up. I know this nation [the UK] is, right here.' Attention has been drawn to the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza in recent days, as images of malnourished children circulate widely on TV and in print. Philippe Lazzarini, the Commissioner-General for the UN's Palestine refugee agency UNRWA, said last week his health workers were surviving on 'one small meal a day, often just lentils, if at all'. UN humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher has accused the Israeli government of forcing starvation on the people of Gaza, which is classified as a war crime. Israel, in turn, has accused the UN of failing to distribute aid properly, saying Hamas has been allowed to siphon it off. Netanyahu's government announced at the weekend that secure routes would be opened in Gaza for aid delivery, while the UK is preparing to airdrop aid as part of plans led by Jordan. Starmer described the situation as a 'humanitarian crisis' and an 'absolute catastrophe' as he stood beside Trump, adding: 'I think people in Britain are revolted at what they're seeing on their screens.' More Trending The crisis in Gaza is among the top priorities as the two leaders talk at Trump's Turnberry golf resort in Ayrshire, with the PM pushing for a ceasefire. He has come under pressure in recent days to announce the UK will formally recognise Palestinian statehood, but has held off, with government figures saying the move should come when it would have the maximum impact. A No 10 spokesperson today repeated Starmer's recent comment that Palestinians have an 'inalienable right to statehood', adding it is a 'question of when, not if' the UK would recognise it. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Joey Barton branded 'bitter and twisted' after vile posts about England's Euro 2025 win MORE: Donald Trump labelled 'Commander in Cheat' after caddie drops golf ball next to bunker MORE: Gaza becomes 'most expensive place to eat in the world'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
India says its troops killed 3 suspected militants in Kashmir fighting
Indian troops killed three suspected militants in a gunfight in a forested area in disputed Kashmir, officials said Monday. The Indian military in a statement on social media said three militants were killed 'in an intense firefight' in the forested area in Dachigam area, some 30 kilometers (19-miles) northeast of the region's main city of Srinagar. Police Inspector-General Vidhi Kumar Birdi told reporters that the joint operation by the military, paramilitary and police was still ongoing. Officials did not give any other details. The Associated Press couldn't independently verify the details. Nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan each administer part of Himalayan Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety. Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi's rule since 1989. Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels' goal of uniting the territory, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country. Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict. Monday's incident is the second major gunfight since a gun massacre in the region in April that killed 26 people, mostly Hindu tourists, in Indian-controlled Kashmir. That led to tit-for-tat military strikes by India and Pakistan that brought the nuclear-armed rivals to the brink of their third war over the region. The Indian army also said in May that its soldiers killed three suspected militants in a gunfight. Before the April gun massacre in the Kashmiri resort town of Pahalgam, the fighting had largely ebbed in the region's Kashmir Valley, the heartland of anti-India rebellion and mainly shifted to mountainous areas of Jammu in the last few years. The massacre increased tensions between India and Pakistan, leading to the worst military confrontation in decades and the death of dozens of people until a ceasefire was reached on May 10 after U.S mediation. The region has simmered in anger since New Delhi ended the region's semi-autonomy in 2019 and drastically curbed dissent, civil liberties and media freedoms while intensifying counterinsurgency operations.