Turn Up Knox responds to cancelled contract, says it worked 4+ months without pay
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (WATE) — Violence prevention nonprofit Turn Up Knox (TUK) released a response after the City of Knoxville terminated their contract in February.
The statement responds to the city's criticisms of the nonprofit released in February. For example, the City said TUK's spending exceeded available funds, a claim TUK said is 'simply NOT true.'
Governor Lee signs Farmland Preservation Act
TUK also said the City failed to pay it for 139 days of work. It says it was not paid for work completed in September and October 2024, August 2023 and June through August 2022. The nonprofit did receive payment for some of these months in April 2024 after termination.
The City said there were delays in TUK submitting required reports, but TUK stated that the City's reporting requirements changed multiple times, often with little notice. The nonprofit said that its requests for clarity were unmet.
'[It] is difficult to submit a report when you have no idea what should be included in that report,' TUK said.
TUK also disputed many other statements from the City's release. For example, the City said it issued a warning that TUK said it never received.
TUK's Response to City's Overview of ContractDownload
Given its 'historic results' TUK said 'one has to wonder what the real reason' its contract was terminated.
In 2024, a Knoxville Police Department report stated that crime was down in nearly every category for 2024. This included a drop in homicides and non-fatal shootings.
For years, Black and Brown men and women in Knoxville have disproportionately been victims of homicide, with percentages consistently surpassing more than half of all lives lost to violence. Families, neighborhoods, and entire communities have felt the weight of this crisis, mourning loved ones while desperately calling for change.
But 2024 marked a historic shift. For the first time in recent history, the percentage of Black and Brown homicide victims dropped to 39%—a significant decrease from previous years. These are more than just statistics; these are lives saved,
TUK release
New Tennessee law opens empty school buildings to childcare agencies to combat shortage
After the City terminated their contact, TUK received outside funding that has helped it continue.
At the end of its response, TUK called on the City and City Council to reinstate the contract. The director is running for City Council.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
38 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
105 South Koreans sue former president for ‘emotional damages'
SEOUL, South Korea - It's been a season of legal woes for former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol. His short-lived declaration of martial law on Dec. 3 first landed him in front of the Constitutional Court - which removed him from office later that month - and then in the Seoul Central District Court, where he is now being tried on charges of insurrection. There is also the group of 105 irate citizens suing Yoon for emotional damages related to his power grab, which sent special forces soldiers to occupy the National Assembly and brought the press briefly under military control. Filed shortly after South Korean lawmakers voted to overrule Yoon's martial law order last year, the lawsuit is demanding compensation of 100,000 won ($73) for each of its plaintiffs. The first hearing is due later this month. "The defendant's declaration of emergency martial law and the actions that followed were unlawful, violating the plaintiffs' basic rights as South Korean citizens such as the freedom to one's life and body and the guarantee of human dignity, in addition to inflicting mental harm such as fear, anxiety, discomfort and shame," the complaint said. Behind those words is Lee Gum-gyu, a 52-year-old attorney who specializes in urban development law, but has become nationally known for facing down presidents in their impeachment trials. The first was conservative president Park Geun-hye, whom Lee, as a member of the legislature's legal team, helped oust in 2016 following a major graft scandal. The second - and the only other South Korean leader to be removed from office - was Yoon. As a member of the National Assembly's legal team in the Constitutional Court trial that confirmed Yoon's impeachment, Lee used his closing argument to speak of the fear he felt for his son, who was a conscript in the military. "The fact of emergency martial law itself filled me with fear, but the thought that my son might be deployed to enforce it was even more horrifying," he said. The civil suit, he says, is largely symbolic - one final rebuke of Yoon. It is why Lee gathered exactly 105 plaintiffs: the number of pro-Yoon legislators who boycotted his impeachment. And the asking sum of 100,000 won ($73) each? "I thought about keeping it at 10,000 won ($7.30), but that seemed like too little. My pride wouldn't let me," Lee said. "Obviously there isn't a formula for something like this, but 100,000 won just seemed more appropriate." The success rate of emotional damages claims against former presidents is not high. The closest example is a series of similar suits filed by South Korean citizens against Park in 2016. They sought 500,000 won ($364) per plaintiff. But the Supreme Court dismissed those claims in 2020, saying that "even if there were South Korean citizens who felt emotions like anger due to the defendant's actions, it cannot be said that this constituted a level of mental distress that necessitates compensation for every citizen." Still, Lee figures that his suit against Yoon has at least a marginally higher chance of success, given the far graver offense at hand. "The case against Park was related to corruption - it wasn't a case of the president unconstitutionally infringing on people's basic rights," he said. "The martial law forces actually went to the National Assembly and pointed their rifles at legislators and their staff. I do think that people's right to life was directly threatened." Some legal experts agree. "I am also curious whether this will work or not," said a judge in Seoul who requested anonymity to comment on an ongoing case. "Under current jurisprudence, I don't think it's entirely impossible." Given South Korea's history with authoritarianism, Lee argues, the claim to emotional distress isn't just courtroom theater. South Koreans lived under a dictatorship as recently as the 1980s. Political repression and violence are still part of the country's memory. The last declaration of martial law was made in May 1980 by the Chun Doo-hwan military junta, which sent special forces units to violently quash pro-democracy protests in the city of Gwangju. More than 160 civilians were killed, many of them gunned down by soldiers in the streets. Lee, who is from Gwangju, remembers watching a tank roll down the street behind his house as a child. "The national trauma from those events led to a real and deep fear in many South Koreans," he said. Han Ki-chang, a real estate agent and one of the 105 plaintiffs, says that he suffered from "martial law insomnia." The term entered the popular vernacular in the last few months and has been covered by the national media as an anecdotal phenomenon, with some older South Koreans saying it stirred panicked memories of living under authoritarian rule. "It was real. I had trouble sleeping in January and February," Han said. "And I could tell I wasn't the only one. Whenever I'd message people or post in a group chat in the middle of the night, a lot of people would respond, saying they needed to sleep but couldn't." At least one other group is preparing their own emotional damages lawsuit against the former president. Lee, the attorney, expects that there will be even more suits because he has been sending out copies of his complaint to anyone who wants it. They can just fill in their names and file their own. "If we win this case, that might make it possible for all 52 million South Korean citizens to claim damages," he said. He quickly did the math: at $7.30 per person, a total of $380 million. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Andrew Cuomo Gets Bad News from New York Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's hopes for a political comeback may have hit a roadblock. A new poll, conducted by Public Policy Polling for Democrat Justin Brannan's city comptroller campaign on June 6 and June 7 among 573 likely voters, and reviewed by Politico, shows socialist Zohran Mamdani, 33, ahead of Cuomo for the first time, two weeks before the Democratic primary. Newsweek has contacted representatives of Cuomo and Mamdani for comment via email. Why It Matters A primary win for Cuomo, 67, would mark a dramatic political comeback, just four years after he resigned as New York governor in 2021 amid the threat of impeachment over sexual misconduct allegations, which he has consistently denied. No charges relating to the allegations have ever been brought against him. But this latest poll suggest he may face strong headwinds from voters still skeptical of his leadership. Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo, left, shakes hands with Zohran Mamdani, center, as Whitney Tilson reacts after participating in a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York. Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo, left, shakes hands with Zohran Mamdani, center, as Whitney Tilson reacts after participating in a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York. Yuki Iwamura/AP What To Know The poll showed Mamdani beating Cuomo 35 percent to 31 percent—a difference that is narrowly within the 4.1 percent margin of error. While Mamdani's strongest backing came from white and Asian voters, he also attracted 27 percent of Black voters and nearly one-third of Hispanic voters. Still, Andrew Cuomo maintains a solid lead among Black voters at 42 percent. Meanwhile, the survey also revealed a wide gap between the two leading candidates and the rest of the field. City Comptroller Brad Lander, despite his citywide role and heavy campaign spending, drew just 9 percent support. Former Comptroller Scott Stringer was at 5 percent, and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams trailed at 4 percent, even with high-profile endorsements from Attorney General Letitia James and labor giant District Council 37. The poll is the first to give Mamdani, who was endorsed by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez earlier this month, a lead over Cuomo. The primary election is a rank-choice voting election, meaning voters have the opportunity to rank their five top choices for mayor. Since entering the race on March 1 to challenge Mayor Eric Adams, who will seek reelection as an independent, Cuomo has consistently held the frontrunner position, with most public polls showing him maintaining a comfortable lead. A Cuomo campaign poll conducted by Expedition Strategies and shared with Politico earlier this week showed the former governor leading Mamdani by 12 points—56 percent to 44 percent—after eight rounds of ranked-choice voting. That poll was conducted during the same period as the Public Policy Polling survey that had Mamdani in the lead. And a SurveyUSA poll conducted in mid-May 2025 showed that he was the top choice among likely Democratic voters for the upcoming June primary, with 43 percent support. He held a solid lead over his closest competitor, Mamdani, who had 11 percent. But some polls have shown Mamdani catching up to his opponent. That includes the most recent Data for Progress poll, which surveyed 819 likely Democratic primary voters between May 30 to June 4, and showed Mamdani 2 points behind Cuomo in a poll on the final ballot of the primary's rank-choice voting system. The poll also showed that Mamdani was polling 10 percent more favorable than Cuomo, at 58 percent to Cuomo's 48 percent Overall, Cuomo's support is strongest among Black voters (74 percent), voters over 50 (66 percent), and women (with a 58 percent to 42 percent edge over Mamdani). In contrast, Mamdani has built a solid base among voters under 50, leading with 61 percent, as well as among white voters (57 percent to 43 percent) and college-educated voters (58 percent to 42 percent). Zohran Mamdani has built momentum through social media and grassroots energy. His slick, attention-grabbing videos highlight proposals like free public bus service, government-run grocery stores, and a citywide rent freeze. As the race tightens, Cuomo has sharpened his criticism of Mamdani, calling him inexperienced and arguing that his proposals are unrealistic without significant tax hikes. Mamdani, however, insists his policies are designed to ease the burden on working-class New Yorkers. Mamdani told The New York Times that affordability is "the most important issue facing New Yorkers right now." What People Are Saying Zohran Mamdani told the New York Times: "There are far too many New Yorkers who do not know if they will be able to call themselves that next year, who do not know if they will be able to afford their rent, or their child care, their groceries, or even their MetroCard. "This is a city that we want to ensure does not become a museum or a relic of the working-class people who built it, but rather a living, breathing testament to the continuation of that story." Andrew Cuomo told the New York Times when asked what the most pressing issue is for New Yorkers: "Lack of management capacity evidenced through all of the above [affordability, public safety, President Trump or something else]. Lack of affordable housing, deterioration of quality of life—they all stem from poor management. Then the existential threat is Trump." What Happens Next Early voting in the June 24 primary is set to begin on Saturday. Mamdani and Cuomo are to participate in a debate Thursday evening.


Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Fireworks snitches wanted: Des Moines offers tips to help police
Des Moines is helping residents become fireworks finks by offering tips on how to report, testify against, and assist in convicting those who use them illegally. Why it matters: City leaders are facing a frustrating dilemma — they must legally allow fireworks on certain days due to a new state law, while also dealing with hundreds of resident complaints, persistent property damage, and limited resources to enforce violations each year. Driving the news: On Monday, the City Council voted to allow fireworks during certain times to celebrate the Fourth of July and New Year's. Context: The city was one of several metro cities that had year-round personal fireworks bans until the Legislature took precedence over its authority this year. Flashback: Police have long warned that widespread enforcement is impractical and that it can take police hours to respond to complaints. Only a few tickets have been issued in recent years, mainly because securing a conviction requires a witness who can identify perpetrators and is also willing to provide testimony. What they're saying: Among the most significant concerns is damage to Des Moines parks, Councilperson Joe Gatto said during this week's council meeting. Mayor Connie Boesen said the city is also working to help the public understand what they should do to assist police in issuing a citation. Zoom in: Videos of incidents are valuable, but sharing them on social media alone is insufficient for a conviction, Sgt. Paul Parizek tells Axios. If an officer does not witness a violation, the department needs a complainant who will make themselves available for court hearings if needed, he said. The intrigue: Generally, law enforcement can write citations up to a year after an illegal fireworks event, allowing time for investigations, Parizek said. The City Council reduced fines from $625 to $200 last year to better align with consequences in other metro cities. What's next: DSM's ordinance now permits fireworks on private property from 9am-10pm on July 3; 9am-11pm on July 4; and 9am to midnight on Dec. 31.