logo
Andrew Cuomo Gets Bad News from New York Poll

Andrew Cuomo Gets Bad News from New York Poll

Newsweek2 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo's hopes for a political comeback may have hit a roadblock.
A new poll, conducted by Public Policy Polling for Democrat Justin Brannan's city comptroller campaign on June 6 and June 7 among 573 likely voters, and reviewed by Politico, shows socialist Zohran Mamdani, 33, ahead of Cuomo for the first time, two weeks before the Democratic primary.
Newsweek has contacted representatives of Cuomo and Mamdani for comment via email.
Why It Matters
A primary win for Cuomo, 67, would mark a dramatic political comeback, just four years after he resigned as New York governor in 2021 amid the threat of impeachment over sexual misconduct allegations, which he has consistently denied. No charges relating to the allegations have ever been brought against him.
But this latest poll suggest he may face strong headwinds from voters still skeptical of his leadership.
Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo, left, shakes hands with Zohran Mamdani, center, as Whitney Tilson reacts after participating in a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York.
Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo, left, shakes hands with Zohran Mamdani, center, as Whitney Tilson reacts after participating in a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York.
Yuki Iwamura/AP
What To Know
The poll showed Mamdani beating Cuomo 35 percent to 31 percent—a difference that is narrowly within the 4.1 percent margin of error.
While Mamdani's strongest backing came from white and Asian voters, he also attracted 27 percent of Black voters and nearly one-third of Hispanic voters. Still, Andrew Cuomo maintains a solid lead among Black voters at 42 percent.
Meanwhile, the survey also revealed a wide gap between the two leading candidates and the rest of the field. City Comptroller Brad Lander, despite his citywide role and heavy campaign spending, drew just 9 percent support. Former Comptroller Scott Stringer was at 5 percent, and City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams trailed at 4 percent, even with high-profile endorsements from Attorney General Letitia James and labor giant District Council 37.
The poll is the first to give Mamdani, who was endorsed by Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez earlier this month, a lead over Cuomo. The primary election is a rank-choice voting election, meaning voters have the opportunity to rank their five top choices for mayor.
Since entering the race on March 1 to challenge Mayor Eric Adams, who will seek reelection as an independent, Cuomo has consistently held the frontrunner position, with most public polls showing him maintaining a comfortable lead.
A Cuomo campaign poll conducted by Expedition Strategies and shared with Politico earlier this week showed the former governor leading Mamdani by 12 points—56 percent to 44 percent—after eight rounds of ranked-choice voting. That poll was conducted during the same period as the Public Policy Polling survey that had Mamdani in the lead.
And a SurveyUSA poll conducted in mid-May 2025 showed that he was the top choice among likely Democratic voters for the upcoming June primary, with 43 percent support. He held a solid lead over his closest competitor, Mamdani, who had 11 percent.
But some polls have shown Mamdani catching up to his opponent.
That includes the most recent Data for Progress poll, which surveyed 819 likely Democratic primary voters between May 30 to June 4, and showed Mamdani 2 points behind Cuomo in a poll on the final ballot of the primary's rank-choice voting system.
The poll also showed that Mamdani was polling 10 percent more favorable than Cuomo, at 58 percent to Cuomo's 48 percent
Overall, Cuomo's support is strongest among Black voters (74 percent), voters over 50 (66 percent), and women (with a 58 percent to 42 percent edge over Mamdani). In contrast, Mamdani has built a solid base among voters under 50, leading with 61 percent, as well as among white voters (57 percent to 43 percent) and college-educated voters (58 percent to 42 percent).
Zohran Mamdani has built momentum through social media and grassroots energy. His slick, attention-grabbing videos highlight proposals like free public bus service, government-run grocery stores, and a citywide rent freeze.
As the race tightens, Cuomo has sharpened his criticism of Mamdani, calling him inexperienced and arguing that his proposals are unrealistic without significant tax hikes. Mamdani, however, insists his policies are designed to ease the burden on working-class New Yorkers. Mamdani told The New York Times that affordability is "the most important issue facing New Yorkers right now."
What People Are Saying
Zohran Mamdani told the New York Times: "There are far too many New Yorkers who do not know if they will be able to call themselves that next year, who do not know if they will be able to afford their rent, or their child care, their groceries, or even their MetroCard.
"This is a city that we want to ensure does not become a museum or a relic of the working-class people who built it, but rather a living, breathing testament to the continuation of that story."
Andrew Cuomo told the New York Times when asked what the most pressing issue is for New Yorkers: "Lack of management capacity evidenced through all of the above [affordability, public safety, President Trump or something else]. Lack of affordable housing, deterioration of quality of life—they all stem from poor management. Then the existential threat is Trump."
What Happens Next
Early voting in the June 24 primary is set to begin on Saturday. Mamdani and Cuomo are to participate in a debate Thursday evening.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident
Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Secret Service Followed Protocol in Padilla Incident

California Sen. Alex Padilla is getting plenty of mileage out of his scuffle with the Secret Service and federal authorities in Los Angeles Thursday. Padillas Senate and campaign accounts posted a total of seven outraged videos in the first 24 hours after the altercation. Viral videos of the incident show a Secret Service agent dragging a fuming Padilla out of a press conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and he identifies himself as a senator only as hes being pushed out the door. The agent then forces Padilla to the ground, while two agents handcuff him. Padilla, however, wasnt arrested. Within the hour, agents released him with no charges. Dozens of Democratic members of Congress then jumped to Padillas defense, denouncing the action while casting the Secret Service and FBI agents involved as an extension of what they labeled as President Trumps totalitarian police state. Sen. Schumer called the Secret Services use of force "cruel and unacceptable." "This was a deliberate attempt to intimidate an elected official whose only offense is standing up for the voiceless," Schumer said. "But its not just about Sen. Padilla, its about every person who dares to speak truth to power." Republicans and conservative commentators countered that it was all a big publicity stunt and noted that a Padilla staffer filmed the tussle and then quickly distributed it to the media in the room. "Sen. Padilla didnt want answers - he wanted airtime," Rep. Byron Donalds said on Fox News Thursday night. "Shoving past security for a viral moment is a stunt, not leadership. If he cared about solutions, hed have asked for a meeting. But like most Democrats, he just wants the spotlight." "Alex Padilla is an embarrassment to California," said Steve Hilton, who is running for governor in California as a Republican. "Hes a complete nonentity. Thats why they didnt recognize him … [he has] zero accomplishments and now this pathetic stunt as his only claim to fame." Yet, one Republican, Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, an ardent Trump critic, condemned Padillas treatment as "shocking at every level" and "not the America I know." Secret Service experts argue nothing could be further from the truth - that the agent was simply following normal protocol. Padilla, they said, actually received preferential treatment by not being arrested and jailed for his menacing display. The Secret Service agent warned Padilla, whom agents did not recognize as a senator and who wasnt wearing his Senate pin, to back away from Noem and then forcibly removed him when he ignored their entreaties. "They can represent this however they want, but those agents made the right decision to get him out of the room," Charles Marino, a former Secret Service agent told RealClearPolitics. "He did not have a congressional pin on, he was yelling and closing distance very quickly to make it to the front of the room to confront Noem." "Look, hes not above the law. Anyone taking those actions would been treated far worse - they would have been arrested and been forced to spend some time in jail," Marino said. "Who was escalating the situation? When you look at Padillas action, taken in totality, the agents had no other choice." Instead of dragging him to a cell, federal agents released the senator after the incident. Then Noem met with Padilla for 15 minutes and gave him her cell phone number to discuss matters further. "We probably disagree on 90% of the topics, but we agreed to exchange phone numbers and continue to talk - that is the way it should be in this country," Noem told Fox News Thursday afternoon. The Homeland Security Department issued a statement Thursday defending the federal agents actions, arguing that Padilla chose "disrespectful political theater" over constructive congressional oversight. Padilla, the agency said, "interrupted a live press conference without identifying himself or having his Senate security pin on as he lunged toward Secretary Noem." "Mr. Padilla was told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers repeated commands," the department added. "@Secret Service thought he was an attacker and officers acted appropriately." Several other Secret Service sources backed up Marinos account. "Any sudden movement towards a protectee that feels threatening, especially when that person has not been identified, the policy is 100% to prevent further escalation or movement toward Noem," said a source in the Secret Service community. "We would have done the same thing for anyone threatening [former DHS Secretary] Mayorkas." Even though the situation escalated very quickly, the agent still followed the basic rules of engagement for law enforcement, the source asserted. Agents and officers first ask a person to move away from the protectee, then they tell them firmly to move away, and if those warnings arent abided, then they can use physical force to move the threatening person away. "Its a pretty common law enforcement way of relaying information and taking action, because emotions can get the best of people, and agents are forced to err on the side of protection," the source added. After the two assassination attempts against Trump, agents are highly attuned to aggressive behavior and working to ensure theyre not involved in any security lapses. "In this day and age, you can see what a split-second hesitate could result in," one former agent remarked. "Could you imagine if the agent didnt respond, and Padilla got on the stage and hit [Noem]?" The agency has been knocked around for months for the egregious security failures in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13 and then nearly two months later during another close call against Trump at his West Palm Beach golf course. And just because its Padilla who was attending a press conference doesnt mean assaults against a Cabinet secretary or president are unlikely to occur. During a December 2008 press conference in Iraq, an Iraqi journalist threw both of his shoes at former President George W. Bush in a pique of outrage. Secret Service agents with their zero-fail mission have to be poised to respond to all types of unexpected threats, which sometimes come with no warning at all. Back in 2005, during Bushs visit to the country of Georgia, a man attempted to assassinate Bush and then-Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili by throwing a hand grenade at both of them. "Listen, we dont always know who you are if youre not wearing your [congressional] pin," the source said. "Youre coming at [Noem] in an aggressive manner, and you didnt heed our warnings to stop. If you get into the buffer zone, we have to take you down. All public officials should know, and I would hope understand, that." Susan Crabtree is RealClearPolitics' national political correspondent.

Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest
Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

A new national poll indicates that Americans are divided over President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard and U.S. Marines to the nation's second most populous city. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by the president have dominated national headlines for a week. Forty-one percent of adults nationwide questioned in a Washington Post/George Mason University Schar School poll said they support the president's move, with 44% opposed and 15% unsure. The survey was conducted on Tuesday and questioned over 1,000 adults nationwide, including roughly 200 in blue-state California. First On Fox: Immigrant Voters Abandon Democrats On Immigration Issue Support for the president's actions among the California respondents stood at 32%, with 58% opposed. Read On The Fox News App The poll also highlighted an expected massive partisan divide. Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Eight-six percent of Republicans surveyed supported the president's deployment of the National Guard and Marines to the streets of LA, with more than three-quarters of Democrats giving a thumbs down on Trump's move. A third of independents approved of the sending of the troops, with nearly half opposed and nearly one in five unsure. Trump took control of California's National Guard without the permission of Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, the first time in 60 years that a president has federalized National Guard troops without a governor's request. Newsom, leading the resistance to Trump's moves, took legal action to try and reverse the order. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook A federal district court judge this week ruled that Trump's moves were illegal and ordered him to return control of the National Guard troops to Newsom. But a federal appeals court quickly temporarily blocked the lower court judge's ruling. The survey also indicates Americans are divided over whether they support (39%) or oppose (40%) the protests. Just over one in five (21%) were unsure of their support or opposition. Seventy percent of Democrats — but just 39% of independents and only 6% of Republicans — support the aims of the protesters. According to the poll, Americans are also divided over whether the protests have been mostly peaceful (35%) or mostly violent (37%).Original article source: Americans weigh in on Trump's deployment of troops to quell Los Angeles unrest

Will Bay Area mass protests be peaceful? How events unfold could be crucial to Trump opposition
Will Bay Area mass protests be peaceful? How events unfold could be crucial to Trump opposition

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Will Bay Area mass protests be peaceful? How events unfold could be crucial to Trump opposition

Organizers of the Bay Area's No Kings rallies are enlisting some of their participants as peacekeeping marshals for the Saturday demonstrations, the volunteers tasked with snuffing out any flare-ups of violence or disorder. The events, which are among the estimated 2,000 rallies planned across the nation against President Donald Trump that day, come as the administration points to protests over this month's federal immigration raids, which have at times been marked by property damage and clashes with law enforcement, as justification to deploy the National Guard and Marines to Los Angeles. The timing of the protests presents a challenge for Bay Area and national Democratic leaders, who know that it will play into Trump's hands if widespread violence erupts. Protest organizers have vowed to keep the actions peaceful, but as events in Los Angeles have shown, large protests can take a life of their own. 'Given the threats from the Trump administration, they're really going to be going out of their way to try to maintain, as much as possible, nonviolent discipline, so as not to give the authorities the excuse to crack down,' said Stephen Zunes, a professor of politics and international studies at the University of San Francisco. Stewart Chen, an Oakland Chinatown leader who is part of the planning committee for the city's march, said no one wants to give Trump an excuse to send troops to the Bay Area. 'I have been given assurances time and time again that this is going to be a family-friendly event,' said Chen, who is an immigrant from the Philippines. 'It's not going to be like L.A., we're not fighting ICE… we're just exercising our freedom of speech and freedom of peaceful assembly.' Still, officials aren't taking any chances. While they've spoken in support of protesters' rights to make their voices heard, they've also issued stern warnings about law-breaking. In San Francisco, Mayor Daniel Lurie stood next to the police chief, sheriff, district attorney and others Friday to deliver the message. 'We are … here to protect our small business owners and our residents and visitors,' Lurie said. 'I want to be crystal clear, if there is violence or destructive activity, law enforcement will step in. If you assault a police officer or break windows of a local business, you will be arrested.' Police arrested more than 150 people after a protest Sunday night in San Francisco. Chen, who became involved in the Oakland rally after the movement's nationwide organizers asked him to speak at the march's kickoff, said he passed on these assurances to everyone he's spoken to, which included officials with the California Highway Patrol, city councilmembers and the governor's office. Chen said national organizers are sending in about 100 people to participate in the marches and act as crowd control, and Chinatown's own, orange-vested patrol team will have several dozen members lining up along Eighth Street. The crowd-controllers' role, Chen said, will be to 'identify bad apples and point them out to police.' 'So if people start throwing projectiles or something, (the volunteers) mobilize, sort of surround them, get between them and the cops, and isolate them from the group,' Zunes said. In warning against violence Friday, Lurie and others were careful to express support for peaceful protests and the immigrant community. 'As mayor, my top priority is keeping everyone in San Francisco safe,' he said, 'and I'm fully committed to protecting everyone's first amendment rights.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store