logo
Only Critical Thinking Ensures AI Makes Us Smarter, Not Dumber

Only Critical Thinking Ensures AI Makes Us Smarter, Not Dumber

Forbes16-07-2025
AI needs more human thinking, not less, but are we giving it the opposite?
We're entering a new era where artificial intelligence can generate content faster than we can apply critical thinking. In mere seconds, AI can summarize long reports, write emails in our tone and even generate strategic recommendations. But while these productivity gains are promising, there's an urgent question lurking beneath the surface: Are we thinking less because AI is doing more?
The very cognitive skills we need most in an AI-powered world are the ones that the tools may be weakening. When critical thinking takes a back seat, the consequences are almost comical—unless it's your company making headlines.
These real-world breakdowns show what can happen when critical thinking is absent.
As AI models get more advanced and powerful, they exhibit even higher rates of hallucinations, making human supervision even more critical. And yet, a March 2025 McKinsey study found that only 27% of organizations reported reviewing 100% of generative AI outputs. With so much of the focus on the technology itself, many organizations clearly don't yet understand the growing importance of human oversight.
Clarifying what critical thinking is
While most people agree that critical thinking is essential for evaluating AI, there's less agreement on what it actually means. The term is often used as a catch-all term for a wide range of analytical skills—from reasoning and logic to questioning and problem-solving—which can feel fuzzy or ambiguous.
At its core, critical thinking is both a mindset and a method. It's about questioning what we believe, examining how we think and applying tools such as evidence and logic to reach better conclusions.
I define critical thinking as the ability to evaluate information in a thoughtful and disciplined manner to make sound judgments instead of accepting things at face value.
As part of researching this article, I spoke with Fahed Bizzari, Managing Partner at Bellamy Alden AI Consulting, who helps organizations implement AI responsibly. He described the ideal mindset as 'a permanent state of cautiousness' where 'you have to perpetually be on your guard to take responsibility for its intelligence as well as your own.' This mindset of constant vigilance is essential, but it needs practical tools to make it work in daily practice.
The GPS Effect: What happens when we stop thinking
This need for vigilance is more urgent than ever. A troubling pattern has emerged where researchers are finding that frequent AI use is linked to declining critical thinking skills. In a recent MIT study, 54 participants were assigned to write essays using one of three approaches: their own knowledge ('brain only'), Google Search, or ChatGPT. The group that used the AI tool showed the lowest brain engagement, weakest memory recall and least satisfaction with their writing. This cognitive offloading produced essays that were homogeneous and 'soulless,' lacking originality, depth and critical engagement. Ironically, the very skills needed to assess AI output—like reasoning, judgment, and skepticism—are being eroded or suppressed by overreliance on the technology.
It's like your sense of direction slowly fading because you rely on GPS for every trip—even around your own neighborhood. When the GPS fails due to a system error or lost signal, you're left disoriented. The skill you once had has atrophied because you outsourced your navigation skills to the GPS.
Bizzari noted, 'AI multiplies your applied intelligence exponentially, but in doing so, it chisels away at your foundational intelligence. Everyone is celebrating the productivity gains today, but it will eventually become a huge problem.' His point underscores a deeper risk of overdependence on AI. We don't just make more mistakes—we lose our ability to catch them.
Why fast thinking isn't always smart thinking
We like to think we evaluate information rationally, but our brains aren't wired that way. As psychologist Daniel Kahneman explains, we tend to rely on System 1 thinking, which is fast, automatic and intuitive. It's efficient, but it comes with tradeoffs. We jump to conclusions and trust whatever sounds credible. We don't pause to dig deeper, which makes us especially susceptible to AI mistakes.
AI tools generate responses that are confident, polished and easy to accept. They give us what feels like a good answer—almost instantly and with minimal effort. Because it sounds authoritative, System 1 gives it a rubber stamp before we've even questioned it. That's where the danger lies.
To catch AI's blind spots, exaggerations or outright hallucinations, we must override that System 1 mental reflex. That means activating System 2 thinking, which is the slower, more deliberate mode of reasoning. It's the part of us that checks sources, tests assumptions and evaluates logic. If System 1 is what trips us up with AI, System 2 is what safeguards us.
The Critical Five: A framework for turning passengers into pilots
You can't safely scale AI without scaling critical thinking. Bizzari cautioned that if we drop our guard, AI will become the pilot—not the co-pilot—and we become unwitting passengers. As organizations become increasingly AI-driven, they can't afford to have more passengers than pilots. Everyone tasked with using AI—from analysts to executives—needs to actively guide decisions in their domains.
Fortunately, critical thinking can be learned, practiced and strengthened over time. But because our brains are wired for efficiency and favor fast, intuitive System 1 thinking, it's up to each of us to proactively engage System 2 to spot flawed logic, hidden biases and overconfident AI responses.
Here's how to put this into practice. I've created The Critical Five framework, which breaks critical thinking into five key components, each with both a mindset and a method perspective:
To make critical thinking less ambiguous, The Critical Five framework breaks it down into five key ... More components.
Just ASK: A quick AI check for busy minds
While these five skills provide a solid foundation for AI-related critical thinking, they don't operate in a vacuum. Just as pilots must adapt their approach based on weather conditions, aircraft type and destination, we must be able to adapt our critical thinking skills to fit different circumstances. Your focus and level of effort will be shaped by the following key factors:
Critical thinking doesn't happen in a vacuum. It is shaped by an individual's domain expertise, org ... More culture and time constraints.
Recognizing that many scenarios with AI output may not demand an in-depth review, I've developed a quick way of injecting critical thinking into daily AI usage. This is particularly important because, as Bizzari highlighted, "Current AI language models have been designed primarily with a focus on plausibility, not correctness. So, it can make the biggest lie on earth sound factual and convincing." To counter this exact problem, I created a simple framework anyone can apply in seconds. Just ASK:
For quick evaluations, focus on questioning the assumptions, sources and your objectivity.
To show this approach in action, I'll use an example where I've prompted an AI tool to provide a marketing strategy for my small business.
This quick evaluation could reveal potential blind spots that might otherwise turn promising AI recommendations into costly business mistakes, like a misguided marketing campaign.
The future of AI depends on human thinking
If more employees simply remember to 'always ASK before using AI output,' your organization can begin building a culture that actively safeguards against AI overreliance. Whether using the full Critical Five framework or quick ASK method, people transform from passive passengers into engaged pilots who actively steer how AI is used and trusted.
AI can enhance our thinking, but it should never replace it. Left unchecked, AI encourages shortcuts that lead to the costly mistakes we saw earlier. Used wisely, it becomes a powerful, strategic partner. This isn't about offloading cognition. It's about upgrading it—by pairing powerful tools with thoughtful, engaged minds.
In the end, AI's value won't come from removing us from the process—it will come from how disciplined we are in applying critical thinking to what it helps us generate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta Appoints Ex-OpenAI Scientist Shengjia Zhao to Lead New Superintelligence Lab
Meta Appoints Ex-OpenAI Scientist Shengjia Zhao to Lead New Superintelligence Lab

Entrepreneur

time23 minutes ago

  • Entrepreneur

Meta Appoints Ex-OpenAI Scientist Shengjia Zhao to Lead New Superintelligence Lab

Zhao, previously a research scientist at OpenAI, played a pivotal role in creating GPT-4 and various lighter models such as version 4.1 and o3. He is among at least eight researchers who have recently transitioned from OpenAI to Meta. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Meta Platforms has appointed Shengjia Zhao, a leading figure in the development of OpenAI's ChatGPT, as chief scientist of its newly launched Superintelligence Lab. This high-profile move marks a significant step in Meta's accelerating drive to position itself at the forefront of advanced artificial intelligence. CEO Mark Zuckerberg shared the announcement on Friday through Threads. He said Zhao will guide the lab's scientific direction and collaborate closely with both Zuckerberg and Meta's Chief AI Officer Alexandr Wang. Wang joined the company earlier this year after Meta took a substantial stake in his former company, Scale AI. Zhao, previously a research scientist at OpenAI, played a pivotal role in creating GPT-4 and various lighter models such as version 4.1 and o3. He is among at least eight researchers who have recently transitioned from OpenAI to Meta. The influx of talent signals Meta's intent to rapidly close the distance with competitors in the race toward building artificial general intelligence. The creation of the Superintelligence Lab is part of Meta's broader efforts to establish a premier AI research division. The lab is distinct from FAIR, Meta's long-standing AI unit led by deep learning pioneer Yann LeCun. While FAIR has focused on foundational research, the new lab aims to develop what Zuckerberg has described as full general intelligence. Zuckerberg also confirmed that Meta plans to open-source the work produced by the Superintelligence Lab. This strategy has drawn mixed reactions within the AI community, with some praising the transparency and others warning of risks linked to such openness. Meanwhile, Meta's recruitment campaign has unsettled OpenAI. Internal messages leaked this month revealed OpenAI Chief Research Officer Mark Chen comparing Meta's tactics to "someone breaking into our home and stealing something." In response, OpenAI is reportedly reassessing its compensation practices and offering staff additional time off to curb further departures. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has publicly criticised what he views as profit-driven hiring practices. He alleged that Meta has lured researchers with offers reaching USD 100 million in signing bonuses, a claim dismissed as exaggerated by Meta's Chief Technology Officer Andrew Bosworth. However, reports of even higher offers, including an unverified USD 1.25 billion compensation package over four years, illustrate the escalating competition for elite AI talent. While Altman argues that OpenAI's mission-focused approach offers a stronger long-term foundation, others in the industry see Meta's strategy as justified. Google DeepMind's CEO Demis Hassabis called the hiring surge a rational response given Meta's desire to catch up. With over USD 14 billion invested in AI infrastructure and partnerships, Meta is making its intentions clear. The addition of Zhao and other key hires underscores the company's determination to lead—not just follow—the next wave of AI development.

Musk Announces Deal With Samsung For Tesla AI Chips Made In Texas
Musk Announces Deal With Samsung For Tesla AI Chips Made In Texas

Forbes

time24 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Musk Announces Deal With Samsung For Tesla AI Chips Made In Texas

Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced late on Sunday that Samsung will manufacture the car maker's next-generation AI chip at its upcoming Texas semiconductor plant as part of a deal worth $16.5 billion, in a significant boost for Samsung's struggling chipmaking arm. Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that Samsung will manufacture Tesla's next-generation AI chips. Getty Images In a post on X, Musk announced that 'Samsung's giant new Texas fab will be dedicated to making Tesla's next-generation AI6 chip,' adding: 'The strategic importance of this is hard to overstate.' In a regulatory filing made in South Korea shortly before Musk's announcement, the electronics giant announced it had secured a $16.5 billion contract with a 'large global company.' The multi-year deal will run through till the end of 2033, and Samsung's semiconductor fabrication plant in Taylor, Texas, is scheduled to begin operations in 2026. In a follow-up post, Musk said Samsung has agreed to 'allow Tesla to assist in maximizing manufacturing efficiency,' but he didn't specify whether this meant Tesla would assist in bringing the plant into operation. Musk pointed out the Samsung fab 'is conveniently located not far from my house' and claimed he would walk the production line 'personally to accelerate the pace of progress.' Musk pointed out that Samsung currently manufactures Tesla's AI4 chip. The billionaire said his company has completed the design for the AI5 chip, which will be manufactured by TSMC, Samsung's primary chipmaking rival. According to Musk, the AI5 chips will be first manufactured in Taiwan and then later at TSMC's Arizona plant. How Have The Markets Reacted? Shortly after the announcement, Samsung Electronics' Seoul-traded shares surged 6.22% to $50.6 (KRW 70,000).

Samsung to Make Tesla AI Chips in $16.5 Billion Multiyear Deal
Samsung to Make Tesla AI Chips in $16.5 Billion Multiyear Deal

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Samsung to Make Tesla AI Chips in $16.5 Billion Multiyear Deal

(Bloomberg) -- Samsung Electronics Co. will produce AI semiconductors for Tesla Inc. in a new $16.5 billion pact that marks a win for its underperforming foundry division. The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy South Korea's largest company announced on Monday that it secured the 22.8 trillion won chipmaking agreement, which will run through the end of 2033. The plan is for an upcoming plant in Taylor, Texas, to produce Tesla's next-generation AI6 chip, Tesla chief Elon Musk said on X, confirming a Bloomberg News report. Samsung's Seoul-traded shares rose as much as 5%, to their highest since September. A company spokesperson declined to comment, citing confidentiality terms in its contract. 'The strategic importance of this is hard to overstate,' the Tesla chief executive officer and X owner wrote. Musk, 54, will walk the production line himself and has been authorized by Samsung to assist in optimizing production, he said. The contract win comes as Samsung has been steadily losing ground in chip manufacturing. The company, which makes its own memory chips and also fabricates semiconductors on behalf of clients, has had difficulty bringing in enough orders to fully utilize its foundry capacity. It has postponed completion of construction and operational ramp-up of its new Texas fab to 2026. 'Their foundry business has been loss-making and struggling with under-utilization, so this will help a lot,' said Vey-Sern Ling, managing director at Union Bancaire Privee in Singapore. 'Tesla's business may also help them to attract other customers.' That's in contrast to leading chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., which still cannot meet all demand. TSMC held a dominant share of 67.6% of the global foundry market in the first quarter this year, according to Taipei-based TrendForce. Samsung's share slipped to 7.7% from 8.1% in the previous quarter. What Bloomberg Intelligence Says Samsung Electronics' new contract to supply semiconductors implies a recovery in its foundry business' 2-nanometer generation chip production. The $16.5 billion contract spans 2025-33 and could boost Samsung's foundry sales by 10% annually, we calculate. — Masahiro Wakasugi and Takumi Okano Click here for the full research Samsung and TSMC are both on pace to deliver the next generation of semiconductor advancement — moving to 2-nanometer fabrication — and the new deal is seen as a signal of confidence for the company's upcoming fabrication technology. --With assistance from Seyoon Kim, Linda Lew and Abhishek Vishnoi. (Updates with Musk's confirmation and further details from third paragraph) Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Dude! They Killed Colbert! ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store