Third-grade retention law sends students to summer academies
As vacation season gets underway, thousands of families across the state and those in the MSCS district are having to postpone their summer plans for tutoring sessions, all because of Tennessee's Third Grade Retention Law.
'I am very concerned because third-graders need to know how to read early,' said Stephanie Love/MSCS Vice-Chair. 'I agree with Mark White (State Representative/(R) Memphis). We need to state early on in kindergarten in the first grade. Third grade is too late for them to know.'
Meharry to open medical training center in Midtown Memphis development
A state law enacted in 2021 says students who fail the English portion of the TCAP exam must choose between summer school and tutoring just to advance to fourth grade.
According to MSCS, approximately 9,000 students are enrolled to attend the Summer Learning Academy, and the number that attend will vary.
MSCS is offering a Summer Learning Academy for grades kindergarten through 9th grade, and it's required for many third-grade students. About 10 thousand spaces are available.
Across Tennessee, the state Department of Education says only 40% of third-grade students were proficient in English in the 2023 to 2024 school year.
Restaurant Inspection Scores, June 3 – June 9
'Proficiency is when you get above a certain level in reading proficiency,' said Rep. White. 'The latest scores at our MSCS schools is 23% reading proficiency for our third graders. That's not acceptable.'
As some students are back in the classroom for summer learning academies. Parents are also appealing to TCAP for third graders facing retention, as some call for changes in the state law.
'The state needs to take in all considerations all tests in academic levels, besides the TCAP,' said Love.
MSCS told WREG that all 2025 TCAP testing results are under embargo by the state, so they cannot share results.
School Board Vice Chair Stephanie Love said she and Interim Superintendent Roderick Richmond will tour the summer learning academy at Woodstock Middle School on Thursday to see how students are progressing.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Don't Destroy Institute of Education Sciences, Rebuild It With Students in Mind
The scaffolding that supports the nation's federal education data systems is crumbling. By canceling programs and eliminating staff, including those that fulfilled statutorily mandated functions, the Trump administration has taken a hatchet to the Institute of Education Sciences, the federal agency responsible for collecting, analyzing and making public key higher education data, with no real plan for replacement. This is not strategic reform; it's irresponsible leadership. This system must be rebuilt, and it must be done thoughtfully, with student success as the guiding goal. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter Data are among the most important tools available for understanding what's working and what isn't in education. For higher education especially, data are critical for identifying problems, spotlighting solutions and distinguishing colleges and universities that deliver strong student outcomes from those in need of improvement. IES has long provided trusted, rigorous data that inform decisionmaking and drive policy change. But the agency and the insights it supports are now in jeopardy. The administration's cuts have real consequences for students, families, states, policymakers and the country. Every year, over 1 million people use tools powered by federal data to make decisions about college and about higher education policy. The College Scorecard, for example, helps prospective applicants compare schools by cost, student loan debt, graduation rates and post-graduation earnings. However, colleges have reported system outages when trying to upload information to the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, which the scorecard relies upon. In addition, staffers responsible for verifying, approving and publishing the data have been terminated — along with 90% of all IES personnel. Equally troubling, the Department of Education canceled the contract that provided training to the professionals who report data to the system, risking the quality and integrity of the information. Related In February, IES did away with other vital data collections, including the National Postsecondary Student Aid Study and its longitudinal follow-up study about the outcomes of first-time college students, the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study. These data sources are essential to answering basic questions like: Who enrolls in college? Who transfers? Who completes their degree? How do students pay for college? How do graduates fare in the workforce? While the contract for the 2024 postsecondary student aid data collection was reinstated June 30, questions remain about the scope of that study and its future, as well its related longitudinal studies. These concerns are especially pertinent as IES remains severely understaffed and the Trump administration has proposed a 67% budget cut for fiscal year 2026. IES' outlook remains wholly unclear. The administration has not outlined a plan nor has it sought, nor has it sought any public input to determine its future. Some officials have advocated scattering the Education Department's responsibilities across other agencies, but they have not explained how they would preserve researcher access and data quality under such a fragmented system. This creates uncertainty for students, families, state officials and researchers — and threatens to destroy a system that took decades to build, undermining the future of evidence-based policymaking. Related A newly announced department senior adviser, Dr. Amber Northern, is reportedly focusing on IES reform. But without swift and transparent action, the damage risks becoming permanent. The nation doesn't need a patchwork fix. It needs a clear, thoughtful and ambitious plan to rebuild its education data infrastructure. That starts with a few key principles: First, protect the principles that made IES so crucial in the first place: statistical rigor, public transparency, data security, privacy protections, data accessibility and responsiveness to stakeholder input. Second, recognize that no state or private entity can replace what the federal government is uniquely equipped to do: mandate consistent reporting across colleges, access administrative data across agencies and ensure national recognize that federal data are a public good, and that changes to them should be informed by stakeholders — states, colleges, education researchers, policy analysts, policymakers and, of course, students and families. Any reform must be conceived with their needs in mind. Related Fourth, think bigger. Set an ambitious vision for the depth, breadth and scope of education data and research that the nation truly needs. America's future relies on the strength of its education system — and education decisions made by students, families, educators, states and policymakers ought to be informed by the best available data and research. If students are to succeed, the nation must commit to providing and learning from the data. As the Education Department and Congress consider their next steps, they face a pivotal choice: continue to erode critical data systems, replace what existed before or seize the moment to design something stronger — a system worthy of the students it's meant to serve.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Baltimore Schools Face Investigation Over Antisemitism Allegations
The Department of Education announced on Thursday an investigation of the public school system in Baltimore over accusations that it did not do enough to address antisemitism. The move indicated the administration would broaden its focus on antisemitism to K-12 schools, after spending months pursuing similar claims against universities. The investigation stems from an Anti-Defamation League complaint against Baltimore City Public Schools. It centers on the actions of a high school English teacher who, during a lesson on Shakespeare last January, reportedly performed a Nazi salute in the classroom, directed toward a Jewish student. The complaint states that while the school system substantiated the student's version of events, it did not meaningfully discipline the teacher, who is still employed by the district. It also covers a broad range of other reported incidents, including swastika graffiti found in classrooms, and students bullying Jewish peers with statements such as '6 million was not enough' and 'we should call Hamas and have them come here.' The A.D.L. alleges that one Baltimore high school removed mentions of the Holocaust from lessons about World War II, while another displayed a sign reading 'from the river to the sea' — a rallying cry of the movement for Palestinian rights, whose meaning is often debated. The federal investigation will consider whether Baltimore City Public Schools has violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which seeks to prevent discrimination based on race, color and shared ancestry. Schools found in violation of civil rights law can have their federal funding revoked, unless they agree to certain terms — the same pressure the White House is wielding against elite universities. In a written statement, Baltimore City Public Schools said it was aware of some of the incidents in the A.D.L. complaint and had taken action in response. 'We unequivocally reject antisemitism and hate in any form,' the district said. Democratic administrations have tended to use civil rights investigations to attempt to protect Black, Hispanic, Native American and L.G.B.T.Q. students. But the Trump administration has focused on antisemitism, while also arguing that many diversity, equity and inclusion efforts discriminate against white students. In a written statement, Craig Trainor, acting assistant secretary for civil rights at the Department of Education, said that if the allegations against Baltimore were true, they 'confirm a disturbing trend: too many of our nation's educational institutions are failing American students by inculcating in them a loathing for their own country and fellow citizens, and a tolerance and acceptance for a deeply destructive ancient hatred.' The A.D.L. has requested that Baltimore offer instruction on antisemitism to staff and students. It has also asked that the district adopt a broad definition of antisemitism that has been controversial, because it could equate much criticism of Israel with anti-Jewish hatred. Baltimore is just the latest school system in a Democratic-leaning region to be investigated by the Trump administration. The administration is investigating Chicago Public Schools over its efforts to raise academic achievement for Black students. And it has declared that the states of California and Maine violated the law with policies that allow transgender girls to compete on female sports teams.
Epoch Times
2 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Trump to Direct Colleges to Report More Admissions Data
Colleges and universities that receive federal funding will be required to share information and data about their admissions practices with the public under President Donald Trump's new directive to the Department of Education. The order, titled, Ensuring Accountability in Higher Education, was announced on Aug. 7. It expands the federal data reporting system to include admission criteria at schools.
