Chandigarh admn issues directions for ‘Har Ghar Tiranga' campaign
The Administration calls upon every citizen to hoist national flags at their homes from August 13 to 15, symbolising unity, national pride, and the shared spirit of independence.
UT Administrator and Punjab Governor Gulab Chand Kataria said, 'Har Ghar Tiranga is not just a celebration, it is a call to every citizen to embrace our national identity with pride. Let every home in Chandigarh reflect the spirit of unity and patriotism as we pay tribute to our Tricolour. I urge all residents, institutions, and the youth to participate in this initiative and make it a grand success.'
'In alignment with the national movement under Azadi Ka Amrit Mahotsav, the campaign aims to inspire every citizen, fostering a sense of collective pride, national unity, and emotional attachment to the Tricolour. Far beyond a symbolic gesture, it is designed to rekindle awareness about the significance of the Tiranga, the sacrifices made by freedom fighters, and the values enshrined in our Constitution. Citizens, including schoolchildren, government employees, institutions, and community groups, are being encouraged to participate actively through ceremonies, creative initiatives, and digital engagement,' the UT Administration said in a statement issued here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
What will it take to restore J&K statehood
Six years after the Centre's unprecedented decision to reorganise the erstwhile state of Jammu & Kashmir into two Union Territories — J&K and Ladakh — calls to restore statehood have been getting louder. Last month, J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah made a forceful plea to the Centre for restoring statehood. 'We're not asking for something that is not our due. Statehood is the right, it was promised to the people,' he had said on July 20. What would restoration of statehood mean for J&K? What would it take for that to happen? Statehood will empower CM The J&K Reorganisation Act was passed in Parliament on August 6, 2019. It gave the Centre, through the Lieutenant Governor, a heightened legislative role in J&K, and put the bureaucratic apparatus in the UT under the Union Home Minister. Both policing and public order were placed within control of the Centre. Subjects on the Concurrent List in the Constitution were taken off the plate of the legislative Assembly as well. The Act also barred the UT's legislature from introducing bills with any fiscal, monetary or taxation implications without the recommendation of the L-G. This is particularly limiting since virtually every policy decision requires taxation, expenditure or revenue adjustments. So a restoration of statehood would effectively empower the elected government in J&K and vastly reduce the powers of the L-G, who, according to Section 53 of the Reorganisation Act, has the 'final' say on almost every administrative and legislative decision. '…The decision of the Lieutenant Governor in his discretion shall be final, and the validity of anything done by the Lieutenant Governor shall not be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion…,' Section 53 states. Act of Parliament will be needed The J&K Reorganisation was without precedent — no state had ever been reduced to a UT before. But granting statehood would not be without precedent. Five UTs have previously been granted statehood by Parliament: Himachal Pradesh in 1971, Manipur and Tripura in 1972, and Arunachal Pradesh and Mizoram in 1987. Additionally, the state of Goa was carved out of the then UT of Goa, Daman and Diu in 1987. For statehood to be restored to J&K, the Reorganisation Act would have to be repealed, and the Centre would have to introduce a fresh bill in Parliament, which then would have to be passed in both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha. Article 3 of the Constitution empowers Parliament to form a new state out of the territory of any other state or UT, as well as to change the area or name of a state. But a bill to this effect can only be introduced on the recommendation of the President. Since the President acts only on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers — led by the Prime Minister — this essentially means that it is up to the Centre to recommend the introduction of the bill for restoration of statehood.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
12 minutes ago
- Business Standard
6 years of abrogation of Article 370: Why it matters and what has changed?
On August 5, 2019, India's Parliament witnessed a moment of historic consequence. Home Minister Amit Shah rose in the Rajya Sabha to introduce a resolution to abrogate Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) of its special constitutional status under Article 370. Moving the resolution, Shah had then said, 'There should not be a delay of even a second to remove Article 370 from the Constitution.' Simultaneously, the government imposed a complete communication blackout in Kashmir — shutting down the internet and telephone services. There was a heavy deployment of security forces, political leaders were detained, and Section 144 was imposed. Tracing the origins of Article 370 Article 370 originated from the special circumstances after India's partition in 1947. J&K acceded to India by signing the Instrument of Accession, with Maharaja Hari Singh as ruler. At that time, Sheikh Abdullah was appointed as the head of an interim government. Later, intense discussions between Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Sheikh Abdullah led to Article 370, which entered the Constitution in October 1949. What changed on August 5, 2019 On August 5, 2019, the government revoked Article 370 through a Presidential order and reorganised the state. J&K was split into two Union Territories (UTs): J&K (with legislature) and Ladakh (without legislature), effective October 31, 2019. The region was put under a strict security lockdown, with leaders from major political parties detained and communication suspended. As J&K was under President's Rule, the Centre acted through the Governor in the absence of an elected Assembly. Govt's justification for abrogation of Article 370 The union government justified the act on several grounds: • Security: To curb terrorism and separatism that plagued the valley. • The government believed Article 370 hindered Jammu and Kashmir's integration with the rest of India and limited its development. • Supporters argued its abrogation would promote socio-economic development. • They said it would help ensure equal rights and opportunities for the people of the region. • Better governance was another expected benefit cited by supporters. • The move was also seen as a way to apply national laws and programs that were earlier not fully enforceable in Jammu and Kashmir. Reactions and political fallout of the decision • Domestic: The ruling BJP and its allies celebrated the move as 'historic', while Congress, National Conference (NC), People's Democratic Party (PDP), and Left parties called it undemocratic. • International: Pakistan immediately condemned the move, calling it illegal and a violation of United Nations Security Council resolutions. The country argued that India's actions had 'no legal value' under international law, and insisted that Kashmir is an internationally recognised dispute, whose final status should be determined in accordance with UN resolutions and the wishes of the Kashmiri people. China expressed its 'serious concern', particularly regarding the reorganisation of Ladakh as a Union Territory, saying that it undermined China's territorial sovereignty claims over parts of Ladakh. Legal challenges to abrogation of Article 370 Over 20 petitions challenged the Centre's move in the Supreme Court, raising critical questions: Can Article 370 be removed unilaterally by Parliament? Is the process under the President's Rule constitutional? The matter went to a five-judge Constitution Bench, which ultimately upheld the abrogation in December 2023, calling Article 370 a temporary provision. On the ground: What has changed? There have been both positive and negative developments. While the government claims improved law and order, incidents like targeted attacks in Pahalgam highlight ongoing security concerns. However, Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has said that the region's infrastructure development is not connected to the abrogation of Article 370 on August 5, 2019. Speaking to India Today TV, he urged people not to politicise development, adding, 'Let's not link the infrastructure projects in Jammu and Kashmir to the politics surrounding Article 370.' He clarified that these initiatives were planned earlier and would have progressed regardless of the constitutional change. On security, Abdullah acknowledged a drop in terrorism and stone-pelting but attributed it partly to strict government actions, which he said, 'go against the principles of natural justice". The road ahead for J&K Restoration of J&K's statehood remains a major demand. The Modi government has promised to restore it 'at the right time', but petitions in the Supreme Court urge faster action for statehood restoration, emphasising the need to uphold federal principles. Article 370's abrogation marked a turning point in India's constitutional history, with its full impact still unfolding across J&K.
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
A year after Sheikh Hasina's ouster, hope fast fading in Bangladesh
DEHRADUN: As Bangladesh marks one year of the ouster of Sheikh Hasina 's Awami League govt on Tuesday, some of its citizens TOI talked to expressed disappointment over the trajectory the country has taken in the past year. Many, including students, businesspersons and members of the Hindu community, said their expectations of social reforms and justice were far from being met and hoped elections would be held soon for stability. Tanbirul Miraj Ripon, who works with human rights organisations, expressed his concern about the 'drastic deterioration of communal harmony'. "Attacks on minorities that started after the ouster of Hasina govt are still happening. Another cause for concern is the rising mob culture," he said. A trader, Dhrubo, claimed minorities were "living in constant fear." "The intensity of attacks against minorities is not the same as it was last year, but is still happening. About a week ago, around 20-30 families in Rungpur city were attacked by a mob over allegations of blasphemous posts on social media. The mob indulged in arson and violence," he said. "It is like a fight for survival for us as the country is also witnessing an unchecked rise of radical organisations like Hizb-ut-Tahrir and Jamaat-e-Islami," he added. The country is also facing economic challenges, with unemployment increasing. Samir-ul-Hasan, who runs a software firm with 10 employees in Dhaka, said, "Our firm used to mainly cater to govt departments, but now business is not even 50% of what it used to be. We are unable to give salaries." Bilateral relations are also in troubled waters with growing anti-India sentiment among the public. "They believe it was India which supported Hasina's oppressive regime, and now not agreeing to the interim govt's demand of sending her back to face justice. One can see graffiti all around Dhaka giving calls to 'boycott India'. Hasina taking refuge in India remains a bone of contention," said Ferdous Alamgir, a student at Dhaka University. Despite challenges, Ripon claimed there was now more accountability in those in power. "They are now more sensitive towards public criticism of any of their policies. Another positive change is the rising political awareness among youths," said Ripon. A young media professional, Tanvir Hasan, meanwhile, had high hopes for the country's future. 'We have been overcoming challenges for the betterment of country ever since we got independent in 1971. We will overcome this too and ensure justice and equal rights for all the citizens irrespective of religion or creed,' said Hasan.
