OpenAI Discusses Raising Money From Saudi Arabia, Indian Investors: Report
Last Updated:
ChatGPT maker OpenAI has reportedly talked to Saudi's PIF, India's Reliance Industries and existing shareholder United Arab Emirates' MGX about its $40 billion financing.
ChatGPT maker OpenAI has talked to Saudi's PIF, India's Reliance Industries and existing shareholder United Arab Emirates' MGX about its $40 billion financing, The Information reported on Wednesday. The investors could put in at least hundreds of millions of dollars each, the report said, citing people familiar with the fundraise.
OpenAI is looking to raise more funds to fuel its model development and ambitious infrastructure plan Stargate, with the financing led by SoftBank.
Earlier this year, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman met with India's IT Minister and discussed India's plan of creating a low-cost AI ecosystem, after which Altman also had plans to visit UAE to discuss raising funds with Abu Dhabi investment group MGX, two sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters.
The Microsoft-backed startup has also discussed raising at least $100 million each from Coatue and Founders Fund as part of the fundraise, The Information report said, adding that the company also expects to raise an additional $17 billion in 2027.
Reuters could not immediately confirm the report.
First Published:
June 12, 2025, 13:30 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Will AI replace us? Yuval Noah Harari's stark warning about a future without borders
In yet another illuminating conversation, renowned author Yuval Noah Harari, known for his acclaimed works 'Sapiens' and 'Nexus', shared his unique perspective on the rapid rise of AI and how it will impact humanity. 'AI will not be one big AI. We are talking about potentially millions or billions of new AI agents with different characteristics, again, produced by different companies, different countries,' the author said in his latest conversation at the WSJ Leadership Institute. During the conversation, one of the guests asked Harari that through history, organising principles like religion and church shaped society in a unified way, but with AI there is no single central force. There are many different AIs being built with different goals and values. What happens when there isn't one dominant AI but many competing AIs evolving quickly? What kind of world does that create? In his response the author said that we are dealing with potentially millions or billions of new AI agents. 'You'll have a lot of religious AIs competing with each other over which AI will be the authoritative AI rabbi for which section of Judaism. And the same in Islam, and the same in Hinduism, in Buddhism, and so forth. So you'll have competition there. And in the financial system. And we just have no idea what the outcome will be.' He said that we have thousands of years of experience with human societies, and at least we have some experience as to how these things develop. But, when it comes to AI, we have zero experience. 'What happens in AI societies when millions of AIs compete with each other? We just don't know. Now this is not something you can simulate in the AI labs.' Harari went on to say that in case OpenAI wanted to check the safety or the potential outcome of its latest AI model, it cannot simulate history in the laboratory. While it may be able to check for all kinds of failures in the system, it cannot predict what happens when there are millions of copies of these AIs in the world developing in unknown ways. He went on to call it the biggest social experiment in human history, of which all of us are a part, and nobody has any idea how it will develop. In an extension of his argument, Harari used the analogy of the ongoing immigration crisis in the US, Europe and elsewhere. According to him, people are worried about immigrants for three reasons – they will take our jobs, they come with different cultural ideas, and they will change our culture. 'They may have political agendas; they might try to take over the country politically. These are the three main things that people keep coming back to.' According to the author, one can think about the AI revolution as simply a wave of immigration of millions or billions of AI immigrants that will take people's jobs and have very different cultural ideas, and that may even try to gain some kind of political power. 'And these AI immigrants or digital immigrants, they don't need visas; they don't cross a sea in some rickety boat in the middle of the night. They come at the speed of light,' he said, adding that far-right parties in Europe talk mostly about human immigrants but overlook the wave of digital immigrants that is coming to Europe. Harari feels that any country that cares about its sovereignty should care about the future of the economy and culture. 'They should be far more worried about the digital immigrants than about the human immigrants.' When the host asked the acclaimed author what it meant to be human at the moment, Harari responded by saying, 'To be aware for the first time that we have real competition on the planet.' The author said that while we have been the most intelligent species by far for tens of thousands of years, now we are creating something that could compete with us in the near future. 'The most important thing to know about AI is that it is not a tool like all previous human inventions; it is an agent. An agent in the sense that it can make decisions independently of us, it can invent new ideas, and it can learn and change by itself. All previous human inventions, you know, whether they're printing presses or the atom bomb, they are tools that empower us,' said Harari. The host said that there is a lot of responsibility on leaders because how they act is how the AI will be. 'You cannot expect to lie and cheat and have a benevolent AI.' In his response, Harari acknowledged that there is a big discussion around the world about AI alignment. He said that there are a lot of efforts focused on the idea that if we can design these AIs in a certain way, if we can teach them certain principles, they will be safe. However, there are two problems with this approach – firstly, the definition of AI is that it can learn and change by itself; secondly, if you think of AI as a child that can be educated, it surprises or horrifies you. 'The other thing is, everybody who has any knowledge of education knows that in the education of children, it matters far less what you tell them than what you do. If you tell your kids not to lie, and your kids watch you lying to other people, they will copy your behaviour, not your instructions.' Similarly, Harari explained that if AIs that are being educated are given access to a world where they see humans behave, even some of the most powerful humans, including their makers, lying, then the AIs will copy that behaviour. 'People who think that I can run this huge AI corporation, and while I'm lying, I will teach my AIs not to lie; it will not work. It will copy your behaviour,' he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'We're done with Teams': German state hits uninstall on Microsoft
At a time of growing concern over the power of the world's mighty tech companies, one German state is turning its back on US giant Microsoft . In less than three months' time, almost no civil servant, police officer or judge in Schleswig-Holstein will be using any of Microsoft's ubiquitous programs at work. Instead, the northern state will turn to open-source software to "take back control" over data storage and ensure " digital sovereignty ", its digitalisation minister, Dirk Schroedter, told AFP. "We're done with Teams!" he said, referring to Microsoft's messaging and collaboration tool and speaking on a video call -- via an open-source German program, of course. The radical switch-over affects half of Schleswig-Holstein's 60,000 public servants, with 30,000 or so teachers due to follow suit in coming years. The state's shift towards open-source software began last year. The current first phase involves ending the use of Word and Excel software, which are being replaced by LibreOffice, while Open-Xchange is taking the place of Outlook for emails and calendars. Over the next few years, there will also be a switch to the Linux operating system in order to complete the move away from Windows. 'Digital dependencies' The principle of open-source software is to allow users to read the source code and modify it according to their own needs. The issue of the power wielded by American tech titans has been thrown into sharper relief by Donald Trump's return to the White House and the subsequent rise in US-EU tensions. In the case of Microsoft, there have long been worries about the dominant position it enjoys thanks to it owning both the Windows operating system and a suite of programs found in offices the world over. In 2023, the European Union launched an antitrust investigation against Microsoft over the way it tied Teams to its other programs for businesses. "The geopolitical developments of the past few months have strengthened interest in the path that we've taken," said Schroedter, adding that he had received requests for advice from across the world. "The war in Ukraine revealed our energy dependencies, and now we see there are also digital dependencies," he said. The government in Schleswig-Holstein is also planning to shift the storage of its data to a cloud system not under the control of Microsoft, said Schroedter. He explained that the state wants to rely on publicly owned German digital infrastructure rather than that of an American company. Taken 'by the throat' Experts point to economic incentives for the sort of shift Schleswig-Holstein is making, as investing in open-source alternatives and training staff to use them often costs less than the licences for Microsoft's programs. This is particularly the case when businesses and public bodies find themselves taken "by the throat" when hit by unexpected extra costs for mandatory updates, said Benjamin Jean from consulting firm Inno3. Schleswig-Holstein hopes that its move away from Microsoft will eventually save it tens of millions of euros. But organisations considering this sort of change have to reckon with resistance from staff who fear upheaval. "If people aren't guided through it, there's an outcry and everyone just wants to go back to how it was before," warned Francois Pellegrini, an IT professor at Bordeaux University. Pioneer administrations The potential pitfalls can be seen in the experience of Munich, whose city administration was a pioneer in using open-source programs in the 1990s. In 2017, the city announced an about-turn, citing a lack of political support and the difficulty of interacting with other systems. But other public bodies are staying the course: France's gendarmerie, around 100,000 strong, has been using the Linux operating system since the 2000s and India's defence ministry was in 2023 reported to have launched a homegrown system called "Maya OS". Across the border from Schleswig-Holstein, in Denmark, reports say that the local governments of Copenhagen and Aarhus are also looking into ditching Microsoft. Another factor that could push the trend is the EU "Interoperable Europe Act", which came into effect last year and encourages the use of open-source software. According to Jean, "Within the space of two or three years" there could be a number of pioneer administrations who will be able to give feedback on their experiences and inspire others to make the switch.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Anthropic says looking to power European tech with hiring push
By Tom Barfield American AI giant Anthropic aims to boost the European tech ecosystem as it expands on the continent, product chief Mike Krieger told AFP Thursday at the Vivatech trade fair in Paris. The OpenAI competitor wants to be "the engine behind some of the largest startups of tomorrow... (and) many of them can and should come from Europe", Krieger said. Tech industry and political leaders have often lamented Europe's failure to capitalise on its research and education strength to build heavyweight local companies - with many young founders instead leaving to set up shop across the Atlantic. Krieger's praise for the region's "really strong talent pipeline" chimed with an air of continental tech optimism at Vivatech. French AI startup Mistral on Wednesday announced a multibillion-dollar tie-up to bring high-powered computing resources from chip behemoth Nvidia to the region. The semiconductor firm will "increase the amount of AI computing capacity in Europe by a factor of 10" within two years, Nvidia boss Jensen Huang told an audience at the southern Paris convention centre. Among 100 planned continental hires, Anthropic is building up its technical and research strength in Europe, where it has offices in Dublin and non-EU capital London, Krieger said. Beyond the startups he hopes to boost, many long-standing European companies "have a really strong appetite for transforming themselves with AI", he added, citing luxury giant LVMH, which had a large footprint at Vivatech. 'Safe by design' Mistral - founded only in 2023 and far smaller than American industry leaders like OpenAI and Anthropic - is nevertheless "definitely in the conversation" in the industry, Krieger said. The French firm recently followed in the footsteps of the US companies by releasing a so-called "reasoning" model able to take on more complex tasks. "I talk to customers all the time that are maybe using (Anthropic's AI) Claude for some of the long-horizon agentic tasks, but then they've also fine-tuned Mistral for one of their data processing tasks, and I think they can co-exist in that way," Krieger said. So-called "agentic" AI models - including the most recent versions of Claude - work as autonomous or semi-autonomous agents that are able to do work over longer horizons with less human supervision, including by interacting with tools like web browsers and email. Capabilities displayed by the latest releases have raised fears among some researchers, such as University of Montreal professor and "AI godfather" Yoshua Bengio, that independently acting AI could soon pose a risk to humanity. Bengio last week launched a non-profit, LawZero, to develop "safe-by-design" AI - originally a key founding promise of OpenAI and Anthropic. 'Very specific genius' "A huge part of why I joined Anthropic was because of how seriously they were taking that question" of AI safety, said Krieger, a Brazilian software engineer who co-founded Instagram, which he left in 2018. Anthropic is still working on measures designed to restrict their AI models' potential to do harm, he added. But it has yet to release details of its "level 4" AI safety protections foreseen for still more powerful models, after activating ASL (AI Safety Level) 3 to corral the capabilities of May's Claude Opus 4 release. Developing ASL 4 is "an active part of the work of the company", Krieger said, without giving a potential release date. With Claude 4 Opus, "we've deployed the mitigations kind of proactively... safe doesn't have to mean slow, but it does mean having to be thoughtful and proactive ahead of time" to make sure safety protections don't impair performance, he added. Looking to upcoming releases from Anthropic, Krieger said the company's models were on track to match chief executive Dario Amodei's prediction that Anthropic would offer customers access to a "country of geniuses in a data centre" by 2026 or 2027 - within limits. Anthropic's latest AI models are "genius-level at some very specific things", he said. "In the coming year... it will continue to spike in particular aspects of things, and still need a lot of human-in-the-loop coordination," he forecast.
