Trump executive order takes steps to protect domestic hackers from blowback
The Trump administration announced Friday it is amending 'problematic elements' of two landmark cybersecurity executive orders — though the extent of the changes in many cases appears modest.
The modifications are part of a new executive order signed Friday by President Donald Trump. The full text of the EO was released Friday afternoon, and the Trump administration first outlined details of the order in a White House fact sheet.
The fact sheet says the new order takes aim at two previous EOs focused on cybersecurity — one signed by former President Joe Biden in January just before leaving office, and one by former President Barack Obama in 2015.
The order outlines a potentially weighty change: the new EO would change the Obama-era order — which allows for sanctions on individuals behind cyberattacks on U.S. critical infrastructure — by limiting it 'only to foreign malicious actors' and clarifying 'that sanctions do not apply to election-related activities.'
While the fact sheet on the EO points to limiting sanctions against those interfering in U.S. elections, the text does not mention this, clarifying that only 'foreign persons' can be targeted by sanctions for attacking critical infrastructure.
It is unclear if foreign hackers engaging in efforts to undermine U.S. elections, such as Russia, could therefore be exempt from possible U.S. sanctions.
Spokespersons for both the White House and the National Security Council did not immediately respond to requests for further comment on the executive order.
One key element of the Biden executive order was creating a pathway for the federal government to issue more digital identity documents for public benefits, such as mobile driver's licenses. It also outlined various measures to help the state and federal governments put these processes into effect.
The new order revoked this portion of the Biden document, with the fact sheet describing this effort as a 'mandate for U.S. government-issued digital IDs for illegal aliens that would have facilitated entitlement fraud and other abuse.'
Some cybersecurity experts on Friday criticized the order as undermining the nation's cybersecurity.
'The fixation on revoking digital ID mandates is prioritizing questionable immigration benefits over proven cybersecurity benefits,' said Mark Montgomery, senior director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies' Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation.
The order includes several less controversial directives on artificial intelligence, quantum computing and secure software development.
It directs the Pentagon, Homeland Security Department and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to work with the White House on developing standards for tracking, mitigating, and responding to vulnerabilities in AI systems.
It also directs the NSA and the OMB to issue new encryption requirements that federal agencies must meet by 2030, in preparation for the arrival of more quantum computers.
The order puts a heavier burden on the Commerce Department and its National Institute of Standards and Technology than on other agencies in terms of requirements to oversee. NIST has been among the federal agencies to face workforce cuts in recent months.
It directs NIST to establish a consortium with industry to develop guidance on the implementation of the agency's secure software development practices; to update its guidance on how to update and deploy fixes for security bugs; and produce a 'preliminary update' to its secure software development framework.
Montgomery, the FDD expert, said that NIST will face 'challenges' in overseeing the new order due to the budget cuts.
The fact sheet also says the new EO will 'refocus' government efforts on AI and cybersecurity toward 'identifying and managing vulnerabilities, rather than censorship.' It is unclear what censorship the language is referring to, though Republicans have criticized federal efforts to combat disinformation online related to election security.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was…
The UK and US stock markets are once again approaching all-time highs. Markets have truly rebounded since Trump shocked the world with his trade policy. However, this rebound concerns me. These stock markets are trading near all-time highs despite a huge increase in the average effective US tariff, despite worsening geopolitical tensions, and despite sovereign debt concerns. Personally, I'm not sure investors have truly factored in the full impact of recent tariff increases on corporate earnings. Over the past year, average effective tariff rates have risen significantly, reaching levels not seen since the late 1930s. Under the Biden Administration, the average effective tariff rate was around 2.5%-2.7%. In May, that figure had risen to almost 20%. These tariffs have introduced new costs for businesses that rely on international supply chains. However, I just don't believe we've really seen the impact of them yet. After all, 'Liberation Day' took place at the beginning of Q2, and we're still in Q2. The full earnings impact of these tariffs is expected to become more visible in the second half of 2025, as companies report on their financial results and adjust to the new cost structures. Michael Burry, best known for predicting and profiting from the 2008 subprime mortgage crisis — a story retold in The Big Short — sold nearly all positions at Scion Asset Management in the quarter ending 31 March 2025. This move, alongside concentrated bearish bets through put options — bets that a stock will go down — on major tech and Chinese stocks, seemingly reflected his conviction that the market was sinking. Burry's only notable long was Estée Lauder, suggesting a defensive stance. However, 13F filings only show holdings as of 31 March, so his actions after that date remain unknown. As we know, the market slumped in early April but has since recovered. Within this context, I'm increasing looking at defensive options. I could look at farming stocks like Pilgrim's Pride, for example, which could outperform in a downturn. However, one option closer to home is the National Grid (LSE:NG.). The company recently reported strong financial results for the fiscal year 2025, with statutory and underlying pre-tax profit up 20%. The company is also investing heavily in its infrastructure, with a capital expenditure plan of £10bn aimed at modernising the energy grid and supporting the transition to renewable energy sources. This investment is part of a broader strategy to expand its regulated asset base, which is expected to grow by around 10% annually over the next few years. It does, however, introduce additional execution risk. Net debt is already £47.5bn — very sizeable. It's also not particularly cheap on face value. The stock trades at 14 times forward earnings, which may be a little demanding when we consider debt is on par with market capitalisation. Nonetheless, the forward dividend looks strong at 4.6%. The National Grid is not a stock I'd normally watch, but given my concerns about the potential overheating of the market, it's something I'm adding to my watchlist. It may be worth considering. The post Worried about a stock market crash? The Big Short's Michael Burry was… appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool James Fox has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended National Grid Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Boston Globe
40 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Stay strong, Harvard
Peabody Sadly, it is not surprising that the Trump White House is crying antisemitism at Harvard while simultaneously trying to oust Harvard's two most prominent (and Jewish) leaders. I fervently hope that Harvard, Garber, and Pritzker continue to stand strong. Dana Holmberg Middleborough The Trump administration has anonymously stated that 'no deal' can be made with Harvard as long as Alan Garber and Penny Pritzker remain in their positions. Both Garber and Pritzker are Jewish. To the best of my knowledge, no other university in the country is facing the same levels of harassment from the federal government as Harvard. It is time stop hiding behind the masquerade the government is using: claiming it is protecting Jewish students. This has been a lie from the first day the government took aim at Harvard. Advertisement Ed Mann Framingham
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Former White House doctor: Biden physician should have tested for cognitive decline
A former doctor for the White House under the Obama administration said former President Biden should have been tested for cognitive decline in his final year in office, given his age. Jeffrey Kuhlman said performing such a test on Biden would have shed light on the former president's mental state and ability to serve another four years. 'Sometimes those closest to the tree miss the forest,' Kuhlman told The Washington Post. Biden's long-term doctor, Kevin O'Connor, didn't perform a cognitive test on the leader during his fourth year in office, as White House officials said formal results weren't needed to prove the former president's mental soundness. 'The president's doctor has said, if you look at what this president, who is also the commander-in-chief — he passes a cognitive test every day — every day, as he moves from one topic to another topic, understanding the granular level of these topics,' former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said during a February briefing last year. 'You saw him talk about fighting crime today. Tomorrow, he's going to go to the border. Next week, he's going to give a State of the Union Address,' she added. O'Connor was recently subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) to address why a cognitive test wasn't given. Biden traveled often while serving, including taking two international trips prior to his first presidential debate with President Trump. 'This is a very rigorous job. And the president has been able to do — do this job every day for the past three years,' Jean-Pierre previously told reporters from the podium. However, Kuhlman said the public deserved to have evidence that Biden was mentally sharp, arguing that health reports should include a total overview of a president's well-being. 'It shouldn't be just health, it should be fitness,' Kuhlman said. 'Fitness is: Do you have that robust mind, body, spirit that you can do this physically, mentally, emotionally demanding job?' Months after leaving office, Biden was diagnosed with prostate cancer amid reports alleging he suffered from mental decay while serving as commander-in-chief. 'Cancer touches us all. Like so many of you, Jill and I have learned that we are strongest in the broken places,' he wrote in a post on X. 'Thank you for lifting us up with love and support.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
