MP criticises DWP as she accuses them of cutting off her own son's PIP
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is facing heavy criticism from an MP over her son's Personal Independence Payments (PIP). She said the department had cut his funds 'entirely' despite his health worsening.
During a debate in the House of Commons about the government's latest benefit reform bill last week, the DWP came under heavy criticism from Labour MP Alison Hume. She criticised the department and suggested they were often antagonistic towards those they are meant to support.
She said: "The DWP is too frequently at war with the people it is supposed to protect. Too frequently, it lets down the most vulnerable in our community, and it mostly gets away with it."
A 'hostile' culture to disabled people
She said there was a pressing need for change within the DWP. At this point, she shared her personal ordeal, highlighting what she said was the department's adversarial approach towards disabled claimants - but said the DWP offered to reinstate her son's benefits if she dropped a tribunal.
She added: "That experience cemented in my mind something that I believe to this day: the culture of the DWP is hostile to disabled people. That culture must change if we are to have any chance of building a sustainable, fair and compassionate welfare system for the future."
She then made the claim that despite a decline in her son's health, the DWP entirely stopped his benefits following the submission of new evidence for his reassessment. She said: "In May, after reporting a deterioration in his health, he submitted new evidence to support reassessment for a higher rate of PIP, which led to the DWP removing his award entirely.
"He was left with no income or support despite his ongoing need for care."
Less support for those returning to work
Speaking on the challenges faced by those with fluctuating health conditions, Ms Hume pointed out that rejected PIP applicants often resort to the health component of Universal Credit. She drew attention to the fact that such people may return to work during brief improvements in their health.
But she cautioned that when they experience another downturn in health and need to rely on Universal Credit again, under the government's proposed bill, their financial support would be diminished.
She argued: "That completely ignores the realities faced by disabled people and their experience of their conditions. Without the protections provided for in amendment 38, we would create a two-tier system where people with unpredictable conditions would be valued less than those with more predictable ones."
'Genuine support' for disabled people
A DWP spokesperson commented: "While we were not provided with the details to look into this specific case, we will consider all the available evidence when making decisions and people have the right to challenge them and provide additional information.
"We're reforming the welfare system so people are genuinely supported into work while putting it on a sustainable footing. We are putting disabled people at the heart of a ministerial review of the PIP assessment to make sure it is fit and fair for the future, and we will work with them and key organisations representing them, to consider how best to do this."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Concern raised over proposed changes to RCT parking scheme
Concern raised over proposed changes to RCT parking scheme A consultation has been launched and the proposed changes include increased screening at the start of the process, to introduce a requirement for medical evidence Proposals are being considered by RCT council to change the Disabled Persons Parking Bay (DPPB) Scheme (Image: Getty) There is concern about proposed changes to how disabled parking bays are issued in Rhondda Cynon Taf (RCT). Proposals are being considered by RCT council to change the Disabled Persons Parking Bay (DPPB) Scheme following a recent review but members of the council's community services committee recently raised concern about people having to pay for medical assessments, the fact that only 12 spaces are allocated and the fact that any Blue Badge holder can use them not just the resident who has the bay. An eight-week consultation on the proposals is set to take place on the proposed changes with the feedback set to form part of a report to a future cabinet meeting. The proposed changes include increased screening at the start of the process, to introduce a requirement for medical evidence, the provide people with a rationale if their application is unsuccessful and to review existing parking bays. The criteria will include a valid permanent blue badge, a car registered at the address where they live, no access to off road parking and no traffic prohibitions affecting the safety of the bay. They also include that medical evidence is supplied from a consultant, a specialist nurse or a physiotherapist that specifically addresses their difficulties related to mobility and parking and that the person receives the higher rate mobility component of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) or Disability Living Allowance (DLA), a war pension mobility supplement or attendance allowance. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here The proposal is for no charge for the scheme but the person would be responsible for funding all costs associated with gathering documents and medical evidence for their application. It is proposed that the existing limit for allocating up to 12 disabled parking bays only per year stays but this will be kept under review. The annual cost of running the DPPB scheme is estimated to be around £43,000 a year which is £3,583 per bay. The removal of unwanted bays also comes at a cost and so the cost of running the scheme can change from year to year depending on how many bays need to be removed. A council report said that the the existing DPPB Scheme was introduced in 2004 and was then amended in 2015 following a review. Since its introduction the number of people applying for a parking bay has increased significantly with 193 applications received during the last round in 2022-23. Historically 12 parking bays have been awarded each year based on applicants meeting some basic eligibility criteria and an assessment from an occupational therapist/occupational therapy assistant. There is no right of appeal, but applicants can re-apply during the next round. Since its introduction 269 disabled parking bays have been installed across RCT and of these 115 have been removed leaving around 154 disabled parking bays in place. Each bay has its own traffic regulation order, enforceable by the council, and currently anyone with a blue badge can use the bays. The current scheme charges a £10 non-refundable one-off application fee for all applicants and the number of applications received was always in excess of the number of available bays. The current scheme was suspended in September 2023 pending a full independent review with Practice Solutions commissioned by the council to carry out the review during the autumn and winter of 2024 with the final report completed. in February 2025. The review recommended that the council continue to offer a DPPB Scheme with recommendations to clarify the eligibility, to introduce a more robust screening process, to review the charge, to introduce a system to remove the parking bay when it was no longer in use and to provide information to unsuccessful applicants. Sian Nowell, the council's director of adult services at the council, said that there is a mixed picture across Wales in relation to the charge with very little standardisation of approach. Councillor Karen Webb said: 'It seems to be a bit of a nonsense that someone will go to all of the expense and trouble of needing that space and getting it but then maybe they can't use it because it's not only for them. Other people can still park there.' She asked why can't the parking space be kept for the person who has applied for it and who has been allocated it. Sian Nowell said that they would look into that and discuss it with traffic colleagues to see what options there are to maybe make it exclusive use but her understanding was that may not be possible. Councillor Sheryl Evans said she was 'very concerned' about asking people to have a medical report saying it would cost a couple of hundred pounds and be at the discretion of the doctors. Sian Nowell confirmed they're not asking for something from a GP but from a a consultant, a specialist nurse or a physiotherapist. Councillor Ros Davis said the 12 spaces doesn't sit well with her because as councillors they come across people with really good cases for having the bays but she understood they can't provide them for everyone who asks for them. She said that 12 feels 'far too low' and that it's contradictory to ask people to pay considerable sums of money and then find that they don't have exclusive use. Councillor Will Jones said the criteria needs to be strict if they've only got 12 spaces and said they need to work to make sure that the people that need them have them and that they are their bays. He said you've got to have medical evidence and he said that's really important for these bays. Article continues below
The Herald Scotland
4 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kate Forbes exit: Has Holyrood failed family friendly goal?
"I am grateful to them for accommodating the heavy demands of being a political figure. Looking ahead to the future, I do not want to miss any more of the precious early years of family life – which can never be rewound." It's a statement that will resonate with all working parents (most often mothers as they usually have the responsibility as chief carer) across Scotland, many who will have regretted missing a school sports day or a school show or felt the panic of a meeting over-running as the clock approached nursery closing hours. But it will particularly echo with a considerable number of MSPs. Kate Forbes pictured with her daughter Naomi aged six months, in March 2023 during the SNP leadership race (Image: Colin Mearns) When the Scottish Parliament was reconvened in 1999 there was much emphasis that Holyrood would do things differently to Westminster including that it would be more family friendly. For instance, the late night sittings, common place in the House of Commons, would be avoided in preference for more usual office hours and parliamentary sittings would align with school term times. But despite Holyrood mostly keeping to the standard working hours for its debates and committee hearings and sitting during school term times, MSPs and ministers have duties that take them well beyond the daily nine to five. For many MSPs the job is a 24 hour round the clock role - so perhaps political parties should do more to help promote a better work life balance among their parliamentarians. READ MORE: Ahead of the last [[Holyrood]] election in 2021, [[Kate Forbes]]' SNP colleague and fellow Highland MSP Gail Ross spoke about how it was to be an MSP, especially for a large constituency a long way from Edinburgh with the huge amount of weekly travel that involves, and being a mother who was there for her children. If there are difficulties for a backbencher, as Ms Ross was, in finding a decent balance between working and caring duties, these challenges intensify for someone in government, who in addition to all their responsibilities as an MSP, also has the huge demands of being a minister or a cabinet minister. And of course the pressure rises still further for anyone in the role of Deputy First Minister or First Minister. I was struck by a comment by John Swinney last week when he told Donald Trump that he likes to caddy for his son Matthew, who is 14. My immediate thought was 'that's a really nice thing to do but how does the First Minister find time to caddy for his son?' Clearly the FM must do a lot of diary juggling to find time to spend this quality time with his teenager. It reflects the situation that few of Scotland's First Ministers have been parents of young children while in office. Donald Dewar's two children were adults when he was First Minister, as were his Labour successors' Henry McLeish's and Jack McConnell. When it came to the [[SNP]], neither Alex Salmond nor Nicola Sturgeon had any children. The latter has spoken of her deep sadness of this situation and has also revealed she suffered a miscarriage in January 2011 while Deputy First Minister. As an indication of the pressures under which senior politicians are under Ms Sturgeon told some years later that instead of dealing with her grief at home she attended the 40th anniversary of the Ibrox disaster, in which 66 Rangers football supporters were crushed to death. Humza Yousaf was indeed the first First Minister to have young children while in office at Bute House. Mr Yousaf used his time at the top of government to highlight that he also had an important role as a father. The then First Minister and his wife Nadia El Nakla had one daughter Amal, three, together when he first became FM while Mr Yousaf was also stepfather to 14 year old daughter Maya. He liked to describe himself as a "hands-on dad", was pictured reading bed time stories to Amal after becoming First Minister and spoke of the need to set boundaries between his family and working life. Things didn't always go to plan and Mr Yousaf previously recounted one episode, just after he was elected SNP leader, when Amal burst into a Bute House meeting when he was deciding who would be in his Cabinet. 'I'm deciding who's going to be in my Cabinet, making last-minute tweaks to the ministerial team. It was about 9.30pm and in comes Amal, bare feet, unicorn pyjamas, saying 'Dad I have to go to bed, Mummy says'. 'And both Colin [McAllister] and Shona [Robison] were like 'that has never happened at Bute House before. I say to my kids and wife Nadia, as much as this is a workspace, it's also our residence and family home too.' Given the challenges it was perhaps not surprising that Mr Yousaf paid tribute to his wife, children and family for their support in his tearful resignation statement. "Politics can be a brutal business. It takes its toll on your physical and mental health; your family suffer alongside you. I am in debt to my wonderful wife, my beautiful children and wider family for putting up with me over the years, I am afraid you will be seeing a lot more of me now. You are truly everything to me," he said. Shortly after returning to the backbenches the former First Minister was keen to highlight one of the silver linings of his loss of office was being able to attend events with Amal that he wouldn't have had the time to while in Bute House. Kate Forbes's resignation announcement has been met with considerable dismay across Holyrood today. No doubt her young daughter and her wider family will be delighted to see more of her. But it is a sad state of affairs that we expect so much of a sacrifice from our politicians that they feel they cannot be both successful MSPs and even senior ministers and also contented and nurturing parents.
Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP PIP rule changes and what they mean for free bus passes across UK
The DWP is coming under fire for new rules and regulations which could see thousands of people across the country lose out on money and mobility The recent announcement of new PIP regulations has dealt a severe blow to disabled individuals in one part of the UK, with local MPs and charity representatives claiming the welfare reductions are "immoral". Many existing benefits are contingent on PIP eligibility, which could see people out of pocket by hundreds if revoked. One key benefit at risk is the disabled concessionary travel scheme throughout England, which links certain qualifying criteria to PIP entitlement. Required proof for obtaining the pass includes evidence of receiving the enhanced rate mobility component of PIP, or scoring at least 8 points in the categories of "moving around" or "communicating verbally". This comes after a major broadband provider introduced a new £60 charge and issued a deadline to act. Proof can also be provided through Disability Living Allowance (DLA), specifically for those on the higher rate mobility component. Other alternatives include possessing a blue badge, receiving the War Pensioner's mobility supplement, or having an education, health and care plan for individuals up to 25 years old. Nevertheless, the Green Paper proposals' phrasing suggests that loss of PIP might not disqualify one from retaining the pass, reports Chronicle Live. Although mobility issues don't factor into the PIP payment assessment, qualifying for the enhanced rate mobility component, due to mobility difficulties, ensures eligibility for the pass, regardless of payment receipts. For disabled persons facing benefit cuts, applying for this card represents a potential avenue for financial savings. The North East's concessionary card system is a boon for those eligible, offering free travel and reduced fares. To snag a pass at no cost or a discounted rate, you might be in luck if you are: An elderly person who has reached state pension age - their 66th birthday. A person under the pension state age with a learning, speech, visual or physical disability. a carer companion to a person unable to travel without your assistance. An individual that meets the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme criterion. For those aiming to qualify as disabled under the scheme, here's the lowdown on eligibility: You must be invariably sick, disabled or suffering from any disability which has permanently and seriously impaired your mobility. Be permanently blind and therefor cannot do any tasks where sight is needed. Be diagnosed for having learning disabilities. Be registered as profoundly deaf, with or without speech. Be unable to use of both arms, be that through the absence of limbs or otherwise. Be unable to drive after having your driving license revoked or refused on medical grounds. Or registered as partially sighted (where disability can be assessed by a Consultant Ophthalmologist). Moreover, securing a pass requires a PIP assessment and proof of receiving the enhanced rate mobility component of PIP, or scoring at least eight points in the "moving around" or "communicating verbally" categories. Holders of the card can enjoy complimentary bus rides throughout England (bar London), trips on the Shields Ferry for just 60p, and Northern Rail journeys between Newcastle and Metrocentre/Blaydon for a mere 50p, starting from 9.30am on weekdays and all day on weekends and bank holidays. With this card, you could pocket an annual saving of about £500, mirroring what the average person in the North East shells out on public transport each year, as per a Statista report.
