The Taliban's top environment official wants the UN to include Afghanistan in climate talks
A Taliban delegation attended last year's COP29 climate talks in Azerbaijan , but as observers.
Matiul Haq Khalis, the head of the National Environmental Protection Agency, said the suspension of environmental protection projects after the Taliban takeover in 2021 had resulted in widespread harm to Afghans. Khalis said he wanted inclusion at COP30, which is being held in Brazil later this year.
Russia is the only country to recognize the Taliban's government.
'Afghanistan is severely affected by climate change,' Khalis told a conference in Kabul. ' Drought , water shortages, declining arable land, flash floods , and threats to food security are having a profound impact on people's lives and the economy.
'Although Afghanistan's contribution to global climate change is almost nonexistent, it suffers greatly from its consequences.. As a victim of climate change, Afghanistan has the right to be present at global platforms, especially at COP30, to voice the damages it has endured.'
Earlier this month, the U.N. published a report that said June was marked by below-average precipitation and higher-than-average temperatures across Afghanistan.
By the end of May, the significant decline in soil moisture had already negatively affected the yield and productivity of rainfed wheat, according to the report from the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
'The current monsoon season has started earlier than usual, beginning in May instead of the typical June or July, and is more intense than in recent years. Forecasts indicate above-average rainfall in many regions.'
In Baku last November, Khalis told The Associated Press that authorities had prepared national action plans to deal with climate change and would be updating their climate goals.
He said the country had great potential for wind and solar power, but needed international support to develop it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
5 minutes ago
- Fox News
How Trump could exposes fractures in Xi, Putin alliance
Fred Fleitz says Trump could break up the alliance between Russian President Putin and Chinese President Xi.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A Chinese blockade could cripple Taiwan's electricity, war game warns
A Chinese blockade could cut Taiwan's electrical generating capacity so much that the island is unable to function, according to war games conducted by a U.S. think tank. 'Energy is the weakest element in Taiwan's resilience against coercion,' warned the report by the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'The overwhelming preponderance of energy must be imported and is thus vulnerable to a blockade.' China could supplement a blockade with attacks on Taiwan's electrical grid, as Russia has done with some success in Ukraine. 'Total electricity production might be reduced to 20 percent of pre-blockade electricity levels,' CSIS said. At that level, all manufacturing ceases – including computer chips vital to the U.S. and the global economy. These conclusions came from a series of 26 war games run by CSIS to test a blockade of Taiwan, an attractive option for Beijing that offers the prospect of Taiwan agreeing to 'reunify' with China, without the need for a bloody and risky Chinese amphibious invasion. Train like you fight: Taiwan comes to grips with an old military adage CSIS researchers matched up various combinations of variables in each scenario, with the scenarios simulating 20 weeks of game time. For example, the severity of China's blockade ranged from a mere China Coast Guard stop-and-search operation to an all-out military effort that launched missiles at U.S. and Japanese bases. Other variables included hardening Taiwanese infrastructure and anti-invasion defenses, procuring additional cargo ships for convoys, more lethal Chinese missiles, whether Japan chose to defend Taiwan, and whether the fighting extended beyond the local blockade zone. The CSIS report admitted that some of these scenarios 'are uninteresting because of the force mismatch: No one could doubt that a China willing to embark on a wider war against a constrained Taiwan could completely cut off imports to Taiwan.' Yet assuming various changes in U.S., Taiwanese and Chinese policy, strategy and forces had a major impact on scenario outcomes. For example, a nightmare scenario depicted attacks on Taiwan's electric grid and strikes on American airbases in Japan and Guam, while the U.S. refrained from hitting airbases on the Chinese mainland. Chinese air forces 'were able to crowd into forward coastal air bases without risk of being hit by air strikes,' while 'the escalation level greatly improved the survivability of Chinese warships and submarines, which took shelter as needed in ports or other areas immediately offshore,' the report said. In that game, the U.S. and Taiwan lost 33 surface warships – including two aircraft carriers – and 153 merchant ships. With Taiwan's electrical generation meeting just 24 percent of demand, the result would be 'not just economic collapse but also the failure to meet even minimal health and safety activities for the population.' But in another scenario, Taiwan hardened its electrical infrastructure, the U.S. took a more aggressive posture, and large numbers of merchant ships were available to carry supplies to Taiwan. In this iteration, Chinese air and naval losses rose sharply, more cargo ships successfully ran the gauntlet to reach Taiwan, and there was sufficient electricity to meet most of the island's demand. Interestingly, five of the 26 scenarios were 'free play' games where players could choose to escalate, deescalate, or negotiate an 'off ramp' to end the conflict, rather than being locked into a course of action. Most players seemed reluctant to escalate, CSIS noted. Yet they often made 'small escalations' to signal the opposition, who responded with counter-escalations. In all five games, naval forces fired upon each other and suffered losses. While a blockade would be grim for Taiwan, it is not hopeless. For example, the capability to assemble large numbers of merchant ships – and the necessary crews – would be the most important preparation that Taiwan and the U.S. can make, according to CSIS. This includes sufficient liquified natural gas tankers crucial to meeting Taiwan's energy needs, as well as providing governmental insurance to replace commercial insurers who avoid war zones. Transshipment will be key: most merchant ships won't run a blockade, but their cargo can be unloaded in Japanese ports, and then reloaded aboard vessels that will make the Taiwan run. Taiwan can also reduce its dependence on imported energy. This could include boosting its reserves of oil, natural gas and coal, and even reopening its last nuclear plant, which shut down in May. Meanwhile, the island's electrical grid could be hardened, including stockpiles of spare parts such as transformers and turbines. For its part, the U.S. could increase its air transport capacity for a Berlin 1948-style airlift. While insufficient to meet all of Taiwan's needs, 'in some circumstances, an airlift could have a powerful moral effect and provide some breathing room,' CSIS said. In addition, the U.S. Navy will need to improve its capability for convoy escort. Ultimately, perhaps the most crucial step is to ensure that diplomacy is always an option. A Chinese blockade of Taiwan – and retaliation by the U.S. and its allies – could devastate the global economy, and not least the economies of China and America. 'Creative offers by the United States and Taiwan might allow China to declare victory and lift the blockade at an acceptable cost to the coalition (e.g., Taiwan agreeing to international observers in customs houses; reiterating the 1992 Consensus verbatim),' CSIS concluded. Michael Peck is a defense writer whose work has appeared in Forbes, Business Insider, Foreign Policy magazine and the Center for European Policy Analysis. He holds an MA in political science from Rutgers Univ. Follow him on Twitter and LinkedIn.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
India to defy Trump's threats and keep buying Russian oil, government sources say
India will keep purchasing oil from Russia, despite President Donald Trump threatening to impose penalties for doing so, two Indian officials said on Saturday Officials in India, the most populous country on Earth, told Reuters and That contradicted a statement from Trump, who on Friday told reporters his understanding was that India would 'no longer' be buying oil from Russia. "These are long-term oil contracts," an unnamed Indian official told Reuters. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight.' Last week, Trump said India would face unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil in addition to a 25 percent tariff on goods. However, China and Turkey, two countries that also purchase large amounts of Russian oil, have not faced similar penalty threats. India drastically increased its import of Russian oil after the Kremlin invaded Ukraine in 2022, while many other countries began to cut back it's imports. The cheap availability of Russian oil allowed India to reduce its reliance on other countries, such as Saudi Arabia or Iraq, who typically sell to Asian countries at a higher price. While India faced criticisms for doing so, the general consensus around India's increase in imports has been that it helps avoid a global surge in oil prices. It's unclear why exactly Trump has targeted India in reducing its import of Russian oil. The president has recently expressed frustrations with Russian President Vladimir Putin for failing to come to the peace talks table to negotiate a ceasefire in Ukraine. On Friday, India's external affairs spokesperson Randdhir Jaiswal said India and Russia had a 'time-tested partnership' and that India was analyzing its energy sourcing. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," Jaiswal said, according to Reuters. India heavily relies on energy imports to sustain the needs of it's more than one billion population. It imports more than one million barrels per day.
