
How Could Strait of Hormuz Closure Impact Americans?
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Iranian lawmakers have voted to support closing the Strait of Hormuz—a vital route for global oil and gas shipments—in response to U.S. airstrikes on three of the country's nuclear sites on Saturday, a move that if agreed upon by the Supreme Leader, could disrupt energy markets and drive up prices worldwide and stateside.
Why It Matters
Following U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, Isfahan, Fordow, and Natanz, the world waits as Iran considers its response.
The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow, yet incredibly strategic waterway connecting the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. At its narrowest point, the strait is about 21 miles wide, with two shipping lanes that are 2 miles wide in each direction.
Around 20 percent of global oil trade passes through the Strait, with any closure likely to spike global prices.
What To Know
In the first fiscal quarter of 2025, the U.S. Energy Information Agency (EIA) noted that just under 15 million barrels of crude oil and condensate, and about 8 million barrels of petroleum products were transported through the Strait.
There are very few alternative routes for the large volume of oil that passes through the chokepoint. The average 20 million barrels of oil products that pass through make up around 20 percent of the global consumption.
The price of Brent crude oil was already climbing ahead of the U.S. strikes, increasing from $69 per barrel on June 12 to $74 per barrel on June 13.
While the EIA estimates that a large majority, around 80 percent, of the oil-based product moving through the Strait go to Asian markets, around 2 million barrels a day end up in the U.S.
Stena Impero being seized and detained between July 19 and July 21, 2019 in Bandar Abbas, Iran as it passed through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital regional shipping channel.
Stena Impero being seized and detained between July 19 and July 21, 2019 in Bandar Abbas, Iran as it passed through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital regional shipping channel.
Tasnim/Getty Images
If the Iranian government following the lead of the parliament, decides to close the Strait, Asian markets are expected to be most hit, but American markets will be too.
Despite influence over the Strait, Iran doesn't supply the most oil that transports through it, Saudi Arabia does.
Some experts have said that if Iran were to cut off access to the Strait, it could spike oil prices by 30 to 50 percent immediately, with gas prices likewise rising.
"Oil prices would likely double, to well above $100. The extent to which that price shock would be sustainable is unclear," Marko Papic, chief strategist at BCA Research, told Newsweek in an email Sunday. He also noted that due to the overwhelming pressure campaign the country would face over its closure "the price shock would be of limited duration."
"However," he continued, "it could impact confidence domestically, impact capex [capital expenditure] intentions by corporates, and thus trickle into the animal spirits [psychological factors that influence economic behavior] that affects not just stocks, but also the labor market."
Fears that Iran could attack U.S. oil infrastructure in the region and levy its power over the Straits of Hormuz could "combine to make prices and speculation rise about the security and dependability of supply," Greg Kennedy, director of the Economic Conflict and Competition Research Group at King's College London, previously told Newsweek.
"Lack of clarity of how long this condition will last will also lead to hoarding or preemptive purchasing by other nations, so there are competition supply fears that will drive up prices," he added.
Iran has been reluctant to close to Strait, even during times of intense conflict during the heat of the Iran-Iraq war.
Infographic with map of the Gulf showing maritime tanker traffic in September 2024 through the Strait of Hormuz.
Infographic with map of the Gulf showing maritime tanker traffic in September 2024 through the Strait of Hormuz.
NALINI LEPETIT-CHELLA,OMAR KAMAL/AFP via Getty Images)
What People Are Saying
Greg Kennedy, director of the Economic Conflict and Competition Research Group at King's College London, told Newsweek: "This is not an act that just stays in the Gulf region, it has wider global strategic ripples."
Spencer Hakimian, founder of Tolou Capital Management, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Saturday: "There are close to 50 large oil tankers scrambling to leave the Strait of Hormuz right now. Looks like the oil industry is expecting the Strait to be blockaded in the coming days."
President Donald Trump wrote on Truth Social on Saturday evening: "ANY RETALIATION BY IRAN AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL BE MET WITH FORCE FAR GREATER THAN WHAT WAS WITNESSED TONIGHT. THANK YOU! DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES."
Brian Krassenstein, who has over 900,000 followers on X wrote on Sunday if the Strait is closed, people can expect: "U.S. Gas Prices likely Skyrocket. Potential $5–$7/gallon range depending on duration. Military Escalation Risk. U.S. Navy and allies likely to respond. Tanker delays affect oil, LNG, and related goods."
What Happens Next?
Any final decision on Iran's response, whether negotiation or closing the Strait or other, however, will largely rest with the country's leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The parliament vote to close the Strait merely advises him of the option to pursue.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social Security problem
American workers anticipating the arrival of Social Security monthly paychecks when they retire often express concerns about whether the program's trust funds will be in sufficient supply to meet their financial expectations. Dave Ramsey, radio host and bestselling personal finance author, sounds an alarm about what is needed to keep those notions alive - and what exactly it is for which Americans should be planning. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter According to the 2025 Social Security Trustees' Report, if lawmakers fail to intervene, Social Security beneficiaries could see a large reduction in payments starting in 2034. This looming cut stems from the projection that the Social Security trust fund will be exhausted by then. Simply put, the program would be taking in less revenue than it needs to fully cover all scheduled benefits for both current and future recipients. Historically, Congress has stepped in with last-minute reforms to prevent such scenarios - while often shielding lower-income individuals from the brunt of the changes. In 1983, for example, legislators passed a set of measures designed to stabilize Social Security in the short term and extend its financial health for what they hoped would be about 75 years. These measures combined increased revenue - through higher payroll taxes, taxing benefits, and expanding coverage - with modest spending cuts such as adjusting the cost-of-living formula and gradually raising the retirement age. Related: Jean Chatzky sends strong message to Americans on Social Security The latest annual trustees' report, published on June 18, estimates that the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) trust fund may run dry by 2033 - unchanged from last year's forecast. After that, only about 77% of promised benefits would be payable unless corrective action is taken. However, one notable update is that the combined trust funds - which include both the OASI and Disability Insurance (DI) programs - are now projected to remain solvent through 2034, one year earlier than previously expected, unfortunately. At that point, around 81% of scheduled combined benefits would still be paid out. Ramsey discusses some basic math involved in why the Social Security system needs adjustments. "As more and more boomers retire, the number of Americans 65 and older is expected to jump from roughly 61 million today to about 77 million in 2035," Ramsey wrote. "At the same time, there will be fewer workers supporting more retirees, which puts even more of a strain on the system." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Ramsey emphasizes the fact that Americans should not view Social Security as a main source of income during retirement. Rather, it should be a small but helpful part of one's retirement income that includes investments in tools such as 401(k) plans and IRAs. "Any money you get from Social Security should be considered icing on the cake," Ramsey wrote. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on Medicare In a statement, the Social Security Board of Trustees made a few key observations. In 2024, the combined reserves of the OASI and DI trust funds saw a significant decline, dropping by $67 billion and bringing the total down to $2.72 trillion. This continued erosion of the funds is an indication of the program's mounting financial strain as benefit payments outpace income from dedicated payroll taxes and other sources. Looking ahead, the financial outlook remains challenging. Starting in 2025, Social Security's total annual expenditures are projected to exceed its total annual income for the foreseeable 75-year horizon. This imbalance isn't new - costs began surpassing income in 2021, and the gap has existed between costs and non-interest income even longer, stretching back to 2010. This growing disparity has contributed to the gradual depletion of trust fund reserves. The statement summarizes the key point for Americans discussed above: Without legislative action, projections show that by 2034 the combined trust fund reserves could be exhausted. If that happens, the program would not go bankrupt, but it would only have enough ongoing revenue to cover approximately 81% of scheduled benefits. This shortfall would significantly affect payments to retirees and other beneficiaries unless Congress enacts reforms to restore long-term solvency. Related: Tony Robbins sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s, IRAs The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
Bank hacks, internet shutdowns and crypto heists: Here's how the war between Israel and Iran is playing out in cyberspace
The war between Iran and Israel has already expanded from the battlefield into cyberspace. The conflict between the two Middle East adversaries has so far largely played out in public view, with hundreds of missiles and drones causing mass casualties across major cities. But Iran and Israel have also been launching cyber attacks against one another from the shadows — which officials are now warning may soon spill over onto U.S. targets. Overnight strikes by the U.S. against Iranian nuclear facilities have heightened the threat environment, and Iran could retaliate by hacking into U.S. electrical grids, water plants, and other critical sectors. 'Cyber is one of the tools of Iran's asymmetric warfare,' said Alex Vatanka, senior fellow at the Middle East Institute. The National Terrorism Advisory System warned Sunday of a range of Iranian threats to the U.S., including attacks on 'poorly secured U.S. networks and Internet-connected devices.' 'Low-level cyber attacks against U.S. networks by pro-Iranian hacktivists are likely, and cyber actors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks.' Joint Chiefs Chair Gen. Dan Caine told reporters on Sunday that U.S. Cyber Command was helping support the strikes, although he did not elaborate on its involvement. A spokesperson for U.S. Cyber Command did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, the main U.S. cyber defense agency, declined to comment. Critical infrastructure groups last week called on U.S. companies to proactively step up their defenses in anticipation of an attack. Former CISA Director Jen Easterly posted on LinkedIn on Sunday that U.S. critical infrastructure organizations should have their 'shields up' and be prepared for malicious cyber activity. 'While it's unclear whether its cyber capabilities were at all impacted by recent Israeli strikes, Iran has a track record of retaliatory cyber operations targeting civilian infrastructure, including: water systems; financial institutions; energy pipelines; government networks; and more,' she wrote. Both Iran and Israel are considered global cyber powers and have traded barbs online, particularly in the aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. An Iranian gang claimed responsibility for hacking into an Israeli hospital and stealing patient data in 2023, and an Israeli hacking group followed by shutting down large swaths of Iran's gas stations. But Israel's cyber capabilities are widely considered more sophisticated. 'The Iranians … are good, they are emerging, but I don't think they're at the level of the Israelis or Americans,' Vatanka said. Some of the most aggressive efforts over the past week have been cyberattacks against major financial institutions in Iran and disinformation campaigns aimed at causing chaos and confusion in Israel. A pro-Israeli hacking group known as Predatory Sparrow claimed credit for a cyberattack last week on Iran's Bank Sepah, which caused widespread account issues for customers. The group also later claimed credit for draining around $90 million from Nobitex, Iran's largest cryptocurrency exchange, and for posting stolen Nobitex source code lists on the social media platform X. Hackers also targeted Iranian news stations. Videos circulated online appeared to show Iranian state TV broadcasting anti-regime messages last week. The Iranian government shut down the nation's internet in response to the attacks late last week, a blackout that was largely still ongoing on Sunday. 'Gaining control of the flow of information is certainly to be expected from the regime … they suspect that there is maybe an attempt to mobilize public attention,' Vatanka said. Top Iranian officials and their security teams were also advised last week to stop using internet-connected devices, in particular telecommunication devices, to protect against potential Israeli disruptions. Last year, thousands of pagers used by the Iranian proxy militant group Hezbollah exploded across Lebanon, leaving thousands injured. One reason Israel's cyberattacks may have been more effective in this round of fighting is that Israel struck Iranian facilities first, giving it more time to prepare its offensive and defensive options before Iran could retaliate. Iran and its proxy organizations are fighting back, albeit on a smaller scale. Israel's National Cyber Directorate warned Israelis abroad on Saturday not to fill out forms on malicious websites that are seeking to gather intelligence on these individuals. Gil Messing, chief of staff for Israeli cyber company Check Point Software, said Saturday just before the U.S. strikes that his company had tracked cyber and disinformation campaigns against Israel 'escalating a bit,' though no new major attacks had been reported. Messing said that there was a 'flood of disinformation' pouring onto social media last week, including messages discouraging Israelis from entering shelters during attacks and erroneous texts about gas and supply shortages. Israel's civilian cyber defense agency warned that Iran was renewing its efforts to hack into internet-connected cameras for espionage purposes. John Hultquist, chief analyst for Google Threat Intelligence Group, posted on X on Saturday shortly after the attacks that Iranian cyber forces usually use their 'cyberattack capability for psychological purposes.' 'I'm most concerned about cyber espionage against our leaders and surveillance aided by compromises in travel, hospitality, telecommunications, and other sectors where data could be used to identify and physically track persons of interest,' Hultquist wrote.


The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump opens door to regime change in Iran
President Trump on Sunday suggested regime change in Iran if the current one is 'unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump said in a Truth Social post. Trump's comments follow his announcement Saturday the United States had bombed three Iranian nuclear sites, stepping into a conflict between Iran and Israel that kicked off on June 13 amid already heightened tensions in the region over Israel's war in Gaza and Iran's nuclear capability. In a late Saturday address, the president said, 'Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.' 'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace,' Trump added. The United States warned of a 'heightened threat environment' following Trump's ordering of strikes on the three Iranian nuclear sites. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a National Terrorism Advisory System (NTAS) bulletin Sunday, giving a heads-up to the public to the possibility of cyberattacks done by those who back Iran or are affiliated with its government. Former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley on Wednesday pushed for the U.S. to not 'engage in regime change in Iran.' 'Our focus should only be on our national security. The Iranian regime has threatened the US with nuclear production for years,' Haley, who served in the first term of the president, said.