logo
‘The war needs to end': Is the US right turning on Israel?

‘The war needs to end': Is the US right turning on Israel?

The Guardian3 days ago
As the Israel-Gaza war nears its two-year mark, and as images of starving people and utter devastation flood social media, cracks seem to be emerging in the American right's typically iron-clad support for Israel.
The US continues to support Israel diplomatically and militarily, and last Thursday pulled out of peace negotiations that it accused Hamas of sabotaging. And in the US Congress, only two Republicans voted for a recent amendment that would have pulled funding for missile defense systems for Israel.
Yet the war's duration and human cost, as well as recent Israeli strikes on Christian targets, have spurred modest signs of discontent on the US right. Some conservative commentators have walked back their support for Israel's war; the US's famously Zionist ambassador to Israel rebuked the actions of Jewish settlers in the West Bank, and an unresolved rift over foreign intervention continues to plague the Maga world.
To some extent this mirrors trends in US sentiment overall. A recent CNN poll found a steep decline in US support for Israel since the war started. That drop was most dramatic among respondents who identified as Democrats or independents, but the poll also found that since 2023 the percentage of surveyed Republicans who believe that Israel's actions are justified fell from 68% to 52%.
It's highly likely that depictions of starvation in the territory – where 147 people have reportedly starved to death, including 88 children, and nearly one in three people are going multiple days without eating, according to the United Nations – have played a role. On Monday, Donald Trump partly contradicted Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu's claim that there is no starvation in Gaza, telling reporters: 'That's real starvation … I see it, and you can't fake that. So, we're going to be even more involved.' Trump made the statement while visiting Britain, where the Daily Express, considered the country's most rightwing mainstream tabloid, recently ran a headline decrying hunger in Gaza: 'FOR PITY'S SAKE STOP THIS NOW.'
A recent spate of Israeli attacks on Christian targets in Gaza and the West Bank have also angered some American conservatives. Last Thursday, after an Israeli tank fired on the sole Catholic church in Gaza – killing three people and wounding nine, including a priest – a reportedly upset Trump called Netanyahu to complain.
A few days after the church shelling, the US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, visited Taybeh, a Palestinian Christian town in the West Bank that has been repeatedly attacked by Israeli settlers, who earlier this month set a fire near a fifth-century church. In a statement, Huckabee described the attack as 'an absolute travesty' and 'an act of terror' and called for the perpetrators to be prosecuted. (He did not directly implicate the Israeli government or settlers.)
Although there have long been isolationist and populist elements on the right skeptical of the United States' close alliance with Israel, their point of view has been eclipsed in recent history by the pro-Israel camp, which enjoys strong support among American evangelical Christians.
Huckabee is an evangelical Christian who has described himself as an 'unapologetic, unreformed Zionist'. Like many evangelicals, he believes that Israel has a divine claim to the West Bank, and has famously declared that 'there is no such thing as a Palestinian.'
That Huckabee issued such a strong statement on Taybeh 'was surprising,' Todd Deatherage said. Deatherage is the co-founder of Telos, a non-profit that works to give US policymakers and religious groups a more nuanced understanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Huckabee's gesture, he said, seems to indicate 'some complexity in a movement that didn't have complexity around this before'.
Sohrab Ahmari, a conservative journalist and commentator, described Huckabee's statement as remarkable 'given how much of a kind of Boomer evangelical Huckabee is'.
Huckabee also recently called for Israel to 'aggressively investigate' the murder of Sayfollah 'Saif' Musallet, a Palestinian American man who was recently beaten to death by settlers in the West Bank, according to his family.
The events abroad also seem to have made ripples in the US conservative media sphere.
The Israeli government said that the church strike was a battlefield mistake, but in a recent episode of his talk show, Michael Knowles, a rightwing American pundit, expressed skepticism. 'I've been broadly supportive of the state of Israel,' Knowles, who is Catholic, said in the segment. 'And you're losing me.' The Israeli government 'is really screwing up, is really not playing its cards right', he argued. 'The war needs to come to an end. How long is the war gonna go on?'
He added: 'America is the only friend that Israel has on planet Earth. I do not get what the Israeli government is doing here, but I suspect there will be political consequences – as there should be.' Some critics in the comments section of Knowles' video accused him of only noticing deaths in Gaza once the victims were conspicuously Christian.
The Free Press, the online publication founded by Bari Weiss to challenge what she describes as an establishment liberal media, recently published an article arguing that although past claims about hunger in Gaza were 'lies', the territory is now rapidly entering a 'real hunger crisis'. The Free Press has generally taken a fervently pro-Israel stance.
Similarly, Joe Rogan, the everyman podcaster who threw his support to Trump in the last election, has refused to host Netanyahu on his podcast, the premier's son, Yair Netanyahu, claimed on Friday. And Ross Douthat, the conservative New York Times columnist, published an op-ed on Saturday arguing that Israel's military operation has crossed into being 'unjust'.
Although the US right is perceived today as staunchly pro-Israel, recent history is more complicated, Deatherage noted; George HW Bush's Republican administration undertook a political fight with Israel about Jewish settlements in the West Bank. The right's pro-Israel stance really hardened after 9/11, he said, when Christian conservatives and defense hawks embraced the view that the US and Israel were allies against Islamic terror.
The modern iteration of Christians United for Israel (CUFI) was founded in 2006 to facilitate US evangelical support for Israel. The organization's membership is significantly larger than Aipac, the pro-Israel organization founded by Jewish Americans. Trump's alliance with the religious right during his first term intensified the political power of Christian Zionism.
'That part of the evangelical movement really gained unprecedented access to being heard,' Deatherage said.
Some Christian Zionists, particularly evangelicals, believe there are Biblical justifications for the US supporting Israel. A small subset believe that a showdown between Israel and enemy states could presage the End of Days, Daniel Hummel, a historian of Christian Zionism, said. The recent strike on Iran sparked apocalyptic speculation in some Christian circles, he noted.
Yet polling data suggests a generational divide. Younger evangelicals, like younger Americans broadly, are more skeptical of Zionism, and the gap seems to be growing.
A 2021 survey by researchers at the University of North Carolina at Pembroke found that only 33.6% of American evangelicals between the ages of 18 and 29 supported Israel, down from 69% surveyed in a similar poll in 2018. Research by the University of Maryland Critical Issues Poll has found similar shifts among younger evangelicals.
'Younger evangelicals in particular are kind of renegotiating what it means to be a Christian in the public square,' Deatherage said. 'And they're not thrilled by the bargain that the older generation maybe made with politics.'
The topic of Christian Zionism came up during a heated episode of Tucker Carlson's talk show, this June, featuring Senator Ted Cruz. Carlson is one of the major faces of an America First camp in the Maga movement that views the American alliance with Israel with increasing suspicion. During the conversation, Cruz cited a Bible verse as one of the reasons that he supports Israel. Carlson responded by testily mocking the notion that foreign policy objectives should be determined by biblical exegesis.
On the fringes, criticisms of Israel have sometimes been intertwined with outright antisemitism. The far-right pundit Candace Owens, for example, has often disparaged Israel in conspiratorial terms.
Yet skepticism of Israel has also gained some credible intellectual traction on the more mainstream Maga right, particularly among a group of mostly younger conservative activists, political staffers and policy wonks sometimes known in Washington DC as the 'restrainers'. These are generally pro-Trump conservatives who, while not necessarily outright isolationists, believe that the US should protect its own national interests even if this means scaling back – or 'restraining' – allies such as Israel.
The term is subjective and contentious, but the Pentagon's policy chief, Elbridge Colby; the deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East, Mike DiMino; and JD Vance himself are sometimes considered examples.
Pro-Israel Republicans and hawks still mostly hold the whip hand, but Deatherage believes a political window for rethinking the US's relationship for Israel may be opening on the right. 'There's a lot of pressure on [Trump] to support whatever the Israeli government is doing. But there's now some really dissenting voices on the other side of that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tariffs: Full list of countries hit by US president's new trade war levies
Trump tariffs: Full list of countries hit by US president's new trade war levies

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

Trump tariffs: Full list of countries hit by US president's new trade war levies

President Donald Trump has signed off on sweeping new tariffs for dozens of countries as he continues to escalate his global trade war. Trump imposed higher import duty rates of between 10 per cent and 41 percent for multiple trading partners including the European Union, set to come into force on August 7. Among the hardest hit nations is Switzerland on 39 percent, while Canada is facing 35 percent. Some of the countries affected had reached tariff-reducing deals with the U.S. but others had no opportunity to negotiate with the Trump administration. Goods from all other countries not listed would be subject to a 10 per cent US import tax. Trump had previously threatened that rate might be higher. The administration also teased that more trade deals were in the pipeline as it seeks to close trade deficits. European stocks hit a three-week low on Friday as investors focused on the impact of the new tariffs, while Asian shares were headed for the worst week since April after the announcement Thursday night. Trump's separate order for Canada raises the rate on Canadian goods subject to fentanyl-related tariffs to 35 per cent, from 25 per cent previously, saying the country had "failed to cooperate" in curbing illicit narcotics flows into the U.S. The higher tariffs on Canadian goods contrasted sharply with Trump's decision to grant Mexico a 90-day reprieve from higher tariffs of 30 per cent on many goods to provide more time to negotiate a broader trade pact. Canadian prime minister Mark Carney said he was disappointed by Trump's decision, and vowed to take action to protect Canadian jobs and diversify the country's export markets. Meanwhile, China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a tariff agreement with Trump's administration after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary agreements in May and June to end tit-for-tat levies. A U.S. official said they are making progress toward a deal. US trading partners hit by new tariffs: Syria 41% Laos 40% Myanmar (Burma) 40% Switzerland 39% Canada 35% Iraq 35% Serbia 35% Algeria 30% Bosnia and Herzegovina 30% Libya 30% South Africa 30% Brunei 25% India 25% Kazakhstan 25% Moldova 25% Tunisia 25% Bangladesh 20% Sri Lanka20% Taiwan 20% Vietnam 20% Cambodia 19% Indonesia 19% Malaysia 19% Pakistan 19% Philippines 19% Thailand 19% Nicaragua 18% Afghanistan 15% Angola 15% Bolivia 15% Botswana 15% Cameroon 15% Chad 15% Costa Rica 15% Côte d`Ivoire 15% Democratic Republic of the Congo 15% Ecuador 15% Equatorial Guinea15% European Union 15% Fiji 15% Ghana 15% Guyana 15% Iceland 15% Israel 15% Japan 15% Jordan 15% Lesotho 15% Liechtenstein 15% Madagascar 15% Malawi 15% Mauritius 15% Mozambique 15% Namibia 15% Nauru 15% New Zealand 15% Nigeria 15% North Macedonia 15% Norway 15% Papua New Guinea 15% South Korea 15% Trinidad and Tobago 15% Turkey 15% Uganda 15% Vanuatu 15% Venezuela 15% Zambia 15% Zimbabwe 15% Brazil10% Falkland Islands 10% United Kingdom 10%

Exclusive: US sanctions force vessels with Russian oil to divert from India, sources say
Exclusive: US sanctions force vessels with Russian oil to divert from India, sources say

Reuters

time2 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Exclusive: US sanctions force vessels with Russian oil to divert from India, sources say

NEW DELHI/MOSCOW, Aug 1 (Reuters) - At least two vessels loaded with Russian oil bound for refiners in India have diverted to other destinations following new U.S. sanctions, trade sources said, and LSEG trade flows showed. The U.S. Treasury Department this week imposed sanctions on more than 115 Iran-linked individuals, entities, and ships, some of which are involved in transporting Russian oil. U.S. President Donald Trump has urged countries to halt purchases of oil from Moscow, threatening 100% tariffs unless Russia agrees to a significant peace deal with Ukraine. Three ships - the Aframaxes Tagor and Guanyin and the Suezmax Tassos - were scheduled to deliver Russian oil to Indian ports this month, trade sources said. All three vessels are under U.S. sanctions. Tagor was bound for Chennai on India's east coast, while Guanyin and Tassos were headed to ports in western India, according to trade sources and Russian ports data. Tighter Western sanctions aimed at cutting Russia's oil revenue, seen as funding its war against Ukraine, have been increasingly hitting Russian oil supplies for India, which buys more than a third of its oil needs from Russia. Tagor is now heading to Dalian in China, while Tassos is diverting to Port Said in Egypt, the data shows. Guanyin remains on course to Sikka, a port used by Reliance Industries ( opens new tab and Bharat Petroleum Corp Ltd. ( opens new tab. Indian Oil Corp ( opens new tab, which was to receive the Tagor shipment, and BPCL did not respond to Reuters' emailed requests for comment. Zulu Shipping, linked to Panama-flagged Tassos and Tagor, and Guanyin-owner Silver Tetra Marine could not be reached for comments. Both companies are under U.S. sanctions. A Reliance spokesperson said that "neither of these two vessels, Guanyin and Tassos, is coming to us". Reliance has previously purchased oil in Guanyin. Separately, two other vessels, Achilles and Elyte, loaded with Russian oil, are preparing to discharge Russian Urals for Reliance, according to LSEG data. Both these vessels are sanctioned by Britain and the European Union. India has condemned the EU sanctions.

Has Trump pulled off an amazing deal, or is the worst yet to come?
Has Trump pulled off an amazing deal, or is the worst yet to come?

Times

time2 minutes ago

  • Times

Has Trump pulled off an amazing deal, or is the worst yet to come?

The Trump administration's flurry of eleventh-hour tariff agreements will raise US protectionism to the highest level in a century. The effective tariff applied on goods entering America will jump from an average of just above 2 per cent at the start of the year to around 18 per cent, according to the Yale Budget Lab. Before its August 1 deadline, the White House signed off tariff agreements that will apply a basic 15 per cent tariffs on goods from the European Union, Japan and South Korea, a higher 35 per cent rate on some Canadian goods, and 39 per cent rate on Switzerland. The UK will be subject to a 10 per cent minimum, while scores of other countries — around 70 — that failed to agree new terms will fall back on the 'reciprocal' levies announced in April. • FTSE 100 slides as markets retreat on new Trump tariffs The expiry of President Trump's deadline marks an unprecedented four months of upheaval in the global economy, where the world's economic superpower has picked apart the rules of globalisation through daily threats of punishing import taxes, de facto capital controls, and financial sanctions on its trading partners. Yet for all the noise about what Trump will announce or un-announce on the rest of the world, the US and global economy enter August in a position not too dissimilar from where they started before Trump's 'liberation day' taxes were unleashed in April. The US economy and labour market have not been plunged into recession, interest rates continue to fall in most advanced economies, and equity markets have reversed their April wobbles to touch record highs in the US, UK, and Europe. This relatively benign outcome has led some to conclude that Trump has won the first battle in his trade war: the US is dismantling the global trading system and dictating humiliating terms to its erstwhile allies with minimum damage to its economy or financial stability so far. • Investors fleeing US equities boost unloved London market To add to the euphoria, the effective 18 per cent tariff rate on the rest of the world will generate around $450-500 billion in federal tax revenues for Trump — worth more than 1.25 per cent of the US economy and significant source of fiscal relief in a country where the budget deficit was on course to stick at 7 per cent of GDP. 'The US has emerged as a clear winner in the trade war at this juncture,' Mark Dowding, chief investment officer at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, said. 'There is a feeling that Trump has extracted pretty much every concession he would have hoped for in the trade negotiations conducted to date. In the absence of material retaliatory tariffs, this has been viewed as a great result for the US.' Dowding added that then 'worries that Trump was undermining US policy credibility have been replaced by a grudging sense of respect for the negotiator-in-chief'. This reassessment is best reflected in the value of the dollar which is heading for its strongest week in three years. The US currency, which has been the chosen market proxy for worries about US policy credibility, has recovered 1.5 per cent from the trough hit at the end of June. The greenback remains around 9 per cent weaker against major currencies this year and is still having its worst year since the dollar became a free-floating currency liberated from gold in 1972. • Copper price drops a fifth after Trump waters down tariff The performance of the US stock market has been even more striking. After the worst start to a new presidency in a century, US equities have outperformed all main peers since April 21, reflecting the 'Goldilocks' state of an economy that is 'not too hot, and not too cold', Will Denyer at Gavekal Research said. Trump's tariffs strategy has been emboldened by 'hard' economic data this week which showed the US the economy bounced back strongly with a 3 per cent annualised GDP expansion in the second quarter, after a 0.5 per cent contraction at the start of the year. Signs of tariff-induced inflation are also scarcely showing up in monthly price data, and while the labour market is slowing, demand for workers remains far above historical averages. The tariffs deadline also coincided with another bumper week of corporate earnings for American tech and AI giants that has charged up US market bulls. It's not just investors who are relieved at the state of the world at the start of August. The International Monetary Fund this week gave modest growth upgrades to most developing world economies, including the US, acknowledging that after the burst of tariff fears, the probable landing spot for American protectionism is likely to be lower than first feared. Even the US Federal Reserve, the country's beleaguered central bank, is inclined to think that tariffs are likely to have a one-time impact on raising American consumer prices, rather than marking the start of a new burst of inflation that triggers higher wages. • How Trump is delivering his pledges after 200 days Outside the US, growth forecasts for big economies that capitulated to Trump's demands are not being revised down drastically. The EU economy could still outperform forecasts as Germany's mass spending counteracts part of the hit from Trump's trade war. Goldman Sachs this week revised up Europe's GDP projections by 0.1 percentage points to 1.2 per cent this year and 1.3 per cent in 2025, after the bloc agreed to a broad 15 per cent tariff rate that will initially cover pharmaceuticals. Economists, however, are still divided over whether the resilience of the US and world economy means the tariff pain has simply been delayed, or whether there are other factors at play that will lead to an altogether more benign outcome for America and its trading partners. The widely held assumption among most forecasters is still that American households and businesses will suffer the brunt of higher import taxes, supply chain disruption, and the frozen investment as a result of the barrage of protectionism. On the flip side, the White House points to the 2018 tariffs episode as 'proof' that levies have no lasting effect on consumer prices and they did not prevent the US becoming the fastest growing economy in the G7 for the past two years. Freya Beamish, chief economist at TS Lombard, thinks market exuberance will come to a halt as US 'data over the next six months will be a rude awakening'. • Trump announces 90-day pause to higher tariffs on Mexico 'Inflation dynamics are deteriorating. Right now, it's as if the market actually believes that tariffs are going to be paid by the rest of the world and that Trump has pulled off some amazing deal. We've heard hitherto serious economists making such claims and can only assume they have taken leave of their senses. Unfortunately, the stock market reaction is likely to embolden the administration into further damaging policy moves,' she said. Looking ahead, few trade experts or diplomats expect Trump to stick to his word on his set tariff rates as the likes of the EU and Japan have been bounced into making investment pledges — like buying fanciful amounts of US energy — that they simply cannot meet. Even more worryingly, the president has shown he is willing to use the tariff stick against countries over any policy disagreements — over security, foreign policy, and in the case of Brazil, domestic court procedures against a former president. 'These are very high level deals that have been announced. A lot of work is going to have to go into filling the blanks,' Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, chief economist at the IMF, warned.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store