Islamist fighters sign a petition to obtain Syrian citizenship
The fate of foreign fighters has been uncertain since Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) took power, as few states are willing to host these individuals, often considered extremists, and whom Syrians themselves distrust.
Many fighters and their families, as well as others, including humanitarian workers and journalists who joined the rebels, do not have proper documentation. Some have been stripped of their original nationality and fear long prison sentences or even death in their home countries. However, granting them Syrian citizenship could harm Syria's relations with the foreign states in question, even as the new Syrian government seeks their support for unifying and rebuilding a country devastated by war and shaken by sectarian massacres, the agency notes.
A petition submitted Thursday to the Syrian Ministry of Interior argues that foreigners should be granted Syrian citizenship so they can settle, own land, and even travel. 'We have shared bread, we have shared pain, and we have shared the hope of a free and just future for Syria… Yet, for us, the muhajireen (emigrants), our status remains uncertain,' the letter reads. 'We respectfully request that the Syrian leaders, with wisdom, insight and fraternity, grant us full Syrian citizenship and the right to hold a Syrian passport,' it continues.
The letter was submitted to the ministry by Bilal Abdel Karim, an American actor turned war journalist who has been living in Syria since 2012 and is a prominent figure among foreign Islamists in the country. He stated that the petition aims to help thousands of foreigners from more than a dozen countries. These include Egyptians, Saudis, Lebanese, Pakistanis, Indonesians and Maldivians, as well as British, German, French, American, Canadian and people of Chechen and Uyghur origin.
It was not possible to determine how many people supported the petition for citizenship, but three foreigners in Syria — a Briton, a Uyghur and a Frenchman — confirmed that they had. A spokesperson for the Syrian Ministry of Interior said that it is up to the Syrian presidency to decide on the issue of foreign citizenship.
In the weeks following his rise to power, interim president Ahmad al-Sharaa, a former HTS leader, stated that foreign fighters and their families could obtain Syrian citizenship, but no public information has been provided on the matter since.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
7 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
Is Sudan on its way to becoming a hub for captagon trafficking?
Following the fall of Bashar al-Assad on Dec. 8 in Syria, whose regime was accused of running a narco-state at the helm of global captagon production, the spot has become up for grabs. Syrian authorities reportedly destroyed nearly 200 million pills discovered after the Assad clan's collapse, compared to almost 300 million tablets seized in 2023, according to a World Bank studies are still lacking on who has definitively taken over supply — especially to Gulf countries, the main consumers — an increasing number of reports point to new production centers in Sudan. A few laboratories were uncovered and dismantled by Khartoum before April 2023, when civil war erupted between the army and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The war, however, appears to have acted as a catalyst, particularly since Sudan borders the Red Sea across...
L'Orient-Le Jour
7 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
New 'coalition of residents of southern border villages' requests state assistance
A "coalition of residents of the southern border villages" formed on Sunday held a press conference at 11 a.m. in Kfar Jouz (Nabatieh) to call on the Lebanese state and "concerned parties" for the reconstruction of damaged areas, as well as a series of compensations and aid for families. This announcement comes as Hezbollah is expected to have evacuated the region south of the Litani River under the cease-fire agreement from last November, and as the state pledged to disarm the party throughout Lebanese territory by the end of the year. Presenting itself as "neither affiliated with nor opposed to any political party," although it stems from an area largely supportive of Hezbollah, the "coalition" first wanted to reject "all rumors about buffer zones emptied of their residents, because this land has owners who will not abandon it." Israel is accused of seeking to create a buffer zone in southern Lebanon to ensure its security along its northern border, after having largely destroyed border villages during the last war against Hezbollah, which began on Oct. 8, 2023, and as it continues to carry out almost daily attacks on various vital infrastructures. It remains at five positions it deems strategic on Lebanese hills near the border, in violation of the cease-fire agreement that went into effect on Nov. 27, 2024. "As for the 'five points,' these are not points, but thousands of kilometers drenched in our blood, our tears, and our sweat ... Among them, entire villages are still occupied, such as Hunin, which had been rebuilt on the remains of Hunin destroyed and occupied in 1948, and today finds itself occupied and destroyed a second time," the coalition's statement said. 'The return rate does not exceed 10 percent' Denouncing the fact that "tens of thousands of displaced people are still scattered throughout the country, some still taking refuge in schools," and that "the rate of return does not exceed 10 percent of the prewar population," the coalition sent 14 demands to the Lebanese state "and all concerned parties," including the reconstruction of destroyed areas, payment of compensation to victims, medical care and free education, the release of frozen bank deposits, and the payment of at least $300 per family per month as a housing allowance. "We will knock on every door and use every possible and available form of mobilization, in a democratic, legal, positive and peaceful manner," the statement said. Since the cease-fire, Hezbollah has repeatedly called on the Lebanese state to fund the reconstruction of destroyed areas, as the party's supply sources have largely dried up, notably following the fall of the Assad regime in Syria in December 2024, overthrown by an Islamist coalition hostile to Hezbollah, which cut the land supply routes from Iran, and the gradual reassertion of control by the Lebanese state over the country's port and airport. This appeal from the villagers comes as the international conference on aid for the reconstruction of destroyed areas in Lebanon, which the state is unable to handle because of its exorbitant cost, is only scheduled for the final stage of Hezbollah's disarmament, which is set to be completed by the end of December, according to the roadmap adopted in the Cabinet meeting last Aug. 5.
Ya Libnan
8 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Trump's Alaska surrender: What does Putin have on him?
When the U.S. president adopts the position of an adversary, allies and adversaries alike wonder who is really calling the shots. By: Vlad Green, Op-ED The world watched in disbelief as President Donald Trump stood alongside Vladimir Putin in Alaska and appeared to adopt the Russian leader's position on Ukraine. For the leader of the United States—the nation long regarded as the guardian of freedom and stability—to echo the demands of an adversary is nothing short of shameful. It has shaken not only Americans but also U.S. allies who rely on Washington's resolve. For decades, American presidents, Republican and Democrat alike, have understood that standing firm against Moscow is a matter of principle. Yet what we saw in Alaska was different. Instead of defending Ukraine's sovereignty and the values of the free world, Trump reversed himself, leaving allies to wonder whether America can still be trusted. The question now echoing from London to Warsaw to Tokyo is simple: why? The images from the summit told their own story. Putin looked calm, collected, even triumphant. Trump, by contrast, appeared hesitant and subdued. For all the bravado he displays on the campaign trail, he seemed deferential in the presence of the Russian president. For allies, this was alarming. If Trump cannot stand firm against Putin, how can he be relied upon to defend NATO in Europe or Taiwan in Asia? The stakes are not limited to Ukraine—they extend to the credibility of U.S. commitments worldwide. There must be a reason for such a reversal. Former FBI Director James Comey once hinted that Russia may possess kompromat—compromising information—that could explain Trump's pattern of deference to Putin. No definitive evidence has been made public, but the suspicion lingers. Even the appearance of blackmail is damaging. Diplomacy depends not only on strength but on perception. If allies believe the U.S. president is compromised, their trust in America erodes. If adversaries believe he can be pressured, they will exploit it. This is why so many are asking the same uncomfortable question: What does Russia have on Trump? For Ukraine, Trump's stance is nothing short of betrayal. For NATO allies, it is a shock to the system. And for U.S. partners in Asia, the fear is clear: if Trump concedes to Putin today, Xi Jinping may take note tomorrow. Beijing is watching closely. If Moscow can pressure Trump into reversing U.S. policy, why not test the same strategy in the Pacific? Already, Chinese state media has been framing the Alaska summit as proof that American resolve is faltering. This only encourages aggressors and destabilizes the international order. America's power is not measured by tanks or missiles alone. Its greatest strength lies in credibility—the belief among allies that the U.S. will honor its commitments, and the fear among adversaries that America will stand firm. When that credibility is weakened, the entire global order is placed at risk. The Alaska summit has left America's credibility hanging by a thread. Allies are hedging, adversaries are emboldened, and the balance of power is shifting before our eyes. The American people deserve answers. So do America's allies. Was Trump simply outmaneuvered by a seasoned ex-KGB officer, or is there something deeper at play? Until these questions are addressed, suspicion will continue to corrode U.S. leadership. Congress and the press must press for transparency. Silence is not an option when the credibility of the United States—and the security of the free world—are at stake. The Alaska summit was supposed to bring progress toward peace. Instead, it left the world uneasy, allies shaken, and adversaries emboldened. By appearing to side with Putin over Ukraine, Trump did more than weaken American policy—he raised doubts about whether the president of the United States acts freely or under influence. The question is no longer whispered in diplomatic corridors; it is shouted across the globe: What does Putin have on Trump? Until this question is answered, America's leadership will remain in doubt—and the world will grow more dangerous.
