logo
Meet President Shane Smeed: Utah Tech's new leader anxious to optimize school's evolving opportunities

Meet President Shane Smeed: Utah Tech's new leader anxious to optimize school's evolving opportunities

Yahoo28-05-2025
Newly appointed Utah Tech University President Shane Smeed's first day on the job — May 1 — happened on the same day as the school's annual graduation ceremony.
'So my very first day was a commencement — and on my second day, we had three additional commencement ceremonies,' Smeed recently told the Deseret News editorial board.
'So within the first 48 hours of me serving as president, we had the fortunate opportunity to be able to celebrate some of the most exciting days in the lives of our students and their families.'
Smeed's enthusiasm to be sharing his personal achievements with those of the UTU student body, simultaneously, seems apropos at a moment of historic change — both within the UTU community and across Utah's higher education system.
Perhaps none of the state's degree-granting public institutions has experienced the level of growth in recent years as UTU.
During the 2000s, the school originally known as the St. George Stake Academy went from being Dixie State College to Dixie State University and now, since 2022, Utah Tech University.
Even the school mascot has evolved: Rebels to Red Storm to Trailblazers.
Meanwhile, UTU's enrollment has grown every year since 2013, increasing by almost 60% to over 13,000 students today. Of the school's 304 academic programs, 60% have been developed within the past seven years.
One reason why UTU has become a popular higher ed destination for many Utahns — 82% are in-state students — is obvious: It's the most affordable university in the state.
But the school's 19th president believes UTU's opportunities extend beyond affordability and program growth.
While some in Utah's public higher education system view recent legislation demanding budget reallocations as a hostile act against traditional learning, Smeed sees opportunities.
HB265, he counters, 'allows us to reinvest money in the places where we think can be impactful — not only in (students') educational experience, but also in the workforce and preparing them to meet workforce needs and its requirements."
Additionally, Smeed is anxious to reconnect with members of the UTU community who may have separated themselves from the school. UTU, he said, is their asset.
'It's an asset for the state. It's an asset for the community and (Washington County). I see my role as president as every bit 'externally facing' as internal — so it's a great opportunity.'
Prior to Smeed's hiring, UTU was without a president for over a year after President Richard 'Biff' Williams stepped down from the position. Williams, who now serves as president of Missouri State University, was included as a defendant in an ongoing lawsuit alleging Title IX violations in the wake of a vulgar prank.
When asked if those divisive investigations have harmed UTU's reputation, Smeed said his new job offers him the opportunity to be 'a spokesperson for the university' going forward.
'Reputationally, our community will see that our students are probably the best representation of who we are as a university.'
A Utah native, Smeed served for almost four years as the president of Missouri's Park University, where he championed education/workforce readiness and expanding the Park campus for military-affiliated students.
He and his wife, Angela, are the parents of three children.
Smeed presided over Park University while also serving as the president of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints' Platte City Missouri Stake.
While going through the UTU job application process and meeting with Utah's higher education leaders and members of the Washington County community, 'I realized that this was a special place,' he said.
'I was born in Provo, Utah — so this was a great opportunity for me to come back to my home state.'
As an academic, Smeed said he was drawn to UTU's polytechnic mission. 'I believe that it most readily prepares our graduates to meet the workforce needs.'
The Beehive State offers a variety of colleges and universities, both public and private, that are relatively affordable and boast a wide range of academic programs.
Smeed is confident that UTU — an open-enrollment institution — is a campus where Utahns can thrive academically, while saving a few bucks at the state's most affordable university.
'There's been a big question about whether or not the value of higher education is still there today — but the facts show that a person with a college degree will earn $1.2 million (over one's lifetime) more than one with just a high school diploma,' he said.
'So if you're from Washington County, you can expect to make $20,000 more annually than someone who only has a high school diploma.'
Smeed also highlights UTU's campus growth over the past decade that has transformed the campus. He's committed to building relationships with the philanthropic community to raise funds and secure scholarships.
Such efforts, said Smeed, will allow UTU students 'to graduate with less debt, or no debt, by the time they're finishing their education — especially for those that are looking for opportunities with internships.
'And then they're ready to hit the job force and really help with workforce development.'
Smeed noted that UTU is evolving in real-time even as Washington County's population booms.
A new performing arts center and a general classroom building are under construction on campus — and a new residence hall was recently completed.
Expect such growth markers and physical footprints to increase in the coming years, he said.
'The growth that's happening in St. George in Washington County is a tremendous opportunity for us to attract more students from Washington County and within the state,' Smeed said, noting that more than half of the school's students come from inside the county.
While some have been alarmed by the budget reallocation demands placed on Utah's public colleges and universities by HB265, Smeed sees the new legislation as an opportunity to better educate and prepare students.
The state-mandated reallocations happening at Utah campuses should not be viewed as cuts — but, rather, reinvestments that will serve graduates well in the coming decades.
'Through our reinvestment plan, we're looking to add approximately a dozen additional faculty lines to our university.'
UTU's new president says he is already focused on building relationships with his new faculty.
'My commitment to them is to listen to their concerns and opportunities,' he said. 'They'll see me as a strategic partner — one that can understand the needs of the faculty but can also understand the broader needs of the university.
'My actions will speak louder than my words.'
Smeed is also reassuring UTU students that liberal arts studies and the humanities 'aren't going anywhere.'
Still, there might be opportunities to examine traditional programs and decide if there are ways to incorporate, say, new technologies to make them more applicable for today's job market.
Smeed's guiding administrative question: 'How can we more strategically place some of those programs in a position where students can graduate, find gainful employment and be able to meet workforce needs, now and then throughout the 21st century?'
Varsity sports at UTU made a historic leap last year to NCAA Division I competition.
Most of the Trailblazer teams are competing in the Western Athletic Conference, while the gridiron program is part of the Football Championship Subdivision.
College sports, of course, have undergone historic disruptions in recent years with the emergence of NIL and the transfer portal for athletes.
Given those recent changes, it will take 'a bit of time' to build up the school's athletic program to where it wants to be, said Smeed.
But UTU students and fans can still expect to support competitive teams. Everybody loves a winner.
'So we're only going to continue to put investment into our athletic programs,' said Smeed.
'We can't rely on student-athletes to come here without some level of incentive, and so fundraising is a big part of my role as president of the university to find ways to connect with the community, connect with corporate partners and the business community alike, and find ways where they're interested in supporting athletics.'
UTU's goal, he added, is to 'fill the stadium and fill the arena.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Infrastructure first: The rise of eVaults in capital markets
Infrastructure first: The rise of eVaults in capital markets

Fast Company

time5 hours ago

  • Fast Company

Infrastructure first: The rise of eVaults in capital markets

The shift to digital lending has elevated infrastructure from a support function to a core consideration in capital markets execution. As financial institutions navigate rising expectations for transparency and speed, alongside strict regulatory requirements, the infrastructure supporting asset management and document integrity becomes essential. Solid infrastructure is essential in structured finance transactions, enabling businesses to confidently meet evolving market demands and regulatory scrutiny. Today, eVault technology helps manage how assets are created, managed, transferred, and securitized, ultimately driving operational efficiency and trust across the financial ecosystem. When managing portfolios, selecting the right eVault provider is critical. A misinformed decision can bring a heavy cost in both time and money, potentially disrupting operations and negatively impacting client satisfaction and compliance standings. Here are some insights to guide your decision-making, ensuring you are prepared to select the ideal eVault provider aligned with your business's unique needs. Through selecting a provider that offers seamless integration with digital signature platforms, custodial solutions, and portfolio lifecycle management, you can significantly enhance efficiency and reduce portfolio complexity. Integrated custodial solutions offered by some eVault providers can enhance connectivity and reduce administrative friction. Providers with fast, frictionless onboarding processes help minimize operational downtime and accelerate your institution's time to market, enabling quicker realization of benefits. Additionally, prioritize solutions that provide a clear, auditable trail from origination throughout the portfolio lifecycle, ensuring a verifiable chain of custody. Look for platforms offering intuitive user experiences, comprehensive reporting capabilities, and robust security frameworks that safeguard single authoritative copies (SAC). RED FLAGS TO AVOID Avoid providers whose solutions rely on multiple disconnected systems or manual handoffs, as these significantly increase complexity, disorganization, and operational risk. Providers lacking a robust compliance infrastructure, reporting, and real-time monitoring capabilities can create vulnerabilities due to insufficient transparency and auditability, leading to regulatory complications and legal implications. Additionally, steer clear of solutions with legacy technologies, rigid or non-scalable infrastructure; your chosen eVault provider should effortlessly scale with your institution's growth and evolving regulatory demands without requiring costly upgrades or substantial system overhauls. Be cautious of providers who offer limited support platform or unclear service level agreements, as these deficiencies can impede timely issue resolution and negatively impact your operational continuity. Consider asking potential providers specific questions regarding how quickly they or their platform can realistically be implemented within your operational timeline, as well as what resources, support, or training would be required from your internal teams. How user-friendly and transparent is their system to extract data for loan verifications and audits? Request clear, detailed demonstrations or documented evidence of their platform's capability to secure and maintain enforceable single authoritative copies. Additionally, thoroughly understand how seamlessly and effectively their solution integrates with your organization's existing technology, infrastructure, and operational workflows to minimize disruption and maximize efficiency. Furthermore, inquire about their past performance in similar institutional contexts or request client testimonials to understand their level of expertise regarding uptime and regulatory compliance. FINAL THOUGHTS We've seen how the absence of an eVault provider with seamless integration and a clear digital trail can create problems. In one case, a client hadn't yet implemented an eVault when a backup servicing trigger event occurred. Without a secure system to house their loan collateral, they discovered that some assets had been double pledged. The bankruptcy court delayed the servicing transfer by 90 days to verify ownership—a delay that impacted portfolio performance and compromised investor confidence. If those assets had been stored in an eVault with enforceable single authoritative copies and a clear audit trail, the issue could have been resolved in minutes. In contrast, another client who had adopted an eVault was able to verify asset ownership instantly during a similar servicing transition. The presence of a secure, centralized system allowed them to execute the transfer without disruption. That speed and certainty helped preserve trust and minimize portfolio risk—underscoring how critical infrastructure is to maintaining control and integrity in structured finance. Infrastructure is the backbone of modern finance, and eVault technology can help to protect asset integrity, ensure compliance, and streamline financial operations. Ensure that you prioritize transparency, integration, scalability, and auditability when selecting your eVault provider. By making informed decisions today, you can establish trust, enhance efficiency, and position your institution for sustainable success in a digital-first future.

Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent walks out for taped interview with FOX 5
Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent walks out for taped interview with FOX 5

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent walks out for taped interview with FOX 5

The Brief Fairfax County Schools Superintendent Dr. Michelle Reid abruptly ended a taped interview with FOX 5 on Monday. Reid declined to address questions on ICE policy, a 2021 abortion investigation, and taxpayer-funded security. FOX 5 informed Reid of the topics in advance during a pre-interview discussion at John R. Lewis High School. FAIRFAX COUNTY, Va. - Fairfax County Public Schools Superintendent Dr. Michelle Reid cut her interview with FOX 5 short Monday, appearing unwilling to discuss certain topics as students headed back to class. Interview cut short What we know Topics FOX 5 sought to discuss included: FCPS policy on ICE agents appearing at schools, the Virginia State Police investigation into an alleged 2021 abortion matter at Centerville High School and parent frustrations that taxpayer dollars would be paying for private security for the Superintendent. This was not a secret to Dr. Michelle Reid. Dr. Reid spoke with FOX 5 Reporter Stephanie Ramirez prior to their interview, who informed the Superintendent about what our station was wanting to discuss. Ramirez had been covering Fairfax County Public Schools' first day back to school since 5:15 a.m. Monday, interviewing different guests throughout the morning shows. The station had an interview with Dr. Reid booked at a county high school for 9 a.m. The Superintendent and her team arrived about an hour early at our team's location at John R. Lewis High School in Springfield, Virginia. READ MORE: Fairfax County to add metal detectors at middle and high schools Topics flagged early It was there, about 30-40 minutes ahead of the slated interview, that a discussion was had with the Superintendent and a member of the FCPS communications team. They were informed of the topics wanted to be discussed live — and the topics wanting to be discussed in a taped interview to air at a later time. Since the Superintendent had arrived so early, an offer was made to do the taped portion before the 9 a.m. live hit. Dr. Reid responded that she thought it would be better to conduct the taped portion after her 9 a.m. live hit. Ramirez and Dr. Reid did discuss new updates for the school year, including the expanded cell phone policy and newly installed metal and weapons detectors at school entrances. Title IX dispute She also addressed the Department of Education's Title IX dispute with FCPS and other northern Virginia school districts. "I want to be clear that we believe we're following Virginia and federal law in this case," said Dr. Reid during the live interview, "And I also want to be really clear for our students, our staff and our families that we're going to provide a safe and supportive and inclusive school environment for each and every one of our students, including our transgender and gender expansive students." Asked about the FCPS response to the Department of Education and whether FCPS could lose funding, she replied, "So we did respond to the Department of Education last week, on Friday. And I also sent a note out to our community and our families in the community on Friday. So, we expect to have continuing conversations with the Department of Education, but we also believe that the federal funds, which have been approved by Congress, will continue to flow." When that time arrived for the taped interview, Dr. Reid abruptly announced she had to leave. She would not take any more questions and continued to claim she had a meeting to get to. The FCPS Spokesperson with Dr. Reid said there was a "communication error" and offered to work with FOX 5 on possibly booking an interview with the Superintendent at a later time. Monday, August 18, marks the first day of school for Prince William County, Alexandria City, Falls Church, and Fairfax County Public Schools—Virginia's largest school system, with over 181,000 students. In addition to the updates Dr. Reid discussed, FCPS is rolling out new bus technology that provides GPS routes to drivers, tracks bus locations in real time, and monitors which students board each bus, among other changes. The Source Information in this article comes from Fairfax County Public Schools. Solve the daily Crossword

Let Squash Die
Let Squash Die

Atlantic

time7 hours ago

  • Atlantic

Let Squash Die

A few sports at a few U.S. universities generate billions of dollars in total. The rest hemorrhage money. For decades, this was an easy circle for schools to square: The money from football and basketball was spent on sports such as squash, water polo, rowing, tennis, golf, and field hockey. But this system was monumentally unfair. The football and basketball players, disproportionately Black and poor, entranced millions of TV viewers and enriched their universities. Rather than compensating them, administrators turned around and spent much of the money subsidizing teams that go largely unwatched. Recent court cases have produced major policy changes: Star athletes can now be paid by advertisers, fans, and as of this summer, their schools. This has spooked those on the other side of the equation, whose sports are getting cut to free up money to pay the football players. 'That's not fair, you know?' Cochise Wanzer, the father of twin collegiate divers, told The Washington Post, after both of his sons lost their roster spots because of budget reductions. Yet allowing colleges to pay revenue-generating athletes is long overdue. If that means cutting the diving team because athletic budgets are finite, so be it. Saahil Desai: College sports are affirmative action for rich white students In the struggle of subsidized squash against the powerful forces of the free market, President Donald Trump has sided with the former. In an executive order signed late last month, he declared that 'opportunities for scholarships and collegiate athletic competition in women's and non-revenue sports must be preserved and, where possible, expanded.' (Whether he has the legal authority to enforce these requirements is, to put it lightly, unclear.) Protecting women's access to college sports is a matter of settled federal law—Title IX is interpreted to require equitable athletic opportunities for men and women. But blanket protection for nonrevenue sports, which Trump's order calls 'the backbone of intercollegiate athletics,' would help preserve an arbitrary status quo. If you're an excellent high-school-squash player, you might be admitted to a school that you would otherwise not get into, and that might pay for your tuition, even if your parents could have afforded it. (Student athletes come from disproportionately wealthy backgrounds, and many nonrevenue sports are distinctly upscale pastimes.) When you arrive, you'll be treated to expensive travel, fancy merch, and a get-out-of-class-free card. If you're equally good at chess or violin or oil painting, however, none of this is an option. Where does the money for nonrevenue sports come from? Revenue-generating sports put up some of the cost; the student body (or tuition-paying parents) tends to cover the rest. James Madison University, for example, is unusually transparent about this nonconsensual sponsorship agreement: Each student pays a mandatory $2,362 a year to support the university's athletics. In the race to secure applicants and alumni donations, colleges see this as money worth spending—and charging students for. But the usual rationales for most intercollegiate sports don't add up. If the goal is to promote school spirit, why does almost nobody go to the games? If the goal is to promote fitness, why not do so directly, rather than count on the tennis and lacrosse teams to set a good example? If the goal is teaching teamwork and resilience, why recruit and admit a special group of students to hoard these learning opportunities? From an academic standpoint, the traditional athletics program is a negative: According to NCAA figures, athletes typically spend 30 hours a week on their sports. Originally, college athletics were cheap and nonintensive. Some stronger-than-average Yale and Harvard students rode a train to New Hampshire in 1852 to face off in a rowing race, the first-ever intercollegiate sporting event. For a while, that system of athletic amateurism continued. Even today, a version of this system exists, known as club sports. As an undergrad, I played club soccer and club table tennis against teams from other colleges. We paid dues to help fund our modest operating costs—we had no coaches—and offered financial aid to students who couldn't afford those dues. Over the past 75 years, NCAA sports has become ever more professionalized. Football and men's basketball began to generate eye-watering sums of money, incentivizing colleges to invest more resources in them. Revenue generated by those teams subsidized the school's less popular teams. The roster of sports continued to expand as more and more women enrolled in higher education and schools added teams to comply with Title IX. To protect the 'amateur' status of the athletes, a rigid policing structure was created to make sure they never earned any money off their sports, no matter how much they generated for their universities. Not only could colleges not pay them, but the players couldn't accept any money or gifts as a reward for their athletic achievement. They couldn't charge to sign autographs or even accept complimentary meals from local restaurants when their 250-pound bodies got hungry. In the mid-2000s, the running back Reggie Bush was the best player on a football team that generated tens of millions of dollars for the University of Southern California. His Heisman Trophy and the team's national championship were stripped after the NCAA found out that marketing agents had bought him a $13,000 car, let his parents stay in an empty investment property, and paid for their airfare so they could watch him play. (His Heisman was reinstated last year.) Ohio State players were suspended for multiple games for, among other things, accepting discounts on tattoos. Reggie Bush went on to the NFL, but not every college sports star can go pro. The most egregiously unfair cases regarded the football players who were crucial to their juggernaut teams, never got paid for their work, and just barely missed out on a professional career. By contract, about 50 percent of NFL and NBA revenue goes to the players. At that rate, according to a 2020 National Bureau of Economic Research paper, college football players at the top 65 schools would have been paid about $360,000 a year, and basketball players about $500,000. Instead, for decades, they got nothing. This began to change in 2021. In National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston, the Supreme Court unanimously held that certain rules against athlete compensation violated federal antitrust law. Shortly thereafter, the NCAA allowed players to receive pay for the use of their name, image, and likeness. This dramatically shifted the economics of big-time college sports. Top players at major programs can now make millions of dollars in endorsement deals. 'Donors' eager to attract talent to their favorite team provide compensation to many other players, nominally in exchange for showing up at some events. A legal settlement approved in June gave athletes another way to cash in: Universities are now allowed to directly pay athletes, up to a total of $20.5 million a year per school. Because some schools will compensate revenue-generating athletes in order to attract top talent, other athletes fear they'll make room in the budget by cutting the teams that don't generate any revenue at all. This fear has been especially pronounced about women's sports, which typically generate less money, but Title IX ensures that any cut would affect men and women equally. In practice, universities that continue to field teams in their most lucrative men's sports would also maintain their most popular women's teams. Not every school will necessarily keep football and men's basketball in perpetuity—at many schools, even those sports have little following. Jemele Hill: Trump has a funny way of protecting women's sports Supporters of the existing system fear that the country will lose out if universities drop niche sports. In comments earlier this month, Trump noted that college sports are the primary training ground for American Olympians. But a negligible fraction of college athletes will ever compete in the Olympics, and many Olympic sports aren't played at the intercollegiate level anyway. Cuts to nonrevenue sports might be a good thing. Instead of giving admissions, scholarships, and resources to the best cross-country runners, for example, colleges could accept the most qualified applicants, spend money to provide them the best education, and offer financial aid to as many needy students as they can. Students would remain free to pursue hobbies, including sports. They just wouldn't be rewarded with scholarships and other benefits for doing so. Trump's order purportedly seeks to 'maximize the educational benefits and opportunities provided by higher education institutions through athletics.' Awarding scarce benefits and opportunities on the basis of talent in niche sports is one way to run an educational system, but it's not one worth preserving.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store