Access top AI tools in one spot with this $30 tool
Tired of constantly switching tabs while working with different AI models? 1min.AI unites them all in one convenient spot, and right now you can secure a lifetime subscription for just $29.97 (reg. $234) through June 1.
Each AI model has its own strengths, and it can be tough to keep up with their unique advantages. 1min.AI aims to make working with AI a whole lot easier by uniting them on one platform.
1min.AI gives you access to ChatGPT, Gemini, Midjourney, Mistral, and more in one spot. Whether you need to create an image for social media, whip up a blog post, or optimize your business's website, 1min.AI can do it all. (Just remember to give things a human once-over, as editing may still be required.)
This lifetime subscription lets you enjoy all the perks of these platforms at a one-time low price, with no subscription fees required. And aside from saving you money, it saves time since you won't have to switch between different AI services constantly.
This Pro Plan gives you 1,000,000 monthly credits, with an unlimited prompt library and storage. Curious about what a million credits can get you? You can generate 805,555 words, 161 images, or 12 videos with that amount. If you need more, earning free credits is easy by visiting the web app daily, referring a friend, or leaving a review.
Take advantage of all AI has to offer with 1min.AI, now only $29.97 (reg. $234) until June 1.
StackSocial prices subject to change.
1min.AI: Lifetime Subscription
See Deal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
41 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Imaginarium Labs Announces Launch of AI-Assisted Visual Writing Platform for Storytellers
Imaginarium Labs announces the launch of its all-in-one writing platform that enhances storytelling through AI-powered structure, visual planning, and creative control. United States, June 7, 2025 -- Imaginarium Launches Comprehensive AI-Enhanced Writing Platform Focused on Visual Story Development Imaginarium Labs has officially announced the release of its AI-assisted visual writing platform, marking a significant innovation in digital storytelling. Designed to transform the traditional writing experience, the new platform introduces a human-centered interface that blends creative autonomy with AI-enhanced planning and narrative structure. The announcement follows a three-year development cycle led by founder Alex Stanin and a focused team of engineers, designers, and AI specialists. Their mission was to build a product that allows storytellers to manage complex narratives, develop immersive worlds, and streamline their creative process—all without compromising artistic integrity. Stanin stated that the platform was born out of a personal struggle with fragmented writing tools and a desire to craft a single environment where imagination could flourish without distraction. Announcement of a New Creative Paradigm The official launch of the introduces what the company calls a 'visual narrative universe' for writers, authors, screenwriters, and collaborative teams. The platform provides a seamless space for outlining, drafting, character development, and formatting—offering visual tools to organize timelines, track themes, map relationships, and explore world-building with clarity. The announcement addresses a key challenge in modern storytelling: managing increasingly complex projects while maintaining creative momentum. The Imaginarium app offers a structured yet flexible approach, enabling users to plan and revise with the benefit of spatial design elements rarely found in writing platforms. The company confirmed that the Imaginarium App is now fully operational and open to the public. The tool includes dedicated modules for fiction authors, screenwriters, and multi-format creators developing content for television or digital media. AI-Assisted Storytelling With Human Control In response to growing debates around AI-generated content, Imaginarium announces its commitment to a writer-first AI model. The platform uses artificial intelligence to offer intelligent suggestions on pacing, dialogue, character consistency, and world logic—but it does not write the story. According to Stanin, the role of AI in Imaginarium is to reduce creative fatigue, not author the work. 'Our mission is simple,' said Stanin. 'We want writers to stay in full control of their narratives. The AI handles structure and repetitive tasks so creators can focus on storytelling.' The AI co-pilot is presented as an optional tool rather than a driver, reinforcing the company's position that storytelling is a human endeavor enhanced by technology, not overridden by it. All-in-One Toolkit for Novelists, Screenwriters, and Creative Teams With the official release, Imaginarium becomes one of the first platforms to integrate a full suite of creative tools under one architecture. This includes chapter planning, auto-formatting for screenplays, print-ready manuscript exporting, detailed location and character builders, and real-time team collaboration. Unlike conventional tools that specialize in one area of writing, Imaginarium announces support for the entire creative lifecycle—from ideation to final manuscript formatting. The platform's visual structure enables authors to view and interact with their content spatially, making it easier to identify narrative gaps or inconsistencies. The company has confirmed support for individual creators and collaborative teams, positioning Imaginarium as scalable for studios, co-writers, and development houses managing serialized content or franchise universes. Commitment to Ethical Technology and Creative Empowerment In its public launch announcement, Imaginarium Labs emphasized its ethical approach to artificial intelligence, prioritizing creative integrity over automation. All AI components within the platform are designed to assist rather than dictate, focusing on consistency checks, dialogue flow, and pacing improvements. The platform also distinguishes itself through its visual design philosophy. Story elements are not confined to text blocks or folders but are presented in interconnected maps, timelines, and networks that mirror how many creators think and plan. This approach is intended to foster deeper engagement with story mechanics and narrative cohesion. Strategic Development and Future Vision The company has announced ongoing investment in community engagement and educational resources. Plans include webinars, storytelling forums, interactive tutorials, and mentorship opportunities that connect users to industry professionals. Stanin confirmed that the company is actively gathering feedback from early adopters to inform feature enhancements and roadmap priorities. The goal is to evolve Imaginarium into a central creative hub for writers across mediums and skill levels. The launch announcement also included a call to action for writers looking to join a growing ecosystem committed to elevating their work through thoughtful design and intelligent support tools. About Imaginarium Imaginarium is a next-generation writing platform that merges visual planning, narrative structure, and AI-powered support to assist storytellers across genres and formats. Founded in 2022 by Alex Stanin, Imaginarium's mission is to provide creators with a distraction-free environment that promotes deep storytelling, collaborative development, and intuitive control over complex narratives. The platform is designed to serve novelists, screenwriters, world-builders, and creative teams seeking an integrated solution for story development. Media Contact Name: Alex Stanin Email: [email protected] Title: Founder Contact Info: Name: Alex Stanin Email: Send Email Organization: Imaginarium Website: Release ID: 89161858 Should any problems, inaccuracies, or doubts arise from the content contained within this press release, we kindly request that you inform us immediately by contacting [email protected] (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). Our dedicated team will promptly address your concerns within 8 hours, taking necessary steps to rectify identified issues or assist with the removal process. Providing accurate and dependable information is at the core of our commitment to our readers.
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's why the Scottish Mortgage share price is back at 1,000p
The Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust (LSE: SMT) share price has risen to £10 again in recent days. This means it's up nearly 50% over the past two years, and 23% since early April. Here, I want to look at what might have fuelled the recent turnaround, and whether it could continue. Scottish Mortgage's focus on disruptive companies more often than not leads it to the tech-packed US stock market, particularly the Nasdaq. Around 61% of the FTSE 100 investment trust's portfolio is in US stocks. Therefore, a recovery in share prices across the pond has underpinned Scottish Mortgage's short-term performance. The Nasdaq is now 28% higher than its April trough. That said, there have also been some notable jumps in a few key holdings. Latin American e-commerce giant MercadoLibre hit an all-time high in early June, as did audio streaming platform Spotify. Indeed, Spotify stock is now up 805% since the start of 2023! While the trust has been selling some Nvidia shares recently, it's still a significant holding (around 2.3% of the portfolio). And the AI chip king has also been on a hot streak, surging 51% since the April sell-off. It should also be noted that the FTSE 100 itself is now just a whisker away from a 52-week high — and therefore a new record. One key theme that Scottish Mortgage has invested in heavily is the digitalisation of global finance. It has called this one of 'the world's most transformative trends'. Key holdings here include MercadoLibre and Nu Holdings (Nubank) in Latin America, Affirm and Stripe (unlisted) in the US, and Sea Limited and Ant Group (unlisted) in Asia. Sea is up 61% this year, while Affirm has rebounded 62% since early April. Somewhat rarely for the trust, it does have a couple of UK-based fintechs in the portfolio. These are money transfer app Wise and neobank Revolut, which is private. The Wise share price jumped close to a record high this week after the firm posted strong annual results. Wise also said it intends to transfer its primary listing to the US, which will allow it to work towards inclusion in major US indexes. Whether the trust keeps rising in the near term is largely dependant on what the US market does. We know Trump's tariffs are hurting the global economy, so this is a risk to American corporate earnings and the value of Scottish Mortgage's portfolio. Investors in the trust need to be prepared to ride out sometimes stomach-churning periods of volatility. On the flip side, the global IPO market is warming back up again (though not in London, unfortunately). Revolut is reportedly preparing for a public listing that could value the company at over $45bn, while Ant Group might list in Hong Kong later this year. These massive IPOs could help boost Scottish Mortgage's net asset value (NAV), assuming they're well-received by investors. It would also help relieve worries about the true value of its unlisted assets. Either way though, I still think Scottish Mortgage shares are worth considering. They're currently trading at an 10.8% discount to NAV, which I think is attractive given the long-term growth potential of the portfolio. The post Here's why the Scottish Mortgage share price is back at 1,000p appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Ben McPoland has positions in MercadoLibre, Nu Holdings, Nvidia, and Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended MercadoLibre, Nu Holdings, Nvidia, Sea Limited, and Wise Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I tested 5 apps that detect AI writing — here's the one that beat them all, and the one that missed the mark
On the one hand, AI tools like ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and DeepSeek are incredibly useful when it comes to writing emails, summarizing content, and detecting tone in our writing. It's hard to imagine life before late 2022, when most of us discovered that ChatGPT can do some of the legwork when it comes to writing content. Need a cover letter? You can write one in five seconds, complete with a greeting and a summary of your work the other hand, AI slop is all around us. Prose written by a chatbot has a few telltale signs, such as a lack of originality and vague details. In this war of words, though, the AI bots are improving. You can ask ChatGPT to rewrite content so that it sounds more original and can avoid detection by apps like GPTZero. The war rages on, a true cat and mouse don't really know who is winning the war. If you're a student, writing content for your job, or even composing an email for a family reunion this summer, detecting AI writing is far easier than you might think — which might give you pause. For example, most professors in college now know how to run an AI detection service on your assignments. One popular tool — called GPTZero — uses a probability index to detect whether AI was involved in a piece of all of the AI detection apps work the same, though. I found there was one superior tool and one that missed the mark. For my tests, I used a sample chapter from a book I'm writing — I loaded an entire chapter into the five AI detection apps below. I also had ChatGPT write a cover letter for a fictitious job. I asked the bot to use some flair and originality, and to try to avoid AI detection. Lastly, I asked ChatGPT to finish this article for me — essentially, a 50-50 split between me and AI (e.g., something I'd never actually do).Here's how each AI detection tool fared on the three tests, including the big winner. I've used GPTZero many times, in part because the free version lets you detect a small amount of text without signing up for a subscription. For this review, I used the full Premium version that costs $23.99 per month and can do basic and advanced scans. With the advanced scan, GPTZero splits a long section of text into pages and rates the AI probability for each section. GPTZero did flag quite a few paragraphs with a 1% AI probability and a few sentences with a 5% AI probability rating. Yet, overall, the service worked remarkably I tested the cover letter written by ChatGPT, GPTZero really shone the brightest of all the apps. The service reported that it was likely 100% AI-written. The only issue is that there were some false flags, even with that overall rating. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. GPTZero labeled a few sentences as human-generated. When I had GPTZero scan my article that was 50% human and 50% AI, the service flagged it as 58% human — the most accurate of the AI detection apps. is a comprehensive tool that provides detailed detection results. The service costs $12.95 per month for the Pro plan with 2,000 credits. In the sample text from my book, Originality. AI quickly labeled my text with 100% confidence that it was all human-written — the only app that returned that correct result. That is reassuring, although the service did question a few sentences as AI-written even if it gave me an overall 100% confidence the ChatGPT cover letter test, reported that it was 91% human. That's because I asked ChatGPT to try and avoid the AI detection apps and write with flair, but a little troubling. In my test where I asked ChatGPT to finish this article, I was quite shocked. flagged the entire article as original with 100% confidence, even though only the first half was human. (When I asked ChatGPT to finish the article, it churned out some generic content even though I asked the bot to match the article style.) It seems was fooled by that trick even though it's likely a common practice, especially with students. Grammarly is designed primarily to help you write without errors and to avoid plagiarism, but it also includes a robust AI detector. I would say it is too robust. The interface for Grammarly is confusing since it flags plagiarism and AI writing at the same time. The app flagged the chapter of my book, saying '7% of your text matches external sources' which felt like a slap in the face. Come on! First, it isn't true, and second, that's discouraging. The app also said it did not detect common AI patterns in the writing, so that was a relief. Still, I didn't like the false flags. Grammarly is also expensive, costing $30 per month if you pay trick, asking ChatGPT to write a cover letter to avoid detection, proved quite effective — Grammarly said: 'Your document doesn't match anything in our references or contain common AI text patterns.' That was entirely incorrect, since the text was 100% AI-generated. The same result occurred when I fed the article that was 50% me and 50% AI — it said it was all human. Winston AI is another powerful and full-featured app, similar to in many respects. Scanning the sample chapter of my book, Winston AI gave me a 96% human score, which is fair. Unfortunately, like Grammarly, the service flagged some sections with only a 50% probability of human writing. In the middle section, Winston AI labeled two entire paragraphs as 100% AI written, even though they weren't. I tested the Winston AI Essential plan, which costs $18 per month but does not detect plagiarism; it's $12 per month if you pay annually. As for the cover letter, Winston AI was all over it. The service flagged the text as 100% AI written, although it suggested the second half of the letter might have been human-generated (suggesting a 48% probability as human). Fortunately, Winston AI also flagged my article correctly, saying there was a 46% chance of it being human-generated. The app flagged a middle section that was all AI-written, but missed the closing section (which was AI). Monica was my least favorite AI detection tool, but that's mostly because the service has multiple purposes — AI detection is just one feature. The app actually outsourced detection to Copyleaks. GPTZero, and ZeroGPT. For the book chapter, Monica flagged my test as 99% human but didn't provide any other guidance as far as feedback on specific detected the cover letter as 100% AI-written. That's not a surprise since GPTZero reported the same result, and Monica uses that same app. Monica had some serious problems detecting my article which was 50% human and 50% AI-generated. The service decided it was 100% human-generated and didn't flag the second half, which was AI-written.
