How Pakistan's military stacks up against India
India has launched military strikes against Pakistan, putting the two nuclear-armed neighbours on the brink of an all-out war.
The flare-up means that two of the region's largest militaries are again in face-to-face conflict.
The stand-off pits India, a global defence giant, against a country that may be much smaller, but is nevertheless heavily militarised and has dedicated a significant share of its resources to preparing for war.
As the world's most populous nation, India has one of the largest militaries, numbering around 1.4 million active service personnel, which include 1.2 million in the army, 60,000 in the navy and 127,000 in the air force. India also has 1.6 million-strong paramilitary forces and a reserve of 1.1 million.
The country is a defence expenditure heavyweight. Its defence spend reached £58 billion ($77.4 billion) in 2024, the second-highest outlay in Asia after China.
Members of the national cadet corps train in Kolkata, India - NurPhoto/Sudipta Das
Meanwhile, Pakistan's population is a fifth of the size and the country has been mired in an economic crisis for years.
Last year, Pakistan's defence budget was estimated to have been a 10th of that of its eastern neighbour.
Pakistan has become heavily militarised to fend off Indian control, which has come at great cost to its democracy.
The military exerts significant control over the civilian government, with Gen Syed Asim Munir, the head of the army, widely seen as the most powerful man in the country.
While India's military is increasingly deployed to face China, Pakistan has built up a defence posture and doctrine revolving almost entirely around India.
Pakistan fields a total of around 650,000 active service personnel, including 560,000 in the army, 23,800 in the navy and 70,000 in the air force. It also has 280,000-strong paramilitary forces, according to the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
In limited exchanges, such as those seen in the past 24 hours, Pakistan can punch above its weight, though analysts say that Delhi's numerical and economic superiority could come to bear very quickly in a full-blown war.
Pakistan has leaned heavily in recent years towards China for its arms, shifting away from more costly Western suppliers.
India has significant quantities of equipment from Russia, but has begun buying more from France and America.
On the battlefield, India is thought to have around 3,100 main battle tanks, including Arjun, T-72 and T-90 models.
Smoke rises after a missile strike by India against a target in Pakistan - PUNIT PARANJPE/AFP
Pakistan has around 2,500, which include Al-Khalid, T-80, T-54/55, Type-59/Al Zarrar, Type-69 and Type 85 models.
Each country also has a significant air force. India has a mixture including Dassault Rafale fighters, Sukhoi Su-30s and MiG-29s, MiG-27s and MiG-21s.
Pakistan has Chinese J-10s and JF-17s, as well as American F-16s, Mirage 3s and Mirage 5s.
The two countries may be closer to parity in their nuclear weapons.
An explosion in the western Indian state of Rajasthan during an air exercise - Manish Swarup/AP
India conducted its first nuclear test in 1974 and Pakistan became a nuclear power in 1998.
India has never declared the size of its nuclear armament, but one assessment places the country's stockpile at 160 nuclear warheads, according to the Centre for Arms Control and Nuclear Proliferation. These can be deployed in land-based ballistic missiles, submarine-launched missiles and aircraft with nuclear bombs and missiles.
Pakistan is estimated to have around 170 warheads and nuclear-capable ballistic missiles of varying ranges. The country can also launch the weapons from planes. In 2017, Pakistan test-fired a submarine-launched missile, though this is not yet thought to be ready for use.
Even a small nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan could kill 20 million people in a week, according to the Centre for Arms Control and Nuclear Proliferation.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
28 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
The Leverage Against China That the US Hasn't Used Yet
News Analysis The United States and China are locked in a war, experts are saying. It's not a war of bullets, but rather an 'unrestricted war' in almost every other strategic domain, including the economy, cyberspace, culture, and information. In many ways, the information war is key. It determines what people know, which then sets what they think. That, in turn, determines their actions in all other areas of the conflict. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) wages its information war on many levels, from seeding grand overarching narratives to tarring individual critics. In some areas, however, the regime lacks a counterargument. Some of its actions are so gruesome, the only option is to suppress the information, experts say. It's exactly these areas where the United States could mount severe, potentially fatal pressure on the regime—if willing to pursue them, several China experts told The Epoch Times. 'The darkest crime they're doing right now is organ harvesting,' said Sean Lin, former U.S. Army microbiologist and Epoch Times contributor. He is also a member of the independent group, Committee on the Present Danger: China. 'Maybe there are even darker crimes, more vicious, darker than organ harvesting. We don't know. And so the CCP is very afraid of this being further exposed, further recognized by the international community,' he added. The fact that the CCP was killing prisoners of conscience for their organs was first reported in 2006 by The Epoch Times based on whistleblower testimony. Since then, evidence of the crime has snowballed, resulting in an independent tribunal in the United Kingdom Related Stories 5/22/2025 5/14/2025 Still, to this day, no government has published the results of a formal investigation into the issue. 'Western governments did not take all this information seriously. They were still wishfully thinking that if we bring economic freedom to China, then eventually China will change its political system,' said Nan Su, a China commentator and senior editor with the Chinese edition of The Epoch Times. Three factors have changed that situation, he said. The COVID-19 pandemic showed China as irresponsible and malicious, blocking critical information that would have aided other countries in facing the disease. The undercutting of Hong Kong's independence in 2022 showed that China wouldn't honor its promise to preserve the island's separate political and legal system for 50 years. And finally, the CCP's support for Russia in the Ukraine war shows China siding with adversaries of the United States and Europe. In recent years, Congress passed several resolutions condemning forced organ harvesting in China, but 'none of them really had teeth,' Nan said. 'If the U.S. government was to really take this issue seriously, invest time and money into the investigation, that's something Beijing's leaders have always been afraid of happening.' The issue is, in fact, a 'key point' in the international confrontation with China as it allows the West to hold the CCP's feet to the fire, said Heng He, an expert on Chinese politics and Epoch Times contributor. (L-R) Robert Destro, former assistant secretary of state for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, Cheng Peiming, a Falun Gong practitioner who had his organs forcibly removed in China, and Dr. Charles Lee, forced organ investigator, speak during a press conference in Washington on Aug. 9, 2024. Madalina Vasiliu/The Epoch Times For issues such as unfair trade practices and military expansion, the CCP can just ignore the criticism. Even if the CCP invaded Taiwan or started a war with the Philippines, 'somebody can still defend China, find excuses for China,' he said. 'But for organ harvesting, nobody can,' he added. Rarely is there a matter so clear-cut as to allow one side to assume the unequivocal moral high ground, the experts suggested. 'The issue is whether the U.S. government has a strong will to do it, to expose it, to take action,' Lin said. 'The CCP now realizes that they are at a critical junction … because the current Trump administration has one of the strongest teams, you can say the most hawkish team against the CCP,' he added. The wheels are already in motion; last month the House The CCP is well aware of the historical precedent of the Holocaust, Lin noted. 'The CCP is really worried that their persecution of Falun Gong will become something like that,' he said. Shoot the Messenger Unable to explain the organ harvesting issue away, the CCP is trying to suppress the information by discrediting its victims, the experts said. As The Epoch Times previously 'They want to take down Falun Gong's reputation in the United States so the U.S. government would hesitate to collaborate with the Falun Gong group to expose CCP crimes,' Lin said. The CCP sees this issue as particularly urgent because it strikes at its constant source of insecurity—a lack of legitimacy, Heng He said. Dr. Sean Lin, former lab director of the viral disease branch at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. (Courtesy of The Epoch Times In the past, Chinese dynasties drew legitimacy from a divine mandate. In modern times, legitimacy usually stems from elections, said Heng. However, the CCP rejects both. With its revolutionary promises depleted after Mao Zedong's catastrophic Cultural Revolution in the '60s and '70s, the Party now uses economic growth as a source of pseudo-legitimacy. With the Chinese economy teetering from a massive real estate crash, insolvency in its off-the-books local government financing vehicles, a lack of foreign investment, and the trade war with the United States, the CCP is already facing significant challenges. Thorough exposure of its crimes could very well push the regime over the edge, Lin suggested. 'Even though the Chinese economy has a hard landing and crashes, as long as the CCP leadership is there, they may try to survive this harsh time. And the critical issue is that they still need to be somewhat legitimate to the world, to the Chinese people,' Lin said. 'If their crime against innocent Falun Gong practitioners inside China is fully exposed, nobody can accept such a government, and the CCP may even be disintegrated from inside.'
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tech transfer pledge steers Thailand to pick Sweden's Gripen warplane
CHRISTCHURCH, New Zealand — The Swedish government's offset package has proved decisive in Thailand's decision to purchase 12 Gripen E/F fighters in three phases. The economic and technology garnishes helped Saab's Gripen offer defeat its American F-16 Block 70/72 competitor. On June 4, the Royal Thai Air Force – or RTAF – held a press conference to announce it was buying more Gripens, with the deal accompanied by a generous package of technical support and offsets. When final offers were submitted last August, Saab had vowed, 'The Swedish proposal will ensure the best return on investment for Thailand that will exceed the contract value through a well-structured, long-term plan that covers key areas of critical technologies and national capabilities for Thailand.' Saab's offset package – equating to around 155% of the project's value – has proved especially appealing to a nation keen to boost its aerospace industry and self-sufficiency. 'The offset committee conducted negotiations with Saab concerning the defense offset proposal with the aims of maximizing benefits and complying with the policies of the government and the minister of defense,' the Thai air service said in a statement: A key element in Sweden's proposal is Thailand's unique, Saab-developed Link-T data link. Currently, only a handful of Thai aircraft and several warships are equipped with it. Bangkok now gains intellectual property rights for Link-T's unrestricted use and expansion. 'Saab will transfer Link-T development capabilities to the RTAF and local defense industry,' reads the service's statement. Link-T will enhance Thailand's ability to perform multi-domain operations. With the U.S. keeping tight control over its data links, Lockheed Martin's F-16 offer could not compete in this regard. Thailand's two Saab 340 airborne early warning aircraft will be upgraded, too, with Thai participation. Additionally, a local Gripen maintenance, repair and overhaul hub will be established. Furthermore, Thai companies will join the Gripen supply chain with opportunities to make components like tires, bearings, clamps and airframe parts. Training support covers 26 personnel, made up of six pilots, 18 maintainers and two support staff. From 2025-29, Saab will provide a mission support system for network-centric flight planning and training, plus a maintenance ground support system for logistics management and maintenance. Saab welcomed its selection, stating: 'In addition to Gripen E/F fighter aircraft and associated equipment, Saab's offer includes a long-term offset package. This will benefit the national security and strategic independence of Thailand, while also bringing new jobs and investments to a range of Thai society sectors.' Thai Gripen E/Fs will come with a Raven ES-05 radar, SkyWard infrared search and track, Arexis electronic warfare suite, a targeting pod and standoff weapon capability, Link-T, Meteor and IRIS-T missiles, and Targo helmet-mounted display. The initial batch comprises three single-seat Gripen Es and a twin-seat F, to be procured for 19.5 billion baht (nearly US$600 million) from FY2025-2029. Eight more Gripen E/Fs will be delivered through FY2034, replacing aging F-16A/B fighters in 102 Squadron. Thailand's aircraft choice followed a decision publicized on Aug. 27, 2024 that the Gripen had been nominated. Now with the selection approved, the air force said the procurement contract would be signed in August.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jerusalem marks Pride 10 years after murder of teenage marcher
Thousands of Israelis took to the streets under a heavy police presence for Jerusalem's annual Pride march Thursday, a decade after the murder of a teenager by a Jewish extremist during the same event. The fatal stabbing of 16-year-old Shira Banki on July 30 that year, in an attack that also wounded six others, prompted police to step up their surveillance of Pride festivities in Jerusalem in the years that followed. Thursday's march snaked through central Jerusalem, with participants carrying rainbow flags, placards and balloons, while a small group of anti-LGBT counter-protesters were also permitted to gather in a contained space nearby. "We mark 10 years since Shira Banki was murdered in Pride... which means that the Pride today is dedicated in her honour," Hadass Bloemendal, chairperson of the Jerusalem Open House for Pride and Tolerance, told AFP. Nadav Haruvi, Banki's former teacher, said it was especially important for him to come this year. "I come here every year, but this is actually the first time we're coming in an organised way as teachers from the school. And we understood that after a decade, we want to create a strong tradition for future generations of teachers," he said. Israeli President Isaac Herzog also attended the march, a statement from his office said, making him the first president to join the event since Banki's murder. "We came here to remember and remind, to honour the memory of a beautiful young Israeli girl who came to do good, Shira Banki, of blessed memory, who was murdered here 10 years ago," Herzog said, standing on the spot where Banki was killed. "Her only goal was to do good and spread light in the world," he said. "We must recognise a clear and unequivocal social principle: There is no place for violence, under any circumstances. There is no dialogue with violence. We will not accept violence in our society." Banki's killer had been freed from prison just weeks before the 2015 attack, having completed a sentence for a prior attack at the Pride march that wounded three people. He was later sentenced to life in prison for her murder. Opposition leader Yair Lapid joined the marchers on Thursday, telling journalists that "liberal Israel is here and here to stay, and we stand by our friends in the LGBTQ community, and we are marching together in favour of rights for everyone". The city has held an annual Pride march since 2002, often accompanied by counter-protests by far-right, religious groups. Israel has a large and influential LGBTQ community, despite homosexuality being rejected by conservative religious parties. While Israel does not register same-sex marriages itself, it recognises those conducted overseas. mib/reg/smw/dv
