Major storms on Jupiter can leave a fingerprint in the planet's atmosphere
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
It would appear that a really big storm on Jupiter can leave a noticeable mark in the planet's atmosphere.
A recent study tapped into data collected by the Jupiter-orbiting spacecraft Juno and the Hubble Space Telescope to start piecing together how this gas giant's storms churn up the world's atmosphere — even surprisingly far below the clouds. This churning involves the storms dredging up ammonia in some places and hurling it far into the Jovian depths as slushy hailstones in others.
The result, it appears, is that patches of ammonia gas end up buried deep in some parts of Jupiter's lower atmosphere, while other areas have far less ammonia than they normally would. In other words, some storms on Jupiter can leave behind a fingerprint, reworking the whole chemical makeup of the planet's atmosphere.
A huge storm on Jupiter broke out in December of 2016, just south of the planet's equator and about 60 degrees east of the famous Great Red Spot. Amateur astronomer Phil Miles was the first to spot this storm in February of 2017 — and the timing couldn't have been better.
Juno was about to make its fourth close flyby of Jupiter, and the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array here on Earth, along with the Hubble Space Telescope in orbit, were also pointed at the gas giant. This meant astronomers could see Jupiter in different wavelengths of light at the same time.
Armed with data from three observatories, University of California, Berkeley, planetary scientist Chris Moeckel and his colleagues just needed to figure out what kinds of updrafts, downdrafts and heat transfer could best explain what Juno, Hubble and ALMA saw during and after the storm. The team simulated the inner workings of Jupiter's atmosphere, which revealed that the massive storm had stirred up the planet's atmosphere dozens of miles below even the lowest-hanging cloud decks.
To understand exactly what that means, we first need to understand one of the quirks of describing the weather on Jupiter.
It's hard to measure altitudes in Jupiter's atmosphere, because the planet doesn't have a surface in the usual sense (there's liquid somewhere below all those deep layers of gas, but it's never been directly measured), so scientists rely on pressure instead. There's a level in Jupiter's middle stratosphere at which the atmospheric pressure is about the same as it is at sea level here on Earth, and that makes a useful baseline for saying how deep things are in Jupiter's atmosphere. The dense, heavy water vapor clouds where huge Jovian storms begin are about 82 miles (132 kilometers) below that level, where the air pressure is about 10 times higher than it is at sea level on Earth.
Furthermore, Juno's data suggests the lowest-hanging clouds present during the early 2017 storm loomed several miles lower than even that level — thus, in the storm's wake, the atmosphere had been stirred up deep, deep below the clouds.
Juno and Hubble images from 2017 showed a powerful updraft near the heart of the storm, pumping ammonia from deep within Jupiter's atmosphere and rushing it upward to the peaks of the towering storm clouds. Below that plume, Juno and Hubble saw that the updraft had "dried out" most of the ammonia from a patch of Jupiter's atmosphere stretching down at least tens of miles below the base of the storm clouds.
Wrapped around the bright spot of the updraft, darker patches shown in Juno's data mark where downdrafts carried a slushy mix of ammonia and water back down to the Jovian depths. And surprisingly, the ammonia was plunging much deeper into the atmosphere than Moeckel and his colleagues expected.
If the clouds in the early 2017 storm had just been raining big liquid droplets of ammonia, they shouldn't have been able to fall very deep into the atmosphere before the higher temperature and pressure evaporated the droplets — and the resulting gas wouldn't keep falling. It would just hang out, forming a new ammonia gas layer. But instead, the ammonia fell deeper — according to Moeckel and his colleagues' simulations, down to a depth where the pressure in Jupiter's atmosphere is about 30 times higher than that at sea level on Earth. That means the storm was most likely dropping down big, slushy mush balls of mixed water and ammonia.
Mush balls are a weird weather phenomenon on Jupiter that astronomers first pieced together (also from Juno data) a few years ago.
Related Stories:
— NASA's Juno probe sees active volcanic eruptions on Jupiter's volcanic moon Io (images)
— NASA's Juno probe spots massive new volcano on Jupiter moon Io
— Jupiter's volcanic moon Io may spew sulfur to icy neighbor Europa's surface
Ammonia stays liquid at much lower temperatures than water can, which means droplets of liquid ammonia can mingle with icy crystals of water in Jupiter's storm clouds. The resulting mix is a ball of slush just solid enough to stay together, but definitely mushier than, say, a hailstone; picture a wet snowball. And mush balls raining out of a storm could fall much faster than raindrops, so they'd make it much farther before succumbing to evaporation.
The result is that deep within Jupiter's atmosphere, there are patches of ammonia that fell as mush balls from storms raging dozens of miles above – and that ammonia will stay buried down there until the next big storm dredges it up.
The scientists published their work on March 28 in the journal Science Advances.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
10 hours ago
- New York Post
Microplastics in your food are contributing to these two health issues: study
You know microplastics are showing up in your take out containers and your junk food. But alarming fresh research indicates they're present in pretty much anything you consume — and the effects of these tiny particles are from far teeny. 3 New research raises red flags about what all that invisible plastic might be doing to the human body. molenira – Advertisement A new study in mice suggests that microplastics found in food and drink could be interfering with blood sugar levels and damaging the liver. Researchers at the University of California, Davis, found that animals who consumed polystyrene nanoplastics — the kind of plastic used in food packaging — developed glucose intolerance and signs of liver injury, two serious health issues that may have long-term consequences. Advertisement The findings — which were presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition on Sunday — raise red flags about what all that invisible plastic might be doing to the human body. 'With the growing concern around micro- and nanoplastic exposure, we wanted to evaluate the impact of this exposure on health,' lead author Amy Parkhurst, a doctoral candidate at UC Davis, said in a press release. Parkhurst and her team fed mice a standard diet spiked with a daily dose of polystyrene nanoparticles, mimicking the way people are exposed through food and drinks. 3 The study suggests that microplastics found in food and drink could be interfering with blood sugar levels and damaging the liver. – Advertisement The dose was chosen to reflect real-world human exposures — which could range from tens of thousands to millions of particles per year, according to previous estimates. Compared to their plastic-free peers, the mice that ate nanoplastics had trouble regulating blood sugar — a condition known as glucose intolerance, which can be a warning sign for diabetes. The plastic-dosed mice also had higher levels of a liver enzyme called ALT — a common marker for liver injury. 3 On top of that, the study found that the plastics made the gut more 'leaky,' allowing harmful substances to enter the bloodstream and potentially stress the liver even more. Crystal light – Advertisement On top of that, the study found that the plastics made the gut more 'leaky,' allowing harmful substances to enter the bloodstream and potentially stress the liver even more. While the findings come from mice, not humans, they add to a growing pile of research raising questions about how microplastics — which are now found everywhere from bottled water to seafood — might be affecting our health. 'We can't control for all the plastics the mice are exposed to,' Parkhurst noted, 'However, our study design allowed us to see dose-correlated changes since the nanoplastics-dosed group would have a higher exposure.' Parkhurst emphasized that more research is needed to understand how these particles affect people and whether they pose similar risks in the long term. Still, the message is clear: what's too small to see might not be too small to hurt.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Northern lights may be visible in these 23 US States tonight
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Northern lights could put on an impressive show tonight (June 1) as ongoing geomagnetic storm conditions may push auroras farther south than usual, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Earth is currently reverberating from a speedy coronal mass ejection (CME) impact that struck in the early hours of June 1, wreaking havoc on our planet's magnetic field — great news for anyone hoping to see the northern lights. Space weather forecasters from the U.K. Met Office predict frequent G1 to G2 level storming and occasional G3 and even G4 level storm intervals possible June 1-2. Read more: Aurora alert: Ongoing powerful geomagnetic storm could spark more northern lights across the US tonight The NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center predicts that the Kp index will peak at 7.67 over the next 24 hours. For an up-to-date breakdown of timings, check out NOAA's 3-day forecast. (Kp is a measurement of geomagnetic activity, with an index that ranges from 0 to 9; higher Kp indicates stronger auroral activity.) Aurora chasers, get those cameras charged, fingers crossed and your eyes firmly fixed on the skies! You can also keep up with the latest forecasts and geomagnetic storm warnings with our aurora forecast live blog. Alaska has the highest chance of seeing the northern lights tonight. If G3 or even G4 storm levels are reached, auroras could be visible at high-latitude states, including Michigan and Maine, according to NOAA. Below, we have listed all 23 states that appear either fully or in part above the possible view line for auroras tonight according to NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center. They are ordered most likely to least likely based on their proximity to the auroral oval's center and how much of each state is within or near the view line. But remember, auroras are fickle — sometimes they appear much farther south than predicted, and other times they barely show up at all. Many conditions have to align for the perfect display. Alaska Montana North Dakota Minnesota Wisconsin Michigan South Dakota Vermont New Hampshire Maine Idaho Washington Oregon New York Massachusetts Connecticut Rhode Island Nebraska Iowa Wyoming Illinois Indianna Pennsylvania If you find yourself in one of the 23 states forecasted to have a chance of seeing the northern lights tonight, head to a north-facing vantage point as far away from light pollution as possible. But as we approach the summer solstice on June 20/21, the window of darkness for observing northern lights is shrinking; the early morning hours around 1 and 2 a.m. might be the best time to try and see the northern lights. Interested in tracking space weather and knowing when and where to spot auroras? Download a space weather app that provides forecasts based on your location. One option I use is "My Aurora Forecast & Alerts," available for both iOS and Android. However, any similar app should work well. I also use the "Space Weather Live" app, which is available on iOS and Android, to get a deeper understanding of whether the current space weather conditions are favorable for aurora sightings. Editor's note: If you snap a great picture of the northern or southern lights and would like to share it with readers, send your photo(s), comments, and your name and location to spacephotos@
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google's AI push overshadowed by an awkward date error
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Google was all about AI at its annual I/O event last week. The tech giant wants its Gemini AI model everywhere and plans to put it in all of its devices. It also plans on bringing its AI into more of its services. One of those services getting the AI upgrade is Gmail. Over the course of the upcoming weeks, Gmail users will begin seeing AI summaries of their email, according to a blog post from Google. This summary will provide bullet points of what was in the email as well as any follow-up replies to make sure you're up to date. This feature will only be available on emails in English. Those who don't care for AI summarizing their correspondence can opt out of the feature, but it will be enabled by default. Google began instituting AI features into Gmail last year by having Gemini provide instant replies that no longer sounded generic. At the same time, Google is implementing new AI features, but some people have found the company's AI is far from perfect. A post on Reddit went viral earlier in the week when a screenshot of an interaction with an AI summary on Google Search was unable to determine what the current year was. And yet we can't turn this off from r/google In the screenshot, the individual did a Google search asking, "Is it 2025?" The AI summary they received apparently had issues with the question saying, "It is not 2025. The current year is 2024." Other people on X posted similar results. Wired did multiple tests over this prompt and confirmed the issue. In one case, the AI summary reiterated that it was 2024, but said that in parts of New Zealand and Russia, it was 2025. It even went on to contradict itself, saying that it was 2025 after claiming it was 2024. A Google spokesperson says it was working on the problem. 'As with all Search features, we rigorously make improvements and use examples like this to update our systems. The vast majority of AI Overviews provide helpful, factual information, and we're actively working on an update to address this type of issue,' Meghann Farnsworth, a Google spokesperson, told Wired. As of the publication of this article, Googling "is it 2025" returns with an AI summary saying, "Yes, according to the provided information, the current year is 2025." It remains to be seen if this problem will happen again in 2026. Google makes a bold pitch for an all-encompassing AI: "Project Astra" Google and XREAL announce Project Aura, XR smart glasses for Android An exclusive look at Google's NotebookLM app on Android and iOS