logo
How the EU is pushing back against fast fashion

How the EU is pushing back against fast fashion

Irish Examiner25-04-2025

The EU has just launched a probe into fast fashion giant Shein, while the European Commission is asking the company to provide information about the presence of illegal content and goods on its digital marketplace.
Fast fashion is the clothing industry business model where fashions go from the catwalk to mass consumption with unparalleled speed. In a world in climate crisis, how we choose to spend our money today has a direct impact on the lives of others. Buying cheap clothes that don't last is getting more and more difficult to justify.
Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Andrews is one of the co-negotiators of the EU's proposed Directive on Corporate Sustainable Due Diligence as well as the EU's Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles. He points out that Shein has been consistently criticised for its promotion of ultra-fast fashion and for its unwillingness to share details about its manufacturing practices.
'In years gone by,' he says, 'there used to be two fashion seasons a year: summer and winter. With Shein and the advent of ultra-fast fashion, there are now 52 seasons a year.
Fianna Fáil MEP Barry Andrews: 'The EU is currently working on a number of pieces of legislation protecting human rights and the environment in companies' supply chains.'
"This leads to unsustainable waste, the destruction of our environment and the inability of Irish and European companies to compete.'
You would think that not having to pay top dollar for top brands was a good development, but the race to the bottom has meant that production is concentrated in places of high poverty, low economic development and no protections for workers.
There are four million textile workers in Bangladesh, working for very low wages in over 5,000 factories. 85% of workers are women, and many of the factories in which they work are not up to standard.
The Rana Plaza factory in Bangladesh was so poorly built that it collapsed in 2013, killing 1,100 and injuring 2,500. This event garnered international headlines, but the truth is that hundreds of Bangladeshi workers have died in factory fires over the past decade.
'Shein is facing allegations of sourcing Uyghur-produced cotton,' says Mr Andrews, 'effectively using modern slavery and forced labour to produce their clothes at such a cheap cost. In addition to this, they are facing a number of lawsuits for blatantly copying other fashion retailer's designs as well as being one of the world's least transparent fashion companies.'
'The EU is currently working on a number of pieces of legislation protecting human rights and the environment in companies' supply chains.
We cannot and should not have products entering our market that were made by forced labour. I think that the government should pressure Shein into shining more light on their business model and ensure that consumers have more transparency about what they are buying.
"Human rights and environmental abuses should not be allowed in our shopping baskets.'
The other issue with these clothes is that they are produced in factories which are many thousands of miles from the western markets where we buy them. That means that huge amounts of carbon are burned to get them here. It's estimated that the fashion industry accounts for as much as 10% of global CO2 emissions – more than all international flights and shipping combined.
Environmental news outlet, EcoWatch says that dyeing clothes involves a 'toxic cocktail' of chemicals.
"Denim production alone is the second-largest polluter of fresh water on the planet. An estimated 70% of Asia's lakes and rivers are contaminated by over 2.5 billion gallons of waste from the textile industry, resulting in a massive ecological and public health crisis.'
The clothing industry also creates astonishing amounts of waste – an estimated 92 million tons per year. These clothes aren't designed to last, and recycling rates are abysmally low – less than 1%.
New rules
As Mr Andrews points out, legislatures are now turning to face this problem. In February, the EU Parliament and Council reached a provisional agreement on new measures to prevent and reduce waste from food and textiles across the EU.
According to the deal, EU countries would have to establish producer responsibility (EPR) schemes, through which producers that make textiles available in an EU country would have to cover the costs for their collection, sorting and recycling.
That's the good news. The bad news is that under the terms of this deal, they don't have to do this until two-and-a-half years after the directive comes into force. So a great deal more waste will be generated before we can expect an effective legislative response.
The new rules would cover products such as clothing and accessories, footwear, blankets, bed and kitchen linen, curtains, hats. We're also seeing pushback against fast fashion by consumers anxious to do the right thing and not become part of the problem.
Turning the tide
Fashion Revolution was set up in the aftermath of the Rana tragedy in 2013 with the aim of turning the tide on fast fashion and finding alternative ways of running the clothing industry. This is their vision: "A global fashion industry that conserves and restores the environment and values people over growth and profit."
Oxfam Ireland offers an ethical and transparent stock solution tailored to the needs of clothing industry businesses. By collaborating with Oxfam, manufacturers and retailers increase their collective impact and influence by extending the life of their product and diverting from landfill and/or incineration. The charity also offers a free collection service for excess stock across the Island of Ireland and most European countries.
The Ethical Consumer organisation offers these tips to help turn your back on fast fashion:
1. Make a second-hand pledge. Buy only second-hand for a year. Traid, an organisation working against fast fashion encourages people to commit to sourcing a chosen percentage of their wardrobe second-hand rather than buying new.
2. Upcycle. Instead of throwing clothes away, adapt them. Or buy second-hand and alter them to fit you.
3. Swap clothes with friends, or lend them if you don't want to part with them permanently. Have a clothing-swap party.
4. Clear out your wardrobe. If you haven't worn something for a year, bring it to a charity shop or find some other way of giving it a new home.
5. Limit the number of items you have. Project 333 suggests wearing just 33 items for 3 months, and the Capsule Wardrobe Challenge is to never own more than 37 items.
6. Look after your existing clothing. Even if we love our clothes, we often replace them once they lose their shape, get holes or go bobbly. By buying higher quality clothes and washing them at a lower temperature (30 degrees) and less often, they last longer.
Read More
European Union launches probe into fashion website Shein

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dozens of politicians' print requests refused, including 2,000-page document for Simon Harris
Dozens of politicians' print requests refused, including 2,000-page document for Simon Harris

The Journal

time12 minutes ago

  • The Journal

Dozens of politicians' print requests refused, including 2,000-page document for Simon Harris

TDS AND SENATORS have had dozens of print jobs refused by the Oireachtas over the last few years. Politicians at Leinster House are entitled to have tens of thousands of items printed for free every year to help promote their work. However, a strict policy is in place that covers only 'parliamentary duties' and not material related to elections, political parties, or fellow candidates. Between 2022 and 2024, a total of 125 print jobs were rejected by the Oireachtas for a variety of different reasons. Records released under FOI show that Fianna Fáil were behind more than half the refused batches – 67 in total. Fine Gael had 22 print jobs refused, Labour 11 and Sinn Féin 8; there were also lower numbers recorded for other smaller groupings or Independents. High-profile political figures were among those who had printing rejected with three jobs refused for Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers. Little detail was provided on the reasons why, with Oireachtas records simply saying they were not in line with the 'service level agreement.' Both Tánaiste Simon Harris and Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan had a single print job refused. Harris' 2,000-page-print job was rejected as outside the bounds of the 'service level agreement' while Mr O'Callaghan's newsletter was declined due to 'overtelectioneering.' Advertisement Former Taoiseach Leo Varadkar also had a 5,000-batch constituency update refused during 2023 – it was simply marked 'rejected' in the Oireachtas files with no further information provided. There were other reasons for refusal too with one newsletter denied because it breached rules about the promotion of a business. A note said this was based on: 'Material which is or could be construed as being related to or promoting a private commercial endeavour, for example a newsletter which promotes, whether directly or indirectly, a company, business or product.' Another was refused because it was considered to be promotion of a political party. It said that was covered by rules covering a ban on 'political party/independent members' corporate material e.g. headquarter type printing, such as application forms for party membership; material which is either directly or indirectly aimed at party fundraising; information notes to party members.' Other jobs were rejected for more banal reasons including faulty file types, defective documents, and one case where a senator exceeded their monthly printing allowance. One job for a batch of 1,500 printed leaflets was refused because it contained information on an upcoming referendum. A note on the file said: 'It is the responsibility of the members and qualifying political parties to ensure that items printed in the printing facility that could be said to be designed to influence voters on how to vote in a Referendum are not distributed after the passage of a [bill].' Fianna Fáil's John Lahart, who had four separate jobs refused, said: 'I don't remember the specific ones offhand, but it often relates to materials about councillors. 'We have had generic material sent back and generally where that might be about the Fianna Fáil team in our area and they would have come back and said that wasn't allowed.' Under Leinster House's printing policy, jobs can also be declined where they have information that could be considered a crime or encouraging others to commit a crime. However, there were no refusals under that section according to the documents that were released. Asked about the records, the Oireachtas said it had no further comment to make. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Gerry Adams to donate €100,000 from BBC defamation trial to Irish language and Palestinian charities
Gerry Adams to donate €100,000 from BBC defamation trial to Irish language and Palestinian charities

Irish Independent

time21 minutes ago

  • Irish Independent

Gerry Adams to donate €100,000 from BBC defamation trial to Irish language and Palestinian charities

Mr Adams took the BBC to court over a 2016 episode of its Spotlight programme, and an accompanying online story, which he said defamed him by alleging he sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson, for which he denies any involvement. Last Friday, a jury at the High Court in Dublin found in his favour and awarded him €100,000 after determining that was the meaning of words included in the programme and article. The BBC will also have to pay Mr Adams's legal costs. During an eight-minute video posted on the official Sinn Féin YouTube channel, Mr Adams accused the BBC of showing 'arrogance' when it did not resolve the dispute after he issued legal letters nine years ago. In Putting Manners On The BBC – The Gerry Adams Blog, Mr Adams said that the BBC has been held accountable for the content it broadcasts. Mr Adams said: 'As for the money that the jury awarded me in damages, I will donate this to good causes. 'These will include the children of Gaza, groups in Ireland involved in helping the homeless, Cumann Carad, the Irish language sector and other projects like this in west Belfast. 'When the case began six weeks ago, the BBC's legal strategy was evident very quickly. Their narrative was that pursued by successive British and Irish governments for years. 'They blamed everything during the conflict on Irish Republicans and by extension, during this trial, on me. 'The BBC lawyers embarked on a Jesuitical presentation of the case that tried to convince the jurors that the words broadcast and published by the British Broadcasting Corporation, that I had sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson, did not, in fact, mean that I sanctioned the murder of Denis Donaldson. ADVERTISEMENT 'They were, they said, that's the British Broadcasting Corporation, not defending the truth of the accusation. 'Instead they were defending, they claimed, their journalism, which they said was fair and reasonable, in the public interest and made in good faith. 'They concluded their case by trying to exert moral pressure on the jurors by claiming that a defeat for the British Broadcasting Corporation would be a blow to freedom of speech and a setback to victims. 'In the end the jury didn't buy in to any of this. 'On all the key issues the jurors unanimously accepted that the script used by the Spotlight programme did mean that I had sanctioned and approved the murder of Denis Donaldson.' He said that after the BBC's decision to air the Spotlight programme, he decided to sue the broadcaster. Mr Adams said the BBC could have resolved the dispute there and then. 'They chose not to. Why? That's a question to be asked. Why did they not resolve this issue when they could have? 'Was it arrogance? Yes, that's part of it. But I also suspect political interference. 'In January, the British Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to a decision in the High Court in Belfast, which included that I and, by implication, up to 400 other former internees, were wrongfully detained and that we were entitled to compensation. 'Mr Starmer told the British Parliament that he would look at every conceivable way to block compensation being paid.' Mr Adams also urged the Minister for Justice Jim O'Callaghan to met Denis Donaldson's family. He signed off by saying 'slan agus tog go bog e', which means goodbye and take it easy. Earlier this week, the BBC was granted time to consider appealing against the jury's decision. The broadcaster was granted a stay on paying the full costs and damages to allow it time to consider whether to lodge an appeal. The stay was subject to paying half the damages €50,000 and €250,000 towards solicitors' fees.

US trade deficit plummets in April
US trade deficit plummets in April

Business Post

time23 minutes ago

  • Business Post

US trade deficit plummets in April

US President Donald Trump has said he is 'very disappointed' following Elon Musk... Corporation tax receipts dropped 30 per cent in May amid major uncertainty arising... Solidroad, an Irish start-up founded by former Intercom employees, has raised $6.5... TikTok has been granted a temporary pause on a decision by the Irish Data Protection... DUBLIN The Iseq All Share closed in the green Thursday evening, up nearly 2 per cent... US stocks edged higher on Thursday after the call between US President Donald Trump... Money20/20 – which bills itself as the world's 'leading, premium content, sales...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store