
Inside the cheapest three-bed houses to buy in YOUR area – prices start at just £45,000
JUST when you thought it couldn't get any harder to buy a home, house prices have hit a new record.
Rightmove said the average house price hit £379,517 earlier this month, with demand up by 3% compared to last year.
24
This may seem out of reach for many buyers, as even a 5% deposit would require saving over £18,976.
For those aiming for a 10% deposit to secure a lower mortgage rate, the savings needed would soar to an eye-watering £37,951.
However, for hopeful homeowners without a hefty savings pot, there are still properties out there that won't cost a fortune.
With the help of Rightmove, we've unearthed the cheapest three-bedroom homes across the UK's nine regions, with prices starting at an incredible £50,000.
To keep things fair, we've focused on freehold properties.
This means you'd own both the building and the land outright, avoiding the steep service charges and ground rent often associated with leasehold properties.
It's worth noting, though, that properties at this price point often come with their own challenges and may require significant renovation work.
Getting a survey done before purchasing is crucial, as it can help you avoid unexpected repair costs and give you a clearer idea of the investment needed to bring the property up to standard.
Plus, don't forget to budget for extra expenses such as legal and valuation fees, which will require some extra cash in the bank.
Best schemes for first-time buyers
North East: Peterlee, Durham - £45,000
5% deposit: £2,250
10% deposit: £4,500
24
24
This three-bedroom house in County Durham is available for £45,000.
Situated on Thirteen Street in Peterlee, this terraced property boasts spacious living areas and a low-maintenance courtyard, making it an appealing prospect for buyers.
The freehold home features a large kitchen and a downstairs bathroom, presenting an excellent opportunity as a starter home or an investment.
However, it's worth noting that the property will require some internal and external renovation.
Northern Ireland: Tempo, County Fermanagh - £58,000
24
24
Located in a desirable village centre, this three-bedroom semi-detached house offers an exciting renovation opportunity for builders, developers, or landlords.
This three-bedroom house in Tempo, County Fermanagh is available for £58,000.
With a rear yard, outbuilding, and spacious rooms, this property offers significant potential, but requires a full renovation and currently has no heating system.
North West: Blackpool - £59,950
5% deposit: £2,998
10% deposit: £5,995
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Blackpool is available for £59,950.
Requiring modernisation throughout, this three-bedroom mid-terraced house presents a rewarding opportunity for renovators or first-time buyers.
Boasting spacious living areas, a dining kitchen, and proximity to local shops, the property offers significant potential to create a desirable home or investment, and is offered with no chain.
It also comes with UPVC double glazing and gas central heating.
Scotland: Brechin, Angus - £60,000
5% deposit: £3,000
10% deposit: £6,000
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Angus is available for £60,000.
Nestled in the heart of Brechin, this three-bedroom townhouse offers a fantastic minor renovation project for those seeking to create their own dream home.
Located in a conservation area and part of a C-listed building, the property boasts spacious rooms, traditional features, and a garden with a carport, presenting a unique opportunity for a buyer with vision.
Yorkshire and the Humber: Saltburn-By-The-Sea - £60,000
5% deposit: £3,000
10% deposit: £6,000
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Saltburn-By-The-Sea is available for £60,000.
Located in the popular Queen Street area of Carlin How, this three-bedroom mid-terraced house presents an ideal investment for first-time-buyers.
Benefitting from gas central heating, double glazing, and a rear yard, this property requires minimal immediate work.
This also makes it an attractive option for landlords seeking a hassle-free addition to their portfolio.
What help is out there for first-time buyers?
GETTING on the property ladder can feel like a daunting task but there are schemes out there to help first-time buyers have their own home.
Lifetime ISA - This is another Government scheme that gives anyone aged 18 to 39 the chance to save tax-free and get a bonus of up to £32,000 towards their first home. You can save up to £4,000 a year and the Government will add 25% on top.
Shared ownership - Co-owning with a housing association means you can buy a part of the property and pay rent on the remaining amount. You can buy anything from 25% to 75% of the property but you're restricted to specific ones.
Mortgage guarantee scheme - The scheme is open to new 95% mortgages until June 30, 2025. Applicants can buy their first home with a 5% deposit, it's eligible for homes up to £600,000.
Wales: Treharris, Taff Bargoed Valley - £70,000
5% deposit: £3,500
10% deposit: £7,000
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Treharris, Wales is available for £70,000.
Located in the heart of the town, this three-bedroom, three-storey mid-terrace house offers a blank canvas for ambitious renovators and developers.
With spacious rooms, original features, and good transport links, this property is ripe for modernisation, offering the potential to create a dream home, a profitable resale, or a valuable rental investment.
West Midlands: Goldenhill, Stoke-on-Trent - £75,000
5% deposit: £3,750
10% deposit: £7,500
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Goldenhill, Stoke-on-Trent is available for £75,000.
This spacious terraced home offers a fantastic opportunity for buyers seeking a project to put their own stamp on, ideal as a starter home or buy-to-let investment.
Requiring refurbishment throughout, the property features two generous reception rooms, a rear yard, and convenient access to local amenities and transport links.
East of England: Lowestoft, Suffolk - £90,000
5% deposit: £4,500
10% deposit: £9,000
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Lowestoft, Suffolk is available for £90,000.
This Victorian mid-terrace house, located within walking distance of the town centre and train station, presents a rare opportunity to add value in a sought-after location.
Boasting classic period features, generous room proportions, and a rear courtyard, this property offers a perfect canvas for modernisation.
East Midlands: Boston, Lincolnshire - £95,000
5% deposit: £4,750
10% deposit: £9,500
24
This three-bedroom end-of-terrace house in Boston offers a convenient town centre location and the added benefit of being sold with no onward chain, making it an attractive option for investors or first-time buyers.
Situated on a no-through traffic road, within easy reach of amenities and transport links.
This promises a quick and straightforward purchase.
What types of mortgages are there?
IF you're looking to buy your first home, there's a few things you should be aware of.
For starters, you'll need to decide whether to go for a fixed-rate mortgage or a tracker mortgage.
Fixed-rate mortgages are much more popular as they offer the stability of a fixed monthly payment that doesn't change.
You'll pay the same interest rate for a set number of years, and it won't change regardless of what happens to the Bank of England's base rate.
Generally lenders offer two or five-year fixed-rate mortgages, but terms of three, seven, 10 and even 15 years are also available.
At the end of your fixed period, you will need to remortgage.
If you don't, you'll be moved to your lender's standard variable rate (SVR), which is usually much more expensive.
Meanwhile tracker mortgages "track" the Bank of England's base rate plus a set percentage.
Given the base rate is currently 4.25%, if you have a tracker mortgage which is "base rate plus 1%" then your rate will be 5.25%.
Your monthly repayments will likely go up if the base rate goes up, but they should also go down.
Bear in mind, though, that some tracker mortgages come with a "collar" which means the rate can only fall to a set level.
South West: Chard, Somerset - £100,000
5% deposit: £5,000
10% deposit: £10,000
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Chard, Somerset is available for £100,000.
Located just off Chard town centre, this three-bedroom Grade II listed property offers ample living space and huge potential for refurbishment.
This freehold property boasts three reception rooms, two first-floor bathrooms, and an enclosed rear garden
South East: Dover, Kent - £160,000
5% deposit: £8,000
10% deposit: £16,000
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Dover is available for £160,000.
This charming three-bedroom home, spread across three floors on Clarendon Street, offers a well-considered layout and ample space for comfortable living.
Complete with a low-maintenance garden and a garage at the rear, this property provides ample space and practical living solutions for families or those seeking a comfortable home.
This property is move-in ready, although it could benefit from some interior updates.
London: Dagenham - £350,000
5% deposit: £17,500
10% deposit: £35,000
24
24
This three-bedroom house in Dagenham is available for £350,000.
"Located down a quiet walkway with easy access to amenities, schools, and transport links, this three-bedroom semi-detached house offers a practical and convenient lifestyle.
Featuring a spacious living and dining room, a modern kitchen with utility room, a ground-floor W/C, and newly decorated interiors, this property offers comfort and convenience in a desirable location.
How to get the best deal on your mortgage
IF you're looking for a traditional type of mortgage, getting the best rates depends entirely on what's available at any given time.
There are several ways to land the best deal.
Usually the larger the deposit you have the lower the rate you can get.
If you're remortgaging and your loan-to-value ratio (LTV) has changed, you'll get access to better rates than before.
Your LTV will go down if your outstanding mortgage is lower and/or your home's value is higher.
A change to your credit score or a better salary could also help you access better rates.
And if you're nearing the end of a fixed deal soon it's worth looking for new deals now.
You can lock in current deals sometimes up to six months before your current deal ends.
Leaving a fixed deal early will usually come with an early exit fee, so you want to avoid this extra cost.
But depending on the cost and how much you could save by switching versus sticking, it could be worth paying to leave the deal - but compare the costs first.
To find the best deal use a mortgage comparison tool to see what's available.
You can also go to a mortgage broker who can compare a much larger range of deals for you.
Some will charge an extra fee but there are plenty who give advice for free and get paid only on commission from the lender.
You'll also need to factor in fees for the mortgage, though some have no fees at all.
You can add the fee - sometimes more than £1,000 - to the cost of the mortgage, but be aware that means you'll pay interest on it and so will cost more in the long term.
You can use a mortgage calculator to see how much you could borrow.
Remember you'll have to pass the lender's strict eligibility criteria too, which will include affordability checks and looking at your credit file.
You may also need to provide documents such as utility bills, proof of benefits, your last three month's payslips, passports and bank statements.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
22 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges. Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States. 'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement. 'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.' Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal. Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.' UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry. Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion. 'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.' Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs. Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.' When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.' The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing. An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher. Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher. 'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US. 'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods. 'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change. 'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'


North Wales Chronicle
22 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Steel industry braced for 50% Trump tariff despite UK-US deal
Downing Street would not say on Tuesday whether British steel exporters would be hit with 50% tariffs from the US from Wednesday, despite an agreement to eliminate the charges. Last week US President Mr Trump announced he was doubling tariffs on the imports of steel from 25% to 50%. The UK struck a deal with Washington for import taxes on its steel to be removed weeks ago, but its implementation has not been finalised. The steel industry is working on the understanding that the sector will be impacted by the new rules and the 50% levy will likely affect UK steelmakersfrom Wednesday. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds was due to meet US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris on Tuesday. Asked whether it was 'embarrassing' that steelmakers could face a worse situation despite the announcement of the deal last month, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'I'm not going to get ahead of announcements for the United States. 'But what you've seen so far is the US and the UK agree a landmark deal across sectors to protect British industries – cars, steel, aluminium – and you've seen the welcoming statements the industries have made in support of the agreement. 'When it comes to implementation of the agreement, that work is ongoing.' Number 10 later insisted that Mr Trump would keep his word on the UK-US deal. Asked if Mr Trump could be trusted, a No 10 spokesman said: 'Yes, absolutely. We have a very close relationship with the US. I think that's reflected in the fact that this deal has been signed, and that it is, as we've said before, the first of its kind.' UK Steel has previously said the tariff announcement is a 'body blow' for the industry. Director general Gareth Stace said: 'The deal that the Prime Minister and President Trump struck just a few short weeks ago is yet to be finalised, so this doubling of tariffs plunges the UK steel industry further into confusion. 'Uncertainty remains as to whether and when our second biggest export market will be open for business or is being firmly shut in our faces.' Meanwhile, a Tata Steel director told the Business and Trade Committee on Tuesday that the UK 'absolutely' needs to go faster in supporting the steel industry in response to US tariffs. Russell Codling, director of markets, business development and commercial services at Tata said: 'It is not just for us making sure that this deal (with the US) is the right deal, it is also about making sure that the trade protection measures are the appropriate ones in the UK, and they are at least as good as other trading partners around the world.' When asked if the UK needs to go faster on the issue, Mr Codling said: 'Absolutely.' The same committee also heard from leaders in other sectors that have been affected by the tariff arrangements, including car manufacturing. An industry figure told the MPs that motoring firms would 'of course' like the 100,000 quota for a 10% tariff on car imports into the US to be higher. Murray Paul, public affairs director at Jaguar Land Rover said: 'Of course we'd prefer for it to be higher. 'But I think if we're honest it's there or thereabouts what the current market volume is of producing from the UK into the US. 'We are expectant that it's administered fairly, that if there's a small amount of pain that that is distributed equally amongst British manufacturers of goods. 'Obviously, we would like it to grow in the future because we think there's a growth opportunity in the US market as the incredible cars that we produce in this country are admired around the world.' A Government spokesperson said: 'Ministers and officials have worked tirelessly to ensure that the UK was the first country to secure a trade deal with the US, helping us deliver on the Plan for Change. 'The Government is engaging intensively with the US to implement the Economic Prosperity Deal that we agreed on May 8 at pace, including on steel and aluminium, and will update on progress in due course.'


Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
If defence is Starmer's ‘first priority', why is he allowing an invasion of illegal migrants?
In the week that the Prime Minister vowed to increase defence spending and solemnly averred, 'My first priority is the safety and security of the British people', the British people scratched their heads and gestured crossly in the direction of their southern coastline. 'Hang on, Keir,' they muttered. 'What about those 1,195 men from God-knows-where who broke into our homeland on Saturday to access the all-you-can-sponge benefits buffet that's 15,000 of the blighters this year so far, a record. How are you making us safe and secure?' You could tell the PM thought he was making a historic speech; the hair gel gets heavier and greasier along with the sententious, slippery phrases. It didn't help that he was speaking at the Govan shipyards in front of a group of workers who appeared to have been taken hostage during their break, wrestled from their Twixes and builder's tea to provide a stirring backdrop for this tinpot authoritarian dictator. All credit to the Scots, they looked either bored or openly hostile. Samuel Johnson's observation that 'patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel' never rang truer. A hugely unpopular Labour leader, who acts against the national interest at any given opportunity, was suddenly asking the country to pull together because his party risks coming a humiliating third, behind Reform UK, in the Hamilton by-election on Thursday. Don't get me wrong. I welcome any rise in funding for our beleaguered armed forces, but the PM's promise to make the UK 'a battle-ready, armour-clad nation' sounded absurd. Not least because he called committing to spending 3 per cent of GDP an 'ambition' when highly-respected generals (and now Nato) say 3.5 per cent on defence is the bare minimum. The damage has already been done as a result of years of underinvestment, lack of purpose, partly through constant change of leadership in all three services, lack of political will and an increasing number of civil servants without any military experience who hold down jobsworth appointments resisting change and threats to their position. But it wasn't just the lack of a firm financial commitment that felt evasive. Starmer avoided any mention of the clear and present danger, which is by far the biggest threat to our national security. There are currently more illegal male migrants of fighting age in the UK than there are soldiers. The British Army, once among the world's best, is now 71,000-weak and can no longer put an armoured division in the field, yet the state somehow finds a stupefying £8 million a day to place 'asylum seekers' in pleasant hotels beyond the means of any squaddie. The 1,200 invaders who came ashore on just one day last weekend are roughly the equivalent of two infantry battalions. One estimate has numbers reaching 50,000 by the end of the year, although if we have a good summer, it could be much worse. It's frightening. To add to the jeopardy, in 2020, MI5 said that nine-tenths of the 43,000 suspects on its terror watchlist were jihadists. More potential terrorists from Iraq, Iran, Syria and North Africa are ferried ashore every hour by the RNLI and Border Force; they are so busy transporting unwanted arrivals that last week they asked trawlers for help. (When Keir Starmer promised to 'stop the boats', little did we realise the boats he planned to stop were British fishing boats! The PM sold our fishermen out to the French as an incentive to prevent migrant dinghies setting sail. Curiously, for our 500 million quid, the numbers being 'prevented' are going down not up. Tant pis, Monsieur Keir!) If you or I were the prime minister or home secretary, the numbers above would be giving us sleepless nights. Who knows, maybe Keir Starmer in the wee small hours frets a little that the multicultural experiment is fast approaching breaking point and no amount of jailing 'far-Right thugs' like Lucy Connolly or clamping down on free speech is going to keep a lid on civil unrest. I doubt it somehow. It is an article of faith for the Left that Western countries have no moral right to control their borders and keep out unfortunate people from supposedly exploited places. In 1988, Starmer even said that 'a racist undercurrent… permeates all immigration law'. Nowadays, living in fear of Farage's turquoise tsunami, the hypocrite tweets: 'You have every right to be angry about small boat crossings. I'm angry too.' You have every right to be angry about small boat crossings. I'm angry too. We are ramping up our efforts to smash the people smuggling gangs at source. Hundreds of boats and engines: seized. Illegal working raids: up. Almost 30,000 people: returned. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 2, 2025 Don't believe him. Sir Keir is a member of that human rights legal elite who have set themselves up as defenders of the international 'rules-based order', rejoicing in their principled stand against their less enlightened and bigoted countrymen. (That's us, folks.) Irreversible change to the population and culture of our country is not an accidental by-product of their love for open borders; they won't rest until every last vestige of despised Britishness and patriotic feeling is erased. No one better personifies that sanctimonious, canting breed than Sir Keir's old mucker Attorney General, Lord Richard Hermer. Last week, Lord Hermer caused uproar when he said that politicians threatening to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) were basically Nazis 'echoing 1930s Germany'. It is that very same wretched ECHR which all the human rights zealots love to exploit. Immigration judges regularly place some Islamist maniac's right to a family life above the right of British people not to be blown up, or raped, successfully blocking the deportation of thousands of dangerous foreign criminals. Imagine hating your country so much that you dedicate your life to representing those who hate it even more. Gerry Adams, Shamima Begum, five brutes linked to al-Qaeda – all were represented by Lord Hermer. So I was disgusted, but not surprised, when The Telegraph disclosed on Sunday that Lord Hermer personally signed off on the prosecution of Lucy Connolly for a single, deeply unpleasant tweet. At the time of the fast-tracked show trials around the Southport riots, the Attorney General warned: 'You cannot hide behind your keyboards – you will face the full force of the law.' (Looks like he and the PM both approved the draconian crackdown on free speech to cover up the cracks in their multicultural project.) The Telegraph also discovered that Hermer's office had declined to review 'unduly lenient' sentences handed to a convicted rapist, a paedophile and a terrorist fundraiser – all of them received shorter terms than Lucy. What a sick, ideologically-warped society it is where a convicted rapist is sentenced to 28 months and a devoted mum and childminder who typed one bad thing (swiftly corrected) is sent down for 31 months. Thank goodness for Robert Jenrick, who perfectly summed up the grotesque two-tier justice meted out to Lucy in an excoriating question in the Commons, and for Baroness Kate Hoey, who demanded compassion for Lucy in the Lords. The Justice Secretary released Lawson Natty early, who supplied a machete used to kill a 14 year old. She is now halving the sentences for killers and rapists. Meanwhile Lucy Connolly remains behind bars for a reprehensible, but swiftly deleted tweet. Why? She had no answer👇 — Robert Jenrick (@RobertJenrick) June 3, 2025 In Scotland, the Prime Minister asked the country to 'work together' to confront the threat from Russia. I don't know about you but, right now, I'm less worried about Vladimir Putin than Richard Hermer. Even if the Royal Navy and the Army get the funds they need and deserve, there is no way the current Attorney General will permit our forces to repel or repatriate the thousands of undocumented males who present such a danger to the UK (particularly to women and girls). Unless we leave the ECHR, the hands of our soldiers and sailors are forever tied. Imagine trying to explain that mortifying impotence to those who died protecting this island from actual Nazis. Confronting the enemy within is every bit as important as bolstering our defences to engage the enemy abroad. Make no mistake: uncontrolled migration is by far the biggest threat. Starmer, Hermer and their ilk are not to be trusted with our nation's security; they owe their loyalty to international human rights law. Not to the men, women and children of Britain.