China accuses Pete Hegseth of sowing division in Asia in speech ‘filled with provocations'
On Saturday Hegseth said China was 'credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific', and was rehearsing for 'the real deal' of invading Taiwan.
'There's no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,' the US defence secretary said in a keynote address at the Shangri-la Dialogue defence forum, calling for Asian countries to increase defence spending.
On Sunday, China's ministry of foreign affairs condemned his words, which it said were 'filled with provocations and intended to sow division'.
'Hegseth deliberately ignored the call for peace and development by countries in the region, and instead touted the cold war mentality for bloc confrontation, vilified China with defamatory allegations, and falsely called China a 'threat',' it said.
'The remarks were filled with provocations and intended to sow division. China deplores and firmly opposes them and has protested strongly to the US.'
The statement also pushed back at Hegseth's claim that China was trying to become a 'hegemonic power' in the region.
'No country in the world deserves to be called a hegemonic power other than the US itself, who is also the primary factor undermining the peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific,' it said.
The ministry accused Hegseth of 'playing with fire' with what it calls 'the Taiwan question'. China's ruling Communist party (CCP) claims Taiwan is a province of China, illegally run by separatists, and has vowed to annex it. Taiwan's democratically elected government and the majority of its people reject the prospect of CCP rule.
Speaking to reporters on Sunday morning, Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles, rejected the premise of China's criticism of Hegseth.
'What we have seen from China is the single biggest increase in military capability and buildup in a conventional sense by any country since the end of the second world war,' he said.
'That is one of the key features of the complexity of the strategic landscape which all of us face within the region and which is faced around the world.'
Marles said Australia had worked with regional partners including the US and the Philippines 'over a long period of time to uphold the global rules-based order', including freedom of navigation operations to assert the UN convention on the law of the sea.
The US is not a signatory to that convention.
The Shangri-la Dialogue is an annual conference that hosts dozens of leaders, defence ministers and military chiefs from around the world, for three days of panel discussions and speeches. But much of the significant interactions occur on the sidelines, with private meetings between representatives. Past years have often seen the US and China trade barbs, but also occasionally hold significant meetings, including last year with China's defence minister, Dong Jun, and Hegseth's predecessor, Lloyd Austin.
This year, however, China sent only a small delegation led by a vice-president of the People's Liberation Army's national defence university, Rear Adm Hu Gangfeng.
On Saturday afternoon Hu told a panel, which included the head of the British armed forces, that speakers had attempted to 'provoke, split and instigate confrontations in the region' with criticisms of China.
He said the maritime situation in the region was 'generally stable' but faced 'severe challenges', and accused unnamed countries of increasing military presences and infringing on territorial sovereignty of others 'in the name of so-called freedom of navigation' and supporting 'Taiwan independence separatist forces'.
China claims much of the South China Sea, where there are overlapping claims of sovereignty among several countries. It has rejected a ruling by The Hague that its claims are unlawful.
Later on Sunday, Singapore's defence minister, Chan Chun Sing, told a panel that it was crucial China and the world properly understand each other. Referencing China's absence, Chan said Beijing should use 'every opportunity' available get its position across.
'But regardless of whether China attends the [dialogue], it is incumbent on all of us to reach out to China in different forums … to not end up in a situation where either side misinterprets, miscalculates, or misrepresents each other's position. That is dangerous.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Insider shares insights on Trump's diplomatic tactics
As crunch talks were underway between the United States and China in Donald Trump 's first term, Xi Jinping 's negotiating team used every trick in the book to unsettle the American side. Shortly before a key meeting took place, as the U.S. team was about to set out from their embassy in Beijing , the Chinese delivered a follow-up to a carefully prepared negotiating document for the talks. It was in Chinese, without an English translation. Then, when Trump's negotiating team got to the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse for the meeting, they discovered there were one too few chairs for them. One of the U.S. negotiators had to leave the room. 'We're sitting in a secure facility, a team of tens of people that have come over from the U.S., and we looked at the document they provided. It was in Chinese, it was not at all responsive to the draft we sent before travelling to Beijing,' Mitchell Silk, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, told the Daily Mail. Silk shared his insights on Trump's diplomatic tactics ahead of the president's historic showdown with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. 'They completely disregarded our document. They delivered up something that they wanted to use for the negotiations,' Silk said of the Chinese ahead of the 2019 summit with Trump. In his upcoming book 'A Seat at the Table,' Silk, who speaks two dialects of Chinese, recounts how he quickly translated the document in the car en route to the talks with Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin. When they got there Mnuchin made it clear the Americans weren't meeting for the sake of it. 'He was just very short and very simple, he was perfectly gracious in, thanking the Vice Premier for his kind and warm welcome. He acknowledged receipt of the document, and he just took our document, waved it around, and said, thank you but I think we're going to be using our document for these discussions, and that's exactly what we did,' said Silk. 'There was no funny business. There were no games. We were there to do business, and we weren't having any of it.' He added :'If it had been another administration, another time, and this is probably what was happening in these endless, meaningless meetings prior to Trump, somebody would have said, well, you know, maybe we should we use their document? There was none of that. Psychologically, we weren't having it, and we made that very clear.' During the talks, which led to Trump's first trade deal with China in 2020, every little detail of protocol had been worked out over preceding weeks, including who was going to sit where. But when everybody sat down, right before the then Chinese Vice Premier Liu He spoke, it was clear that there was one chair missing. Someone on the American side had to leave the room, and one of the dedicated career civil servants took the fall. Later, outside of the main room, Silk engaged with the head of protocol from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. It emerged that the Chinese felt snubbed because the Vice Premier had not been granted an Oval Office audience when he was in Washington just weeks prior. 'Our understanding was the chair was their way of getting back at us, rather petty,' said Silk. Ultimately, the head of the Chinese central bank, Yi Gang, was walking by and Silk told him: 'Mr. Governor, when you are next in Washington, please join me at my house for a dinner. I will put out a lavish spread for you with the finest of drink and the finest of food, and you can have as many chairs as you like.' The American team got their chair back. It was yet another example of the psychological games that Trump will face in his upcoming tariff negotiations with the Chinese. This week, President Trump extended a trade truce with China for another 90 days, delaying a dangerous showdown between the world's two biggest economies. The previous deadline was set to expire at 12:01am on Tuesday. Had that happened the U.S. could have ratcheted up taxes on Chinese imports from an already high 30 percent, and Beijing could have responded by raising retaliatory levies on U.S. exports to China. Key has been the use of executive power to deploy tariffs as leverage. 'He's come out swinging, using tariffs imposed under executive order, so presidential authority, as an economic weapon, and he started that literally in the first days of the administration,' said Silk. 'The heavy and the quick action certainly rattled the markets, but I believe that the president was playing for long-term economic leverage.' The tariffs have been 'much sharper, they're more targeted, and they're higher than before.' Behind that was a strategy to 'clear the decks' of other trading partners, securing quick deals with them, so that he could focus on China. 'My take is that the initial move was designed to get initial action out of a certain set of countries (including the UK, EU, Japan and South Korea), and push a second group of countries further down the road, try to pick them off one by one.' He added: 'And then you've got the most difficult countries, and the number one, without a close second in that group, is China.' Realistically, the China negotiation is probably a 12-to-18 month process, he said.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
US container imports may have peaked in July, chief of busiest seaport says
LOS ANGELES, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Ocean imports to the United States may have peaked in July after retailers raced to bring in goods from China and elsewhere to avoid potentially hefty tariffs on holiday-related products, the top executive from the busiest U.S. seaport said on Wednesday. Containerized imports to the Port of Los Angeles, the front door to many U.S. imports, jumped 8% to 544,000 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs) in July. "Much of this volume was fueled by importers hustling to bring in cargo ahead of potential tariff hikes later this month and beyond," Gene Seroka, the port's executive director, said on Wednesday. "Everything is already here for the holiday season," said Zachary Rogers, lead author of the Logistics Managers' Index, which serves as an early indicator for economic activity in the United States. President Donald Trump's tariff policies, particularly short-lived 145% levies on goods from China, have wrecked havoc on U.S. imports as buyers either gorged on or starved themselves of goods to avoid higher import duties. The United States and China earlier this week extended their tariff truce by another 90 days, easing the uncertainty clouding the retail peak season for stocking stores with holiday goods. As a result, major shippers like Walmart (WMT.N), opens new tab, Target (TGT.N), opens new tab and Home Depot (HD.N), opens new tab appear to be breaking the traditional holiday-related import pattern that tended to peak from August to October.
Reuters
3 hours ago
- Reuters
Beijing E-Town sues US firm Applied Materials alleging trade secrets leak
BEIJING, Aug 13 (Reuters) - Beijing E-Town Semiconductor Technologies ( opens new tab, a semiconductor equipment firm backed by Beijing's government, on Wednesday said it has sued U.S. chip equipment supplier Applied Materials (AMAT.O), opens new tab over alleged trade secrets infringement. Applied Materials had illegally obtained and used Beijing E-Town's core technology secrets related to plasma sources and wafer surface treatment, the Beijing-based company said according to a filing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange. The company, which is seeking 99.99 million yuan ($13.94 million) in compensation, alleged that Applied Materials had disclosed technical secrets by applying for a patent in China and claiming the patent's application rights. Applied Materials did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In 2016, Beijing E-Town acquired Mattson Technology, a California-based semiconductor wafer processing equipment designer and manufacturer. Applied Materials sued Mattson in 2022, alleging that it had hired its former employees with the intention of stealing trade secrets. In 2023, Mattson countersued Applied Materials making similar accusations. In the new case filed with the Beijing Intellectual Property Court, Beijing E-Town alleged that Applied Materials had hired two former Mattson employees, who were later listed as the principal inventors behind a patent filed by Applied Materials in China. The patent, filed with China's intellectual property administration, disclosed confidential technical know-how jointly held by Beijing E-Town and Mattson, Beijing E-Town said. Applied Materials' actions, the Beijing firm said, violated China's fair competition law and constituted infringement of its trade secrets. The Beijing court has accepted the civil case but no court hearing has yet been held, Beijing E-Town said. ($1 = 7.1746 Chinese yuan renminbi)
